Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Achadara
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 08:46, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Battle of Achadara (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not verifiable in source. Annwfwn (talk) 22:03, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Military, and Georgia (country). WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:44, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
Delete, no relevant sources found. AllNotAll (talk) 10:50, 30 October 2023 (UTC)- Comment: Outside help might be being solicited [1].
- Redirect to War in Abkhazia (1992–1993): No objection to a delete. Not a hoax, but a mole hill made into a mountain. Two sources confirm fighting in the area, nothing that can be reasonably (NPOV) called the "Battle of ..." but yes there was fighting so a redirect might be merited. Unless non-English sources that can be WP:V exist, I don't believe this has SIGCOV from NPOV sources. Ping me if NPOV sources with SIGCOV are added to the article. // Timothy :: talk 09:02, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 01:29, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete as per G5, creation by blocked/banned user. --Yamla (talk) 13:21, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: Second to that, created by banned user in violation of their block. If G5 is not the case, this page should be deleted regardless since this conflict is possibly a hoax and large parts of the article are unsourced. HarukaAmaranth 春香 14:35, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: No objection to delete. // Timothy :: talk 16:17, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.