Jump to content

User talk:SounderBruce/Archive 21

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 < Archive 20    Archive 21    Archive 22 >
All Pages:  1 -  2 -  3 -  4 -  5 -  6 -  7 -  8 -  9 -  10 -  11 -  12 -  13 -  14 -  15 -  16 -  17 -  18 -  19 -  20 -  21 -  22 -  23 -  24 -  25 -  26 -  27 -  28 -  29 -  30 -  31 -  32 -  33 -  34 -  35 -  36 -  37 -  38 -  39 -  40 -  41 -  42 -  43 -  44 -  45 -  ... (up to 100)


The Center Line: Winter 2015

Volume 8, Issue 1 • Winter 2015 • About the Newsletter
Departments
Features
State and national updates
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
—MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979 (talk · contribs) 18:37, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have no problem with my edits being undone when proper policy is cited, but you misused rollback when none of the relevant criteria applied. Conifer (talk) 05:15, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Conifer: Ah, I misclicked. I meant to undo your edit, but I accidentally used the rollback instead. My apologies. SounderBruce 16:03, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Bay Freeway (Seattle)

The article Bay Freeway (Seattle) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Bay Freeway (Seattle) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Imzadi1979 -- Imzadi1979 (talk) 14:22, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

TWL HighBeam check-in

Hello Wikipedia Library Users,

You are receiving this message because the Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to HighBeam. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:

  • Make sure that you can still log in to your HighBeam account; if you are having trouble feel free to contact me for more information. When your access expires you can reapply at WP:HighBeam.
  • Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed. For more information about citing this source, see Wikipedia:HighBeam/Citations
  • Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, let us know and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.

Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services the Wikipedia Library can offer.

Thank you. Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 16:45, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Newspapers.com check-in

Hello SounderBruce,

You are receiving this message because you have a one-year subscription to Newspapers.com through the Wikipedia Library. This is a brief update, to remind you about that access:

  • Please make sure that you can still log in to your Newspapers.com account. If you are having trouble let me know.
  • Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, to include citations with links on Wikipedia. Links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed. Also, keep in mind that part of Newspapers.com is open access via the clipping function. Clippings allow you to identify particular articles, extract them from the original full sheet newspaper, and share them through unique URLs. Wikipedia users who click on a clipping link in your citation list will be able to access that particular article, and the full page of the paper if they come from the clipping, without needing to subscribe to Newspapers.com. For more information about how to use clippings, see http://www.newspapers.com/basics/#h-clips .
  • Do you write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, let me know and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.

Finally, we would greatly appreciate it if you filled out this short survey. Your input will help us to facilitate this particular partnership, and to discover what other partnerships and services the Wikipedia Library can offer.

Thank you,

Wikipedia Library Newspapers.com account coordinator HazelAB (talk) 18:29, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Center Line: Spring 2015

Volume 8, Issue 2 • Spring 2015 • About the Newsletter
Departments
Features
State and national updates
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
—MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979 12:17, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fuck it, do whatever you want. I don't care. But you seem to ignore the fact that the Sounders DID NOT play at CenturyLink in 2008 but rather at Starfire. http://web.archive.org/web/20080530023154/http://seattlesounders.com/gameschedule.php

@Crusty4545:: Yes, the Sounders did not play at Qwest in 2008. The main issue I had was your merging of the USL and MLS entries together. I've fixed the years in the infobox, but please refrain from similar edits (such as the one you made to Stade Saputo) in the future. SounderBruce 22:07, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@SounderBruce:: The main issue with the Saputo Stadium edit was the fact the Academy team withdrew from the CSL, the PDL team that took over the Academy team folded after last season, and the USL Pro has been renamed. In my defense, it can be argued that it is the same franchise considering that teams switch leagues constantly (NASL to MISL/WSA in the 80s) but retain predominantly the same players. Steve Zungul was traded from the New York Arrows to San Jose and continued to play for the NASL franchise. Same can be said about players with teams promoted from the USL/NASL to MLS. Players would have to re-sign with the "new" MLS franchises since MLS players are registered with the league and not the respective teams. Doesn't necessarily mean it's a new franchise considering it is the same makeup.
@Crusty4545: Having to re-sign is a strong argument for the separate franchises stance that several editors (including myself) have taken. While being bold is nice, please assume good faith and talk it out with us.
In the future, please sign your posts. You also don't need to ping me on my talk page. SounderBruce 01:58, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1. By that logic, Rangers FC was founded in 2012 instead of 1872 and that page should be edited as well. 2. I barely know how Wikipedia works. -Crusty4545

