User talk:TatyanaR

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Britney Spears has been reverted, as it introduced negative or controversial biographical material without providing a reliable source for this information. Wikipedia requires that all such material be sourced to address the issue of libel. Thank you. DVdm (talk) 11:20, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Valeriya Guy Germanika, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. Categories must also be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 11:23, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lika Dobryanskaya

The article Lika Dobryanskaya has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No notability established.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nymf _hideliho! 23:21, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Selena Gomez, you may be blocked from editing. Eeekster (talk) 03:15, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to naming conventions or consensus, as you did at Sexy Cora, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not move the page without establishing a legitimate rationale. Morbidthoughts (talk) 09:49, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Marina Malafeeva

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Marina Malafeeva requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. TYelliot | Talk | Contribs 18:52, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jeniffer Viturino

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jeniffer Viturino requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Erick1984 (talk) 19:42, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jeniffer Viturino for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeniffer Viturino is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeniffer Viturino until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Intoronto1125 (talk) 15:22, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Victoria Chernysheva

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Victoria Chernysheva requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. — ZjarriRrethues — ^talk 08:34, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yulia Mavrina

Hi Tatyana, you really need to use proper sources when writing about living people. The website you used as a reference seems to be a fansite. When writing about living people we need to make sure we get things right, and that involves verifying all the statements and facts about them by using references to reliable sources such as books, magazines and newspapers. They don't have to be in English, Russian sources are fine so long as they have a reputation for fact-checking. Adding sources avoids us making mistakes and it will also help you avoid having your articles deleted, which I see has happened a few times already. Fences&Windows 12:53, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nonna Grishayeva

The article Nonna Grishayeva has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 02:57, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Brigitte Burdine

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Brigitte Burdine requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Jebus989 ^✰ 15:21, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Brigitte Burdine

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Brigitte Burdine requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Jebus989 ^✰ 12:24, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nonna Grishayeva

The article Nonna Grishayeva has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not Notable. See Wikipedia:Notability#Self-promotion_and_indiscriminate_publicity. Also: No reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GeorgeLouis (talk) 06:30, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Margarita Agibalova

The article Margarita Agibalova has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. maucho eagle _(c) 17:43, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Derya Arbaş

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Derya Arbaş requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 15:02, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Other pages with similar concerns:

Proposed deletion of Julia Palmer-Stoll

The article Julia Palmer-Stoll has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NACTOR as there are a lack of reliable sources. The imdb listing (which is not reliable) only shows minor roles.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 16:05, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kadamba Simmons

The article Kadamba Simmons has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:BLP1E - Appears to only be notable for her death.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 16:08, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Oksana Aplekayeva

The article Oksana Aplekayeva has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:BLP1E - Appears to only be notable for her murder

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 16:09, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yulia Kolisnichenko

The article Yulia Kolisnichenko has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to be a non-notable singer who appeared on a single reality TV show. Would require reliable secondary sources to establish the notability of such a claim.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 14:52, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Olga Zarubina

It must be discouraging to see so much of your hard work removed. I looked at one article, and agreed it did not meet the requirements for inclusion, but I also though it might with a little bit more work. So I moved it to User:TatyanaR/Olga Zarubina, where you can work on it if you wish.--SPhilbrick T 23:28, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Elena Bondarchuk for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elena Bondarchuk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elena Bondarchuk until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 14:44, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yulia Rumyantseva

The article Yulia Rumyantseva has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to only be notable for a single event - her suicide. The only sources I can turn up relate to her suicide. In terms of the editing and producing career, only IMDB turns up, which is not a reliable source. I do not speak Russian, so I may be missing reliable sources that cover her editing and film producing career, but barring the addition of those, it appears this is a single event notability, and as such not appropriate for an article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 14:50, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Natalya Bochkareva

The article Natalya Bochkareva has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Drmies (talk) 18:51, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

simple:User talk:TatyanaR ru:Обсуждение участника:TatyanaR

Proposed deletion of Susan Raab

The article Susan Raab has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of any real notability. Zero sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nymf _hideliho! 15:18, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kim Kataine

