Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Rose Entertainment

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Foxy Brown (rapper)#2004–2005: Black Roses. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 13:51, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Black Rose Entertainment

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Record label owned by Foxy Brown who seems to be the sole artist with only one album in 2008 thus not a very large label and another case of an artist's own non-notable label. Not much information to add or improve the article's state aside from the current. Google News searches provided nothing useful and this search found some news links but mostly in her name and it doesn't even seem this company has much ground or a website. My suggestion if not deletion is redirecting to Foxy_Brown_(rapper)#2004.E2.80.932005:_Black_Roses which would seem sensible. SwisterTwister talk 03:12, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The label has seen chart action, so it is at least marginally notable. However, with a single release, and because it is the artist's own label, a redirect to Foxy Brown per above makes the most sense. I seriously doubt the label had its own staff or marketing efforts independent of Koch Records. Seems to be an imprint only. 78.26 (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 16:41, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:58, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:58, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:58, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 16:18, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.