Jump to content

User talk:Sionk/Archive 9

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 5←Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9Archive 10Archive 11→Archive 15


William Lupien bio

Sionk, I don't understand why you consider the numerous sources cited in the article to be unreliable. All of the industry magazine articles (references [10]-[29]) would fit within the category of news sources, which are generally considered reliable sources by Wikipedia standards, and without exception, they prominently feature Lupien as the key person involved in both Instinet and OptiMark. The same goes for the Harvard Business School case studies (references [1],[2] and [31]). Even the title of one of the articles ([14], Equities, "Wild Bill Rides Again") refers to Lupien by first name, thus indicating his name familiarity in the industry. Wikipedia's entry on Instinet (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instinet) describes Lupien as the key player in bringing Instinet to prominence in the securities industry. Lupien has in fact done as much as any man alive today to transform the securities industry from a mainly manual, exchange floor and telephone based operation to the modern age of electronic networks. Other Wikipedia entries on executives in the financial industry (e.g., Jamie Dimon, Lloyd Blankfein, Ray Dalio) inseparably link these individual's significance to their leadership positions within their corresponding firms (J.P. Morgan, Goldman Sachs, and Bridgewater Associates, respectively). If you need further convincing, I can put you in touch with prominent individuals in the securities industry who will vouch for Lupien's significance.97.118.143.18 (talk) 17:37, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Sionk, I've heard nothing from you re my previous post (above) in over a month.97.118.137.46 (talk) 14:44, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

I've nothing else to add. Sources need to be reliable and substantially about Lupien, not passing mentions. Sionk (talk) 17:25, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Sionk, with all due respect, describing the references cited as "passing mentions" about Lupien indicates to me that you have not read any of them, else you would not make such an inaccurate comment. I request another editor in order to appeal your refusal to publish this bio.97.118.137.46 (talk) 13:32, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Maybe the best solution would be to ask advice or a second opinion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk. Sionk (talk) 18:16, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Article for review - April Byron

Hi Sionk,

You reviewed (and declined) my submission about April Byron, Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/April_Byron. I have made the suggested edits - removing obscure sources and replacing with more verifiable and relevant citations. Also removed genealogical heading and listed only relevant ancestral history (similar to that featured in 'early life and beginnings' section of Olivia Newton-John).

I am hoping I have it right this time, as I would very much like to get an article about April approved asap! She is an important link in Australian music history and I know others would love to have her information included on the site.

If you would be able to take another look and let me know if the article is acceptable now, I would greatly appreciate it! As this is my first wiki article (and my third attempt at having it approved :/ ), suggestions/help would be fantastic. Thanks so much! Amyhausen (talk) 20:04, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Tanisha Scott submission

Hello Sionk,

Thanks for your feedback. I will supply more evidence of my subject's Wikipedia worthiness, but I want to note that she has been nominated for MTV VMA Awards in the Choreographer category three times and Tanisha Scott has been noted for her choreography on current Wikipedia pages. So, in addition to her working with famous people, she has been acknowledged by the music industry and in her profession as a choreographer of note. Do her nominations and Wikipedia mentions not reflect her worthiness?

KimberlyKimwrites (talk) 20:46, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Dinesh Swamy

This is my first article made for dinesh swamy in Wikipedia. I was gathering content for him. so I followed him on linkedin. I have gone through the guidelines and rephrased the content. Let me know your thoughts so that I can improvise. Thank you.Prernasw (talk) 16:47, 25 October 2013 (UTC)


Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Filippo Drago

Dear Sionk, you've declined the submission of the Articles for creation/Filippo Drago, adding the comment: Few (if any) reliable secondary sources. Has Professor Drago and/or his work(s) been written about in newspapers, magazines or academic papers? Professor Drago is the author of many acedemic papers see at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Filippo Drago In the last year (2013) he published 20 academic articles He also author of several books: “Farmacologia Oculare Vol.5” (Mediconsult Editrice, Catania) “Trattato di Farmacologia Oculare” (UTET, Torino) “La Prova Scritta di Farmacologia” (Spazio Libri,Catania) “O’Connor Davies’s Farmaci Oftalmici” (Piccin,Padova) He is member of Editorial Office of Academic Journals such as: European Journal of Pharmacology(Editor in Chief: Prof. W.H. Gispen, Elsevier, Amsterdam), Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health(Editor in Chief: Prof. M.G. Carta, Bio-Med Central, New York) and of Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics(Editor in Chief: Prof. C. Crosson). He is co-editor of “Farmacologia – Principidi base e applicazioni terapeutiche” (Minerva Medica, Torino) He has appeared in several italian TV programs promoting scientific information: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3TWj1di0iiI He is the organizer of an important summer school in Neuroscience, taken in Catania, Italy. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hnGc1P13LQo He is a notable worldwide pharmacologist: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UDa9zbqOTVk

I think that thera many reliable sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pchemc (talk • contribs) 14:27, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

They are not. They are things authored by him, not about him, as I thought I made clear in my comment on the draft article. Sionk (talk) 14:39, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Dear Sionk, you are right about the books, however academic publications are cited, so are about him and his work.

