User talk:MikeAllen/2012

WP:FILM October 2011 Newsletter

The October 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Erik (talk | contribs) 15:07, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Princess Bride

I'm going to begin making this article up to snuff for possible GA or FA status. If you would like to assist, it's more than welcome. Rusted AutoParts (talk) 16:20 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Templates

Can you direct me to any template that could be used for technical articles of film/theater for an info box?--Amadscientist (talk) 02:33, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe any exist. I've never seen one being used. —Mike Allen 02:40, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Are you aware of any template makers within the project?--Amadscientist (talk) 03:16, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Might want to open an invitation on WT:FILM. —Mike Allen 03:26, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New name?

Hey Mike, hope all is well :) I'm not sure if you have seen this but The Bad Girls Club (season 7) is now changed to Bad Girls Club: New Orleans (season 7). I'm not sure why the user changed/moved the article to that name. The show is called "Bad Girls Club" not "Bad Girls Club: New Orleans" right? Well I'm done talking to the kid, I left warnings (not equivalent) but I just wanted to see what are your thoughts? Its always nice to hear two sides. Best, Jona yo! ^{Selena 4 ever} 19:24, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think it should be consistent with the other season articles (without the city). —Mike Allen 22:03, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Its just confusing to the uninformed reader, they are going to ask "where's season 6 of BGC: New Orleans?". I bring this up on the talk page soon. Best, Jona yo! ^{Selena 4 ever} 22:07, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

21 Jump Street

Just saw the trailer for this, you have to like the page to see it, its on the wall. Wasn't interested before but seems pretty funny, thought you may like it. http://www.facebook.com/21JumpStreetMovie?sk=wall

WTF, I haven't heard of this movie either. Thanks for sharing, a movie I will definitely check out. —Mike Allen 21:23, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RustedAutoparts brought the article to my attention. Since it was based off a show about cops who go undercover at a school I thought it was going to be some preachy, afterschool special type thing but I was actually laughing at some of the stuff in that trailer, so its a pleasant surprise Darkwarriorblake (talk) 21:26, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, as a comedy it looks entertaining, but being based off a TV series, it doesn't look quite faithful. Rusted AutoParts (talk) 00:58 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Also this one looks interesting http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ecLYhvu_WQY&feature=player_embedded (NSFW)

Looks kind of.. different. lol —Mike Allen 01:06, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like a teen Hangover, and considering it's by Todd Phillips I expect them to find their friend was in the attic all along. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 01:07, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've never seen The Hangover, but thanks for ruining the movie. —Mike Allen 01:19, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Aww you're kidding right? :( That's not the actual ending of The Hangover so you're ok. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 01:23, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

LOL. Yes I'm joking. But I haven't seen Part II yet. Is it just as good? —Mike Allen 01:27, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I only watched it last week, the reviews are true, it is exactly the same film. It's enjoyable but I don't know if I'd call it a comedy, its more of an adventure film with comedy elements since the mystery is much bigger than anything funny. There is one part though, and you will know it when you see it, that absolutely killed me. But it is a complete carbon copy of the original, like events happen in the same way and play out teh same way right up to and including the ending. Jeong seems to be playing Epps role. But it isn't a bad film, if you liked the first you will like this, but prepare to roll your eyes at how lazy Todd Phillips is. I was also kind of annoyed that there is no explanation for why Stu is marrying the random asian woman and not Heather Graham. The whole reason behind their relationship seems to be so that they could get drunk in Thailand. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 01:34, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jeez, and there's going to be a part 3? I also watched Horrible Bosses, but I can't find where the movie was "racist, homophobic, and misogynistic". —Mike Allen 01:42, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I can't remember what the reviews said, the Village Voice one was the most venomous but I can't remember the points being made. I think it was the all white cast turning to the black man for help (I've read similar complaints with Tower Heist), some gay jokes, and the women all being nymphos. As for the Hangover 3, I think one of the reviews made a point to say how uninspired Phillips is htat they used a wedding again because there are so many reasons and occasions in life that can be used as an excuse for getting drunk and/or drugged. There IS potential there, it remains to be seen if they can actually be bothered to try and find it. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 01:46, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Here's trailer 2 for American Reunion. —Mike Allen 02:00, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the WikiLove Mike, though that article is an example of why I unfollowed GTA V, once I start I can't stop. Though I'm looking forward to the film as every critic is saying it's a return to 80s Eddie Murphy. The American trailer looks OK, it seems like a premise that would be open to further sequels. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 11:41, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There's a GTA V? Yes, as you know, IPs can downgrade an article in the matter of minutes. So it's best to stick with an article you put a lot of work into. —Mike Allen 01:48, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

