Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bamboozle Left

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Erik9 (talk) 02:55, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bamboozle Left

Music festival that fails the classic definition of Wikinotability. Sceptre ^(talk) 20:40, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 21:13, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep First Google News hit is an LA Times article about the festival. [1] Drawn Some (talk) 22:59, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - plenty of coverage about the festival. The LA Times article above is recent. Coverage extands back to its launch in 2006 as evidenced by coverage in MTV. And google news search results show coverage is sustained from its launch to now. -- Whpq (talk) 13:02, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per research done by two previous editors. This is a continuing event that garners consistent coverage from major media sources. Easily passes WP:N. Ray^Talk 19:34, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I'm not sure why it wouldn't be considered notable given its press coverage and attendance. -Moritheil (talk) 11:15, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.