User talk:Tom Morris/Archive 10
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Tom Morris. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | ← | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | → | Archive 15 |
This Month in GLAM: April 2012
| ||||||
Request for comment on Theosophy page and Theosophy Talk page
Hello,
An editor of the Theosophy article and its Talk page created a Request for Comment involving both the article and its Talk page. Now I'm asking five to ten uninvolved editors from the religion/philosophy section of Wikipedia:Feedback request service to comment on the Theosophy Talk page.
If you are able and willing to comment that would be appreciated.
Sincerely,
Factseducado (talk) 23:06, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Secular Islam Summit
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Secular Islam Summit. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 23:17, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
Adam Yauch semi-protection
Hey there, just wondering... You noted that Adam Yauch's article is semi-protected on the project page, but it's not there yet. I think you might have accidentally protected the Toruń article instead (which was the entry right beneath Adam Yauch). Can you please check and make sure? Thanks a bunch. Music Pageants (talk) 17:58, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks, made a silly mistake there! Glad that WP:RFPP frequenters seemed to recover from my utter incompetence. —Tom Morris (talk) 19:57, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- Haha... no worries! All is well. Music Pageants (talk) 20:11, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
New Pages update
Hey Tom Morris/Archive 10 :). A quick update on how things are going with the New Page Triage/New Pages Feed project. As the enwiki page notes, the project is divided into two chunks: the "list view" (essentially an updated version of Special:NewPages) and the "article view", a view you'll be presented with when you open up individual articles that contains a toolbar with lots of options to interact with the page - patrolling it, adding maintenance tags, nominating it for deletion, so on.
On the list view front, we're pretty much done! We tried deploying it to enwiki, in line with our Engagement Strategy on Wednesday, but ran into bugs and had to reschedule - the same happened on Thursday :(. We've queued a new deployment for Monday PST, and hopefully that one will go better. If it does, the software will be ready to play around with and test by the following week! :).
On the article view front, the developers are doing some fantastic work designing the toolbar, which we're calling the "curation bar"; you can see a mockup here. A stripped-down version of this should be ready to deploy fairly soon after the list view is; I'm afraid I don't have precise dates yet. When I have more info, or can unleash everyone to test the list view, I'll let you know :). As always, any questions to the talkpage for the project or mine. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 23:22, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
My Last Message
Dear Tom Morris
It seems you are too busy these days. I do not seem to have received your reply to my earlier message posted on 29 April. Would appreciate it if you could let me know what needs to be down for rectifying the decision on deleting the entry in Wikipedia on Ali Paya.
With regards,
Ali PayaAlipayaa (talk) 18:04, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Anti-Pakistan sentiment
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Anti-Pakistan sentiment. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 00:15, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Adam Yauch
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Adam Yauch. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 00:18, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
New Page Triage prototype released
Hey Tom Morris! We've finally finished the NPT prototype and deployed it on enwiki. We'll be holding an office hours session on the 16th at 21:00 in #wikimedia-office to show it off, get feedback and plot future developments - hope to see you there! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 03:30, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
your MfD nom
Please add a diff to your MfD nom to support the assertion that "as it was used as part of a userpage vandalism campaign." Thanks. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 10:12, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
Done —Tom Morris (talk) 10:25, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low 
to High 
.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:19, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
Biochemic cell salts
Hi. I was a bit disappointed with the debate at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biochemic cell salts. I noticed that you wrote "Show that there are independent, reliable sources on the topic that come from non-fringe non-lunatics and I'll happily change my mind". I provided the information that Edzard Ernst had written critical articles, which presumably met your needs, but you didn't show any sign of changing your mind and the deletion juggernaut rolled on. It's not that I care much about Biochemic cell salts, but more the way in which a relevant contribution to the discussion was just ignored. SamuelTheGhost (talk) 21:34, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
- That's not how I saw it. WP:GNG requires multiple independent reliable sources. Even with Ernst, I'm still not quite seeing enough to meet the 'multiple' bit of that. —Tom Morris (talk) 14:11, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
- WP:GNG says "Multiple sources are generally expected", not "required". In fact the German wikipedia article has another independent reference, to a study by Stiftung Warentest, again with a negative appraisal, but unfortunately not on line. WP:GNG explicitly says "Sources are not required to be available online, and they are not required to be in English", so that should be sufficient. SamuelTheGhost (talk) 15:34, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Autopatrolled
thankyou Tom B (talk) 14:04, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Secular humanism
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Secular humanism. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 20:15, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Thanks
Now that I know what that communication was about, I appreciate the revdel. —Strange Passerby (talk • cont) 15:38, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Admin's Barnstar |
| Awarded for your diligent work in dealing with one of the worst sort of banned users, on more than one occasion. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 20:18, 21 May 2012 (UTC) |
Please fill out our brief Teahouse survey
Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at WP:Teahouse would like your feedback!
