Jump to content

User talk:Panini!/Archive 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5→Archive 9
User:Panini!/WikiLoveOnUserpage
Hi! Welcome to my talk page. Any questions about me, what I'm up to, and what I'm doing wrong will be posted here(cut me some slack, we all make mistakes). You can ask me questions here too! I'm up to conversation.
This supposedly helps my talk page load faster.


Hehe

A bot does it after 24 hours :P — ImaginesTigers (talk) 00:15, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

ImaginesTigers, W H A T
I've been hassled by SandyGeorgia to remove talk page clutter all this time. Are you paying for Wikipedia Premium? Le Panini [🥪] 00:18, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
I was asking Lee how to do it earlier and he was like, a bot'll come along and do it soon, hahaha. Next time one of us finishes up a PR, let's determine the truth with the ol' scientific method
PS. No. Wikipedia Premium is a scam and not worth the £29.99/month — ImaginesTigers (talk) 00:21, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
ImaginesTigers, After looking at the Animal Crossing: New Horizons DYK, I have the answer: It adds a template to the talk page, but the user has to organize the templates manually.
Bot revision: [1]
What it should look like: [2] Panini🥪 13:48, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Paper Mario: Color Splash

On 11 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Paper Mario: Color Splash, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Paper Mario: Color Splash was accidentally playable two weeks before its launch? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Paper Mario: Color Splash. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Paper Mario: Color Splash), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Paper Mario: Sticker Star

On 12 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Paper Mario: Sticker Star, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the developers of Paper Mario: Sticker Star de-emphasized a proper story because fewer than one percent of players found the plot of the previous game interesting? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Paper Mario: Sticker Star. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Paper Mario: Sticker Star), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:06, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

From addict to addict

For those lovely userboxes, from a fellow addict, I raise my glass of sweet cold Cherry Coke in your direction! Cheers! Zwerg Nase (talk) 15:25, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Zwerg Nase, Three userboxes isn't enough to show how much I love soda (or pop). However, any more could be considered spam. The sorrow. Le Panini [🥪] 15:27, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
There's never enough of a good thing, at least if you've got "Georgia on your mind"! (Is that a valid euphemism for drinking too much coke? If not, I'd like to trademark that use here and now!) Zwerg Nase (talk) 15:29, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Modern Warfare Remastered peer review

Hi, I just wanted to ask why on my peer review for the above game several hours ago you'd removed our most recent responses? Wikibenboy94 (talk) 16:20, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Wikibenboy94, To be honest, don't know how that happened. I reverted the edit. Le Panini [🥪] 16:22, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
Thanks, I thought it probably was. No worries. Wikibenboy94 (talk) 16:23, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
Wikibenboy94, Oh, I thought you combined no and worries to make norries, like a slang or something. You should coin that. Le Panini [🥪] 16:28, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
Yes, it does work doesn't it! Wikibenboy94 (talk) 16:33, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
@Le Panini: I pinged you at the time but wasn't sure if you'd seen my most recent comments in the peer review in response to some of yours? Wikibenboy94 (talk) 10:40, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
Wikibenboy94, Oh, sorry! Comments coming soon. Le Panini [🥪] 10:48, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
@Le Panini: I'd yesterday commented re. another source (not already mentioned) sympathising with the bundle, but again didn't know if you were getting round to it. Sorry, don't mean to nag. Wikibenboy94 (talk) 12:00, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Wikibenboy94, It seems I didn't get the ping notification. If you're adding a ping, you have to re-sign your post or else it won't notify me, which was probably the issue. I'll put the page on my watchlist for now. Le Panini [🥪] 12:32, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
I'm certain I did sign initially anyway, but unless I'm mistaken I thought editing it again to re-sign doesn't result in a ping? Wikibenboy94 (talk) 12:51, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Wikibenboy94, Not sure, but I left a comment. Le Panini [🥪] 12:53, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Good Job!

