Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ArtéQuesta

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. G11, promotional regardless of any possible notability. The reasoning of keeping so we can use G6 would prevent us using speedy on any article at all. DGG ( talk ) 02:22, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArtéQuesta

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article of a non-notable company. The CEO's article was also created at the same time, which I am also putting up for deletion. Discant X 12:14, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. This, I think, could have been speeded as blatant promotional copy. But allowing the Afd to run its course will mean it can't be recreated, either. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:41, 12 November 2015 (UTC)Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:43, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For posterity, I did consider doing speedies but I felt there was enough claim of notability being made that I erred on the side of caution. Discant X 10:50, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.

Delete - Nothing better yet. SwisterTwister talk 23:31, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.