User talk:Rbkca

Welcome!

Hello, Rbkca, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! AddisWang (talk) 21:00, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017 at Women in Red

If you enjoyed participating in the recent Art Feminism event, you'll want to check this out...

Welcome to Women in Red's Women's History Month worldwide online editathons,
ongoing through March 31, 2017.

"Role Models"

"Art Feminism"

"The Women You Have Never Met"

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 07:37, 4 March 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Laura Larson

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Laura Larson, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 17:22, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Laura Larson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Laura Larson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura Larson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 07:47, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Laura Larson

Hi, I'm Robertgombos. Rbkca, thanks for creating Laura Larson!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. I advise you to cite these references as well: http://www.nytimes.com/1997/01/10/arts/domestic-images-from-young-talent.html, http://www.nytimes.com/1996/05/10/arts/also-of-note.html, https://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&q="laura larson"

I will create an infobox on the article and fix your inline citations.

Thanks,

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Robertgombos (talk) 23:46, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Maria Luisa Zubizarreta moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Maria Luisa Zubizarreta, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. This person definitely passes WP:NSCHOLAR, but both sources, and the external link are all primary sources. Please provide secondary, independent sources. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:56, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Maria Luisa Zubizarreta concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Maria Luisa Zubizarreta, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Maria Luisa Zubizarreta

Hello, Rbkca. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Maria Luisa Zubizarreta".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 19:11, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maria Luisa Zubizarreta has been accepted

Maria Luisa Zubizarreta, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Atlantic306 (talk) 19:40, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]