User talk:Unus Multorum

James Scullin

Can you nominate some reasons why you're nominating a GA on the article's talk page? Timeshift (talk) 09:20, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is that not the procedure outlined by the Good Article nomination guidelines? Unus Multorum (talk) 15:03, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:James Scullin/GA1

I've begun the James Scullin review, which you can see Talk:James Scullin/GA1. Thanks for your work on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 20:03, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Australian plebiscite, 1916

I've begun the GA review at Australian plebiscite, 1916, which you can see at that article's talk page. Thanks for your contributions to this one. -- Khazar2 (talk) 19:51, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Australian States

Hi,

Thanks for all the nice comments, you should try doing basic designs first and then move on to something with more depth and colours. I learned through trying too, never did graphics before until I started contributing to Wikipedia. However I started with Inkscape since it has an easier interface, illustrator is great but expensive! Anyway I am threading carefully around Australian coat of arms, since I am not sure about the copyright issue. There is an example of a debate on it here: Talk:Coat of arms of Australia. I am not saying no, but I need to be certain. I don't want to break any laws and certainly don't want to get any work deleted. Best Regards, Sodacan (talk) 04:50, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RfC:Infobox Road proposal

WP:AURD (Australian Roads), is inviting comment on a proposal to convert Australian road articles to {{infobox road}}. Please come and discuss. The vote will be after concerns have been looked into.

Wikipedia:WikiProject Australian Roads/RfC:Infobox Road proposal

You are being notified as a member on the list of WP:AUS

Nbound (talk) 05:31, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Stanley Bruce

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Stanley Bruce you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Adam37 -- Adam37 (talk) 11:16, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Stanley Bruce

The article Stanley Bruce you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Stanley Bruce for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Adam37 -- Adam37 (talk) 20:48, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Leading Prime Minister article

The Flag of Australia for informed research on an important subject

I would like to recommend your work that shows a very high scholarly diligence to wikiproject Australia

Unus Multorum actually wrote and did the research for over a majority of the current article Stanley Bruce that was award GA status and is currently in the process of attaining FA (featured article) status. I have informally awarded only barnstars to three other very early contributors to the article. - Adam37 Talk 18:53, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bruce

Hi there! I've seen your work on Bruce, although I haven't had time to look at it closely. I will try to take a look maybe this weekend; busy week ahead (election uni). Frickeg (talk) 07:21, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	I award you this barnstar for your excellent work at Stanley Bruce. I suspect the article will be featured shortly, but regardless, your diligent improvements have given it a remarkable transformation from the sorry state it was in just six months ago. Thanks for all your contributions, and I hope you continue to improve Wikipedia! – Quadell ^(talk) 18:13, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And it made it! Well done, good sir. – Quadell ^(talk) 13:13, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping it get over the line Quadell, I certainly hope we can work together in the future! If I can return the favour, let me know. Unus Multorum (talk) 13:17, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, now that you mention it... the FAC for Enrico Fermi has been open for over a month now, and it appears it may soon be closed for lack of reviewers. Fermi is one of the most important physicists in history, and I'd hate to see the candidacy die on the vine. Do you think you'll have time in the next few days to offer a review? – Quadell ^(talk) 15:38, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing, I'll get onto it tomorrow! Unus Multorum (talk) 16:11, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An excellent and thorough review. If you have any further articles that could use a review, please let me know. All the best, – Quadell ^(talk) 15:09, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nanya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stockmen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:02, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Enrico Fermi

Could you have another look at Enrico Fermi, and let me know if you are happy with the article now? Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:30, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Main Page appearance: Stanley Bruce

This is a note to let the main editors of Stanley Bruce know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on October 7, 2013. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask Bencherlite (talk · contribs). You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/October 7, 2013. If it needs tweaking, or if it needs rewording to match improvements to the article between now and its main page appearance, please edit it, following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. The blurb as it stands now is below:

Stanley Bruce (1883–1967) was the eighth Prime Minister of Australia, serving from 1923 to 1929. He was a barrister and businessman before being wounded in the Gallipoli Campaign of World War I. Elected to parliament in 1918 as a member of the Nationalist Party, he served as treasurer in the government of Billy Hughes before replacing him as prime minister in 1923. Bruce overhauled federal government administration and oversaw its transfer to the new capital, Canberra. His "men, money and markets" scheme was an ambitious attempt to rapidly expand Australia's population and economic potential through massive government investment and closer ties with Great Britain and the rest of the British Empire. But his heavy-handed response to industrial unrest and attempts to overhaul labour laws led to a landslide defeat in 1929. After politics, Bruce became involved with the League of Nations until the outbreak of World War II. After the war, he was a leading advocate of development aid, a founder of the Food and Agriculture Organization, the first chancellor of the Australian National University and the first Australian to sit in the House of Lords (as Viscount Bruce of Melbourne). (Full article...)