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Good Job! you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DocFreeman24 -- DocFreeman24 (talk) 07:01, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

In appreciation

The Featured Article Medal
By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this special, very exclusive award created just for we few, we happy few, this band of brothers, who have shed sweat, tears, and probably blood, in order to be able to proudly claim "I too have taken an article to Featured status". Gog the Mild (talk) 14:51, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
@Gog the Mild: (Well, it wasn't that bad.) Thank you for the kind words! Panini🥪 14:56, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
If I had realised that, I would have given you a harder time . I am already looking forward to your next nomination. Gog the Mild (talk) 15:08, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Promotion of Paper Mario: The Origami King

Congratulations, Le Panini! The article you nominated, Paper Mario: The Origami King, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.
This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Gog the Mild (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:06, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar
Congrats on the Paper Mario featured article! Toa Nidhiki05 01:04, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
@Toa Nidhiki05: Thank you! I now feel really special. Panini🥪 01:14, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

TFA

Thank you for the article, "about the sixth entry of the Paper Mario series. This game was considered one of the best games of the franchise (except Paper Mario: The Thousand Year Door because people can't move on) and is on track to be the best-selling game in the series." Good Job! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:52, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Precious

Paper Mario series

Thank you for quality articles around the Paper Mario series, such as Paper Mario: The Origami King and Paper Mario: Color Splash, all on their way to good topic, for serving delicious food and good spirits ("I'll get to it for you!"), for Good Job! - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2550 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:03, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Gerda Arendt, Well then, thank you Gerda! Sorry, I haven't been around to deal with the article's vandalism, they seem to get worse as soon as you're asleep... Panini🥪 10:45, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
That's what you have friends for ;) - FA veterans don't look at all, all day, and repair the next day, but I am not one of them. There's a strong correlation between number of vandalism and number of views so expect something above the normal 35k. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:48, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Gerda Arendt, Yep, your theory was correct, coming in at roughly 45k. Panini🥪 10:44, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
just practical observation over some years, - and congrats! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:49, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Good Job!

The article Good Job! you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Good Job! for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DocFreeman24 -- DocFreeman24 (talk) 03:01, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Good Job!

On 24 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Good Job!, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that before the creation of Good Job!, Paladin Studios had wanted to collaborate with Nintendo for about a decade? You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Good Job!), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:01, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Good Job!

The article Good Job! you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Good Job! for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DocFreeman24 -- DocFreeman24 (talk) 16:02, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Good Humor
Thank you for mentioning that the FA star was bronze and not gold. The Ultimate Boss (talk) 20:53, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
@The Ultimate Boss: Just making Wikipedia a better place. Thanks for the gift! Panini🥪 22:41, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
For being such a good sport, can you leave some comments for Mood Swings at FAC? The Ultimate Boss (talk) 04:59, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Paper Mario origami king

Ok. That was me. I guess we can just keep it the way ya wanted. I just read your reasoning; I really am quite a stickler for details Terad2909 (talk) 22:54, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Sorry bout that Terad2909 (talk) 22:54, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Terad2909, No worries at all. To put it simply with the plot, it used to be much longer, and a lot of people suggested a big cutting-down. Panini🥪 23:31, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
Hey. Random message alert. Any chance you could give my TFA blurb a quick read-through to see if there's anything that needs changing? Would appreciate a support or oppose either way. Thanks. Homeostasis07 (talk/contributions) 01:42, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
Homeostasis07, Looks like I missed this one. I'll get to it for you! Panini🥪 01:49, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Peer review

Hello Panini!, I came across your profile while scrolling through the current list of peer reviews. I wanted to drop by and ask if you'd be willing to leave comments at Wikipedia:Peer review/Lights Up/archive1? The article passed GA a week ago, and my GA reviewer has made comments on how to improve the page, which I've implemented. I would really appreciate it if you could leave some additional comments, and give some advice on how to improve it. Thank you. --Ashleyyoursmile! 12:55, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Mario RPGs topic

Hey @Panini!: I noticed that you are currently working on turning all the Mario RPGs into GAs/FAs and the list into an FL. In your peer review for the Mario RPGs list, I noticed a topic that would probably fail immediately if it was submitted for GTC. I'm working on fixing these articles as well, and I have a great suggestion on the topic should actually look like! KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 17:13, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

edit | discuss
Mario role-playing games
17 articles
Super Mario RPG
Puzzle & Dragons Z Super Mario Bros. Edition
Mario Rabbids Kingdom Battle
Paper Mario
Paper Mario: The Thousand-Year Door
Super Paper Mario
Paper Mario: Sticker Star
Paper Mario: Color Splash
Paper Mario: The Origami King
Mario & Luigi: Superstar Saga
Mario & Luigi: Partners in Time
Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story
Mario & Luigi: Dream Team
Mario & Luigi: Paper Jam
@KingSkyLord: My plans were to promote the Paper Mario series to good topic, hence my current GA nomination and plans for FLC. As such, I currently have no intentions involving the Mario & Luigi series and others. The reason I'm helping out at Superstar Saga is from a request at WP:VG. With this in mind, the topic is looking like this:
edit | discuss
Paper Mario (series)
7 articles
Paper Mario
Paper Mario: The Thousand-Year Door
Super Paper Mario
Paper Mario: Sticker Star
Paper Mario: Color Splash
Paper Mario: The Origami King
To do
Completed