@Crusty4545: Take a look at the FAQ on the Rangers F.C. talk page for the answer. The league considers it a continuation of the club and the league's word is a reliable source. By the same standard, MLS considers these clubs new and thus should not be merged together. You can seek help at the new contributors' help page on editing Wikipedia and abiding by its guidelines. SounderBruce 02:21, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

How does that matter? The current New York Cosmos considers them a continuation of the former franchise. All they did was acquire the name from Pepe Pinton. Same can be said about the San Diego Sockers and the North American Soccer League. They haven't inherit anything but their name from the only franchises/league. Both Rangers and promoted MLS franchises have the same makeup and inherited players, coaches, owners, etc from the "previous franchises." And why would MLS reconigize their history pre-MLS if it has nothing to do with their league? Doesn't mean it's not a continuation of the franchise, it just means there's no relevance between the franchise's stint in the USL/NASL and MLS in general. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crusty4545 (talk • contribs) 02:35, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Crusty4545: It's all just a brand, really. They are separate entities that have separate entries in just about everything (state business records, USSF records, contracts, etc.) and thus need separate Wikipedia articles. SounderBruce 03:24, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, brand reconigtion=more revenue. But the current Rangers FC is seperate (http://imgur.com/NwFmH1t) from the "former" Rangers. Founded on 5/29/2012. If the Sounders are a new franchise, so should Rangers. Therefore their page should be edited as well.

You can bring it up on the Rangers talk page. The Rangers are a bit of a special case, though, so it won't be accepted. SounderBruce 04:01, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Snohomish County, Washington

Hello SounderBruce, you corrected my dates in above. Now you find others between text and infobox. Regards -- Sweepy (talk) 18:24, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Sweepy: I reverted your edits because it falsely stated that there was a census in 2014. The 2014 numbers are only estimates released by the state and should not be the only figure listed on the lead or infobox. SounderBruce 19:29, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Major League Soccer

Go to LA's page. Click on the link 'league's most decorated club' and it will take you to a --> WIKIPEDIA <-- page, the same one I provided a url towards, and you'll see LA at #2. That's the bottom line and everybody knows DC is #1. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MatiGOL85 (talk • contribs) 20:29, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@MatiGOL85: You cannot cite other Wikipedia articles. Please see our reference page on how to cite sources. I'd recommend using sources from the MLS website or an independent source before editing the MLS article any further. SounderBruce 21:07, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Swift Bus Rapid Transit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dwell time. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Does Sound Transit rename the segments when they come online, or will it be East Link Extension forever? Thought you might know. Brianhe (talk) 23:23, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Brianhe: The preliminary plan is to have service on East Link (from Northgate to Overlake) as the "Blue Line" and Northgate to Angle Lake as the "Red Line", according to a recent Northgate Link update and earlier plans from the 2012 station naming policy. The extension names (University, Northgate, Lynnwood, East, Federal Way, etc.) and Central Link will probably be retired and used solely to refer to the projects/history; we can probably keep and expand the extension articles independent of their lines, since they are interlined through the Northgate and University extensions (and possibly to Lynnwood). Interestingly, the Swift BRT network up in Snohomish County will also be switching from project names to colors very soon. SounderBruce
Interesting; maybe I'll add this to WP if it isn't already there. Brianhe (talk) 23:40, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Brianhe: I'd wait until Sound Transit officially releases the updated graphics and colors before we update the articles. I'm guessing they'll be ready before the University Link stations open early next year. Same goes for Swift, since I was told by CT staff that they'll be unveiling it before the 2015 general election in their run-up to a transit funding vote. SounderBruce 23:43, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
OK, maybe just an abbreviated version then. Brianhe (talk) 23:54, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have deleted all of my images, you mad bastard. Change it back!