UcuchaBot (talk) 23:03, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Australian politicians
Thank you, PhD who "decided he should give something back", for quality articles on Australian politicians in history such as Stanley Bruce and James Scullin, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:14, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A year ago, you were the 626th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:49, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Six years ago, you were recipient no. 626 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:35, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Niels Bohr

Thanks for your review of Enrico Fermi! It was much appreciated. I was wondering if you would do me a favour and give Niels Bohr a review? Hawkeye7 (talk) 10:18, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hawkeye. I've been on the road for a couple of weeks, and actually didn't even get a chance to properly close off my review of Fermi (congratulations on its promotion), but when I'm back in a few days I'll be sure to take a look at it. Cheers, Unus Multorum (talk) 01:26, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

Hi Unus Multorum,

Well done on Bruce! Wikipedia needed that. If you were able to make a trip to Sydney, it would be great if you could inject some of your expertise into our forthcoming editathon, which will follow a backstage pass given at the State Library of New South Wales by some of the Library's curators on 23 November.

This is the first time that an Australian cultural institution has opened its doors to us in this way and will be a special opportunity because the Library is providing: one of its best rooms; its expert curators (along with their expertise and their white gloves); a newly launched website (containing new resources); and of course, items from its collection (including rare and usually unavailable material) which we can look at, learn from, and use, to improve WP articles. For example, on the chosen topic (Australia and WWI), the Library holds many diaries and manuscripts from the period.

It should be an interesting event, and you would undoubtedly be of great value to it. As you can see from the Library's project page, they have connected this editathon with their own work. They have already set out a wide range of resources to make things easier for us. Please sign up on the editathon project page if you can participate either online or in person with other Wikipedians. Hope to see you there! Whiteghost.ink (talk) 02:39, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for the invitation - unfortunately I am currently overseas and won't be back until early December, so I can't make your event even though I would have very much liked to have been a part. Hopefully there will be an opportunity in the future! Cheers, Unus Multorum (talk) 16:18, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's a pity for us but thanks for the response. You can participate online if you are able! :) Also, watch that project page (linked above) as there may be some more editathons coming up. FYI, the library is launching its new WWI website on 11 November. Cheers, Whiteghost.ink (talk) 01:23, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Oliver Evans, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Wilmington and Episcopalian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oliver Evans

Hi there, posting this here as it's not relevant to the content of the article. Oliver Evans is looking good, well done! When you get to the stage where it's nearly ready for GA review, give me a shout and I'll do a quick copyedit if needed. I've helped get one or two articles to GA/FA in the past so that might be useful. Best ► Philg88 ◄ ^♦talk 04:15, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Oliver Evans may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

petitioned the [[Congress of the United States|Congress]] to extend it, which it declined to do.{[sfn|Ochoa|p=61}} However Evans later pushed the case again, and in January, 1808 ''An Act for the Relief of Oliver
* [(Colvin Run Mill, Great Falls, Va.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:23, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Oliver Evans, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Labor, Thread and Eastern seaboard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Frank Cooper (Australian politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ned Hanlon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Oliver Evans

The article Oliver Evans you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Oliver Evans for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Philg88 ^♦talk 04:17, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

James Chadwick

I am looking for a reviewer to trake a look at James Chadwick, which is at FAC at the moment. If you have the time, could you take a peek? Hawkeye7 (talk) 14:49, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Oliver Evans

On 8 November 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Oliver Evans, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that other millers viewing the fully-automated flour mill designed by Oliver Evans (pictured) could not appreciate its advantages? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Oliver Evans. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:02, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 24 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Desert Solitaire page, your edit caused an ISBN error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quick question

I'm sorry to be slow to finish work on Evans but my time is not my own at present. One question though, relating to Franklin Peale, in which there is a reference to "card sticking". Do you have a recommendation on a pipe?--Wehwalt (talk) 06:39, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies myself, work and family dramas just about sucked up all available time these past weeks and evidently that and a lack of interest from reviewers have scuttled the latest FA attempt. When I find a quiet period again I'll get back on top of all the changes you recommended and try for another push. In relation to your question though, what do you mean by 'pipe'? Unus Multorum (talk) 01:17, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Unus Multorum. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fair Use in Australia discussion

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Unus Multorum. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:50, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Public and its Problems, 1927, Cover.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Public and its Problems, 1927, Cover.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Hekerui (talk) 16:50, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]