Also, I see no evidence that you have recently edited one of these articles. I would like to hear your thoughts, though. Panini🥪 18:19, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Super Paper Mario

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Super Paper Mario you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Ultimate Boss -- The Ultimate Boss (talk) 03:40, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

FA

Hi Panini, I was wondering when you're going to leave comments for Mood Swings at FAC? I'm in no rush but Pop Smoke's one year anniversary of his death is on February 19, and I really want the article to become FA before it passes. The Ultimate Boss (talk) 04:31, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

The Ultimate Boss, Yep, it's on my today-to-do list. After I review Microsoft Flight Simulator, I'll get to your FAC.
Also, a couple of comments before I begin.
  1. You already have a couple of supports. Don't back down now! It'll most likely make all the FAC delegates and regulars frustrated. FAC requires commitment. Don't take this note the wrong way; only good intents from everybody. FAC is one of the hardest things to do on Wikipedia.
  1. Before the article can be promoted, it needs an image and source review. This might take a while because nobody likes doing it. I'll leave a message on the talk page in hopes somebody will do it. Due to my lack of experience in this field, I can't do it myself, but hopefully, someone else will.
  1. I wish I could promise the article will get promoted by February 19, but there's a very little guarantee. To make it up to you if it doesn't, however, you can nominate it for WP:TFA if the article is promoted. I'll help you with the process after the FAC if you would help.
Best of luck, Panini🥪 12:39, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the message.

Hello, Panini!. You have new messages at BlueFalling's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.


Could you tell me what the best way to use these "talk backs" are? Thank you! --Signed BlueFalling(talk, contribs) I fix grammar and spelling errors. 22:09, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

To be honest, I've never seen these in use. To notify somebody in a much easier way, I'd use the ping template. Here's how it works:

Before you leave a reply, put this:

{{u|Insert Name Here}}

It will then look like this:

BlueFalling (you will be notified because of this)

When this template is used, it will leave them a notification, which will appear in the top right corner. For more information, check out Help:Notifications. Panini🥪 23:45, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Regular Triple Crown

I'm very pleased to present the Triple Crown Jewels to Panini!, for your work on "Did you know?" and the good and featured article processes! — Bilorv (talk) 22:13, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Congrats on the Triple Crown! You might be interested in a userbox I made, {{User crown}}:

This user has been awarded a Standard Triple Crown.

— Bilorv (talk) 22:13, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Moving pages over a redirect to a different page

In the case you mentioned where there is already a redirect at the target, and the redirect points to a third page title, the only way to move is if you have WP:Page mover rights or make a request at WP:RM/TR as you did :) (t · c) buidhe 15:19, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Buidhe, Got it. Thanks for the move! Panini🥪 15:22, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Bisexual video game characters

I saw your comment on the deletion discussion of the List of media portrayals of bisexuality page. While I disagree with you there (I support a merge with a bi characters list page and changing the page to a redirect), I think what you are saying about video game characters, that "they give you the option of being in a relationship with either man or woman because they have no way to determine either what your gender or preference is" is a good point, and agree that in those cases, "it would be the player being bisexual, not the character or game." I'll keep that in mind when updating the List of video games with LGBT characters page. --Historyday01 (talk) 17:04, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Historyday01, I don't mind the page being redirected, it's just that thought didn't come to mind. Panini🥪 17:30, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
I created the List of fictional bisexual characters last year, so I'm moving some of the entries there, but that video games page needs some work, which I'll try to get to at some point in the coming year. I am glad that a new page for bisexual characters in television was created too, which is great, as well, springing from a recent splitting apart of the formerly named "List of LGBT characters in television and radio" (now it only focuses on radio and podcast characters). --Historyday01 (talk) 17:34, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Well, Panini!, I created a new section on the Media portrayals of bisexuality page about bisexual characters in video games. Its only a start, but feel free to add more to it if you'd like, as it definitely should be expanded.
I do not have any personal interest in the topic, sadly, I just wanted to give my insight; good luck on the project! Panini🥪 19:47, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kirby Star Allies

The article Kirby Star Allies you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Kirby Star Allies for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Namcokid47 -- Namcokid47 (talk) 01:42, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Paper Mario

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Paper Mario you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 00:41, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Cups

I was wondering if you could leave some comments for the Cups (song) peer review? I really want that article to become FA because it has a very special place in my life. I also promise I review the super Mario article by tomorrow. The Ultimate Boss (talk) 10:31, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