We have created a brief survey intended to help us understand the experiences and impressions of veteran editors who have participated on the Teahouse. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests pages some time during the last few months.
Click here to be taken to the survey site.
The survey should take less than 15 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!
Happy editing,
J-Mo, Teahouse host
This message was sent via Global message delivery on 01:19, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
New Page Triage/New Pages Feed
Hey all :). A notification that the prototype for the New Pages Feed is now live on enwiki! We had to briefly take it down after an unfortunate bug started showing up, but it's now live and we will continue developing it on-site.
The page can be found at Special:NewPagesFeed. Please, please, please test it and tell us what you think! Note that as a prototype it will inevitably have bugs - if you find one not already mentioned at the talkpage, bring it up and I'm happy to carry it through to the devs. The same is true of any additions you can think of to the software, or any questions you might have - let me know and I'll respond.
Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 13:13, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
Your opinion welcomed
Hi Tom - you recently gave me some advice on my talk page. Critical advice, but I believe it was appropriate and well intentioned. I'd like to ask you to consider the post I just made on the Astrology talk page. I'm aware that last year almost all the contributing editors to the Astrology page were driven out by an exhaustive process of edit conflicts and obstruction, and don't want to see the situation being created where only editors who show clear hostility towards the subject are allowed to make contributions to the main Astrology page. -- Zac Δ talk! 18:35, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 21:38, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
Articles from JSTOR if at all possible
Hello Tom Morris, I recently found the list WP:REX where it seems some nice volunteers like you help locate some not-so-easy-to-find references. I have tried my usual supplier of JSTOR articles but could not get these:
http://www.jstor.org/stable/25730046
http://www.jstor.org/stable/25732716
http://www.jstor.org/stable/25730044
http://www.jstor.org/stable/25730045
http://www.jstor.org/stable/25642457
http://www.jstor.org/stable/25643516
I wonder if I could possibly ask you to locate any of them for me as I read you have JSTOR access and most likely to a larger number of publications than my source. Any help is warmly welcome! Thank you in advance. --Rowanwindwhistler (talk) 18:39, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
- I had a look last night and I don't have access to any of those papers. —Tom Morris (talk) 14:31, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- A pity, thank you all the same! I will the other method then. --Rowanwindwhistler (talk) 04:38, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Resurrection of the dead
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Resurrection of the dead. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 04:15, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
Block sock?
Hi -- you blocked Myrtlesmith (talk · contribs), and I wonder if you'd like to block MyrtleSmith53 (talk · contribs) as well -- same approach to the same article. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 06:17, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- I blocked one as a sock of the other, but blocking policy doesn't require me to block both. I have good reasons per a confidential OTRS ticket to not block both. —Tom Morris (talk) 16:14, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- Hmm. Which one is the sock? Nomoskedasticity (talk) 19:13, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
Themodernizer deleting files
I just noticed your request on Themodernizer's talk page after he removed yet another file from an article without explanation. I saw his rather "unhelpful" response,[1]which raises a red flag for me. I've reverted a number of edits that he has made over past few days so we don't lose those files too and asked him again why he's removing images without any explanation why.[2] Given that he hasn't edited for the past three years, the recent actions seem very strange. --AussieLegend (talk) 04:01, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
Puzzled
I am very puzzled by your ruling in the Arthur Kemp article deletion page. It is blindingly obvious that he meets none of the notability criteria. It is not even a matter of dispute that he is non-notable--all of the multi-user accounts admitted as much. Why have you ruled "no consensus"? I am absolutely baffled. TheFallenCrowd (talk) 17:58, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
- I believe I made myself clear in my closing. I ruled that there was no consensus because there was no consensus on whether or not the subject meets WP:GNG. You seemed to repeatedly avoid answering the question of whether he meets WP:GNG. The current interpretation of Wikipedia policy seems to be that either one must meet GNG or SNG or both. There was consensus that he did not meet SNG, but there was no consensus on the issue of GNG. Once you exclude all the single-purpose accounts, there isn't adequate consensus on GNG, and thus no consensus to delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 18:04, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
- With all due respect, it is obvious that he does not meet WP:GNG. It was clearly established that he does not meet the notability criteria for a journalist, author, politician or single-event player, so how on earth could he meet WP:GNG? It is a non sequitur to claim that there is no consensus on notability when it was clearly established that he fufills none of the notability criteria. Even now, the article still claims that he is a "writer" and a "politician" (his occupation is listed as "political activist"!) even though he does not meet the criteria for notability.
