User talk:Spotteddogsdotorg

This user has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia, per ruling of administrators, Jimbo Wales and/or the Arbitration Committee. See the block log.

I would like all my contributions to this festering dung heap filled with crazy people removed forthwith. If you have any complaints please direct them here as this idiot is responsible.. Thank you.

Bugs

Why do you say that Bugs is not just the Bunny? When people say Bugs, they mostly refer to Bugs Bunny. I redirect the article, Bugs, to Bugs Bunny, because it is the most common use of Bugs. -- SNIyer12^(talk) 04:23 31 May, 2005 (UTC)

No it isn't the most common use of bugs, and I'll keep changing the bloody thing back if you do. --Spotteddogsdotorg 04:26, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

If you want the disambiguation page, please see Bugs (disambiguation). SNIyer12^(talk) 04:30 31 May, 2005 (UTC)

I have now linked the bugs page to the most common usage. --Spotteddogsdotorg 04:37, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 07:23, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Please do not gratuitously remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 07:38, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Content? It is a deleted article. Get over it. I will ignore you from now on. Spotteddogsdotorg 07:41, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

FYI, Boothy was temporarily blocked for persistent recreation of the very same article you removed a link to. R adiant _>|< 15:35, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)

Vfd

Yes, you simply mark the page for deletion again, but locate the actual debate at a different page (i.e. Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Some page/2). However, it's generally frowned upon re-nominating a page that just survived a deletion debate. If you want to go that route, I suggest visiting Wikipedia:Votes for Undeletion. Mackensen (talk) 00:30, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

"TV personality notability"

Perhaps it's because I neither live in the US nor bother to watch TV (or for that matter am interested in "personalities"), but your criteria (on your user page) for a keep vote look pretty reasonable. (At this point, I'm not saying they're right, just that they're reasonable; indeed, I've a hunch that they're not right, as simpler criteria such as verifiability are all that's required.) Also, your first criterion for delete vote, Does not meet any of the "keep" criteria above, seems similarly reasonable -- indeed, it's pretty much implied by the fact that you have a list of keep criteria. But what's the rationale for the other delete criteria? To me, (ii) Transient broadcaster, i.e. has been in over three markets over the past ten years, (iii) Is not in Los Angeles or New York and (iv) Is under 40 seem utterly arbitrary.

If you think this merits a reply, please reply here. I'll be watching this page. -- Hoary 13:39, 2005 Jun 26 (UTC)

There are over two hundred markets in the US, and thousands of people on televison, the majority are not notable, save for those in the top two markets Los Angeles and New York, which have stations that can be seen outside of their respective markets, and in the case of New York the major 4 affiliates are distributed abroad. As for the transient issue, there is a lot of turn over in the industry and most of the "talent" is interchangable replacement parts to the point that you have trouble telling people apart. As for the under 40 guideline, the majority of those who are over 40 in the industry have a higher probablity of actually being noteworthy and not an anchor bimbo type. --Spotteddogsdotorg 04:12, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)

- I thought that the post-Carter era has emphasized opinions from "the heartland", and thus would have expected that faux-hayseed "philosophers" and programs would be springing up across the continent. But even aside from the midwest backlash, doesn't stuff come out of places like Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, DC, Baltimore and Philadelphia? (If not, so much for another myth about the US!) Back when I still took the trouble to watch television, I had trouble telling apart even the "personalities" I was told were the most famous -- though perhaps too much of my concentration went to the bimbos. -- Hoary June 28, 2005 04:25 (UTC)

Er, what?

I found your comment on my talk page rather confusing, but I believe the main point is that you accuse Mothperson, myself and several others of sockpuppetry? I would like to direct you to our policies on civility and personal attacks; unless you have any evidence, throwing wild accusations is not going to get you anywhere. Obviously, holding the same opinion as someone else is not anywhere near evidence of sockpuppetry. R adiant _>|< July 7, 2005 11:01 (UTC)

So its OK that you all do that but if anyone else accuses someone of it its not OK. Lovely! Spotteddogsdotorg 7 July 2005 15:00 (UTC)

I haven't accused you of anything, and if you have multiple accounts I have no problems with that. Having multiple accounts is not forbidden - only using them to be disruptive or to avoid policy is. R adiant _>|< July 7, 2005 17:54 (UTC)

Proxy Software

I notice you have had the same sockpuppet allegations made against you. We maybe using the same proxy software which may have caused the confusion. You should turn it off or uninstall it! -- Toasthaven2 17:15, 12 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

What are you doing?

