Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ava Eagle Brown

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 14:18, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ava Eagle Brown

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominating for deletion, as the subject lacks the in-depth, independent coverage needed to meet WP:BIO, WP:AUTHOR. While the article cites a number of sources, a glaring issue is that almost every source is WP:PRIMARY, as they are based on information provided by the subject, most often in the form of an interview. No source cited lodges a credible claim to encyclopedic notability, and other sources are listing/profile pages that do not provide in-depth information. In addition to this, the fact that the article was created by a blocked (initially undisclosed) paid editor and the fact the article cites sources (such as the Guardian source [1]) written by freelance journalists imply this article contradicts WP:NOTADVERTISING and Wikipedia:Notability#SPIP. SamHolt6 (talk) 14:07, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:32, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:32, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:32, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable motivational speaker.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:11, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Could have been a speedy delete. Non-notable person, promotional article. Edwardx (talk) 09:55, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 02:10, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, no evidence of notability. GSS (talk|c|em) 05:22, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non notable, fails GNG Taewangkorea (talk) 12:21, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Paid promo by blocked acct. Agricola44 (talk) 13:34, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as WP:PROMOTIONAL and not notable BLP DocumentError (talk) 06:03, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Works done, but it just looks like a normal day job. Non-notable. scope_creep^Talk 00:42, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.