And not even a note? Not any explanation at all? Why the fuck would you do that?? That's a super-great way to keep people contributing, don't you think? This is the SECOND time this has happened, and like I made perfectly clear the first time, if you had thought for one fucking second to look, these images are my husband's work. I'm uploading them with his explicit permission. We even changed the license on his website, of which I am the administrator (you didn't check that either did you??) to be compatible with wikimedia commons because the last asshole didn't believe me either.

I don't know how to fix this. It's a lot easier to do damage than to upload good content. You have done the damage and it is on you to fix it. Or perhaps I shall start deleting your work too?

Fix it now! Nate Wessel (talk) 11:20, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @Nate Wessel: You were notified on the Wikimedia Commons at your talk page, which is where the content was removed from. You may wish to request more information on why your images were removed for copyright reasons there. ~ RobTalk 11:23, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No, I was told that the images were deleted. That is not notification. That is action. Notification would give me a chance to defend myself. Nate Wessel (talk) 11:29, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker) @Nate Wessel: In cases of clear copyright infringement, it is not possible to provide notification before removal, as the wiki could face serious legal issues if copyrighted material were left up. ~ RobTalk 11:31, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
But obviously it is not such a case. Is that not yet clear to you? Nate Wessel (talk) 11:33, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Here is further evidence that this deletion was unwarranted. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Nate_Wessel#July_2015 I repeat my insistence that this change be reverted. I would also like to suggest that this user should have his ability to delete images revoked, as I think he has clearly abused the privilege by failing to do any research whatsoever before deleting and by failing to contact me first. Nate Wessel (talk) 14:52, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Swift Bus Rapid Transit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DOC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015 Seattle Sounders FC season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Erik Friberg. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Meetup to revitalize & prioritize WikiProject Seattle
In the Seattle area? Edit Wikipedia or Wikimedia sister projects? You are invited to help. Come to our first Meetup to revitalize & prioritize WikiProject Seattle on July 27, 2015, 6pm to 9pm, at Café Allegro
Yours, Peaceray
To unsubscribe from future messages from Wikipedia:Meetup/Seattle, please remove your name from this list. -MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:36, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia library Newspapers.com renewal

Your free one-year account with Newspapers.com will end on August 5 2015. Newspapers.com has offered to extend existing accounts by another year. If you wish to keep your account until August 5 2016, please add your name to the Account Renewal list here. I'll let Newspapers.com customer support know, and they will extend your subscription. If you don't want to keep your account for another year, you don't have to do anything. Your account will expire unless I hear from you that you want to keep it. All the best, HazelAB (talk) 14:38, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Community Transit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deadheading. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alphen aan den Rijn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pontoon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Amazon Tower II
added a link pointing to Open field
Dunsmuir Tunnel
added a link pointing to Granville Station

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Martha Lake Airport Park, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greenstone. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