All references of the wikipedia article of professor Drago are secondary and third-party sources. The curriculum vitae of professor Drago is available from secondary source such as: https://www.ecnp.eu/~/media/Files/ecnp/.../CV Drago.pdf‎ http://www.frontiersin.org/people/u/16703/profile

If you look to these youtube videos, all of that are about him and not authored by him: He has appeared in several italian TV programs promoting scientific information: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3TWj1di0iiI He is the organizer of an important summer school in Neuroscience, taken in Catania, Italy. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hnGc1P13LQo He is a notable worldwide pharmacologist: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UDa9zbqOTVk

Even the on-line information sites such as: http://www.lasiciliaweb.it/articolo/101616 shows article about him. Most of articles and references about him are on-line. Can the on-line articles about him considered secondary sources? If not let me know how to overcome this problem, because there are many information about this pharmacologist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pchemc (talk • contribs) 10:47, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Sylvia Schwartz

Thank you very much Sionk for your advice concerning Sylvia Schwartz's biography. I'll follow your advice and resubmit the draft. Basil Carmody (backwards of) Lisaby 15:05, 27 October 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lisaby (talk • contribs) Hi Sionk, I added your references and resubmitted the article. Editing Wikipedia is a bit like MS DOS used to be. One forgets all the conventions quickly and it'a a bit difficult at first to re-learn them, but -once back up to speed - it's fun to do. I'm giving myself any free time I can find until tommorrow evening to keep on adding to the article.Lisaby 21:38, 29 October 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lisaby (talk • contribs)

Grinberg method

Hi Sionk, in this entry there is a verification tag near Avi Grinberg being a paramedic. I have check the information and know that it's correct. What to I need to do in order to remove the tag? Do I need to get a hold of some kind of formal document and send it to you? Do you have another idea? Thanks a lot. --Shulas (talk) 15:21, 27 October 2013 (UTC)


Nora Denzel

Hi Sionk,

Thanks for reviewing my entry for submission. I was curious about the reason for denial, that my "references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability." I had 11 references from notable sources. Can you please explain further? Is it because I cite her own site? Would removing it while keeping the others help? I have re-read the sections on notably and believe Nora Denzel qualifies. Any advice would be appreciated.

Thanks very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.15.2.181 (talk) 00:24, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

You need to read the whole message for example "see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule" - her personal website, LinkedIn, YouTube etc. don't count towards notability. I didn't think the brief "Top 10" (in an obscure news website) and "Top 25" profiles were extensive enough and significant enough by themselves. I realise she's a woman successfully working in a very male dominated industry, but the reliable news sourcing is too weak at the moment. Sionk (talk) 01:27, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Tony Grey Submission

Dear Sionk,

Thank you for reviewing my Tony Grey submission. You have rejected it because of "unreliable sources." I am confused, as the sources seem to be quite reliable. (Bass Musician Magazine etc.) I reviewed what was a wikipedia reliable source and the ones I used seem to fit the bill. Could you tell me specifically what is wrong with the sources I used? Thank you. - Walter Wkolosky (talk) 13:56, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

It was rejected because it "is not adequately supported by reliable sources". The strongest source is an interview in Bass Musician Magazine, Grey talking about himself, so not tremendously independent. His notability needs to be established by citing significant journalistic coverage about him; the biographical info needs to be verifiable using published sources. Sionk (talk) 14:03, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Lane Sutton COI

Hi Sionk,

I understand that you may find a conflict of interest on the page. However, I have tried to maintain an unbiased view by including more fact-based information and looked at similar pages to get an idea. Most of the information has been cited that should have it. Can you provide any advice as to revising the phrasing and wording of the article so that it does stay neutral, but also how to de-orphan it?

Thank you. Lanesutton (talk) 23:49, 30 October 2013 (UTC)Lanesutton

Declined Articles for creation/LugLess

Greetings: I have been told that one of the sources (Crain's) was under-cited, so I cited it additional times because the information seems solid, but am uncertain if this is acceptable practice. Also, there are several notable media outlets covering the organization, and I included a couple more references. Do you think it requires a press mention section or additional references? Thank You! Vitopian (talk) 00:38, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Howard Roberts politician

Hi Sionk,

I am a little perplexed that you have rejected my article on this politician based on notability and references. I do feel both are addressed by the original article. This is my first Wikipedia article and so I would appreciate your feedback.

Best wishes, MD. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.165.57.25 (talk) 19:18, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

What makes you think he meets Wikipedia's notability criteria? This isn't the place for every elected local councillor to have a profile. Sionk (talk) 20:39, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Peter York Solmssen article

Can you help me and tell me why Peter York Solmssen page was rejected and steer me towards someone who can help.RebeccaHS (talk) 00:45, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

The article hasn't been rejected yet. I don't know why a message was left on your Talk page. However, you'll need to show that Solmssen has been widely noticed, per Wikipedia's 'golden rule'. It looks like most of the news sources mention him only briefly, at best. Sionk (talk) 00:57, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Dean Mosher

Thank you for reviewing the article and tidying it up. Since the article is published I am wondering: even though my COI in this is second-hand, would it be more appropriate of me to suggest changes on the Talk page rather than editing directly? Are minor typo fixes still acceptable for me to edit? It's just my first time having any sort of coi so I want to make sure. Thanks again! -WarthogDemon 15:33, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Heidi Feek

Thank you for reviewing the article request for Heidi Feek. I was wondering what the Wikipedia criteria for "news sources" includes, as American Songwriter, The Boot, and the Nashville Scene all are included under news headings for Google? A quick Google search of her name will show that she has already garnered significant, reputable news coverage. Thank you. 68.53.120.67 (talk) 00:22, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

I don't have a link to your draft article so can't look at it again. See WP:42 for the sort of things we need to see. Sionk (talk) 00:46, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Here you go. Thanks: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Heidi_Feek#Heidi_Feek 68.53.120.67 (talk) 04:44, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

American Songwriter and the Nashville Scene are both reputable print news sources. AOL's The Boot is also classified as a news source under Google. She is featured within many more upstanding news outlets if you Google her (CMT, Billboard, etc). She is an established artist. Please let me know why the sources listed were grounds to decline the article. 68.53.120.67 (talk) 05:10, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Judgig by the one source that is accessible online, these are brief announcements or reviews about different music/video releases. They're not about her. However, if one of her albums or singles was widely reviewed, or one of them charted nationally then Heidi Feek might meet Wikipedia's alternative notability requirements for musicians. Sionk (talk) 11:30, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK for The Vulcan, Cardiff

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:43, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Jim Cummins (Photojournalist)

Sionk - I have made several additions to the references as suggested. Could you take another look and let me know what you think. Seems like I have much better references than may wiki posts so I am surprised to not be accepted at this point. Thanks Mike Mjjjhjemjsrj (talk) 02:49, 5 November 2013 (UTC) Mjjjhjemjsrj

