User talk:WunderWaff

January 2019

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Steven Kerr— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 14:10, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ric Mathias. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 14:12, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Battle of Kashgar (1933), you may be blocked from editing. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 14:14, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sahra Meydan.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Sahra Meydan was changed by WunderWaff (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.920432 on 2019-01-16T14:16:25 00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:16, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 14:24, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize!

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WunderWaff (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello! My name is WunderWaff and I recently created this account to vandalize. I have done something that is strictly wrong, and am very sorry for what I've done! I will stop vandalizing and will change this into my main account! If I could get unblocked and the ability to edit back would be much appriciated, Thanks! If this gets rejected I understand, Ill wait for later. WunderWaff (talk) 15:00, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Only one open unblock request is required at a time. I will leave your request below open. SQL ^{Query me!} 17:39, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What exactly do you mean when you say that you'll "change this into my main account"? Do you have other accounts active that you've created? ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 15:02, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

yes, I have another account but I do not remember its username nor password. Is my request rejected? WunderWaff (talk) 16:33, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What constructive contributions do you want to make if unblocked? What articles or subject matter are you interested in editing? When you say that you "created this account to vandalize" that could suggest that you still have an account active(that you do not use to vandalize, see WP:GHBH) Are you certain that you don't remember the name of your prior account? 331dot (talk) 17:37, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to Admin 2

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WunderWaff (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I can assure you, I have lost my other account over a month ago and this isn't a sockpuppet. I have read the page about sockpuppets and understand why this question is asked, I really regret vandalizing these pages and would really appriciate a second chance. There isn't anything I would edit right now, but Ill see what I can do in the future. WunderWaff (talk) 13:25, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Then let's see about this when there is something you would edit. Huon (talk) 03:29, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Can I get unblocked yet?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WunderWaff (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been waiting for 1 month now. I REALLY REALLY apologize and I wish I can get the ability to edit back, thanks alot! WunderWaff (talk) 17:17, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline - More than one block request is open. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:26, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What do you want to edit? 331dot (talk) 17:28, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My reason to none unblocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WunderWaff (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to edit and update HolaSoyGerman's wikipedia page by correcting the total view count and sub count: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germán_Garmendia

Decline reason:

Procedural decline - More than one block request is open. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:26, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

WunderWaff (talk) 18:23, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Other reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

WunderWaff (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will try to keep all of HolaSoyGerman's wiki page up to date, as his age is also wrong.

Accept reason:

I'm probably going to receive flack and grief from this, but I'm going to give you another chance and unblock your account. If anything there's a Wikipedia essay (located here) that I believe in. You are expected to contribute positively to the encyclopedia and refrain from making further disruptive edits. You must cite reliable sources when making changes to dates, ages, data, birthdays, weights, heights, measurements, events, facts, and other information and you will be expected to read and understand these policies and guidelines before you resume editing. Should you make any edits that are unreferenced or seen as disruptive or an attempt to add vandalism to the project, your account can be re-blocked by any administrator without any warnings or notice given - consider this your final and only warning. I hope that I don't see your account blocked again, and that you're sincere with your apology and your desire to contribute positively to Wikipedia. I wish you well and I wish you happy editing. :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:32, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WunderWaff (talk) 18:49, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please consolidate your requests; you only need one open request. Subsequent comments should be made without the unblock template, and just be standard comments. 331dot (talk) 21:46, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

:(

Can I finally get unblocked? WunderWaff (talk) 13:42, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please read my statement above. 331dot (talk) 13:52, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your request will be reviewed; administrators are volunteers, just like you, who do what they can they can. Please be patient. 331dot (talk) 13:53, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

I read, and I'm adding this as a discussion, without using the unblock template. Am I going to be unblocked, I really would appreciate an answer, thanks alot! WunderWaff (talk) 13:57, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of clicking "New section" to edit, just click "Edit", either at the top of the page, or next to the section header. Clicking "new section" every time creates a header with every edit, which isn't necessary. You also have not consolidated your requests into one. As I said, your request will be reviewed in due course. Please be patient. 331dot (talk) 14:00, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]