Jump to content

User talk:Naqx1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 2020

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Dishiishe, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. scope_creepTalk 09:19, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dishiishe Doesn't deserve to be redirected to Darod since it forms part of it, it should have its own page in Wikipedia. I want to make discussions on this topic in a bid to prove that the clan should have its own site in wikipedia platform. Let's discuss

Thank you Naqx1 (talk) 09:28, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Naqx1: There is a simple way to fix this, is to create the article as a draft. Goto Wikipedia:Articles for creation, click create new article and write it up. Make sure it is well sources. Once it is reviewed and it is passed, it will be moved into mainspace, at Dishiishe. It needs to be notable, at least three good references are needed. More if the the article is quite large. I hope that helps. scope_creepTalk 09:45, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know enough about it, to discuss it. Give me three good Google book references, or pdf's from some university or some archive like Jstor or some other kind of decent sources like that, and I will have a look at them. And then we will take it from there. scope_creepTalk 09:47, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

These below articles indicate the importance and existance of clan Dishiishe which is considerbale clan of Darod families. I hope Wikipedia will restore Dishiishe page in the platform just to be searchable, along other counterpart clans.

Thank you, Naqx1


http://www.biyokulule.com/A.Nooh'sarticle.htm

http://biyokulule.com/Bosaso_history.htm

http://www.abtirsi.com/view.php?person=5803&abtirsiLang=1

@Naqx1:. It is not enough by a long way. They are self-published source, and they need to be academic sources. I doubt you'll get it. Where I come from there was supposed to be 12th century saint crossed a river, and a village grew up next to it, with. There has never been any evidence of that, although people refer to it all the time. This is a similar case. scope_creepTalk 13:23, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This clan is a considerble, they don't like your birthplace, this clan have enough population. I hope Wikipedia will consider their existance. And i will do ny best,

Regards, Naqx1 (talk) 13:34, 28 June 2020 (UTC) They are not self-published a forum called Roobdoon has conducted the programe and report[reply]

Naqx1, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Naqx1! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for the invitation, i will be at your podium soon. Sincerley!! Naqx1 (talk) 08:42, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

[edit]

Wikipedia has a very strong rule about edit warring: people who do it are blocked. Instead, please ask why others are reverting your edits and engage with arguments they raise. That should happen at article talk, namely Talk:Dishiishe. It's good to ask at WP:Teahouse where the procedure will be explained. Johnuniq (talk) 07:13, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The platform is becoming place dominate ans manipulate strong users who do transgess, offend others and avoid new users to contribute. The page has rights to stay. I further ask you to restore it. Naqx1 (talk) 08:23, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Signature

[edit]

Hi @Naqx1: Please sign your comments with ~~~~ This is updated by the software to provide a datetime and your name. scope_creepTalk 11:19, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Naqx1 (talk) 06:47, 30 June 2020 (UTC)Naqx1 that my name here, thank you.[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rays Garden requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 19:01, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, Naqx1! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! scope_creepTalk 21:05, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous
Notice

The article Juba Hotel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet notability guidelines; is written like an advertisement.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jmertel23 (talk) 10:29, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Juba Hotel for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Juba Hotel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juba Hotel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jmertel23 (talk) 17:49, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Dishiishe has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Dishiishe was changed by Naqx1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.972353 on 2020-07-29T14:24:32 00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:24, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Biyo Kulule moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Biyo Kulule, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 07:53, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced information in Yalho, Habeeno and Cal Miskaad

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm JaAlDo. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Preceding undated comment added 16:59, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Dahalson per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dahalson. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock reviewed|decline=Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. Unambiguous. ~~~~|1=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 14:51, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
{{unblock|reason=I am not a sockpuppet for someone. I was just had intention to beautify the page, and I reviewed the page's history and then decided to manually add some histories. If the admins decided to do some corrections, I welcome. thank you
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Naqx1 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Decline reason:

Simple denial is insufficient. Please address the concerns raised at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dahalson. Yamla (talk) 19:29, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I was trying to correct the page’s sections. I wish this couldn’t be interpreted as suckpuppet. Even I didn’t involve editing warrying or other disruptive actions. I wish my block would have been reviewed. Naqx1 (talk) 06:33, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]