Sionk - incorporated your comments and found some excellent additional references to add. The new 1. and 2. references on top the the liked reference to the NY Times article should do the trick. On top of that cleaned up the text a bit more. I was hoping you could review as I have been working on this for quite some time and hoping someone who has already reviewed could take a quick look. Mjjjhjemjsrj (talk) 20:17, 15 November 2013 (UTC)Mjjjhjemjsrj

I'm not going to waste my time. YouTube and photo-sharing websites aren't "excellent additional references". See again Wikipedia's golden rule. Sionk (talk) 23:24, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Catherine Gund page

Hi Sionk, I appreciate your reviewing this page. I've made a few changes per your comments on page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Catherine_Gund. I removed "award-winning" realizing it's pretty vague and added more concrete awards along with citations in the body. I've also added more references outside of Gund's company-related pages. Let me know if there are any remaining issues to be resolved. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aubinpics (talk • contribs) 21:37, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

A difficult one. Currently the sources are still very poor, mainly non-independent ones - for example the Emmy nomination is cited to a press release by Independent Television. Because she was the producer, not the director or a creative individual who made the documentary, I'm not sure she can claim the credit for the Emmy. In my view, you'd still need to find reliable news coverage about Gund, or prove she's credited with creating a work that has been widely recognised. Sionk (talk) 14:41, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Article/advice

Hi Sionk! What can I do to improve this article? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Nicola_Pfund Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.65.152.12 (talk) 09:54, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

See the explanation and advice left at the top of the article, in particular Wikipedia's 'golden rule'. Sionk (talk) 11:15, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the answer. Particularly what is weak, "significant coverage", Reliable sources" or "Independent"? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.65.152.12 (talk) 11:38, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Thomas Cook India - Wiki Content

Hi Sionk,

My article on Thomas Cook India has been declined on 26th October 2013. Here is the link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Thomas_Cook_India_Ltd

It says:"This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources."

I have added all the possible citations wherever possible. I have been trying to get this successfully reviewed since quite long now.

I would be of great help if you could guide me through the same. We can take a call or Skype to further solve this.

Your help would be highly appreciated.

Kind Regards, Sid```` — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thomas Cook India Ltd (talk • contribs) 11:46, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Mark Burnett bio

I do not understand why you reviewed my article for speedy deletion. I clearly provided reliable references. Makro (talk) 21:38, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

There's no proof or any claims of notability. He's a young film maker that has produced one non notable film. Sionk (talk) 21:47, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

That may be your opinion, he and the film are recognised on IMDB. I have checked all the boxes for this article to be entered onto wikipedia. Makro (talk) 01:53, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Check Wikipedia's WP:GNG and WP:CREATIVE guidelines - we don't list every person who has ever made a film. Sionk (talk) 10:27, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

John Hurst

Thank you for creating the article on John Hurst Magerius (talk) 22:37, 7 November 2013 (UTC)Andrew Selkirk

My pleasure! You did all the hard work, well done! Sionk (talk) 22:47, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Florence Mildred White

I am naturally disappointed that you have rejected my Article for Creation Florence Mildred White. I think you have misunderstood an important point. I have not stated that Mildred White was the first woman to be attested as a female constable. This is because these things were very fluid at the time and some women were called constables but they did not have the power of arrest, pension or other benefits of their male counterparts. I have stated that Mildred White was the first 'documented' woman constable and I have included the evidence mainly from the Police Museum Birmingham and other records to prove this. Because she had this status from day one of her police career she was different from all the other female constables, and was unique. The proof of this is further sourced by Dorothy Peto in her book which I have included. Could I ask you to re read my article bearing this in mind? TimothyWF (talk) 16:06, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Procedural keep

Given your new found interest and slew of editing at the article, perhaps now is the time to take the sensible step of withdrawing the nomination and leave it to pass as a procedural 'keep.' It clearly meets criteria 1 and 12 of the relevant notability guideline. (As for observational documentary, Google disputes your opinion.) Blackberry Sorbet (talk • contribs) 19:52, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Far from it. I was simply trying to correct the Kafka-esque assertions that the choir was something other than it actually was, as per my explanation on the article's Talk page. Sionk (talk) 20:00, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

DOLLS page marked for deletion

HI Sionk,

I have re-edited the page and included further links to the artists' profile on MuchMusic, Canada's only music station, where the artist had 2 video hits charting in the top 10 and 20 countdown, and CHUM Radio (a partner) and Virgin Radio Canada also charted the artist's former project in the commercial pop 10/20. I've also removed most of the quotes from blogs as you requested.

Could you please have another look at the article?

Thanks

Lexiekent (talk) 08:44, 12 November 2013 (UTC)


A Barnstar for You!

The AFC Backlog Buster Barnstar

Congratulations, Sionk! You're receiving the Tireless Contributor Barnstar because you reviewed 139 articles during the recent AFC Backlog elimination drive! Thank you for you contributions to Wikipedia at-large and helping to keep the backlog down. We hope you continue reviewing submissions and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! --Mdann52talk to me! 19:28, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Time to Change (mental health campaign)

The DYK project (nominate) 16:04, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Walden C. Rhines‎

The references to Dr. Rhine's notability include citations from Forbes, The Wall Street Journal, Bloomberg, The Business Journal, EDN, Embedded Computing, IEEE Explore, EDA Cafe, Moringstar, the Computer History Museum, and SEMI/SEMATECH. I don't know what you mean by "stuff off the internet" but these are among the most respected publications in the electronics industry and the world in general. Other references establish the validity of facts in his CV. If you take a look at the "An Oral History of Wally Rhines," Computer History Museum, you will see a great amount of detail. Not very many folks in the history of the electronicsindustry are included in the museum's oral histories. Are you looking at the revised version with these references? Glforte (talk) 17:15, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Specific advice was given by User:FoCuSandLeArN in October. We're looking for journalistic coverage about Rhines e.g. news article that talk about him in some depth. Your sources are almost all 'stuff on the internet', which doesn't prove that Rhines is widely known or important. Sionk (talk) 02:41, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

I've tried to follow the directions and re-wrote Dr. Rhines' biography to put it in my own words, and added 23 references. I didn't see any specific feedback so I'm not sure what to improve. Could you give me some some more info, such as whether you don't like the references, if there are not enough references, or if you think Dr. Rhines is not notable, etc. Do I have to change the copy to make it more different that Dr. Rhine's official biography? Any info would be very helpful. Thanks. Glforte (talk) 01:31, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pluribus Networks

Hello, and thanks for reviewing the article I submitted (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Pluribus_Networks).

