Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arcenio León

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 14:48, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Arcenio León

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another non notable minor league free agent with no decent sourcing. Prod removed by Alex because he apparently "saw a squirrel today." Spanneraol (talk) 21:18, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. Spanneraol (talk) 21:19, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Venezuela-related deletion discussions. Alex (talk) 21:23, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete 10-year minor league veteran with Triple-A experience and all I could find is [1] and [2]. For shame, Internet. For shame. Alex (talk) 21:25, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're reasoning for removing these PROD's really show your lack of sincerity of Wikipedia.--Yankees10 00:09, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No, I just think PRODs are stupid. Alex (talk) 00:17, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fine. But you should at least give a reason for removing them. Not nonsense.--Yankees10 00:19, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It gets boring saying the same thing over and over. Alex (talk) 03:32, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Prods arent stupid, Alex... they save time and avoid having to go through this process for someone who is gonna get deleted anyway. You voted delete, should have let it get prodded and avoided having so many of these. Of course half of these guys are the minor league scrubs youve been adding to the minor league pages. Spanneraol (talk) 04:27, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

They're completely idiotic. They go entirely against what Wikipedia is supposed to be - consensus-driven. By PRODding these and especially by not telling others they are being PRODded (as one of us is wont to do), it greatly diminishes the potential for others to find sources to prove notability. As has happened many times already, these "non-notable minor leaguers" you guys keep proposing for deletion are found to pass GNG after a little digging. Alex (talk) 05:17, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable. Fails GNG.--Yankees10 00:09, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:34, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete To be fair to Alex, he is not the only who thinks PRODs are pointless. There's no real harm in creating the AFD. Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 05:58, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:49, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Alex (talk) 05:19, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.