California Fires template

So the merge discussion is still ongoing, but what do you think of this: User:Zackmann08/California fires navbox? --Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 01:03, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Zackmann08: Exactly what I thought it would look like. Great work. SounderBruce 01:06, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks my friend! What are your thoughts on the collapsible parts? I have mixed feelings... --Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 01:07, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Zackmann08: Have an option to have it in the collapsed state on a page (e.g. {{California fires|collapsed}}). If it's possible, you could have two collapsed options: one for season pages (seasons shown, major fires collapsed), and another for major fire pages (seasons collapsed, major fires shown). SounderBruce 01:09, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Now THATS good thinking!! --Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 01:10, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Check it out now. Even added some shortcuts. :-p What are your thoughts on the color scheme? Leave as is or use the orage from the other templates? --Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 01:29, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Zackmann08: Looks good. I'd keep the orange scheme from the infobox for consistency's sake. I'll be making the Washington navbox shortly. SounderBruce 01:36, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good! On a personal note, I see you are up in Washington? Hope you are doing well with all those fires. Stay safe. --Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 01:41, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm on the west side, so there's not much of a chance of me being threatened by a wildfire. However, the smoke from a few fires is covering the area and causing all sorts of air quality warnings. SounderBruce 01:43, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yea I'm a fire photographer down in Southern California... Our season doesn't even start for a few more months. --Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 02:27, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
With the merger done, how do I archive the discussion? I always forget the template for that. --Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 04:24, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Zackmann08: I'd wait for an admin to come along and close it. Just put a note saying the merger was finished. SounderBruce 04:37, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Question, why not display the coords in the title as well? --Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:00, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Zackmann08: It was a bit distracting having a title with coord on a template page. They should really only appear in the article itself and can be omitted from examples. SounderBruce 19:02, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FACEPALM I just realized that you removed it only from the actual example, NOT from the preformatted sample code. My bad. --Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:09, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. Something is going wrong with the image_size parameter... See the example below. Should default to 300px but it isn't. I can't figure out what is going wrong. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing)
{{Infobox wildfire
| title      = Moonlight Fire
| image      = Moonlight Fire.jpg
| image_size = 
}}
Moonlight Fire
@Zackmann08: It's been fixed by importing/stealing some code from another infobox template. SounderBruce 18:56, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I had no clue what the hell was going on there. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing)

Template:California wildfires

Did you happen to see what was going on with Template:California wildfires? Curious what your thoughts are on the colors. --Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:16, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shaping Seattle: Buildings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CityLab. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Seagull intersection

Hello SounderBruce and nice to see You are on Wikipedia. Lets discuss about this edit in WA-99.[1] Indeed, OSM does not list Broadway as part of the WA-99, but Google did. What about this Washington State Route 529#Major intersections? --Hans Haase (有问题吗) 09:56, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Hans Haase: You should definitely not be using Google Maps are the primary source for WA highway information, since it's very often inaccurate. The best sources would be the WSDOT State Highway Logs and the legislative definition of SR 99, both of which cite the Broadway Interchange (I-5, SR 99/Everett Mall Way, Broadway, SR 526 and SR 527) as the northern terminus. State Route 529, which you linked, is on a different segment of Broadway (at the very north end of Everett) and has never been on the stretch of Broadway where the seagull intersection is. SounderBruce 17:04, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Great, thank You so much and thank You for the pictures. It is what I have been looking for. --Hans Haase (有问题吗) 00:01, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Center Line: Summer 2015

Volume 8, Issue 3 • Summer 2015 • About the Newsletter
Departments
Features
State and national updates
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
—MediaWiki message delivery (talk) delivered on behalf of Imzadi1979 05:23, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015 Seattle Sounders FC season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marco Delgado. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:MAX Orange Line

I've seen your edits to a couple MAX Orange Line articles, so thought I'd point out to you that I have created redirects for some of the other MAX stations that are scheduled to open soon. I hope they are named correctly (I was just clicking on existing red links to create them). Please feel free to help expand these articles if you have any interest. Keep up the great work! ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:04, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Another Believer: I'll go around and fill out those redirects into full articles once the line opens on Saturday. Cheers. SounderBruce 20:53, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Fantastic! ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:55, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

/r/MLS

Hey SounderBruce, its Quidster4040 from reddit. I'm thinking of working on the article that was the first ever MLS match.