I'm confused by the rejection though. In creating the article I based its contents on similar already published wikipedia articles about companies in a similar space and similar state, with I believe a similar amount of notability: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cumulus_Networks https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuage_Networks

The article I submitted has more contents, more links to other Wiki articles, and also more external links than these. Thanks for any thoughts on why they pass the notability test and my article doesn't. Much appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pbgalvin (talk • contribs) 16:23, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Bill Kerdyk

Hi Sionk,

I wanted to ask about a page I submitted that you recently reviewed and rejected (William "Bill" Kerdyk). You mentioned the Golden Rule, but I used basically all sources that are independent of the individual I was writing on - they were mostly newspaper articles. I know you mentioned notability, but I have seen other Wikipedia pages on politicians who are much less accomplished/well-known than Bill Kerdyk. I was wondering if you could let me know if there is any way to fix this page and successfully resubmit. I'd very much appreciate the help, because I don't want to waste my time again.

Also, is there a number I can call for Wikipedia help, or is everything done through 'Talk'?

Thanks!

Wacurbelo (talk) 00:27, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

I notice DESiegel has left an extremely thorough critique at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/William H. ‘Bill’ Kerdyk, Jr.. Hope it makes sense. The main problem is the lack of significant news coverage about Kerdyk over-and-above routine political mentions. We don't normally accept articles about run-of-the-mill local politicians. Sionk (talk) 20:52, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Australia men's national association football team

Hi. You understand that the NPOV tag on that page is because of the hat note? So your undo here is actually a re-introduction of material that violates neutrality. The hat note actually conveys a value judgement as to which of the two national teams the article should be about. Until WP:NPOV and WP:V can be satisified or the article is renamed, the tag pretty much has to remain. The pointy action is actually on your part by re-introducing a disputed POV. Would you care to self revert of participate in the discussion regarding how to neutralize the article text to make it clear two national teams exist? --LauraHale (talk) 15:57, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

I've contributed to the discussion, as you know. You seem to be happy to tell everyone else to wait for the discussion to be resolved, but feel the same rule doesn't apply to you. The solution lies in changing the article title, rather than changing the article subject. Sionk (talk) 16:41, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Because this conversation is frustrating. The whole argument is based on a faulty premise that one team is inferior to another. With this faulty premise in place, people then suggest that a suggestion should trump Wikipedia policies. No one who opposes a move can do so without referring to gender. That should give you a good idea of the validity of the argument. I can't see why precision in naming is so threatening to a few male soccer contributors. The sport is gender segregated. That's most sports. It does not in anyway diminish the men's team by acknowledging that with precision in article naming. --LauraHale (talk) 19:37, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
Well, I don't really know where to start. I'm frustrated with the situation too, but don't know the best way to progress it. You are challenging some of the very fundamentals of Wikipedia. It's a supposedly neutral encyclopedia that bases its content on verifiable evidence. Of course, as we know its editors are young men as a whole, so there are some very significant biases in coverage. I'm also very mindful that the real world is not at all fair and equal and so it's not surprising that Wikipedia's content reflects this. Unfortunately it is also POV to pretend the world is fair and equal, with no evidence to support the claim.
Maybe WP:PRIMARYTOPIC and WP:TITLE need amending with regards to make them pay particular sensitivity to gender issues. Otherwise most editors will revert to citing these guidelines to slap any article name changes down. Sionk (talk) 20:13, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Landlord At Lion's Head

Dear Sionk: Last year this article was declined as essay-like and you commented that the article was too wordy. Since the original author has chosen not to improve it, and it's about a novel which appears to have attracted a lot of attention from critics and academics, I decided to take it on. I have shortened the plot summary, removed the "themes" section which was all unsourced opinion, and tidied up the rest. I don't feel that I can change the criticism section without having read the references. Do you think it's ready to resubmit? —Anne Delong (talk) 05:46, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Well, it still looks very long but, judging by the variety of literary criticism sources it's fine to be unleashed from AfC. A few of the sources are available online and seem to be fairly and scussinctly reflected in the article. Looking briefly at the wiki article for the author this novel doesn't appear listed, so will be a welcome addition. Sionk (talk) 10:39, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Simmie Knox

Hello! Your submission of Simmie Knox at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! EhthicallyYours! 13:30, 27 November 2013 (UTC) EhthicallyYours! 13:30, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Sourcing issues need to be addressed, also. — Maile (talk) 15:27, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

William "Bill" Kerdyk

Hi Sionk,

I left a comment above re: Ytech International's page. I haven't received a response so I wanted to follow up - any suggestions?

Thanks!

162.17.121.89 (talk) 15:01, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Few if any people here are paid staff. I'll reply when I can. Sionk (talk) 15:24, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Sampsa (street artist) review

Hi Sionk, Thank you for reviewing the Sampsa (street artist) submission (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Sampsa_(street_artist)). In response, i have removed material from the article that is off-topic, as well as claims that were supported only by blog posts. I still am unsure about whether the quotations of Sampsa statements about his work are admissable. I've left some of them in (where they are not sourced from blogs), because they seem to give the clearest picture of the artist's intentions. Please let me know if there is anything else the article needs. Clade Cote (talk) 09:41, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Australia national association football team". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! --Guy Macon (talk) 15:13, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Steve Lazarides

The DYK project (nominate) 16:02, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Royal Mail Choir latest event

Hello Sionk

I'm still very new at this and am getting a lot of help from moderators to keep on the straight and narrow. The bit you removed was a performance we did tonight and the link was to a poster. Can I put it back on again now that event has passed? I put the link in to also show it was an actual event.

