User talk:Wickster12345

This is Wickster12345's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: AHL participation at the Spengler Cup has been accepted

AHL participation at the Spengler Cup, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

echidnaLives - talk - edits 04:42, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Georg Kreis (August 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Notcharizard was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Only two of the sources are actually about Kreis, and one of those was published by his employer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Georg Kreis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- NotCharizard ^🗨 12:59, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wickster12345! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- NotCharizard ^🗨 12:59, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited AHL participation at the Spengler Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Canada national hockey team. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Profusa (September 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Profusa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 17:02, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Genocide

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Genocide, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:50, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Georg Kreis has been accepted

Georg Kreis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Superboilles (talk) 19:03, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Lombardi (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not enough independent, significant coverage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:David Lombardi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 07:13, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Profusa (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Profusa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:44, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Wickster12345. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:38, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is hilarious. You assume because I’ve written a detailed article about a company I must have a personal association. I have no personal or professional affiliation with Profusa. Wickster12345 (talk) 17:38, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing hilarious about it. I asked a question. It only requires an answer. (And BTW, I didn't ask a question about any specific company, eg. Profusa, you're the one who brought that up.) -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:01, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was clear what you were referring to. But yes now I answered it. I still think it’s hilarious, but maybe that’a just a personal opinion. I guess I should refrain from expressing that something’s hilarious on Wikipedia, lots of neuroatypical people here, but I digress Wickster12345 (talk) 18:04, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Profusa has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Profusa. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:59, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sacha Wigdorovits has been accepted

Sacha Wigdorovits, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Superboilles (talk) 08:47, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: HBM Healthcare Investments has been accepted

HBM Healthcare Investments, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Superboilles (talk) 13:41, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Secularism

When I said "Calm down", it just seemed to me that you were upset when you said "you’re basically insinuating Wikipedia should have a moralizing and officially secular role". I don't know what your personal beliefs are but it seemed to me that this was upsetting for you. It often helps discussions to focus on the content and not the editor. It's not a good idea to say editors are "insinuating" something because they don't have problems openly stating their positions. I was simply referring to the fact, that you are still disputing, that Hamas is widely considered a terrorist organization by academic sources. We have invented definitions of terrorism just to explain Hamas and fund our response to Hamas and Islamist terrorism. This is the view that prevails. The only significant opposition comes from religious countries with Islamist governments. If Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Turkey designated this organization a terrorist organization, I have little doubt that the UN, Norway and China would drop their opposition, as it is not a defensible or reasonable position after October 7 massacres and they are clawing at thin ice as it is. Ben Azura (talk) 19:23, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I never disputed Hamas is considered terrorist by most academics. I just think the academic view should be provided alongside the view of countries that have taken a position on Hamas. The reason I think why country positions should be included has nothing to do with whether I agree with the merit or value of specific governments’ views. It is simply for informational purposes. It doesn’t mean I agree with the Iranian government, I simply think together with academic views, the views of non-Islamic governments, it is ok to also provide cited explanations of the views of pro-Hamas governments. I personally value the reader’s right to receive all the information more than not mentioning views we think are harmful and Islamist, because this is an encyclopedia for everyone, not just people in the west or secular people. Wickster12345 (talk) 19:42, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Profusa (February 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BuySomeApples was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Unfortunately these sources still don't seem to make the grade.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Profusa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BuySomeApples (talk) 00:28, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How not? Wickster12345 (talk) 07:30, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Freedom of speech in Switzerland

Hello, Wickster12345. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Freedom of speech in Switzerland, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:06, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Comparison of national archive access laws

Hello, Wickster12345. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Comparison of national archive access laws, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:06, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Laurent Dufaux

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Laurent Dufaux, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 03:31, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2011 Zurich hooligan incident has been accepted

2011 Zurich hooligan incident, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Toadspike [Talk] 15:02, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Freedom of speech in Switzerland

Hello, Wickster12345. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Freedom of speech in Switzerland".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:48, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Proposed Switzerland-United States Free Trade Agreement has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Proposed Switzerland-United States Free Trade Agreement. Thanks! Superboilles (talk) 07:22, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Comparison of national archive access laws

Hello, Wickster12345. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Comparison of national archive access laws".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 09:10, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Profusa

Hello, Wickster12345. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Profusa, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:07, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback on Draft:Jennifer Burns (historian)

Hi @Wickster12345,

Thanks for submitting the draft to Wikipedia. I did a tiny bit of copyediting. Please note that the four sources in the article, "My Conversation with the excellent Jennifer Burns", Milton Friedman’s unexpected legacy, with Jennifer Burns, the OUPblog, and the Forbes article, are all WP:primary sources, which is not encouraged for a biography of a living person.

