Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2150 AD (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:23, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2150 AD

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBOOK: no reviews, academic or otherwise. Only 8 google scholar citations at all (here: [1]). A previous AfD in 2008 closed as keep, but it's not 2008 en-wiki anymore. asilvering (talk) 09:28, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. asilvering (talk) 09:28, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This article has a paragraph on the book. It is mostly a footnote, but it is (mostly negative) commentary. Daranios (talk) 15:55, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:19, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: failed to find significant coverage in any reliable sources. Google Scholar brings up 5 sources, one mentioned by Daranios above (footnote with minimal commentary). The search also brings up this but it only gives a trivial mention. This gives a small paragraph outlining the plot, no critical engagement though. This gives two mentions but they are both trivial. I couldn't gain access to Utopian/dystopian literature: A bibliography of literary criticism but I imagine it will also give a brief outline of the plot, similar to the other bibliography source. Overall, fails GNG and NBOOK. Alduin2000 (talk) 14:38, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:31, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. In addition to the above, no reviews listed in Book Review Digest under either Plym or the title. But here's a photo of the authors for good measure. czar 03:53, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.