Thanks

John Kavanagh — Preceding unsigned comment added by JTKKavanagh (talk • contribs) 20:20, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Not really. This isn't an events listing service, it's an encyclopedia. If the event was reported in the media or some other news source then maybe it would be okay to mention it. If it's cited to the choir master's website or a poster it doesn't indicate any noteworthiness. Sionk (talk) 20:39, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Ian Scott (artist)

Hi Sionk, I have moved the external links to the very bottom of the page as you requested. I don't think it makes sense to have web links under "publications about scott > further reading" as that is a proper academic list of printed (published, not online) material. Further I don't think footnotes should be used for links to the museum collections as they (again) are academic citations, and at the moment it is clean & professional. The format I am using was copied from many, many, pages such as Jackson Pollock Pablo Picasso Paul Cezanne which to me (at least in this regard) look perfect.Chriscs26 (talk) 20:16, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi Sionk. Thanks for your help with the formatting of this article. You seem to have much more experience than me on this site, so I'm sure your changes are correct.
  • On a more pressing issue, could you please have a look at the discussion about the review for compliance? I took it there as I've already had a lengthy discussion with Werieth on his page, and it was going nowhere. If I am 'wrong' that is fine, but it seems to me copyright images of artworks are use in similar ways (to what I was doing) on many, many pages? Surely a few images is reasonable? Chriscs26 (talk) 21:32, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive

Hello, Sionk:

WikiProject AFC is holding a two month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from December 1st, 2013 – January 31st, 2014.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1700 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

A new version of our AfC helper script is released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code enhancements, and more. If you want to see a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. Northamerica1000(talk) 05:53, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Simmie Knox

Gatoclass (talk) 00:01, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

To Sionk Louise Harpman Wiki Article

There are several articles referring to Louise Harpman, independent of Specht Harpman. Moreover, she has accomplished a great deal on her own. Also, i don't see how information regarding Specht Harpman would in any prevent an article about Louise Harpman, the founder of Specht Harpman, to be published.Jakemadoff210 (talk) 01:15, 3 December 2013 (UTC)Jake Madoff Jakemadoff210

Sionk, I have removed some of the bullet points, and selected works that mainly refer to Louise Harpman. There is one section that concerns Specht Harpman (the firm)--the rest is purely on Louise Harpman. I think it is only appropriate to include some information about the firm (she is a founder). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jakemadoff210 (talk • contribs) 02:18, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Category:Designers from New York

Category:Designers from New York, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 20:24, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Category:Designers from Texas

Category:Designers from Texas, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 20:24, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

DYK for John Ward (painter)

The DYK project (nominate) 16:02, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Kestenberg Movement Profile article rejection

Hi Sionk, 

Thank you for reviewing my article on the Kestenberg Movement Profile (KMP). In hoping to improve it, I have a few questions:

1) I'm not sure I understand what you mean when you say that the article reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. I know that it is long and has a lot of citations, and I can certainly shorten it and remove some of the citations or integrate them into the article. I'm not entirely sure what the difference is between an essay and an encyclopedia article. You said that you would prefer that the article be about what the secondary sources say about the KMP, not about the KMP itself, but I'm not sure what the difference between those two is. Do you think that you could point me to an existing Wikipedia article that does a good job of showing what secondary sources say in a neutral way? Maybe I can model my revision on that? 2) You said that the article is "esoteric." There is an article on Laban Movement Analysis, a method of analyzing movement that is in some ways similar to the KMP. What is the difference in the level of esotericism between the two articles? Thanks a lot. I would appreciate any help you can give me,

Miriam584 (talk) 02:26, 8 December 2013 (UTC)Miriam584

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/pardo (surname)

Where should the sourced information about the surname be placed, if not at Pardo (surname) and not at Pardo (disambiguation)? -- -- -- 01:56, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Moses Mayekiso

Materialscientist (talk) 05:20, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:Articles for creation/Heart of the Country (film)

I removed the speedy tag. It seems to have been relased independently. Can you review it again, or allow me to work on it a while? Bearian (talk) 18:27, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

The Speedy tags are automatically being added to draft articles that have been left untouched for a long time. As far as I now, because you've edited the article by removing the Speedy tag, it won't be deleted for the time being. You're welcome to improve it and re-submit it for review. Sionk (talk) 18:32, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion

I do not believe that the article i created (Mark Burnett (producer) should be nominated for speedy deletion. He is a genuine producer and is well known in the industry. Makro (talk) 21:36, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

I have included proof of notability in the references. The article was rejected in November because i did not have the references at that time to call upon. I included them in the article. Makro (talk) 00:58, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

I've seen The Apprentice UK and know he produced that, if that helps.--Launchballer 11:39, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Sionk. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Going Left Right.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Ruth Bowyer DYK nom

Hi,

Thanks for your very swift review at Template:Did you know nominations/Ruth Bowyer. You're correct on both points, apologies for not spotting these myself. I have now added a direct ref to the sentence and proposed an amended hook, if you've got time to have another glance at it. Euryalus (talk) 00:22, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Aleah Chapin

Harrias talk 12:03, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Sampsa street artist review

Hi Sionk, After your review of the Sampsa (street artist) submission (Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sampsa (street artist)) three weeks ago, i followed your recommendations to improve the article, and resubmitted it. Could you take another look and approve the article if it is ready?

