Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adata Needle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 22:13, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Adata Needle

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails notability per WP:NBOOK, was redirected to the Author, had been reverted by the Creator CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:08, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:08, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lithuania-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:11, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:BOOKCRIT also, written like a an advert. Chirota (talk) 23:53, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Its a plain advert. Should be G11'd. scope_creep^Talk 10:37, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I'd also back a WP:SPEEDY. --Microhierax (talk) 10:54, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.