The Ultimate Boss, Yes, I will add it to my long list of things I have to do today. No promise it will happen today, however. Panini🥪 12:28, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Panini

I'm not trying to be weird, but I could just eat you up! Hockeycatcat (talk) 10:55, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare Remastered

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Call of Duty: Modern Warfare Remastered has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Best of luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:25, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Twofingered Typist, Thank you for your work. Panini🥪 12:33, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

@Wikibenboy94:

Your GA nomination of Paper Mario

The article Paper Mario you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Paper Mario for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 21:41, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Paper Mario

The article Paper Mario you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Paper Mario for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 22:22, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

WikiCup 2021 March newsletter

Round 1 of the competition has finished; it was a high-scoring round with 21 contestants scoring more than 100 points. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2, with 55 contestants qualifying. You will need to finish among the top thirty-two contestants in Round 2 if you are to qualify for Round 3. Our top scorers in Round 1 were:

  • New York (state) Epicgenius led the field with a featured article, nine good articles and an assortment of other submissions, specialising on buildings and locations in New York, for a total of 945 points.
  • Republic of Venice Bloom6132 was close behind with 896 points, largely gained from 71 "In the news" items, mostly recent deaths.
  • Scotland ImaginesTigers, who has been editing Wikipedia for less than a year, was in third place with 711 points, much helped by bringing League of Legends to featured article status, exemplifying how bonus points can boost a contestant's score.
  • Rwanda Amakuru came next with 708 points, Kigali being another featured article that scored maximum bonus points.
  • Ktin, new to the WikiCup, was in fifth place with 523 points, garnered from 15 DYKs and 34 "In the news" items.
  • Botswana The Rambling Man scored 511 points, many from featured article candidate reviews and from football related DYKs.
  • Gog the Mild, last year's runner-up, came next with 498 points, from a featured article and numerous featured article candidate reviews.
  • Hog Farm, at 452, scored for a featured article, four good articles and a number of reviews.
  • United States Le Panini, another newcomer to the WikiCup, scored 438 for a featured article and three good articles.
  • England Lee Vilenski, last year's champion, scored 332 points, from a featured article and various other sport-related topics.

These contestants, like all the others, now have to start again from scratch. In Round 1, contestants achieved eight featured articles, three featured lists and one featured picture, as well as around two hundred DYKs and twenty-seven ITNs. They completed 97 good article reviews, nearly double the 52 good articles they claimed. Contestants also claimed for 135 featured article and featured list candidate reviews. There is no longer a requirement to mention your WikiCup participation when undertaking these reviews.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article candidate, a featured process, or something else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:26, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Great job, Panini!! I'm cheering for you to win!

Rosefeather of WindClan | Meow at me! | Fresh-kill |My Den 01:05, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Rosefeather of WindClan, Thank you! Much appreciated. Panini🥪 01:06, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

😉

Rosefeather of WindClan | Meow at me! | Fresh-kill |My Den 01:08, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Super Paper Mario

The article Super Paper Mario you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Super Paper Mario for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 22:40, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Super Paper Mario

The article Super Paper Mario you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Super Paper Mario for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 11:42, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Striking out comments

Hello. I noticed in your recent FAC that you made this (I will be striking through completed concerns so I don't break paragraphs and make this very lengthy) and I would highly encourage you not to do this. It is discouraged to not edit other people's comments, and this includes striking out other people's comments. It could annoy editors, and the decision to strike out comments should be kept with only the original poster. I just wanted to let you know this now before it causes any issues. This is something that I have noticed in other FACs so I would again strongly encourage you to not get into the habit of messing with reviewers' comments (unless they explicitly give you the permission to do so). Aoba47 (talk) 23:40, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Aoba47, Well then, did not know this was something frowned upon. I'll go back to doing "done" then, Panini🥪 00:11, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
  • I just wanted to let you know. A good rule of thumb would be to not edit other people's comments in any way (i.e. striking them out, collapsing them, etc.). It is just not a good idea anyway, and I do not think that is a good solution to addressing length issues. Aoba47 (talk) 02:32, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Paper Mario

On 6 March 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Paper Mario, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Paper Mario series was changed from role-playing games to action-adventure games because the developers found it to be too similar to Nintendo's other role-playing series, Mario & Luigi? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Paper Mario. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Paper Mario), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for that GA, and best wishes for the FAC. I took the liberty to adjust some of your indenting there, according to Wikipedia:Colons and asterisks, please check. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:17, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Gerda Arendt, Thank you, Gerda, it means a lot coming from you. Panini🥪 21:55, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
It's insane on how you made a good article about every paper mario game. It would be awesome if you made Mario a GA also, since paper mario, a character itself is that. 180.194.138.138 (talk) 10:05, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello Panini, today an article you authored and submitted was featured on the front page. Congratulations!