Also, separately from getting the Sampsa article approved, if you have any ideas for how to best represent projects by street artists, please let me know. Following your earlier review, i will be submitting articles about street artist projects and methods, separate from pages for the artists themselves. Clade Cote (talk) 19:41, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

I had a look at your draft, but someone has beaten me to it and already declined it again! I admire your ambition, but sometimes 'less is more'. Probably you should concentrate on the important parts of Sampsa's career that can be verified in reliable sources (such as newspaper and magazine articles). I wish you luck! Sionk (talk) 00:50, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Greetings!

Best wishes for a happy, healthy and prosperous 2014!

(To my surprise,) Initially, I was rather annoyed by your recent behavior. So, I decided to do something else for 12 hours before responding.

Now, I am still rather perplexed by your behaviour.

As you have been around WP for about as long as I have, I'm sure you must have come across "don't template the regulars". Never-the-less, that's exactly what you've done.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Tell me please: What is your reaction to having the above placed on your talk page? Pdfpdf (talk) 10:51, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

That is a standard part of Template:Db-notice.--Launchballer 11:07, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Jeez, thanks Einstein for stating the bleeding obvious. Now, perhaps you might like to read what I wrote and actually think before you open your mouth and make irrelevant pointless (talk page stalker) comments? Pdfpdf (talk)

I'm not quite sure which template you're referring to. Do you mean the Speedy Deletion message on your Talk page? Either way, if I notify people they sometimes get angry and, if I don't notify people, they get even more angry. It's just a standard Wikipedia template. What would you prefer?
P.S. No, I've never heard of "don't template the regulars". As a regular myself I'd be glad to be notified of these activities, rather than kept in the dark. Sionk (talk) 18:13, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

It's this, which pertains only to the "Welcome to Wikipedia" part of level 1 warnings.--Launchballer 21:10, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Yep, I guess so! But the SD message is a notification, not a warning, so wouldn't be covered. I think Pdfpdf just got out of bed the wrong side today. They've requested a copy of the deleted article be restored so they can work on it away from main article space, which seems the best solution (rather than needlessly ranting at other editors). Sionk (talk) 22:53, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Article for review - Ivlia

Hallo Sionk,

You reviewed (and declined) our submission about Ivlia (bireme), User:Pavel_Goncharuk/sandbox. We have tried to fix all of your comments. However, we do not know how to change the title of the article on the name "Ivlia (bireme)", and how to link article with the russian version.

We are hoping we have it right this time.

If you would be able to take another look and let us know if the article is acceptable now, we would greatly appreciate it! As this is our first Englishwiki article. Thanks so much!

Sorry for my english. I am the captain of the ship, but the article was prepared by the professional translater.--Pavel Goncharuk (talk) 17:28, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Looks like someone found the article acceptable (though I think it is still quite a mess). Good luck! Sionk (talk) 00:29, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Sionk. You have new messages at Wikipedia:WikiProject Women artists/Notability concerns.
Message added 23:43, 4 January 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

If possible, I'd like to check out Margaret Seaton... Would that work for you? CaroleHenson (talk) 23:43, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Findagrave is a very poor source, a genealogy community. It's not a basis for a Wikipedia article. I'm inclined to AfD it, but thought I'd get a second opinion. Generally with important artists who are no longer living, there will be some trace of publications about them, or opinions about importance on art websites. I couldn't find any of that sort of thing. Sionk (talk) 23:48, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Yes, I agree about Findagrave, it's just a starting point that gives me her married name. If you want to go ahead, though, I understand your point.--CaroleHenson (talk) 00:01, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Ok, well, I'll give it a shot and see what I come up with. It's very likely it will be as you say - that she's not notable because there's so little about her, but it's a fun exercise for me either way.--CaroleHenson (talk) 03:20, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
You've obviously done a very thorough job double-checking. Thanks for that! Sionk (talk) 12:57, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Truly my pleasure, I have a whole story I built up in my mind about her life with her husband, no apparent children, etc. I loved what you wrote for the weak delete message. It was honoring of the early artists like Ms. Seaton.--CaroleHenson (talk) 13:02, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Help needed approving a page

Hi All Thanks for this resource I am trying to publish a cleaned up page but unfortunately I seem to be hitting a tough spot.

The link is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/LiveWell_for_Life

I was wondering if anybody could tell me what I need to do to bring it within the approved format.

Any help would be very gratefully received.

Thanks

Big Angry Bear with a smile — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bigangrybear (talk • contribs) 16:20, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Well, the article in The Observer is very good, lengthy, about LiveWell and in a reputable, journalistic source. The other sources are the LiveWell website. You'll need to find more sources that are independent of LiveWell, preferably things like book, news or magazine articles. To prove something is notable we need to see coverage in multiple independent, reliable sources. Sionk (talk) 17:37, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Sources...

Thanks so much for chiming in on the idea for a list. I went to the page you mentioned and added the idea to their talk page. It would be great to compare notes about good sites. I get such conflicting info from other editors, it would be good to have a list sanctioned by the Visual arts/Women artist project(s).--CaroleHenson (talk) 20:03, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

If you're based in the UK

I would hope you would be able to work out how to subscribe to Who's Who and the digital archives of the Times and the Guardian/Observer, and check for inclusion/obituaries WP:BEFORE prodding a biographical article. Frederic Whiting (note the spelling) has both a Who Was Who entry and a reasonable length obituary in The Times. Barney the barney barney (talk) 17:03, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for de-PROD'ing - maybe you could expand the article to demonstrate what the sources say. Unfortunately I'm not made of money and unlikely to pay for subscriptions to paywall archives. Generally articles in these archives appear online but aren't fully readable. I couldn't see any evidence of coverage at all so PROD'd the article. How was I to guess his name was misspelt?! Sionk (talk) 17:18, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi - you can usually get subscriptions via your local library. In cases where your county library doesn't offer subscriptions, you can often get a library subscription from another county. You might need to pick the card up in person or if you're lucky they might post it to you. I have access to these and haven't paid a penny for them, even managed to pick the cards up when visiting for other reasons. Barney the barney barney (talk) 17:32, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Unfortunately I don't live in a library either ;) But thanks for the advice.
NB I don't make a habit of PROD'ing articles, especially when they are long dead. In this case a one line unsourced stub that made no claims to any notability seemed of no use to man or beast. I agree, if it made a claim to notability I might pay a visit to my local library. Sionk (talk) 17:39, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Tom Nussbaum

Dear Sionk: You posted a message on my talk page.