- Please be so kind as to advise me where this matter can be raised further.TheFallenCrowd (talk) 17:38, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
- If you think I closed it incorrectly, you can take it to deletion review. —Tom Morris (talk) 20:22, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: May 2012
| ||||||
Thanks for the feedback
|
at my successful RFA |
| Thank you, Tom Morris, for your feedback at my RFA. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:11, 3 June 2012 (UTC) |
AN/I discussion regarding Themodernizer
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Themodernizer removing files from articles without explanation. Thank you. --AussieLegend (talk) 14:47, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for handling this issue, AussieLegend. —Tom Morris (talk) 15:18, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Australian Christian Lobby
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Australian Christian Lobby. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 07:15, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Bob Dylan
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Bob Dylan. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 08:16, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Germans
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Germans. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 09:15, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Religious language
Hi there, Tom. I'm hoping to get religious language to Featured Article status soon. I've had it peer reviewed and looked at by other editors; I'd appreciate your input - could you have a look and tell me what you think, please? Thanks. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 21:02, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
- I read a fair amount of Braithwaite at college, and you seem to have Braithwaite covered. There's not much I can add to what you've already got. Great work! I'll have a more formal review soon and am happy to help it go through the motions at FAC (although I can't promise anything given that I've never put anything through FAC and have only helped with one FAC). —Tom Morris (talk) 08:55, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks, I appreciate it. My exams finish on Thursday, so I plan to nominate it at some point after that. If there's anything more you could add, please let me know. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 12:41, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
Help clear the Feedback Dashboard queue... for science! :)
Tom, I need your help!
... well, okay, not just you, but you and all the other Feedback Dashboard responders you know :) My colleagues are running an experiment on MoodBar/Feedback Dashboard, testing to see the effect that receiving feedback has on newbie editing activity. They need to temporarily clear the FD queue or get as close as possible to clearing it by June 19th, in order to get a statistically significant sample. More details are here on Meta. If you could jump in and help us tackle the backlog and/or spread the word among other top FD leaders, that would be fantastic. Thanks so much for any help you can give! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 00:20, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 09:49, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
Help needed to clear the Feedback Dashboard queue
Hi Tom Morris, a project has been constructed and Maryana (WMF) was wondering if you'd be able to help out with a research project her colleagues are running on the effects of MoodBar/Feedback Dashboard. They're trying to see if getting a response to MoodBar feedback helps newbies edit more – but to do that, they need to (temporarily) raise the level of responses to as close to 100% as possible. (Don't worry; it's only a week-long test.) If you could help me and her spread the word among the other FD top responders you know to help us clear the backlog by June 19th, that would be awesome! More details about this test are on this page on Meta (Add your name to the list if you can help). Let her know if you have any questions and feel free to get in touch with other FD leaders about this if you want :)
Cheers,
Riley Huntley talk No talkback needed; I'll temporarily watch here. 16:44, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Anti-Christian sentiment
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Anti-Christian sentiment. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 09:15, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
The Tea Leaf - Issue Four
Hi! Welcome to the fourth issue of The Tea Leaf, the official newsletter for the Teahouse!
- Teahouse pilot wraps up after 13 weeks After being piloted on English Wikipedia starting in February, the Teahouse wrapped up its pilot period on May 27, 2012. We expect this is just the beginning for the Teahouse and hope the project will continue to grow in the months to come!
Thank you and congratulations to all of the community members who participated - and continue to participate!
- What you've all been waiting for: Teahouse Pilot Report is released! We look forward to your feedback on the methodology and outcomes of this pilot project.
- ....and if a pilot report wasn't enough, the Teahouse Pilot Metrics Report is out too! Dive into the numbers and survey results to learn about the impact the Teahouse has made on English Wikipedia.
- Teahouse shows positive impact on new editor retention and engagement
- 409 new editors participated during the entire pilot period, with about 40 new editors participating in the Teahouse per week.
- Two weeks after participating, 33% of Teahouse guests are still active on Wikipedia, as opposed to 11% of a similar control group.
- New editors who participated in the Teahouse edit 10x the number of articles, make 7x more global edits, and 2x as much of their content survives on Wikipedia compared to the control group.
- Women participate in the Teahouse 28% of Teahouse participants were women, up from 9% of editors on Wikipedia in general, good news for this project which aimed to have impact on the gender gap too - but still lots to be done here!