This might have already been touched upon, so feel free to redirect me to any previous answers if so.

Are you in any way related to any company related to the development or publishing of the featured videogame? Do you have any other Wikipedia accounts,or is this your first one?

Please don't take these questions personally, it's just due dilligence.

Kind Regards!--TZubiri (talk) 17:53, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

TZubiri, I'm not related to the company in any way besides being a fan. I would have declared COI a long time ago, believe me. Panini🥪 18:01, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

FLC

Hey bro. It's been a while since we last talked. I was wondering if you could leave some comments for the Pop Smoke discography at FLC? I would really appreciate it! The Ultimate Boss (talk) 17:56, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you

Hey bro. I want to thank you for everything you have done to help me with throughout my time on Wikipedia. I really do appreciate it and hope you are doing well during these difficult times. 💫💫💫 The Ultimate Boss (talk) 09:32, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

The Ultimate Boss, Much appreciated, and good luck with your FAs, I was considering reviewing Pop Smoke Discography, but it's mostly just tables and there isn't much to say about them. That leaves the refs, and I'm not experienced enough in that field to leave bold suggestions. Panini🥪 16:33, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
That is totally fine. I’m sorry to ask... But I was wondering if you could leave some comments for the "Cups (song)"? The nomination is dedicated to my love on who passed away from covid. I really want this article to be FA before I graduate high school in June and head to college. The Ultimate Boss (talk) 03:16, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
The Ultimate Boss, Yeah, I'll leave some comments, but not immediately, though. I'm not sure why nobody is supporting after you address their claims, so don't let that get you down. Stay persistent, even through the source review (I wanted to quit PMTOK during my source review, trust me, it's worth it). Panini🥪 17:18, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Email

You can disable your proxy/vpn and wait 24 hours; that should allow you to edit. If you are unable to do so, you can apply for an IP-block exemption which is explained at WP:IPBE. The block placed by that administrator is definitely not aimed at editors in good standing like you (thanks!), and I'm sorry this is affecting you. --Yamla (talk) 13:46, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

I have granted you WP:IPBE for ten days. This should give you an opportunity to determine if you can disable your vpn/proxy or, if not, make a formal request under WP:IPBE. I see no reason why you wouldn't qualify for a longer duration IPBE; I'm granting a short duration only because your request was made over email, and because I hope there's a way for you to disable your vpn/proxy. :) To be clear, I would expect the reviewing admin to grant you IPBE for perhaps a year if it turns out to be necessary, unless they see something I've missed. Sorry for all the hoops you've been jumping through. I now expect you can sign in and edit any page you wish, while being unaffected by your prior block. Please let me know if that's accurate. --Yamla (talk) 15:07, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Yamla, No worries. Thanks for your help! Panini🥪 15:36, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Trade

Hi Panini!, I see Paper Mario is in the older nominations section. Would you be interested in a review trade with me for my Die Hard nomination? It's not had any activity in a few weeks and I'm a bit confused tbh given it's one of the best action films ever! If you're interested let me know, and I can get to reviewing your article by the weekend. Thanks. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 22:09, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Sure! I won't be able to do it today, but maybe tomorrow. I'm assuming the article isnt getting much attention because the only top reviewers we have only care about medical content, wars, ships, and billiards. Panini🥪 Panini🥪 23:58, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

And extensive themes sections about how randos think a film is about some abstract concept like pollution or undiscovered tribes in a deep forest somewhere. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 11:22, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

TFL notification

Hi, Panini!. I'm just posting to let you know that List of Mario role-playing games – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for April 19. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 20:17, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Giants2008, Well, this is nice to see. Thanks! Panini🥪 20:26, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

G1ing the Main Page

I noticed your CSD nomination for a certain page that doesn't take kindly to being deleted. I think that merits this:

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something silly.

Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}} talk 18:23, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Sdkb, Ugh, my day has come. I accidentally clicked something on Twinkle. Apparently, I'm an old person that doesn't understand technology because the whole concept of twinkle is still new to me. Panini🥪 18:26, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Someday hopefully Twinkle will be better; don't give up on it haha! {{u|Sdkb}} talk 18:29, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Sdkb, If you don't mind, I'm archiving this page now because I don't want to see this every morning my talk page is getting too long. Panini🥪 18:37, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Panini!/Archive_3&oldid=1208924884"