Thank you for taking the time to inform me of the guidelines. I am a relatively inexperienced Wikipedia user, preferring to spend most of my time teaching and doing research at an American university. While I appreciate knowing the rules, I should point out that your inference about me is incorrect. I have not used any account other than Peshrout. Moreover, I have participated in the Tom Nussbaum discussion in a way that I believe is completely consistent with the open philosophy of Wikipedia. My wife gave me a print by the artist several years ago and last year when I met him at a holiday party I told him that I was surprised that he was not on Wikipedia. His public art in Montclair NJ had impressed me as well as my print. He informed me that Wikipedia did not allow persons to set up their own entry, so I offered to do it. He gave me the necessary information to start the entry, and put me in touch with someone who had images that could be loaded. I did my bit as a service to Wikipedia and forgot about it until I was notified that the entry was going to be deleted (Dec 26, 2013). I then contacted the artist and suggested that he contact people who knew his work and get the entry further developed. I did some development myself, and actually uploaded some photos of the public work. All of this was done for free and out of concern that Tom Nussbaum was a person of interest. You might not know anyone who does not have a Wikipedia account, but several admirers of Nussbaum's work did not have such accounts, and therefore set them up. Your inference that this was a sockpuppet event was reasonable, but incorrect. BTW, I thanked you for correcting the mistaken edit to the Articles for Deletion notice. I do not remember doing it, or even what I did. I remain a Wikipedia amateur (this is my first talk entry, for example). Yours in open information, Peshrout. Peshrout (talk)Peshrout (talk) 15:26, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation. Soliciting for support from others (called 'Meat puppetry' is also frowned upon on Wikipedia. However, it looks like the article may be saved, so I hope there will not be any repercussions in this instance. Good luck with your future edits! Sionk (talk) 15:35, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello. Please do not revert to restore copyrighted content to articles when they've been removed. The sources are not the issue - the issue is that the article was created with text copied and clearly derived from the source. Minimal changes over the years do not make the content retainable and "a few select sentences" are a few select sentences too many. You are welcome to rewrite the content in original language and, of course, may cite the same sources in doing so, but restoring the content is not okay under our copyright policy. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:07, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

The term of copyright is not affected by whether or not the material is removed from publication. Our Terms of Use and copyright policy are both very clear that content can only be placed on Wikipedia that is compatibly licensed. In the second paragraph, our article currently said:
On May 17, 1955, St. Michael's Choir School was accorded an affiliation with the Pontifical Institute of Sacred Music, and is one of six choirs and choir schools in the world with such an affiliation.
The source says:
On May 17, 1955, St. Michael’s Choir School was accorded an affiliation with the Pontifical Institute of Sacred Music in Rome -- only six other Choirs and Choir Schools in the world share this privilege. ([1])
The issue is that the material is derivative - when it was placed in the article the content was identical, and it has been modified superficially in the years since. Much of it was recently cleaned out, evidently, by others, but the content that remains needs rewriting.
You are very welcome to rewrite it. However, if I rewrite it, then the copyright issue becomes muddled by editorial issues. In order to remain uninvolved in an article that has had copyright issues from multiple sources, all I did was remove it, as per policy. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:22, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
The problem is not in individual elements but in the arrangement of them following the blatantly copied source. Fortunately, it seems that another editor is rebuilding the content. You are welcome to do this, too. For instance, one might say:
Founded by John Ronan in 1937 as the "Cathedral Schola Cantorum", the school was retitled "St. Michael's Choir School" that same year." ([2])
As you suggested at my talk page, rewriting shouldn't take long, fortunately. We often have to remove much larger chunks of text than that in copyright cleanup, but most of it had already been removed. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:56, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Kay WalkingStick

Hi, I added an image for Kay WalkingStick with the free-use rationale. Hopefully I documented it correctly and it will stay. Thanks so much for telling me about this option, and also why each case needs to be looked at closely for copyright infringement issues. Much appreciated!--CaroleHenson (talk) 18:04, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Another great article about a fascinating artist! The only thing I'd suggest is you explain, based on what the Museum essay says (or another expert source if you can find it), why that particular painting is important. Sionk (talk) 18:49, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
Great point, thanks!--CaroleHenson (talk) 20:21, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Possible page for deletion?

Hello! A few months ago we worked together on the pages for Boundless (company) and Kno. I recently stumbled across a page that I think may be a candidate for deletion: Nine Families. I had never heard of this subject, and nothing in the first ~100 hits on Google for "Nine Families" finds anything about it. The article itself has no references. I started reading the information on how to nominate an article for deletion. But I am wondering about Wikipedia "good manners." As an inexperienced Wikipedian, I thought I would ask for some advice before proceeding. Is this a good candidate for deletion? Is this something that I should flag? If so, can you recommend a "best practice" in this situation? Thanks! James Cage (talk) 21:20, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

English and Scottish stained glass

Hi, I see you, from watchlist updates for articles I worked on, created some new categories and are splitting out English / Scottish. If you'd like help, let me know. For instance, I could create a replace routine in WP:AWB and verify where the artist is from before saving the replacement.--CaroleHenson (talk) 03:50, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

