Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aileen Celeste

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. sufficient consensus DGG ( talk ) 18:14, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Aileen Celeste

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seemingly non-notable and questionably improve as it seems she's not a major or otherwise active actress and the best I found was only this. At best, this could be moved to her one best known work but with seemingly only a few episodes, I question why and it seems deleting is best. SwisterTwister talk 22:52, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:52, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Venezuela-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:52, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor ^Talk! 23:57, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete References consisting of a personal biography page and an IMDB entry do not constitute notability. I found nothing substantive that would do this (at least, not in English— if she is notable in the Spanish-speaking world, someone who speaks Spanish would need to provide evidence of this in the article). KDS4444^Talk 19:31, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also: I checked the Spanish Wikipedia for her and she does have an article but its references consist only of a link to IMDB and another link to a biography page— nothing independent. KDS4444^Talk 02:49, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom and above editor. Nothing in English search engines to show notability. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:50, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.