You wanting to delete your own uploaded images (why?) is not a reason to speedy delete. What's going on?--Pharos 23:00, 15 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I want all the images I have uploaded to Wikipedia deleted forthwith! Then I shall be done with it forever! Spotteddogsdotorg 23:01, 15 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, that's not your right. Feel free is you want to quit, but we'll retain the images you uploaded and remember you well for that.--Pharos 23:05, 15 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I want them gone and I want them gone NOW! Spotteddogsdotorg 23:06, 15 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  - Very nice. I want them gone! Spotteddogsdotorg 23:10, 15 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any particular reason? I mean, do you want to persuade anyone, or are you just blowing off steam here? -- Hoary 07:07, July 17, 2005 (UTC)

I wish to have the images removed plain and simple. - Spotteddogsdotorg 13:21, 17 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- You have absolutely no right to do this. These are not your images. You are maliciously removing useful images from Wikipedia and frankly this is vandalism; you also cannot revoke the GFDL license you issued some of these under. Stop this self-vandalism now and quit Wikipedia if you wish; either way, these shenanigans will not be successful.--Pharos 16:09, 17 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, you are not able to delete your own images. Cburnett 16:37, July 17, 2005 (UTC)

What new username will you be using? —Mar ka ci 2005-07-17 T 19:09:46 Z

I wish to remove my images and I do not care how useful they are. I have given up on this peice of crap thanks to a few assholes. Spotteddogsdotorg 22:09, 17 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm sorry if you've had negative experiences with some other editors. But the point is they're not your images.--Pharos 22:15, 17 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  - Several lawyers say different. Spotteddogsdotorg 22:16, 17 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    - This is not true and you know it. If you only wish to contribute vandalism from now on, I will just extend the ban permanently.--Pharos 22:26, 17 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
      - Nope, GFDL is non-revocable and non-excluse. Sorry, spot, you lose on this one. Cburnett 01:20, July 18, 2005 (UTC)

Problem

Hello, this user has taken a great many images off of my website and is using the domain for my website as their user name, something which I object to. I have narrowed down the suspect list to three persons whom I have had run-ins with, and am wondering how I can remove the content from my site from this one or get my standard usage fee. TheSpottedDogsOrganisation 01:07, 19 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

What's the domain name? -- Hoary 01:40, July 19, 2005 (UTC)

The domain is spotteddogs.org. Most of the directories that the images came from were not protected, but they are now to avoid poaching. TheSpottedDogsOrganisation 02:40, 19 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This is a painfully obvious lie. Please see the discussion above.--Pharos 01:54, 19 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a lie, and I hate to distrub your free hippie co-op here, but some of us are capitalists. Now people do stupid things when you threaten to sue them over copyright infringement as one of the three people I suspect and contacted did by asking for the images removal. As for your "GNU Free Documentation License" it is hippie BS. TheSpottedDogsOrganisation 02:40, 19 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to see this lawsuit filed against yourself in a court. I hope you win.--Pharos 02:46, 19 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Pharos, you are obviously not a reasonable person and I would definitely not contribute to your silly project, since it has no crediblity at all as anyone can just go and put whatever up on it regardless of where it came from. It will this site's downfall since anyone can edit it. TheSpottedDogsOrganisation 02:58, 19 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You mean "anyone" like Kaibabsquirrel with whom you apparently had a dispute and is the reason you want your images removed? Anyway, just don't become like Sollog and dedicate your life to fighting Wikipedia. That way lies madness.--Pharos 03:10, 19 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

"TheSpottedDogsOrganisation", your edits to WP start at a curious time and are curiously similar in gist, tone, and idiolect to those of "Spotteddogsdotorg". Yet you claim that you are somebody else. Can Spotteddogsdotorg be aping you so sedulously? If so, what might motivate her to do that? This is all very puzzling. -- Hoary 03:39, July 19, 2005 (UTC)

Thank you for your participation

You have all been unwitting participants in a peice of performance art entitled "Wikipedia Project: Spring-Summer 2005". All of this has been a big giant peice of art involving several people throughout North America. Thanks for unwittingly playing your roles to a tee. TheSpottedDogsOrganisation 13:01, 19 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

If you talk to yourself like this, Spot, people will start to think you're bonkers. -- Hoary 14:11, July 19, 2005 (UTC)

It was an annoucement moron! Spotteddogsdotorg 20:50, 19 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've now blocked this account indefinitely. If you ever intend to return to non-vandalistic editing, I may reconsider.--Pharos 20:02, 19 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The various participants have other accounts which they are using for leigit posts. Spotteddogsdotorg 20:55, 19 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Can you give him his username back?