The article Kim Kataine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:PORNBIO in its current state. Zero sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nymf _hideliho! 15:19, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

Given your long history of inappropriate article creation and your continued addition of unsourced information to biography articles, I would suggest that you take a break from editing to review Wikipedia's notability criteria for inclusion as well as BLP policy. I also strongly suggest that you find yourself a mentor to assist you with your editing. The bottom line is that you cannot continue to edit as you have been - it is time consuming for other editor's to have to continually monitor your work. Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 15:30, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kim Kataine for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kim Kataine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Kataine until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Nymf _hideliho! 09:41, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kkitaine f kimkataine.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kkitaine f kimkataine.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:44, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Patrice Jennings

The article Patrice Jennings has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Auntof6 (talk) 08:16, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note I have changed added a CSD A7 tag to the article. Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 14:59, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

As my previous request to stop creating unsourced articles on marginally notable biography subjects has fallen on deaf ears, I'm going to draw a bright line so that it is completely clear:

As of the timestamp on this message, if you add personal information to a BLP that is unsourced, or sourced only to IMDB, I will block you.
As of the timestamp on this message, if you create any additional biography articles that contain unsourced personal information that is only accompanied by a link to IMDB, I will block you. WP:BLP is Wikipedia policy, and you cannot continue to violate it.

I implore you to seek mentorship and to ask questions if anything is unclear in order to avoid possible sanctions on your account. --Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 14:55, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"children" in infoboxes

Please don't add names and birth dates for peoples' children in infoboxes, as you have been doing at several articles ([1][2][3]). The instructions for this template indicate that when a person's children are not notable, only the number of children should be indicated in the infobox; their names should only be given in the infobox if they are notable (that is to say, if they have an article on Wikipedia that can be linked to). Thank you, rʨanaɢ (talk) 19:50, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok))I didn't know about this, thanks for the advice!

(UNSIGNED)

Yelena Chernykh

Tatyana: please do not delete edits without providing an explanation or by ignoring edit summary comments. The issue of information regarding minor children is addressed at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard. Also, please sign all comments. Thanks. [email protected] (talk) 14:16, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Yelena Chernykh.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Yelena Chernykh.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nymf _hideliho! 14:38, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Block notice

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for continued BLP violations. Despite a very clear final warning given just four sections above, you have again added unsourced personal information to biography articles. Please take the next 24 hours to read WP:BLP and ensure that you understand this policy prior to editing any additional biography articles. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 14:44, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Victoria Karasyova

The article Victoria Karasyova has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 06:03, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Continued BLP problems

Tatyana - despite the previous block and repeated requests to fully grasp BLP policy, you continue to add unsourced personal info to biography articles (random examples since your last block). Wikipedia is not a repository for gossip, which is what you seem intent on using it for. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced material to biography articles (including the infobox) you will be blocked without any additional warnings. Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 16:11, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 21:06, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Ellen Janov

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Ellen Janov, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0417899/bio. As a copyright violation, Ellen Janov appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Ellen Janov has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Ellen Janov and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Ellen Janov with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Ellen Janov.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. 66.83.126.37 (talk) 05:01, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Block notice

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continued BLP violations via the continued addition of unsourced personal information (examples since last block here, here and here). This block is indefinite as the previous two blocks apparently did not impress upon you the absolute requirement of including reliable sources when adding or changing information in biography articles. If at some point in time in the future you understand that Wikipedia is not a gossip rag and that personal information added to BLPs must be accompanied by reliable sources you can request an unblock. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 16:11, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ekaterina Nosik for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ekaterina Nosik is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ekaterina Nosik until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Davey2010^Talk 03:36, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yulia Takshina for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yulia Takshina is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yulia Takshina until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Davey2010^Talk 03:43, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kate Butler for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kate Butler is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate Butler until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. only (talk) 13:38, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Peggy Trentini for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peggy Trentini is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peggy Trentini until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rogermx (talk) 20:41, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]