I'm guessing an apt title would be "San Jose Clash v D.C. United (April 1996)"? Quidster4040 (talk) 20:13, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Quidster4040: I don't think that match is notable enough (under the sports game guidelines) to have its own article beyond what could be covered in the season article. Please read over those notability guidelines, as well as the match article template, and look through some existing single-match non-cup articles (Category:Association football matches and its sub-categories). Happy editing. SounderBruce 20:20, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Quidster4040: Also, some of your sandboxes and other userpages might violate WP:WEBHOST. Be aware. SounderBruce 20:23, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New Lake Washington floating bridge

Hey SounderBruce, do you know if the new 520 bridge has a name? I'd like to update the Evergreen Point Floating Bridge article. We'll have to rejigger the lede to distinguish the Rosselini Memorial Bridge from the new bridge. As you've probably noticed it's nearly complete now. I took some shots from the air last week File:New 520 bridge August 2015 01.jpg and File:New 520 bridge August 2015 02.jpg (and a few more I didn't upload). — Brianhe (talk) 00:09, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Brianhe: None that I know of yet. WSDOT will probably unveil the name at the ribbon-cutting ceremony next year or even keep the Evergreen Point/Governor Rosellini moniker. I've started a draft for the new replacement's own article based on the articles for the Bay Bridge and Tappan Zee replacements. SounderBruce 00:14, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That's cool. I wonder if there are architectural drawings somewhere? I'd like to document the different parts of the bridge; it's interesting from an engineering point of view with a mix of floating sections, cantilevered sections and conventional beam sections on pilings. Also the deck-elevated-on-pontoon design is fascinating; do you know why that was chosen? Maybe I'll try my hand at making a side-view line drawing of it. — Brianhe (talk) 01:10, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Brianhe: This Flickr image from WSDOT has a side-view drawing and an explanation for the elevated design. The project library on WSDOT's SR 520 site probably has the architectural drawings, as it seems all projects nowadays publish them as appendices to their EIS. SounderBruce 01:34, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sporting Kansas City

Front Office is located in Missouri

http://www.sportingkc.com/contact-us

Sporting Kansas City (formerly Kansas City Wizards) from Kansas City, Missouri is one of the ten founding clubs of Major League Soccer. They are currently and have always been a Missouri team. Kansas does not have a major professional sports team, much less an MLS team. Sporting built a new stadium in Kansas City, Kansas in 2011 but has never changed locations. It is misleading to have Sporting Kansas City listed with a Kansas location. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jkeiltaylor (talk • contribs) 20:45, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jkeiltaylor: Alright, it looks good. I'd like to apologize for the revert of your edits (the MLS page attracts a lot of unwanted changes from new editors so it's policed by several editors). Please add that citation into the Sporting Kansas City article. SounderBruce 20:52, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@SounderBruce: I'm glad you guys are policing this and making sure it is accurate. I should have expected my change to be reverted since I didn't provide any citation. Thank you for your help.--Jkeiltaylor (talk) 23:06, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Wildland Firefighting

Template:Wildland Firefighting has been nominated for merging with Template:Firefighting. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:02, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New Wiki Project

Question... Would you have any interest in creating a new WikiProject Wildfires? We both seem to have a passion for editing these types of pages... Could be fun. As with all projects no obligations... Anyway let me know your thoughts. --Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:52, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Zackmann08: Maybe have it as a task force under the Disaster management or Firefighting wikiprojects for maximum exposure. I'd join but only work on Washington/Pacific Northwest articles for the most part. SounderBruce 04:18, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okanogan Complex Removal

The information was inaccurate stating the fire was not the largest in state history. By definition a "complex" is multiple fires in the same area. They do not need to merge to be considered "one" fire by the incident commander, the State of Washington and the Federal Government. Source: Firefighter who fought the fire in question. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.221.128.97 (talk) 11:44, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@73.221.128.97: Your removal of content was not appropriate. I'm not an expert in the field, but at the very least including the national media's declaration and subsequent correction by a local newspaper is notable for inclusion. SounderBruce 21:12, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re: MAX Orange Line