I screwed with this mean person enough since he did not give me the WCAU tape that I wanted from TV News Talk. Can you give him his user name back. I think he learned his lesson! MrPhillyTV 18:13, 31 July 2005 (UTC) It was User talk:Spotteddogsdotorg who did this to me. If you have an old WCAU video tape when they were CBS please help me![reply]

I have no idea what you're talking about. Your account is less than a half hour old, so I can't say anything about any alleged previous interaction between you and Spotteddogsdotorg. The reason Spotteddogsdotorg was banned has nothing to do with your brand-new account; the reason was continuous vandalism, which Spotteddogsdotorg never gave up on.--Pharos 18:47, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I hacked Spotteddogsdotorg account after he was mean to me on the televison news talk board. He had a very easy password that I was able to get. He promised to send me an old WCAU tape because my mother left me and I wanted to remember, but he did not. I then made all sorts of vandalisms using his name and a anonomus proxy software to get my revenge on him. He has also made fun of me there and has been really mean to me. You should not be mean to people that have had their mother left them. I think the revenge has ended now, but the people on the televison news talk board said I am crazy and was going to kill myself. I am not going to do either and I have given up on the televison news talk board since they are mean people who think I am crazy and have nothing to contribute. I showed that mean person that they are useless since they got screwed up here. Those people think I am crazy but I am not. I tried to hack Spotteddogsdotorg's website but he banned me. So I made it so I could screw with his preciuous Wikipedia. That is what you get when your mother leaves you. If you have any old WCAU newscasts when they were CBS please talk to me. Ever since my mother left I have wanted to relive those days. MrPhillyTV 17:23, 6 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Ilolluds.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ilolluds.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:22, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Id90s.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Id90s.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:15, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Mduds.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mduds.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:13, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Riuds.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Riuds.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:48, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:ANWPVI2005.jpg)

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:ANWPVI2005.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia.

Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. (I have kept it short because most of the things I would usually say you are, alas, unable to do.) --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:45, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Spotteddogsdotorg, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! -Localzuk^(talk) 01:48, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:LeonHarrisWJLA2005.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:LeonHarrisWJLA2005.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Localzuk^(talk) 01:48, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:WHDH-WSVN.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:WHDH-WSVN.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 21:20, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:NewsChannel4WNBC2005.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:NewsChannel4WNBC2005.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 05:08, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:IDKSTP2004.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:IDKSTP2004.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 05:08, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:MauriceDuBoisWCBS2005.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:MauriceDuBoisWCBS2005.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 05:11, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:BillRitterWABC2005.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:BillRitterWABC2005.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 05:17, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Wmaq.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Wmaq.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 17:21, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:SueSimmonsWNBC2005.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:SueSimmonsWNBC2005.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 03:25, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:EWNWUSA2004.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:EWNWUSA2004.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 03:26, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Qcuds.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Qcuds.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:09, 27 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ilse @ 21:09, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:JackCaffertyWNBC1980s.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:JackCaffertyWNBC1980s.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:06, 15 April 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Metros232 13:06, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:BrianWilliams-NBC2005.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:BrianWilliams-NBC2005.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:11, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:BolarisWCBS2005.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:BolarisWCBS2005.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:35, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:IEPromoWJLA1993.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:IEPromoWJLA1993.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Tony Sidaway 21:02, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:DanRather-CBS2005.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:DanRather-CBS2005.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. howcheng {chat} 23:18, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:IDWNVC2005.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:IDWNVC2005.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:13, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:2001.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:2001.jpg. However, the image is missing a fair use rationale. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair-use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 19:22, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:SadeBaderinwaWABC2005.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:SadeBaderinwaWABC2005.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:15, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:WNNABC1993.jpg

I have tagged Image:WNNABC1993.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 15:58, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:ChrisWraggeWCBS2005.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:ChrisWraggeWCBS2005.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:23, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:WNET 2005 - I001.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:WNET 2005 - I001.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Just to make things easier, I am making this a "global warning" for ALL of your WNET ident screencaps. Cite your rationale, or they may be deleted. ViperSnake151 13:53, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Wpxn.png

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Wpxn.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:37, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:IDYES2002.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:IDYES2002.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. aviper2k7 19:56, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Whyy.png

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Whyy.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:54, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:AlpineTowerNJN2001.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:AlpineTowerNJN2001.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --ChrisRuvolo (t) 13:04, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Warner_Wolf_WCBS_2003.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Warner_Wolf_WCBS_2003.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bigr Tex 18:09, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Njn.png

I have tagged Image:Njn.png as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 18:09, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:WNJU_2005_-_I000.jpg

I have tagged Image:WNJU_2005_-_I000.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 18:09, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:WLIW_2005_-_I001.jpg

I have tagged Image:WLIW_2005_-_I001.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 18:10, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:LenBermanWNBC2005.jpg

I have tagged Image:LenBermanWNBC2005.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 18:11, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:WickedWeatherWNYW2005.jpg

