Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Betty Mendez Livioco

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Per WP:NPASR. (non-admin closure) —UY Scuti ^Talk 18:09, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Betty Mendez Livioco

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Questionably notable and improvable as the best I found was this and this. Pinging the only still active user Kguirnela. SwisterTwister talk 20:59, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:05, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:05, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:05, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This is something that cannot be verified through the internet alone due to age. It also needs to be searched using the Philippines language. --MurderByDeadcopy^"bang!" 15:25, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:02, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:24, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Uncertain The one article used as a source might sem to indicate importance in the broadcasting industry. Some of the content of the article seems also derived from an obituary, so that needs to be searched for. DGG ( talk ) 01:37, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I think there's enough out there; it just needs to be found. E.g. [1]. Bondegezou (talk) 15:50, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.