Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apple electric car project

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 21:26, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Apple electric car project

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Way too speculative. If we make an iPhone 7 page now since it would follow a pattern, would that make sense? Justinhu12 (talk) 06:27, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 April 10. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:43, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:43, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:43, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:43, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – Passes WP:N upon a source review (e.g. [1], [2], [3]) and is not a violation of WP:CRYSTAL because it anticipated, verifiable and is of sufficiently wide interest to merit an article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:46, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A large number of available high quality sources. Widely discussed. The very opposite of what we try to remove by CRYSAL. DGG ( talk ) 05:14, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - A woefully bad article, but passes GNG based on the sources already showing in the Footnotes. Carrite (talk) 00:49, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.