- New opportunities await for the Teahouse in phase two as the Teahouse team and Wikipedia community examine ways to improve, scale, and sustain the project. Opportunities for future work include:
- Automating or semi-automating systems such as invites, metrics and archiving
- Experimenting with more ways for new editors to discover the Teahouse
- Building out the social and peer-to-peer aspects further, including exploring ways to make answering questions easier, creating more ways for new editors to help each other and for all participants to acknowledge each other's efforts
- Growing volunteer capacity, continuing to transfer Teahouse administration tasks to volunteers whenever possible, and looking for new ways to make maintenance and participation easier for everyone.
- Want to know how you can lend a hand at the Teahouse? Become a host! Learn more about what makes the Teahouse different than other help spaces on Wikipedia and see how you can help new editors by visiting here.
- Say hello to the new guests at the Teahouse. Take the time to welcome and get to know the latest guests at the Teahouse. Drop off some wikilove to these editors today, as being welcomed by experienced editors is really encouraging to new Wikipedians.
You are receiving The Tea Leaf after expressing interest or participating in the Teahouse! To remove yourself from receiving future newsletters, please remove your username here. Sarah (talk) 17:08, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
You're doing a fantastic job!
Tom, thank you so much from me and the MoodBar research team for your work on clearing the Feedback Dashboard backlog! You and the other responders have doubled the number of responses to feedback in the past few days. I wanted to let you know that in 4 more days, the MoodBar will be temporarily disabled, so you won't see any new feedback coming in for a little while. This is just to get a sample of users to compare to the ones who could give feedback and get responses from you – it'll be back soon. So get all of your responding in now, because you might have to go through a bit of Feedback Dashboard withdrawal next week :) Thanks again, and keep up the great work! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 18:32, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Here, have a barnstar, you deserve it!
|
The Feedback Dashboard barnstar |
| Hola Tom Morris, thank you for all the work you've done responding to feedback via the Feedback Dashboard! Without people like you, this feature would be useless! Cheers, Riley Huntley talk No talkback needed; I'll temporarily watch here. 02:14, 15 June 2012 (UTC) |
- Aww, thanks. My contributions have been pretty minimal compared to others though. —Tom Morris (talk) 07:18, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Featured article nomination
Hi there, Tom. Just to let you know, I've nominated religious language problem as a Featured Article, here. Any feedback you could give would be appreciated. Thanks. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 13:26, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Nice to meet you
Thank you for your post. I am learning a lot in a short amount of time. Nice to meet you Tom. Ț♥ttØØdẄ♥itre§ 15:58, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Feedback Dashboard update
Hello, Tom. New feedback should slow down and then stop in the next couple of days – the researchers temporarily turned off the MoodBar for people registering right now, in order to get a control sample for their test – so you'll have time to catch up. It will be turned on again on the 29th. I just hope you don't get too bored next week without feedback! Maybe visit the Teahouse?
Cheers,
Riley Huntley talk No talkback needed; I'll temporarily watch here. 18:14, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Wikipedia:HAPPYPLACE listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:HAPPYPLACE. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:HAPPYPLACE redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). MichaelSchumacherMercedes (talk) 01:34, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Kerala
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Kerala. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 10:15, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
Kikko Matsuoka
Hi Tom! As you voted for deletion in the related discussion, I would invite you to check the improvements to the Kikko Matsuoka article and consider if now it satisfies WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR requirements. Regards, Cavarrone (talk) 10:55, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Paxlodge
Hi. I wonder if you would like to reconsider this block. Wandered into it by accident, and if you look at the edit pattern, it is blindingly clear that this user is someone who is genuinely trying to improve Wikipedia (albeit primarily in one article whose name coincides with his or her username). And, OK, he or she did not competely statisfy all the cpermission requirements for some pictures uploaded. But really, come on, this is not real conflict of interest territory: it's the scouts/guides ffs. Also, where are the warnings that a block was imminent? Mcewan (talk) 19:15, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
- Just to let you know, I raised this here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)#Inappropriate_COI_bans Mcewan (talk) 22:03, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
- I probably did go over the top on that block, yes. Usually I don't go anywhere near WP:UAA as there are admins who handle it. That said, the block is strictly within policy as it is a promotional username. If another admin wishes to unblock, I won't object. —Tom Morris (talk) 22:13, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Wikipedia on retina
Ooh. Very nice. Finally, the computer industry is delivering us decent screens. (Not my laptop, sadly.) —Tom Morris (talk) 13:08, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Pope
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Pope. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 16:17, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:59, 26 June 2012 (UTC)