Thank you for cleaning up the article titles and expanding articles for the stations. Much appreciated! ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:48, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Another Believer: No problem. The titles were bothering me a little and would probably mess up a few templates or redirects down the line. SounderBruce 19:19, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I was not sure of the best naming convention. Different sources use different titles (with or without street abbreviations, for example). Thanks again. ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:06, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Another Believer: When in doubt, use the official stop list and/or official map (the former here is preferred). SounderBruce 23:08, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I was going off the Catch the Orange website and/or signage at the stops themselves. But I totally yield to whatever you feel is more appropriate based on WP's own naming conventions. :) ---Another Believer (Talk) 23:10, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Another Believer: There's actually a huge debate going on over at WT:USSTATION over these naming conventions and what sources to use (and whether to harmonize/standardize names across the board, which is kind of nuts). Lots of reading but might be worth a look. SounderBruce 23:16, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Laabs

If you find time for it, please take a look at the article about Gustav Laabs. Any help is appreciated and I will of course add you to the DYK nom for the article.--BabbaQ (talk) 22:38, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bridge issue

I know you removed the information from that article from me and another editor, and I do not take offense to that personally. My only issue is that the information has made national news (that is how I heard of it in Arizona from multiple news alerts on my phone), and has a lot of citations out there. I also assume that you meant to cite this page instead of the one you cited, as the other one just leads to a general disambiguation page. Anyways, there is a difference between a fatal (and unfortunately, routine) car accident on a bridge, and one that makes national news, especially since it appears that exchange students were involved. We could easily create tallies for bridge deaths if we wanted, but it would not make sense. At the same time, this is an event where the national press covered it, so there is clearly something going on here that warrants greater attention. I could understand how a regular death would not be worth mentioning, but this tragedy has so far killed twice as many as the bus incident right above it, and that one has been on the page for years. I am more than willing to add more citations though, as I am not comfortable keeping this information off the page as it stands right now. Finally, I do appreciate the fixing of that bus route though, as I misread that and did not catch the mistake until you caught that, so thanks for fixing that. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 05:30, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking the diplomatic approach to this. I'm still waiting to see exactly what kind of lasting impact this accident will have on the bridge (the discussion is leaning towards reducing lanes and adding a median); the Metro bus accident managed to actually damage the bridge itself as well as force some changes in Metro policy (also the route number, which by itself isn't notable). I'll hold off on editing that article for now while awaiting the WSDOT/SDOT response. SounderBruce 14:55, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Seattle Sounders FC

Listen Sounder Bruce. That is not repetition, all other MLS clubs have a year by year record and I place time and effort to make sure Seattle has one on their page as well. No one else says that is repetition and that Is frustrating when anyone says that and takes it off with ridiculous assumptions. It is for others to see their accomplishments on the page. Bluhaze777 (talk) 15:12, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is repetition because there is already an article (at List of Seattle Sounders FC seasons that has the same exact table. The FA review for the Sounders article determined that it didn't need such a table, which would grow and eat up more and more of the page as time went on. SounderBruce 15:28, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Center Line: September 2015

The Center Line
Volume 8, Issue S1 • September 2015 • About the Newsletter

Happy 10th Anniversary!
—delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979 (talk) on 23:58, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Lab at the UW Research Commons

 What: Wikipedia Lab
When: Weekly on Mondays, starting 10/5/2015 through 11/30/2015, 4:30pm-6:30pm
Who: UW students, faculty, and staff; Wikimedians; Seattle community members
Where: UW Research Commons
Focus: Women and the Sciences in October and Pacific Northwest in November; weekly topics
Wikipedia Lab at the UW Libraries Research Commons brings together local Wikipedia experts with University of Washington subject specialists and UW community members to learn about editing Wikipedia. Come contribute vital, local, and corrective content to the world's largest online encyclopedia. Come as you are with questions, ideas, or content knowledge to share!

The Wikipedia Lab will run weekly, every Monday, during fall quarter. The Lab has two thematic focuses: Women in the Sciences and the Pacific Northwest. Each week will feature a special collections librarian content specialist and Wikipedian editors. Sponsored by the UW Libraries & Wikimedians User Group

To unsubscribe from future messages from Wikipedia:Meetup/Seattle, please remove your name from this list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:17, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request for comment!