On a side note, how do you think Burns satisfies WP:Notability (academics)? Cheers, --The Lonely Pather (talk) 18:30, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

She satisifies GNG based on two independent secondary sources covering her in-depth: Two of the sources you mentioned are hybrid as they have both secondary coverage on the basis of the primary interview and a transcript of the interview itself. Wickster12345 (talk) 18:47, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jennifer Burns (historian) has been accepted

Jennifer Burns (historian), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Azarctic (talk) 21:26, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Jennifer Burns (historian)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Jennifer Burns (historian), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:11, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Jennifer Burns (historian)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Jennifer Burns (historian), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:11, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification on Gaza genocide article

I noticed your recent edit to first sentence of the Gaza genocide article. The first sentence of the lead which you edited (The Gaza genocide is the ongoing systematic destruction...) was placed there during a vandalism spree by User:SheikstarAT. Most of his vandalism was instantly reverted but that line stayed for a few hours. The Gaza genocide article used to start with:

Experts, governments, United Nations agencies, and non-governmental organisations have accused Israel of carrying out a genocide against the Palestinian people during its invasion and bombing of the Gaza Strip in the ongoing Israel–Hamas war.

I am not ECP yet so I was hoping to make an edit request for the first sentence in Talk:Gaza genocide but even the talk page for Gaza genocide is ECP. Not sure if you want to revert back to the original first sentence or open up a discussion about that in the talk page. I thought the original first sentence was good but also think there's ground for more discussion there. Up to you. Bitspectator (talk) 21:53, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Someone else took care of it. Thanks for pointing it out though! Wickster12345 (talk) 00:03, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Thank you for having done the edit in the first place. Bitspectator (talk) 01:10, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Proposed Switzerland-United States Free Trade Agreement has been accepted

Proposed Switzerland-United States Free Trade Agreement, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 11:02, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Lombardi has been accepted

David Lombardi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Recon rabbit 16:03, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Babson Diagnostics

Hello Wickster12345,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Babson Diagnostics for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Wolverine XI ^{(talk to me)} 09:04, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bedouin Bureaucrats: Mobility and Property in the Ottoman Empire (September 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tavantius was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bedouin Bureaucrats: Mobility and Property in the Ottoman Empire and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tavantius (talk) 13:12, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Immunocapitalism (October 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/assets/pdfs/Discussion-paper-COVID-19-antibody-testing-and-immunity-certification.pdf. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Immunocapitalism may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RoyiswariiiTalk! 09:50, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/assets/pdfs/Discussion-paper-COVID-19-antibody-testing-and-immunity-certification.pdf. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. RoyiswariiiTalk! 09:59, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nora Barakat

Hello, Wickster12345. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nora Barakat, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:08, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Penrhyn Castle

Hi, and thanks for your additions to Penrhyn Castle. I think the exhibitions section is a very good addition. A few points:

I've done a bit of a copy edit, we don't need to italicise National Trust, for example;
I've standardised the referencing to match the pre-existing style;
I've added a couple of tags. The first is minor, it's good to have a cite at the end of the paragraph. Can the existing Oldfield and Wills just be moved to the end? The second is a bit more significant. I'm struggling with the final two sentences of the last para., particularly the last. "The aim was to foreground the crucial role of empathy and emotion in the audience’s engagement with this history and to present openly the subjectivity of individual responses" reads to me like marketing-speak, rather than English, and I'm not clear as to what it is trying to say. Does it come from the brochure that is Source 47? Droplet is a marketing/design agency, and I'm not able to find reference to that specific sentence in their brochure. Would it be possible to clarify/source it?

Many thanks again. KJP1 (talk) 06:51, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for your edits and helpful suggestions. The information in the last sentence comes from The Welsh History Review article cited. I can send it to you (the article), if you would like, and tell you the page number where this claim is specifically made. If you think the statement is not encyclopedic enough to begin with, or is otherwise not appropriate, it of course can/should be removed. Please let me know what the best course of action is Wickster12345 (talk) 08:36, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]