http://kotaku.com/5855541/grand-theft-auto-vs-first-official-trailer | Note, it isn't anything special. Game articles are a nightmare, thankfully Batman has calmed down. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 02:00, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I know about video games. :-\ Very good graphics, if that's actually in game footage. —Mike Allen 02:29, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well as soon as I've played it and can deal with things like plot I'm gonna try and GA it and then never touch a game article again. I don't know what the difference is between film fans and game fans (though I can definitely see overlap between gamers and people who like Harold & Kumar in terms of being idiots with editing (I like H&K)) and adding unsourced stuff but I watched GTAV and then realized my mistake quickly and unwatched it. Most game articles as well you may notice, the user rating system tends to have like 100 up to 300 ratings before hte game has even come out compared to most films that may have 10. Fast Five had just over 100 I think nearly 7 months after it came out. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 02:44, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unrelated but didn't want to clutter up your talk page with a new section. If you ever have 40 minutes to burn, watch the Red Letter Media review of Jack and Jill here. Actually makes me believe it was an elaborate fraud to make money, at one point they highlight that there are 5 coca-cola symbols facing the camera in one shot and other blatant product placement. Found it interesting anyway and thought you might as well.Darkwarriorblake (talk) 01:14, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

His latest movies suck, but his early movies are ok. ;-) Very good review and spot on (even though I haven't seen it). I wonder if that review could be added to the article? Who are the reviewers, do you know their name? —Mike Allen 03:44, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind it's Mike Stoklasa and Jay Bouman. —Mike Allen 04:26, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know their general notability but I do know that they're pretty famous for their Star Wars prequel reviews Darkwarriorblake (talk) 09:12, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't know what to write, and there would be so much to write. Good info though.. but who really cares about that article? :P I'm sure it won't ever get passed a start class. —Mike Allen 01:15, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it NEEDS to be there so that anyone who reads it KNOWS what a complete sham of a film it is, but that would give the article more effort than it deserves. It should just fade and die like the Bucky Larson: Born to be a Superstar one. But then...then Sandler gets away with the heist of the century. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 02:21, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pnina Tornai

Hi!My name is Katelyn, I am a student at Clemson University and for a project we are creating articles on wikipedia. I am creating a page on Pnina Tornai, a wedding dress designer. I noticed that you have an interest in Tim Gunn, who is also a designer! I was wondering if you could look at look at my page and give me some feedback? If you could that would be so helpful. Thanks! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pnina_Tornai Riffraff520 (talk) 01:07, 4 November 2011 (UTC)user:Riffraff520[reply]

I'm sorry I'm not really into fashion articles or anything. I think I may have edited Gunn's article a few times to correct something. Just read over, WP:NPOV and WP:BLP. —Mike Allen 01:48, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Flight and Paradise Lost

I have created the articles for the upcoming Flight and Paradise Lost. Just thought you might want to take a look. Rusted AutoParts (talk) 16:53 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Looking good. The only thing is that references should go behind punctuation. —Mike Allen

Mariska Hargitay

Overriding a pic with a different version is only permissable when the changes between the two pics are "minor", so I only do this with color changes or minor crops. What constitutes "minor" may be a bit iffy, but the last time that I overwrote a pic with a version that wasn't considered a "minor" difference, it caused a problem on the Commons. I feel less reluctant to do so when the pic being changed is one that I took, so when it's someone else's, I'm more likely to upload the new version separately. Nightscream (talk) 22:46, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a moment...

