This is an archive of past discussions with User:Yohmom. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Brain ischemia
Hey, I saw that you had visited my article and I was hoping you wouldn't mind answering a question. I had brain ischemia peer reviewed the other day and the person who did it commented on my sources, about how certain paragraphs could have a source at the end of every sentence but is that really necessary to do if they are all from the same source? From my understanding, if all your information came from one source, you put the source at the end. ? Thanks!
--Saunc2011 (talk) 22:39, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Hmmm. I'm not positive on this, but I don't think you have to cite a source at the end of every sentence, just for every paragraph. I am wondering though, what information comes from the Chang and Ramirez citations. I think they should be linked within the article? Did this help at all? --Yohmom (talk) 23:53, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
I'm being a TPW on Yohmom's page and jumping in here for a second. Basically, if the entire paragraph comes from the same source, it is usually OK to just put the footnote at the end, but sometimes, if people really find a particular fact to be quite odd, putting in a footnote midway through at the trouble spot, even though duplicative (and annoying) won't hurt anything. If the paragraph has multiple sources, then yeah, footnote things to their source wherever they occur. You don't have to mechanically put a footnote at the end of every sentence, but after each group of facts attributable to the source, be it every sentence, two sentences, three sentences, or paragraph. By the way, User:Ealdgyth is the goddess of footnoting questions, and if she's busy, ask Dana boomer. They both are on top of the issue. Montanabw(talk)06:29, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, both of you! Your help is greatly appreciated! That's what I thought because it seems to be a little repetitive to put the same source at the end of every sentence, but I don't think the user who peer reviewed my article realized that I put the source at the end. I guess I should just let them know and ask them their opinion also. Yeah, I am not sure what came from the Chang and Ramirez citations either, I think they may just be links to other information, they were there when I began editing. ?
Hmm. Is this the same image you were talking about on FoodPuma's talk? I uploaded my images through WikiCommons. As long as the image isn't under full copyright and is licensed appropriately, it should be pretty easy to just fill in information in the template. --Yohmom (talk) 16:50, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, it's the same one. He said it was okay so I'm guessing it is. Okay, so I just go to the link you gave and type in the info and then it uploads? This is kind of a dumb question, but I just am confused! haha Thanks! --Saunc2011 (talk) 19:55, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
That's pretty much it in a nutshell. The process looks more daunting than it already is. Easier done than said. :-) You usually get to class pretty early, so if you are still stuck I'll be happy to help you with it before the bell rings. --Yohmom (talk) 20:20, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Alright, I got to the page but when it says like licensing and stuff, where do I find that on the image page? Thanks again, --Saunc2011 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:13, 22 March 2009 (UTC).
I'm not entirely sure if it would be a "Government Source" because of the Army thing, or if you would need to get permission from the author (Moser). I would try to shoot him a permission email, just in case. If you do some digging, I'm sure that you could find his contact information and then ask for him to release any restrictions on the work. You can also post copyright questions here, they might be able to be more specific. --Yohmom (talk) 20:29, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Maybe, "Original work of the US Army" ? You can always just try to put it up, kind of a trial and error thing. Generally, if it's not acceptable, someone will come along and either fix it or tag it for deletion. Really, nothing catastrophic either way. :)--Yohmom (talk) 20:34, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
I put up a question on the copyright question page so hopefully someone will address it soon. I know to achieve GA status I most definitely need an image so I may or may not attempt it after I get the image up. I have addressed all of the concerns of my peer reviews so hopefully at some point I can make GA. I'm not too sure though. :) The only thing I am a little worried about is my citations, like the problem I discussed with you earlier. Thanks! --Saunc2011 (talk) 21:38, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Alright, I am sorry to keep bothering you with this but I really need to insert an image. (haha) :-) This may be a possibly "dumb" question, but how do you search for an image in Wikipedia Commons? Thank you for ALL of your help! --Saunc2011 (talk) 20:39, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
I just use the search box on the left of the Wikimedia Commons page. Doing a little searching myself, I came up with this picture. (I assume that the shadowed area indicates a loss of blood flow? but I'd ask the author of the work on that one...) You might have to get creative with the search phrases. Nothing comes up under "Brain Ischemia" but you might want to look under terms like "stroke." --Yohmom (talk) 23:56, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
I'm also TPWing, and I thought I'd throw in my two cents. First off, images are not a requirement for GAN. See: Wikipedia:Good article criteria and there's also a discussion on my GAN page: Talk: Osteitis fibrosa cystica/GA3. Furthermore, if you can't find/need images for your article, and need to secure copyrights, there's a form letter that MR left on my talk page that's helpful for the daunting task of "asking permission." Furthermore, I've heard that the site, [1], is good for copyright free images, and allegedly, some of the images that are on my page came from there. Strombollii (talk) 01:42, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Agreed. The contributors of the PET scans and MRIs on WikiCommons (a few claimed to be radiologists) probably have images hanging around that they haven't uploaded. It wouldn't hurt to ask them if they have anything specific or helpful to your article too. --Yohmom (talk) 01:55, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Okay, so I found a few images that were already on wikipedia that I figured would be some bit helpful to the reader. I did use that image above but I just left the caption. ? It sounded pretty solid. I was going to add something but it is basically already stated in the paragraph beside the image so I just didn't. Yeah I knew an image was not required but I figured that it may be helpful! :-) Thank you so much for both of your help and the edits you did to Brain ischemia. I think I am just going to go for it, put it up for GA review, pray, and see what happens! Thanks,--Saunc2011 (talk) 01:29, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello again! Sorry to bother you but I have a quick question about the GA review...When I fix the things that the reviewer suggested, do I need to cross them out or say fixed? Or something? Anyway, thanks! --Saunc2011 (talk) 23:04, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
