Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Airdates of Lost
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 08:57, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is a textbook "indiscriminate collection of information", as per WP:NOT. Are we going to add information for every country that puts the show on? Every re-run? Forever? Evidently a lot of hard work has gone into this page, but the end result remains an unencyclopedic fancrufty list. Vizjim 10:44, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: unencyclopedic fancruft per User:Vizjim. Reyk YO! 11:07, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, or very weak merge into Lost (TV series) per nom and Reyk. Paddles 11:27, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. DarthVader 11:39, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge DVD releases somehwere, and delete everything else. Jtrost (T | C | #) 12:15, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. All that work, and not one reference. Kevin 13:06, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all that work and, er, why? Just zis Guy you know? 15:21, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I love Lost but Wikipedia should only have the original (American) airdates, and they are already included in List of Lost episodes. abelson 17:36, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose. . The information for this article comes from a range of sources, for example televison listings. It helps viewers outside the US to seek information on the broadcast of this show in a quick and easy manner. Regarding the references, I am sure someone can add them. The main reason a article like this exists is due the show's international popularity and the fact we can put all this information together now. ant_ie 22:24, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-mergeDelete, but merge an extremely abbreviated version of the first few sections into Lost (TV series), except in paragraph form (see The_Simpsons#Broadcasting for an example). If this dosen't happen, some anon (most likely that dynamic ip that keeps editing the TF1 article) will just start a list of TV channels in the Lost (TV series) article. -Whomp 23:17, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]- Delete - not encyclopaedic by a long shot. Worldtraveller 23:30, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:LC. Wikipedia is not a TV guide, etc. Stifle (talk) 17:28, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOT. Merge anything usefull into relevent articles -Aknorals 12:17, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment isn't there a lost wiki? Coudn't this info be in there??? -Aknorals 12:19, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Lostcruft. Cool3 00:21, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unenclyclopedic, indiscriminate collection of information. - Liberatore(T) 16:24, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.