Since you've done some work on fire articles, would love you to comment on this discussion about what qualifies as a current wildfire if you have a moment. --Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:07, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Tamil American

I invite you to the ongoing RM discussion. --George Ho (talk) 04:57, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited G4 Beijing–Hong Kong–Macau Expressway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Toll booth. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:08, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015 Seattle Sounders FC season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Erik Friberg. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am so glad...

... you were able to attend last weekend's conference, and it was truly a pleasure meeting you. Hope you had a nice time, learned some things, and will continue making such great contributions to this project. Hope to see you again soon! ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:19, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New Companies delsort category

Hi SounderBruce: Just a heads up that a new deletion sorting page was created on 16 October 2015 for companies, located at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Companies. Thanks for your work in performing deletion sorting on Wikipedia. North America1000 16:41, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New Disability delsort category

Hi: Just a heads up that a new deletion sorting page was created on 19 October 2015 for Disability-related articles, located at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Disability. Thanks for your work in performing deletion sorting on Wikipedia. North America1000 18:10, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Center Line: November 2015

—delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979 (talk) on 22:59, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

With five or six East Links thruout the world, there is no reason to believe that Seattle's is more important than the others. East Link (Sound transit) is the non-ambiguous link. I redirected East Link to the disambiguation page, since the difference between a space and a hyphen isn't enough to make the name unambiguous. You'll notice that the links all display as East Link - meaning that East Link appears on the screen for the reader. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:06, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Citylink (Idaho), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bicycle rack. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Editathon work

Hi SounderBruce, I see that you signed up for the UW editathon(s) and probably contributed while there. I've been trying to track as much of the resulting work as possible to gauge the success of the editathon and surrounding announcements. Would you mind adding tags to any articles that came out of that work, or if you prefer, tell me what you worked on and I will tag them? You can use {{UWRCWikiLab 8}} for the last event, for instance. Thanks! - Brianhe (talk) 09:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

for your welcome message. I see I should have disclosed that I am a librarian with the Washington State Department of Transportation before editing. That's now on my user page. Please forgive me. Apoultra (talk) 18:00, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Apoultra: It's alright, seeing as you're not here for nefarious reasons. Feel free to ask me any questions you have. SounderBruce 19:41, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Westlake station name

I feel there's a good argument for our Link station being "Westlake station" on Wikipeda. The disambiguation page lists "Westlake / MacArthur Park" in Los Angeles and "West Lake" in Atlanta. So our station is the only "Westlake". Thoughts? --RickyCourtney (talk) 23:21, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@RickyCourtney: I think the idea has merit (same with your Pioneer Square move...which steps on the toes of Portland's similarly-named stations), but I'd rather not try and complicate things even more right now. Let things cool off and re-propose the idea. SounderBruce 23:42, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cascadia userbox

This user is a board member of the Cascadia Wikimedians User Group

Feel free to display this userbox, if it suits you. – Brianhe (talk) 11:57, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Seeking advice

Hello SounderBruce, I need your advice.

Over the past 40-some years, the Washington State Department of Transportation has published hundreds of research reports, you can see the list here: http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Research/Reports/

Most of the research is done by third parties, often universities. We would like to make these reports available through Wikipedia since it is so widely used.

However, is it a violation of the "No original research" tenet to write an article on the subject of a report and then cite that report? For example an article on Compost Leachates (one does not currently exist) and refer back to this report?

Experimental Evaluation of Compost Leachates. Abtract: http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Research/Reports/800/848.1.htm Full text: http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/research/reports/fullreports/848.1.pdf

Thanks Apoultra (talk) 21:52, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reaching out, @Apoultra: It is absolutely not a violation of the original research policy to cite those reports. In fact, it's encouraged as a core tenant of Wikipedia (as part of the Verifiability policy), as these are considered reliable sources by virtue of being government-produced documents.
I also suggest looking into the GLAM ("galleries, libraries, archives, and museums") initiative, which helps librarians like you share resources with Wikipedia. I can bring in some other local editors (who meet up regularly in Seattle) who have more experience with the program and the process. I'd be more than happy to work with you especially, since I have a huge interest in local transportation that has been greatly helped by WSDOT's online resources. SounderBruce 22:28, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited West Edge Tower, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Condominiums. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