Go for it
I think it's good to go. The FA reviewers will, of course, take a hack at it and nitpick some more. You can't anticipate everything. Ealdgyth is a good person to mentor you through that gauntlet (beg her for coaching when you put it up) as I think she now has 6 or 7 GAs to her credit. Montanabw(talk)01:02, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
I learned this news somewhat belatedly, despite the article remaining on my watchlist. Congratulations to you, and to all the other involved editors. —BillCtalk23:33, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
A belated congratulations. Very well done! Hope to see you around on more equine articles even after your class is done. Hope you get an A for all your hard work! Dana boomer (talk) 23:46, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
I'm a-creepin' and have left the last 4 or 5 comments on your talk page, so I thought I'd drop in and let you know that I'm starting to piece together the mess that is brain ischemia, if you'd like to give it a once-over. Editing currently at my sandbox. Strombollii (talk) 03:49, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
1. Peach pie. Pie may be a product of frozen or canned goods. The more preservatives the better. Pie must be served with ice cream, and not the pansy low-fat kind. Pie must be served with proper cutlery. Pie crust may not be rolled and cut on a surface where mice have recently been thawed out for snakes to eat.
2. Banana-grams. I reserve the right to discard any of following letters without penalty: Q,X,Z. I also reserve the right to take any vowels or consonants I need. Speling theengs foneticlly is also alowd for me and me onlee. Abbreviations are also acceptable...for me.
3. Willie That's right. Lauren's My new cat.
4. That song on the drive to Food Lion. The one that wasn't scary.
For the record .... I only ask them to open an account. The ones with the user pages did that without my instructions ... although I introduced the project by sharing the efforts of the 2008 group. These guys may prove interesting ... keep an eye out for our progress. Cheers --JimmyButler (talk) 22:57, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
If you get bored .... feel free to verify / criticize any references that are fringe they may opt to use in their list of 30. Also, as the one that came the closest to breaking the code of citation formatting you may throw them a bone if they if they get it wrong. If we can catch it early - then it will not become a huge problem. PS... Old cat is lonely - no one pets her anymore. --JimmyButler (talk) 03:06, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
...Me? Bored? Nah. I don't have time to be bored since, uh, you know, I study all the time. *cough* But yeah, I'll continue to lurk, and maybe if I ever get the courage, I'll type something. Let them know that I have some pretty sweet access to journals, so they can forgo that awful "I-can-only-see-the-abstract-without-a-subscription-experience."
WHY AREN'T YOU PETTING OLD CAT! You are missing out! She is just so soft and floppy. Hurry up and pet her before it's too late!
P.S-- My dorm smells like burnt cauliflower and feet. And the fire-alarm keeps going off...we evacuated three times before we decided to ignore it.
They'll fine you for staying in yo room, dawg. Alas, I digress--we have crazy research journals. Did you see the research funding chart in the DTH today? Chapel Hill gets something like 59% of North Carolina's research grants (for state schools). FoodPuma18:19, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
After typing the first sentence into Google Translate, it produced this wonderful sentence: Hypertrichosis described, based on location, age, gender and ethnic origin, excessive, diffuse or circumscribed hair growth, not corresponding to the distribution pattern of secondary male Geschlechtsbehaarung...which I believe should read more like: Hypertrichosis denotes growth of hair on any part of the body in excess of the amount usually present in persons of the same age, race, and sex, excluding androgen-dependent hair growth. Translators may help with your Spanish homework, but I doubt it will be of any use here... --Yohmom (talk) 23:49, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
If anyone needs minor German translations, user:Wandalstouring is German and sometimes will help if you are really super, super nice. However, he will also look over your article with a sharp eye and may have something to say about it too, (wink), but he's a good egg. Montanabw(talk)04:46, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Vance, I've got access to all three articles. Can you give your email address to my dad so I can forward the articles to you? Wikipedia's email option doesn't allow for attachments, or else I would use that.--Yohmom (talk) 16:10, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi there Yohmom. Just wanted to say that it's really good to see you helping out with this year's AP Biology projects. You've been through the FAC mill and you know what's expected. Great to see that you're still around. --MalleusFatuorum14:25, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Unfortunately, that last part is all too true. But no slow-ness detected on your part, we tried not to broadcast the fact until the project was over. I think I've only dropped the "d" word twice, so rather, you are a regular Sherlock.
Yes, I sill lurk about the Wiki occasionally, mostly to offer my University-access of sources to the new project group. Anything more than that is like the blind leading the blind. I leave all of that wonderful grammar and guideline stuff to folks like you! --Yohmom (talk) 01:36, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Thank you quality articles, Alexis, such as the feral Banker horse, "small, hardy, with docile temperament", for playing "in the sands of Wikiland", improving articles on biology such as Quoll, and reviewing, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!
