User talk:Ukpong1
AfC notification: Draft:Moses Ukpong has a new comment
[edit]
Women's History Month 2018 at Women in Red
[edit]  
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 16:09, 20 February 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Request for assitance
[edit]Dear UKPong. I trust we have dealt with the COI issue. I have received a message from Jimfbleak citing the article needs independent citations for notability. I intend to gather these into the draft. Can I rely upon your assistance moving forward, and if there are issues moving forward, perhaps we can work together to resolve them? Nick Hill (talk) 12:14, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. SmartSE (talk) 17:21, 7 March 2018 (UTC)- I have looked into more of your contributions and found some very strong indicators that you were not being honest about not writing for pay during Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard/Archive_127#Ukpong1. Per WP:BEANS I am not going to explain them to you, but if you request an unblock, I will explain to another uninvolved administrator in private. SmartSE (talk) 17:24, 7 March 2018 (UTC)\
Ukpong1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have been accused of being involved in Paid editing, investigations were carried out at COI noticeboard by Smartse and he says he "found some very strong indicators" that i was otherwise being paid. I feel deeply saddened at this accusations. I have never for once received payment for any article. Please i am appealing for another admin to look into this. And if Smartse can please explain why i have been blocked for no stated or obvious reason.... My only crime and suspicion is creating articles of which are not that of my Wikiproject, just like some founding editors who are now admins i have closely followed Academic Challenger and Aymatth2 who have created articles diversely, including some article which i first edited. There's no crime in it Zazzysa (talk) 21:03, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I have very extensively checked your editing history. A significant part of your editing is promotional. It seems very likely indeed that you have an undisclosed conflict of interest and have at times edited on behalf of subjects of articles you have written about. However, even if that were not so, promotional editing is not acceptable. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:02, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Request to Look into UPE/COI investigation by Smartse
[edit]Smartse opened an investigation against me over concerns of UPE/COI then he accuses me of being Mastersock of a bunch of accounts including a member of WikiProject Nigeria Mahveotm. I was stripped of my rights which i had no problem with, for the sake of whatsoever investigation he was carrying out as at the initial point in time. Few weeks later yesterday he blocks my account for reasons he intends to keep private to himself and reveal only to concerned admins. Note that investigation at COI noticeboard is still active but Archived. Even after i was stripped of rights i continued doing what i did, creating articles of which i feel are Wikipedia worthy. When i first joined Wiki i noticed Aymatth2 had created most articles in Nigeria (including Godswill Akpabio a page he also created) even if he wasn't from here and ever since i have been striving to do same. His only problem is that i have been creating different articles which he says are "Promotional". I will be also kindly request another admin to go through the pages i have created and judge.
Smartse's reason for blocking me is only laughable as i've never seen anyone being blocked directed to WP:BEANS which is just a humorous essay. I would politely and respectfully ask Smartse to send his evidence to the arbitration committee, if they decide to block me, then i will settle with that. You are involved party and as such shouldn't be performing my block. I hope my request is considered. Zazzysa (talk) 07:58, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
- I have never accused you of socking and in fact say the exact opposite. While many of your contributions have been positive, I have seen too many redflags that indicate to me that you have been liberal with the truth. It's not that articles are inherently promotional, but that is not the point. I reference BEANS, because pointing out what I consider to be damning evidence will only assist you from being detected in the future. Hardly an ideal situation, I agree, but I don't see many other options. SmartSE (talk) 08:40, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
- Smartse I'm sorry for replying late as i have been feeling over discouraged and disappointed even as none of the admins i have mentioned has said anything. Yes you didn't accuse me but however it'd come up that i maybe a sock by another user, though that was cleared there's still an issue which is, i have been blocked for something i didn't do. I've sat for days thinking about this and it's just very depressing that i may have wasted my time thinking i was actually having some impact just for this to happen. @Smartse for whatsoever reason or evidence you think you have that i did what you are accusing me of, i beg for you to reanalyze it, please. Zazzysa (talk) 21:22, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
- If I wasn't convinced then I wouldn't have blocked you. Jytdog and Aymatth2 aren't admins. I presume DGG has looked at this, but nobody has emailed me to get more details. I can share them with more admins in private (I already discussed it with User:JzG) but I'm not happy with disclosing the evidence to you. SmartSE (talk) 21:28, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
- Smartse I'm sorry for replying late as i have been feeling over discouraged and disappointed even as none of the admins i have mentioned has said anything. Yes you didn't accuse me but however it'd come up that i maybe a sock by another user, though that was cleared there's still an issue which is, i have been blocked for something i didn't do. I've sat for days thinking about this and it's just very depressing that i may have wasted my time thinking i was actually having some impact just for this to happen. @Smartse for whatsoever reason or evidence you think you have that i did what you are accusing me of, i beg for you to reanalyze it, please. Zazzysa (talk) 21:22, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