North Korea

Thanks for the edit to the ref - it's 0430am and I don't want to start messing about with wikicode at this time of the morning, but also didn't want to miss the responses - so thanks for for cleaning that up for me! :) Calvinkarpenko (talk) 04:35, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Calvinkarpenko: It's only 8 p.m. here, so I'll try to keep it updated and growing as long as I can. I'm quite surprised there wasn't an article up even earlier. SounderBruce 04:36, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@SounderBruce: No worries - I anticipate that it will be accepted as a headline so more editors will contribute as the day passes. I was surprised as well actually - I expected there to be one full of information by the time I checked - as tends to be the case. Calvinkarpenko (talk) 04:39, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Linkrot

You just posted Linkrot on both Mike O'Brien (Seattle politician) and Ventura County Line. I have contributed to neither of those are articles, though I clearly believe in link rot as I discuss in my user page. So its not my "laziness" you are complaining about. But I will complain about your laziness. If you read the link rot tag you just defaced those articles with, it tells you how to use refill. Instead of leaving that obnoxious tag on the top, if you are so concerned about link rot, do something about it. Just push the button and wait. Then you have fixed the "problem" you detected, you can be satisfied and you don't bother someone else to clean up the mess you left. That would be doing wikipedia some good. The average reader sees stuff like that tag on the top of the article and thinks there is something wrong. It hurts the overall credibility of wikipedia. I clearly don't believe there is anything wrong with the link rot in the first place but needless tags bother me. That's the problem I'm trying to solve by talking to you. You are the one bothered by by the link rot. As an experienced editor, if you care, when you see a problem you should also fix it, rather than leaving a tag announcing your single opinion that there is something wrong with the article to the entire world. Trackinfo (talk) 04:13, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Trackinfo: The average reader doesn't care for tags at all. A few uses of a tag (one that exists and is well-used enough to be integrated into Twinkle) will not bring down Wikipedia's credibility. Being called out on my "laziness" is irritating, considering that my goal here is to write content and not necessarily to be janitor. If I come across a problem, I flag and tag, and some kinder soul will come along and acknowledge and correct the issue; this is a normal process and perfectly fine, as it is used commonly off-wiki in the real world. SounderBruce 05:45, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
and some kinder soul will come along and acknowledge and correct the issue is exactly the laziness I referred to. Leave the problem, the problem nobody else saw, for somebody else to fix. Drive by tagging. If you found a body lying in the middle of a road, would you help, or just call 911 and keep driving? Trackinfo (talk) 06:33, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

W15 meetup

Wikipedia 15 meetup in Seattle, January 16, 2016

You might consider using this for inviting others to the meetup. The code is {{Wikipedia:Meetup/Seattle/W15}}. Cheers – Brianhe (talk) 01:34, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia 15 meetup in Seattle

Wikipedia 15 meetup in Seattle, January 16, 2016
In the Seattle area?

You are invited to celebrate Wikipedia's 15th anniversary at the Wikipedia 15 meetup in Seattle on Saturday, January 16, 2016, 12:15pm to 5pm at the University of Washington Communications building, Room 126.

12:15 Potluck lunch
 1:00 Lightning talks and presentations


To unsubscribe from future messages from Wikipedia:Meetup/Seattle, please remove your name from this list. -MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:37, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Seattle Post-Intelligencer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ed Murray. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
For quick work on the 2016 Jakarta attacks. Tom W (talk) 09:15, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Marysville, Washington

Hello, SounderBruce. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Marysville".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 13:49, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Diligence
Thanks for your efforts to keep the Alaskan Way Tunnel articles up to date. Topics with so many twists and bumps in the road often fall out of date without constant care. Good work! Dennis Bratland (talk) 03:10, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Because no hat trick should go uncompleted. –Fredddie™ 03:16, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SounderBruce/Archive_21&oldid=1209062029"