I've been trying to move "artists" into more specific categories. There were 660 "English artists", and I was coming across a number of stained glass artists with no "English" category to move them to.
There is an opinion (shared by me) that "artist" is a very general description indeed and articles should be filtered into more specific categories before they are subdivided by region (or state). I'm still only just beginning to get my head around the 'problem'. It's taking me more time than I expected, because of course I'm coming across articles in a dreadful state, or ripe for improvement, or with quick fix solutions so constantly being sidetracked!
The UK is complex (you're from the States, aren't you?) because many English, Scots and Welsh identify themselves as British. The Scots have a much stronger national identity (hence the current independence vote taking place) and it is probably easiest to find artists who are identifiably Scottish. Wales is less than half the size and more closely integrated with England, so the situation is more blurred. Most English people seem to be ambivalent about whether they are English of British (the two terms are often synonymous) - for example if you're born in London then London is both the capital of England and the capital of the UK. I've lived in Wales most of my life (and speak some Welsh) but was born to an English family so consider myself British.
I guess it's the same in the USA. If you're born in Idaho but moved to New Jersey when you were a child, but studied and live in New York, then what is your identity?!
Confusion reigns :D Sionk (talk) 14:04, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi, yes, there is some similarity in the US - but I think of it as regional (Midwest, south, northeast, etc.) because each of the regions seems to have a characteristic culture. I was born and lived a good chunk of my life in the Midwest, and I continue to identify with those characteristics and feel like I better understand someone off the bat if they're from the Midwest.
I agree with you about the distinction between artist and the type or types of art work that they do. That make sense.
Well, I am happy to help chip in on the clarification of British --> Scottish, Welsh or English, if you'd like. It's funny, I didn't know why but I thought the easiest to tackle was Scottish and isolate that group first, perhaps by a category like Scottish artists or a query. Let me know if that helps, or if I might be too removed to manage some of the distinctions, that's fine, too.--CaroleHenson (talk) 16:51, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
If you have a clever way of moving the articles in Category:Portrait painters into their national categories, then that would be quite useful. I think I must have an OCD, because I quite like category sorting, it's a mindless relief from some of the difficulkt confrontational stuff :) Sionk (talk) 15:22, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
That's funny and so true (appealing, mindless relief). Sure, I'll take a look at it in a bit. Having a bit of fun on a clean-up of Henry James for much the same reason, and that will be a nice break from that type of tedium.--CaroleHenson (talk) 15:49, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Category:British printmaker stubs

Category:British printmaker stubs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 16:51, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

A few more pointers about creating stub tags and categories:
  1. Before creating them, propose them at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals and wait a few days. If there are problems, you'll find out there.
  2. The tool I gave you a link to (this one) is generally good for simple cases (such as intersection of 2 category trees, or of a category tree and usage of a single template); for more complicated cases, this tool can be useful.
עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:50, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
I proposed my initial stub categorisation at the project but received no response from any project members, other than an unsigned agreement from someone else that had left a proposal. There seems to be no activity at the project. Anyway, it's unlikely I'll be visiting the project again, there are more urgent and interesting things to do on Wikipedia. Sionk (talk) 10:42, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
I see no incoming links from the proposal pages for either the category or the tag. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 12:36, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Sionk. You have new messages at Category talk:Portrait painters.
Message added 18:28, 22 January 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I ran across another category, Portrait artists... and started a discussion at the portrait painters talk page. CaroleHenson (talk) 18:28, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your input. I put together an approach and posted it on that talk page. Do you mind looking at it?--CaroleHenson (talk) 00:54, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Portrait painter categories

Hi Sionk! What a wild day or so changing categories around. I spent a lot of time trying to sort out what to do with British, Scottish, Welsh folks... and often went by where they lived, how they had been tagged, etc. Tonight I stumbled across one article and realized that we had both made several changes. You had made a change, when I went through to resolve the subcategory I made a change and then it was changed back again. I had been trying to refine the categories... and it looks like you were, too, but with a different approach than I used.

It would probably be good to touch base about that, just so we're on the same page. I think the British, Scottish, Welsh, English part was the most confusing for me... when someone started their life in one country, but then had their career and completed their life in another.

This also came up with other people, for instance, their was an article that stated that the artist was born in Russia, then moved to France. The article was tagged with both Russian and French painters, and I made them Russian and French portrait painters.

I'm guessing I'm not the only one that would like to ensure we have a consistent approach and if there's something I need to tweak so that the categories are right, that would be good to clarify.--CaroleHenson (talk) 07:42, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

It generally depends on how they have been described in the sources, or how they describe themselves. Failing any evidence either way proving they are Scottish, English or Welsh (unless they're closely associated with a specific area, city or town) I tend to describe British artists as British. But sometimes they're very clear - I remember changing an article yesterday where the painter was widely known as Welsh, became first known for painting the Prince of Wales, but had been categorised as English. This British/English/Scottish/Welsh thing can be ambiguous and very political at times. No doubt there will be some more changes and reverts happening, but I shouldn't take it personally :) Sionk (talk) 10:52, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
P.S. personally I don't confer a non-British person a nationality of my own choosing if it is ambiguous or not clearly stated somewhere. Your Russo-French example I would probably have left in the "Portrait painter" category. But because someone else had made a decision it sounds like you did the right thing. Sionk (talk) 10:57, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
Ok, I'm getting not to worry about it for right now... and of course I won't mind if the categories are corrected for the dual-residency / citizenship folks. If you find that there are more than need to be changed in these cases, let me know - I'm happy to pitch in.--CaroleHenson (talk) 12:47, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Women artists

Great job on the worklists!
You've been making a lot of headway on the worklists: saves, the ones that need to let go, and new articles! Great work! CaroleHenson (talk) 03:08, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Completely undeserved, but thanks! In the main I flit around Wikipedia and apart from a couple of artist articles, I've just been doing housekeeping for other people's hard work. Sionk (talk) 15:15, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Reply to comment at Talk:Australia national association football team

Hi, would you please reply to the most recent comment I left for you at Talk:Australia national association football team.--2nyte (talk) 08:28, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Why should I? You've raised nothing new. As I said further up the discussion I'm not going to endlessly repeat the argument that has already been made by several editors. Your refusal to accept minor amendments to the article is petty. Sionk (talk) 11:50, 29 January 2014 (UTC)


Archive 5←Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9Archive 10Archive 11→Archive 15
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sionk/Archive_9&oldid=1146600385"