I'd like you to take a look at my new essay "On other evidence of film notability" before it goes live. Many thanks, Schmidt,' ^{MICHAEL Q.} 04:40, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright of File:GiantSmurfComic-Con.jpg

Hi Mike:

I noticed that you added an image of a giant Smurf to the article The Smurfs (film) that you got from Flickr and uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. You might want to look at Commons:Derivative works. Also, here is a deletion request at Commons on several Smurf images from a while back, with the subject of one of the images that was deleted being a (large?) Smurf balloon at the 2009 Macy's Thanksgiving Day Parade.

The issue I see is that the image may not be appropriate for Commons per the aforementioned Commons:Derivative works policy. I have thus nominated the image for deletion from Commons (the discussion is here).

Kind regards,

—{|Retro00064|☎talk|✍contribs|} 01:26, 14 November 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Thanks for letting me know about this. —Mike Allen 01:45, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal to add American cinema task force under WikiProject United States

Greetings, I am a member of WikiProject United States, it was recently suggested that the American cinema task force of WikiProject Film which you are a member, might be inactive or semi active and it might be beneficial to include a joint task force for it in the list of projects supported by WikiProject United States, which Kumioko and me have added some of the projects like WikiProject American television and WikiProject United States Government. After reviewing the project it appears that there have not been any active discussion on the talk page in some time and the only content updates appear to be simple maintenance so being supported by a larger project might be beneficial. I have begun a discussion on the task force talk page to see how the members of the project feel about this suggestion. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 21:45, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Auto archiving

Hi Mike, could you refresh my memory on how you go about getting an article's references automatically archived? Darkwarriorblake (talk) 22:17, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No way to automatically archive refs. You have to manually do it via WebCitation and add archiveurl=|archivedate=|deadurl=no/yes inside the citation. —Mike Allen 23:31, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure because I remember doing it for Fast Five. I had to submit it somewhere and it was done a few days later. But I can't remember what I had to do. Not a big deal just saves me some time. I'm trying to archive every time I add a reference now but webcitation goes down a lot.Darkwarriorblake (talk) 00:34, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well that's news to me. Hmmmm. —Mike Allen 00:44, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting...

With this new information I think its safe to say that Season 8 can be created (in this case, re-created). I don't have the time right now, just giving you this information as high vandalism should occur soon. Best, Jona yo! ^{Selena 4 ever} 22:55, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NVM, I did it myself :) Best, Jona yo! ^{Selena 4 ever} 23:13, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. —Mike Allen 23:31, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

BTW there's an WP:AN/I about User:Junebea1 since you have had some trouble with this user. Just leaving a note :) Best, Jona yo! ^{Selena 4 ever} 21:21, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Footloose

Looking at your userpage, it appears as those the Footloose remake is still in your Upcoming category. Just thought you wanna know. Rusted AutoParts (talk) 3:35 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Ah. Thanks! —Mike Allen 04:28, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

BTW

Junebea1 had mentioned you're name several times here. Best, Jona yo! ^{Selena 4 ever} 23:02, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Cowboy & Aliens in release at the box office

Thanks for the quick reply! --Boycool (talk) 00:52, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

for finding the budget for MWWM! Can I include the info about how many US cinemas it opened to in the release section? - JuneGloom Talk 00:53, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem. Los Angeles Times reports on Box office predictions every Thursday and includes budgets for the film and I go through every Thursday and add them to articles. Since the film is British you could probably include the pound currency (I think that's correct), which according to this site would covert to £6.4 million (but leave the $10 million in parenthesis since the source only reports that). You don't have to, but that would make it less-Americanized. Of course if you find a better source for the production in pound that would be preferred. :) Yes including the amount of US cinemas would be good to add. Does it plan on having a wide release in the US? —Mike Allen 01:06, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do that. I have no idea about a wider US release, something else for me to look up I think! - JuneGloom Talk 01:19, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to be a total and utter pain, but I need your help to create a box office section (like the one in Inglourious Basterds) for Marilyn. I found some B.O info for the UK, but then I looked at Box Office Mojo and got totally confused about what to add from that. - JuneGloom Talk 14:46, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

