Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Betsy Beutler
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Nja247 08:46, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Betsy Beutler (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
PROD on the following basis: "No reliable sources to be found which can indicate how this person meets inclusion guidelines", contested without reason given. I maintain the PROD rationale: only trivial sources to be found, no indication of a following or any other elements to pass WP:ENTERTAINER, no significant results in Google News either. MLauba (talk) 08:29, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. —MLauba (talk) 08:33, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. —MLauba (talk) 08:38, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This actor may appear on television, but she doesn't appear to be playing main characters, nor could I find any reliable sources discussing her. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 11:39, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable. Her biggest role mentioned is Katie on Scrubs and that character is not even mentioned in the article Scrubs. Drawn Some (talk)
- Weak keep and expand and source per [1]. There may be enough to make the article properly encyclopedic. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 05:20, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Every single hit is an entirely trivial mention, this search was listed in the nom rationale. MLauba (talk) 06:56, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete yes those hits are trivia, no reliable sources discuss the subject of this blp in any non-trivial depth, therefore delete.Bali ultimate (talk) 13:30, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - non-notable. لennavecia 15:45, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.