User talk:TVArchivistUK

Hello, TVArchivistUK. You have new messages at Bento00's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Re: Eurovision Song Contest 1973 Logo

That's very nice of you. You can email me at [email protected] with the image, I'll upload it and credit you for it. -- [[ axg ◉ talk ]] 11:47, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, TVArchivistUK. You have new messages at Oddbodz's talk page.
Message added 09:11, 25 April 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Regarding Lift Off with Ayshea Oddbodz (talk) 09:11, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lift Off With Ayshea

Hi, where is the image (on your computer or on the internet)? If it's on the internet could you please give me the url. Also, please don't reply on an archived talk page because it could take a long time to find (I only found it this time because I was finishing the archiving process. Please let me know about the image on my talk page. Oddbodz (talk) 16:03, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the URL: http://ufoseries.com/magazines/lookInAysheaWoodCover.jpg TVArchivistUK (talk) 03:49, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, just checked out the picture and unfortunatly, magazine covers can only be used in articles about the magazine. Please let me know if you find another suitable picture. Sorry about this, Oddbodz (talk) 19:30, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocking

So they finally did it. Administrator BWilkins couldn't stand that I challenged their outrageous, bullying behaviour. That I got support from other users , one of whom is in my office it's true, drove them so mad that they continually deleted what I was posting in response to their excuses. So he blocked me and my colleague and even went as far as to say we're the same person. Which is a defammation. You just can't win with administrators. They never apologize, never correct their errors and above all, they will never, ever tolerate being challenged. When they lose control of the argument, they simply hand out bans. But it's OK, it's not a punishment because they never punish anyone. They simply ban. Meanwhile, the administrator who actually started the edit war and made incorrect edits continues to edit without impunity. You really can't make this up. The lives of some are so sad. TVArchivistUK (talk) 21:46, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinitely blocked

Technical evidence confirms that you operate the abusive account User:JKMMOC. Taking into consideration your combative approach at User talk:Bwilkins, I have therefore indefinitely blocked you. Such behaviour is completely at odds with the collaborative attitude we expect of our contributors. AGK [•] 22:28, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

TVAnarchivist removed this block notice with the edit summary This is lies. Per WP:OWNTALK, I am restoring that notice. AGK [•] 00:37, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry to have to do this, but with the second summary removal I have also revoked at Special:Block your ability to edit this talk page. However, you still have several routes to appeal this block: your e-mail access is still enabled, and more relevantly you can still use this service to request an unblock. Have a good night, AGK [•] 01:17, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lies

So now Bwilkins is resorting to lying and posting the lies on my page. Now I am blocked for life. As I predicted would happen. If you challenge an administrator, you will be blocked for life. You just can't win. Good luck folks!TVArchivistUK (talk) 23:10, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what "sock" means, but I'm being accused of it on RedRose64 talk page by another administrator coming to their defence. Making accusations based on lies perpetrated by wiki users shouldn't be acceptable. But they are. Still, I just signed up with a new login, so all is well. TVArchivistUK (talk) 23:21, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Abuse

Bwilkins wrote: "Apparently the poster doesn't a) understand Wikipedia, b) understand life, c) understand WP:AGF, and/or d) understand that a forced "apology" is no apology at all". Anyone else who wrote this would be blocked or have it reverted instantly for abuse. But not when you're an administrator. Having deleted my response, they added "The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion." Best way to shut down any further embarassment for this editor. Lock the page, block the user and hopefully Bwilkins behaviour will be swept under the carpet. How very sad. TVArchivistUK (talk) 23:13, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]