BOM figures are only in US dollars, but having a source that includes the film country's currency is also preferred. For limited films, the per theater total should be included. When I get some free time I'll head over to the article to take a look. —Mike Allen 21:23, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Try and use this other limited released film as a guide - Road_to_Nowhere_(film)#Limited_theatrical_run. —Mike Allen 02:23, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! :) - JuneGloom Talk 22:50, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quick question, do awards and nominations have to be in a table in the article? I've been putting them into prose, but an editor commented on the talk page that they should be in a table. - JuneGloom Talk 20:53, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Errr....

For the sake of continued civility, and as no one has used such a derogatory term so far, might you consider striking through the word "Nazi" in your support? Peace, Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 02:54, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Silent Hill: Revelation 3D wrap date

You mentioned a schedule in your edit summary, but the "It's a Wrap" section of the director's blog does not provide any schedule. Is there one shown on another section? The citation you restored is invalid. Hula Hup (talk) 12:20, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes this one: http://www.webcitation.org/5yfj8jH6G —Mike Allen 12:25, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RFA thank you

Thank you for your comment and support at my recent successful RFA. Being now the new fellow in the fraternity of administrators, I will do my best to live up to the confidence shown in me by others, will move slowly and carefully when using the mop, will seek input from others before any action of which I might be unsure, and will try not to break anything beyond repair. Best, Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 21:48, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats! —Mike Allen 21:49, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Film November 2011 Newsletter

The November 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Peppage (talk | contribs) 22:41, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Saw II

The article Saw II you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Saw II for things which need to be addressed. GRAPPLE X 01:39, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ROALD

Hello, MikeAllen/2012, We are wondering if you would like to join the Roald Dahl task force as you have contributed a lot to the articles in our scope. We hope you can join!

Please feel free to add to this list. If you feel a task has been completed feel free to remove it and start a new one!

Become a member of the task force and encourage others to do so.
Tag articles for the task force.
Improve: George's Marvellous Medicine.
Improve: Going Solo.
Work on all Roald Dahl related articles mainly focusing on stubs.
Assess articles on class and importance.
Get Roald Dahl to FA or GA

sillybillypiggy^{¡SIGN NOW OR ELSE!} 17:27, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA nomination - Law & Order: Special Victims Unit (season 12)

Sorry about that, Mike -- I'm honestly pretty new to the whole GA process, and didn't know at the time that you were planning to do a FL nomination. Let me know if there is any way I can help. Ultimately, I'd like to see more L&O articles with good or featured status (or at the very least, with a better grade on the quality scale), which is why I even started this. By the way, would you like to join the Law & Order task force? --Davejohnsan (talk) 19:30, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dave, when nominating for GA/FA, it's usually best to let the top editors of the article know, in case they would like to help out, or may be able to answer the nominator's questions. Hopefully we will be able to get this up to GA or FL! —Mike Allen 04:01, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll remember that for future reference, thanks. By the way, would you like to start a peer review? --Davejohnsan (talk) 18:15, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review is done. Davejohnsan (talk) 23:32, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good looking out

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		AbsoluteGleek's userpage popped up on my watchlist, and I see you've caught their sock—just as you said you would. Great job! Swarm ^X 18:12, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays

		Happy holidays.
		Best wishes for joy and happiness. Hope you have a great one! Jona yo! ^{Selena 4 ever} 00:15, 27 December 2011 (UTC) [reply]

