Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aurthohin
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) --Regards, MrScorch6200 (talk · contribs) 18:19, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
- Aurthohin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Band article that has lacked published, reliable sources to prove notability for a couple of years.
I am also nominating the following two recently created, unsourced articles on two of the band's album releases that both fails WP:GNG and WP:NALBUM:
- Aushomapto 1 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Aushomapto-2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Sam Sailor Sing 22:54, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Sing 22:59, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Sing 23:00, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep all - one of the most popular bands in Bangladesh, enough reliable sources for the band as well as the albums - [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. --Zayeem (talk) 15:36, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Agree with Zayeem. Aurthohin is one of the preeminent rock metal bands of Bangladesh.--31.205.56.85 (talk) 12:29, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 09:15, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:18, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.