The article Snoopstar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable software, created by undisclosed paid editor
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SmartSE (talk) 18:17, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
The article Amari Cheatom has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NACTOR: offered some film credits but no real depth of bio details for an encyclopedia.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ☆ Bri (talk) 18:49, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article UZURV is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UZURV until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 19:35, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
The article Kaiwi Lyman-Mersereau has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Parts like "biker", "surfer", "white guy" don't contribute to "significant roles in multiple notable films, " demanded by WP:NACTOR. The one part in Hickok don't cut it.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ☆ Bri (talk) 20:12, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Spaceship (company)
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Spaceship (company), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ☆ Bri (talk) 21:21, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
The article Tajawal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:CORPDEPTH
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Theredproject (talk) 21:42, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
The article Corporate360 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Written by now banned editor with undeclared COI.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Theredproject (talk) 21:44, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Enervee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enervee (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Theredproject (talk) 21:48, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Al Tayyar Travel Group
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Al Tayyar Travel Group, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. scope_creep (talk) 21:54, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
The article Hunter Payton has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Firstly, Written by now banned editor with undeclared COI. I tried to clean up, but the ONLY claim to notability is some award for a film that doesn't even list him in the credits: Who's Driving Doug
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Theredproject (talk) 22:02, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
The article Hunter Fischer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Firstly, Written by now banned editor with undeclared COI. Secondly, none of these are significant roles. The sources don't even mention him.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Theredproject (talk) 22:04, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
March 2018
[edit]Hello, Ukpong1. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. I'm sorry, but Al Tayyar Travel Group has been deleted as meeting WP:CSD#G11. "This applies to pages that are exclusively promotional and would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION." These must be rewritten from scratch from "reliable, third party sources unconnected to the subject." See WP:RS.
Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Users who do so may be blocked from editing. Promotional content is vigorously deleted. Wikipedia:Identifying blatant advertising#Typical signs of blatant advertising contains information about content to avoid. For more information on content that may be perceived as promotional, click User:Dlohcierekim/promo.
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources providing verifiable information. That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Please see Wikipedia:Citing sources . Template:cite has templates you can use in citing your sources. Place the template {{references}} at the bottom of the page, and references cited in the text will appear there.
YOU CAN ASK FOR HELP AT THE TEAHOUSE
Any deficiencies should be remedied before reposting as they can lead to repeated deletions. Wikipedia is not a webhost. You may wish to consider alternative outlets.
If you want to try again, please use the Article Wizard or articles for creation to guide you through the creation process. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems.
You may find this tool useful: Google custom search Don't feel discouraged. My first attempts at creating articles were deleted too.
Wikipedia has many articles in need of improvement. Perhaps you can help.
- Category:All articles needing copy edit
- Category:Articles lacking sources
- Category:Articles lacking in-text citations
- There is more information at Wikipedia:Community portal Cheers, and happy editing. --Dlohcierekim (talk) 09:36, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
The article Sahara Ketabi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable author
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SmartSE (talk) 11:46, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Hunter fischer.jpeg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Hunter fischer.jpeg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ℯxplicit 23:39, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Hunter payton photo.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Hunter payton photo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ℯxplicit 23:41, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
April 2018 at Women in Red
[edit]
| ||
|
To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list or
Women in Red/international list. To unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list. Follow us on Twitter: |
New Page Review Newsletter No.10
[edit]ACTRIAL:
- ACTRIAL's six month experiment restricting new page creation to (auto)confirmed users ended on 14 March. As expected, a greatly increased number of unsuitable articles and candidates for deletion are showing up in the feed again, and the backlog has since increased already by ~30%. Please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day.