I have tagged Image:WickedWeatherWNYW2005.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 18:12, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:GabePressmanWNBC2005.jpg

I have tagged Image:GabePressmanWNBC2005.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 18:12, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:LAF80SWNBC2005.jpg

I have tagged Image:LAF80SWNBC2005.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 18:12, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:1974WNBC2004.jpg

I have tagged Image:1974WNBC2004.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 18:13, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:JimLehrerPBS2005.jpg

I have tagged Image:JimLehrerPBS2005.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 18:14, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:NHWJLPBS2005.jpg

I have tagged Image:NHWJLPBS2005.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 18:14, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:MiddayLogoCBC1997.jpg

I have tagged Image:MiddayLogoCBC1997.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 18:14, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:TedKoppell-ABC1995.jpg

I have tagged Image:TedKoppell-ABC1995.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 18:15, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:DianaWilliamsWPVI2005.jpg

I have tagged Image:DianaWilliamsWPVI2005.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 18:15, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:IDWWOR1989.jpg

I have tagged Image:IDWWOR1989.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 18:15, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Chuck&SueWNBC2005_.jpg

I have tagged Image:Chuck&SueWNBC2005_.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 18:15, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:SOUWCBS2005.jpg

I have tagged Image:SOUWCBS2005.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 18:15, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:EWNTEAMWABC1992.jpg

I have tagged Image:EWNTEAMWABC1992.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 18:16, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Chopper4CrashWABC_2004.jpg

I have tagged Image:Chopper4CrashWABC_2004.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 18:16, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:ChuckScarboroughWNBC2005.jpg

I have tagged Image:ChuckScarboroughWNBC2005.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 18:16, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:JaniceHuffWNBC2005.jpg

I have tagged Image:JaniceHuffWNBC2005.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 18:16, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:DonGermaiseWFTS2004.jpg

I have tagged Image:DonGermaiseWFTS2004.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 18:19, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:2018.jpg

I have tagged Image:2018.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 18:19, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:JimVanceWNBC2005.jpg

I have tagged Image:JimVanceWNBC2005.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 18:19, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:EWNKSTP2004.jpg

I have tagged Image:EWNKSTP2004.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 18:19, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:PerriPeltzWNBC2005.jpg

I have tagged Image:PerriPeltzWNBC2005.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 18:20, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Wakeupnews2005.jpg

I have tagged Image:Wakeupnews2005.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 18:20, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:MattLauerWNBC1994.jpg

I have tagged Image:MattLauerWNBC1994.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 18:21, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Hans0nDuBoisTINYWNBC1997.jpg

I have tagged Image:Hans0nDuBoisTINYWNBC1997.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 18:21, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:News4LiveAtFiveWNBC2005.jpg

I have tagged Image:News4LiveAtFiveWNBC2005.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 18:21, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:BBCWNPWLIW2005.jpg

I have tagged Image:BBCWNPWLIW2005.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 18:22, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:DarleneRodriguezWNBC2005.jpg

I have tagged Image:DarleneRodriguezWNBC2005.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 18:23, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:TaylorUsheryWNBC2005.jpg

I have tagged Image:TaylorUsheryWNBC2005.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 18:23, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:LarryKaneKYW1995.jpg

I have tagged Image:LarryKaneKYW1995.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 18:24, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:GeraldoRiveraFNC2004.jpg

I have tagged Image:GeraldoRiveraFNC2004.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 18:24, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:KaityTongWPIX1995.jpg

I have tagged Image:KaityTongWPIX1995.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 18:24, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:BillBeutelWABC1995.jpg

I have tagged Image:BillBeutelWABC1995.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 18:25, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:WBALANWNBC2005.jpg

I have tagged Image:WBALANWNBC2005.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 18:25, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:LyndaBaqueroWNBC2005.jpg

I have tagged Image:LyndaBaqueroWNBC2005.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 18:25, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:AlpineTowerNJN2001.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:AlpineTowerNJN2001.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:23, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Whyy.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Whyy.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:15, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Mpud.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mpud.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:36, 26 November 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 19:36, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Image:NY75FC.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:NY75FC.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:NY75FC.jpg is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:NY75FC.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 16:01, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:EWNKYW2005.jpg

I have tagged Image:EWNKYW2005.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. PhilKnight (talk) 13:16, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:EWNKYW Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:EWNKYW Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Bloonstdfan360 / talk / contribs 04:11, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:New York Liberty Plate.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:New York Liberty Plate.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:35, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of television shows filmed in New York City for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of television shows filmed in New York City is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of television shows filmed in New York City until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Interstellarity (talk) 23:39, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WMBC 2005 - I000.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WMBC 2005 - I000.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]