Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ademe Cuneo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:20, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ademe Cuneo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not establish notability meeting the standards set for runners. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NTRACK. JTtheOG (talk) 05:40, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete he is an 18 years old runner, but hasn't accomplished anything notable so far which would warrant a WP article. He has participated in a number of regional running events according to his profiles on various running webpages, but none of those fulfill the criteria outlined in WP:NTRACK and he also never won any of those. He reached the 2nd place in the Athens marathon but thats not enough to pass the threshold. He fails the general criteria as laid out in WP:GNG likewise. There is basicially nothing on him out there in RS. There are some mentions in a handful of non-RS blogs, but thats definitely not enough. Apart from that his name only appears in listings of running event participants. The article should therefore be deleted since it fails WP:NTRACK clearly and also lacks any sources sufficient for WP:GNG. Dead Mary (talk) 16:09, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:10, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:10, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete has not done anything to establish himself as a notable runner.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:35, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.