User talk:Unobjectionable

Francisca Van Dunem

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Francisca Van Dunem. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done.Unobjectionable (talk) 02:36, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Celcius Technology

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Celcius Technology requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 03:42, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thak you for your time and care. Unobjectionable (talk) 13:07, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion converted to PROD: Classic Army

Hello Unobjectionable, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I have converted the speedy deletion tag that you placed on Classic Army to a proposed deletion tag. The speedy deletion criteria are extremely narrow to protect the encyclopedia, and do not fit the page in question. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Tikiwont (talk) 14:41, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it has been discussed in the past, so not eligible for prod either. I see now that you've tagged some more of those indiscriminately and with out valid speedy deletion criterion, possibly in reaction to above tag, which often is not a good idea.--Tikiwont (talk) 14:47, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the pointer to RHaworth page that explains better and no offense intended. I initially pointed you at the CSD page because by definition pages tagged for speedy deletion are evaluated on a one by one basis according narrow criteria and the further objected to what still looks to me as an indiscriminate tagging of a whole category with a boilerplate message especially if you think that some should actually stay. I am not sure what you consider pending beyond the review of the remaining tagged pages.--Tikiwont (talk) 15:12, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

The article Celcius Technology has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:48, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I support the inclusion of airsoft gun manufacturers' articles in Wikipedia. So that's ok for me. Unobjectionable (talk) 13:05, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Western Europe

Hi, the map[1] that you restored and cited to three sources looks suspiciously as an unsubstantiated ("at least" the following countries?) POV. Does Finland belong to Western Europe? Why isn't Greece there? Not to speak of more contentious issues, such as Catholic Slovenia that in it's entirety lies west of Austria, Finland, and Greece? Unfortunately, all the sources you cite host maps of convenience and provide no criteria for inclusion or exclusion. Is your map based on geographic, historical, socio-economic, or some other principles? The map you restored reflects Cold War realities that should be presented in the concept-history section of the article, and not in the intro. The only contemporary (21. century) map of Western Europe that clearly defines the criteria it is based on (at least that I am aware of) is the UN map. One map clearly defining the region (no modifiers à la at least) should be enough in the intro section.--Vihelik (talk) 20:18, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Credible sources are sources. There are Western Europe maps/definitions that include more countries than those in the map, so the "at least". You can change the "at least" if you think it is POV, but I think you should not delete the map based on the sources already provided. Unobjectionable (talk) 20:28, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, my questions again: 1. What makes Finland WE, but not Greece? After all, both are in the same time zone. 2. Is your your map based on geography, history, or what? 3. Don't you think one map in the intro part is enough? The UN map is clearly better (it is based on defined criteria).

You are welcome to add your map elsewhere in the article, provided you define the criteria for the composition (geographic, socio-economic, historic, or whatever). Right now you force the reader to go to the websites you cite in the references. By the way, all references you provide are maps of convenience defined for the specific purposes of the organizations that use them.--Vihelik (talk) 20:42, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The map of Western Europe including Portugal and Italy must be on the article led. Unobjectionable (talk) 12:51, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Aastrom Biosciences

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Aastrom Biosciences requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:12, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This company is setting up breakthrough experiments in the cardiovascular/circulatory system. These advancements have been published in several media. In addition, the company is listed on NASDAQ! Unobjectionable (talk) 12:50, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Airsoft gun

Hi there. In this edit you added links to multiple articles. Did you check any of them? WG, Well, G&G etc., do these look like Airsoft manufacturers? Please go over the list and remove the irrelevant ones, and please check links before you add them in the future. Best regards, and happy editing. --Muhandes (talk) 00:21, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In the future, all of these manufacturers will have their own article, I presume. However, I don't know the specific disambiguated name each one will have in order to wikilink now. That is why I used the general name. Unobjectionable (talk) 12:46, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, but see WP:INTDABLINK, "creating links to disambiguation pages is erroneous". If you don't know the disambiguated name of the article, please don't link at all. --Muhandes (talk) 12:56, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's ok. I won't change your edits, I will follow the rules. Thank you. Unobjectionable (talk) 13:18, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May I ask that you go over the rest of the links and correct them? This is not just links to dab pages, Echo 1 does not look like an Airsoft gun manufacturer either. --Muhandes (talk) 13:47, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Criticism of science

The discussion of the merge for this article has restarted again after a posting on the helpdesk, I wanted to see what your thoughts are and if they have changes since your last post on this issue considering both pages have undergone revisions since you voiced your opinions. Please check it out and post any changes over here. Thanks. Tiggerjay (talk) 02:45, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:User Wikipedia financing ads

Template:User Wikipedia financing ads has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:28, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Portuguese West Africa

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. .

Republic of China article

Since you mentioned the Republic of China in your user page, I guess you are interested to share your insights at Talk:Republic of China#Requested Move (February 2012). Thanks for your attention. 61.18.170.245 (talk) 17:56, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Celcius Training Weapon

A tag has been placed on Celcius Training Weapon, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

It may meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion under CSD g8

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Reatlas (talk) 08:59, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]