Paid editing
- Now that ACTRIAL is inoperative pending discussion, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary.
Subject-specific notability guidelines
- The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE nominating an article for deletion.
- Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for organisations and companies. A further discussion is currently taking place at: Can a subject specific guideline invalidate the General Notability Guideline?
Nominate competent users for Autopatrolled
- While patrolling articles, if you find an editor that is particularly competent at creating quality new articles, and that user has created more than 25 articles (rather than stubs), consider nominating them for the 'Autopatrolled' user right HERE.
News
- The next issue Wikipedia's newspaper The Signpost has now been published after a long delay. There are some articles in it, including ACTRIAL wrap-up that will be of special interest to New Page Reviewers. Don't hesitate to contribute to the comments sections. The Signpost is one of the best ways to stay up date with news and new developments - please consider subscribing to it. All editors of Wikipedia and associated projects are welcome to submit articles on any topic for consideration by the The Signpost's editorial team for the next issue.
To opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:06, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Moses Ukpong has been accepted
[edit]You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
• Gene93k (talk) 16:39, 17 April 2018 (UTC)May 2018 at Women in Red
[edit]  
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 23:11, 29 April 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Wiki Loves Food
[edit]
Hello! After the successful pilot program by Wikimedia India in 2015, Wiki Loves Food (WLF) is happening again in 2018 and this year, it's going International. To make this event a grand success, your direction is key. Please sign up here as a volunteer to bring all the world's food to Wikimedia. Danidamiobi (talk) 01:31, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Further linkup
[edit]Hi Ukpong, I am so excited to find out your account in the community. I am so so delighted. Can I mail you and keep in touch? Danidamiobi (talk) 01:34, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Women in Red June Editathons
[edit]
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:15, 29 May 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging
July 2018 at Women in Red
[edit]
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:04, 28 June 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
The article Ciara Wilson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
As per talk page: article was written by now banned editor with undeclared COI. More concerning though is that the article subject does not meet WP:NACTOR – at best, we have one possibly "significant role" on a sketch comedy TV series for a now defunct "mobile" TV channel. Other appearances are not "significant", and mostly consist of guest roles. At best, WP:TOOSOON.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 06:50, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
August 2018 at Women in Red
[edit]
| ||
|
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 11:22, 23 July 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
September 2018 at Women in Red
[edit]
| ||
|
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!):
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 01:55, 26 August 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
October 2018 at Women in Red
[edit]
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:46, 28 September 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Get ready for November with Women in Red!
[edit]
Continuing: | ||
|
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:41, 14 October 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging
December 2018 at Women in Red
[edit]
Continuing: | ||
|
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
December 2018 at Women in Red
[edit]
Continuing: | ||
|
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
Nomination of Zonar Systems for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zonar Systems is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zonar Systems until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:21, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
January 2019 at Women in Red
[edit]
 January events:
|
Orphaned non-free image File:Zonar logo.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Zonar logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:51, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
February 2019 at Women in Red
[edit]
 February events:
|
March 2019 at Women in Red
[edit]
   Please join us for these virtual events:
| ||
|
|
April editathons at Women in Red
[edit]April 2019
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:02, 25 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
(Please excuse this post if it is a duplicate!)
May you join this month's editathons from WiR!
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:17, 27 April 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your draft article, Draft:Infinix Hot 4
[edit]
Hello, Ukpong1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Infinix Hot 4".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 08:12, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Gymnastics at the Games of the 18th Olympics - Free Female Body requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
A10 duplicate of Gymnastics at the 1964 Summer Olympics – Women's floor exercise. While created in 2017, the page has been orphaned since creation, and this poorly translated title is implausible as a redirect.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 01:54, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Nnamdi Ezeigbo for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nnamdi Ezeigbo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Celestina007 (talk) 10:36, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
The article Free2Luv has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non notable organisation. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
The article Uyo High School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not actually notable, despite its claim. -
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. UtherSRG (talk) 11:58, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:NACCIMA
[edit]
Hello, Ukpong1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:NACCIMA, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:07, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:NACCIMA
[edit]Hello, Ukpong1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "NACCIMA".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:12, 24 November 2024 (UTC)