The Edge of Heaven

I notice you cut the bit about the gross. Do you think that's a bad number? Thanks. --Ring Cinema (talk) 08:20, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I was reverting a banned editor. —Mike Allen 08:22, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Apollo 13

The GA review was submitted for this, with improvements needed. Care to assist? RAP (talk) 22:39 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Ah you changed your signature I was wondering who this was. I would if I had more time on my hands.. the only thing lately is I've just been going through my watchlist to check the latest changes. Don't have time to really edit. Sorry. —Mike Allen 05:26, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I actually think of it more as an alternative signature if i don't have time to use my other one. RAP (talk) 15:30 29 December 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Film December 2011 Newsletter

The December 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Peppage (talk | contribs) 22:08, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dance Moms

When you reverted, you also reinstated an enormous amount of OR and trivia. Please be more selective. Drmies (talk) 05:24, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping out on that train wreck of an article. :) —Mike Allen 07:41, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Words fail me. Semi-protection is probably the answer until the Wikipedia:WikiProject Dance Moms becomes more active, and I was sorely tempted yesterday to apply it. I think there's one editor using a variety of similar IPs--one fan with little knowledge of WP policy. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 15:58, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah it's gotten worst since season 2 started. Semi-protection seems to be a good solution for now. —Mike Allen 21:20, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with 'List of films considered the worst'

A user named Doktorbuk added Little Man on the list of films considered the worst. I reverted it and he put it back on there again. He did that because he said that it won enough Razzies and has a low enough RT score for it to be included there. I don't believe him. He probably doesn't understand what 'reliable sources calling it the worst' are. (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_films_considered_the_worst&action=history) Can you do something about this? --Superghost987 (talk) 20:13, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review limits changed

This is a notice to all users who currently have at least one open peer review at Wikipedia:Peer review. Because of the large number of peer review requests and relatively low number of reviewers, the backlog of PRs has been at 20 or more almost continually for several months. The backlog is for PR requests which have gone at least four days without comments, and some of these have gone two weeks or longer waiting for a review.

While we have been able to eventually review all PRs that remain on the backlog, something had to change. As a result of the discussion here, the consensus was that all users are now limited to one (1) open peer review request.

If you already have more than one open PR, that is OK in this transition period, but you cannot open any more until all your active PR requests have been closed. If you would like someone to close a PR for you, please ask at Wikipedia talk:Peer review. If you want to help with the backlog, please review an article whoe PR request is listed at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog/items. Thanks, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 02:59, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Question

In a reviews section of a film article, is it all right if we have multiple Film ratings tables, if the number of listed reviews is large? Case in point being Ra.One. I'd be much obliged if you could clarify this issue. ~*~Ankit Bhatt~*~ 08:41, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Film's January–February Newsletter

The January 2012 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

To unsubscribe, please remove your name from the distribution list. GRAPPLE X 00:42, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Input required

Hi. The role of Film Project co-ordinator has been raised at the talk page of the project. As you were appointed to the role, please would you be able to respond to the topic? Thanks. Lugnuts (talk) 20:06, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bad Girls Club

Hi, Mike, how are you? I am reviewing the article Bad Girls Club for GA. Recently I have reverted multiple edits of an editor. See here. I found those edits vandalism. But, you can revert my edits! In addition you can participate in GA review discussion too! --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 19:26, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Three Stooges Teaser.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Three Stooges Teaser.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:27, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tanisha Thomas

Hey buddy, I've been working on this project for a few days. What do you think of it? Should I continue expanding it and move it to its own article? Best, Jona yo! ^{Selena 4 ever} 17:39, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SVU: Payback

Could you please check out: Talk:Payback (Law & Order: Special Victims Unit)? Thank you!--SVU4671 (talk) 11:45, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Accattone

Hi,
When you worked on the infobox for this one back in October, you somehow managed to change it from Italian to American.
Varlaam (talk) 08:32, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Ice-age-complete-dvd-box-set.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Ice-age-complete-dvd-box-set.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:49, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]