User talk:NFD9001
If you're reverting vandalism here, thanks a bundle! I always seem to forget to personally thank people on their talk pages.
Welcome
[edit]Welcome!
Hello, NFD9001, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
~Richmond96 t • c 02:57, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
Re:one quick question
[edit]Yes, you can use Wikipedia in a paper, but be sure to read up on WP:CW and WP:NGR first.~Richmond96 t • c 00:54, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
Idiot traders
[edit]Please take a look at http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/06/magazine/06Economic-t.html?pagewanted=8&_r=2 before accusing other editors and revert things that seem to you to be what they are not. An article by 2008 Nobel laureate in economics, who describes noise traders as idiot traders. "THERE ARE IDIOTS. Look around." a famous quote about noise traders.
Thou art kind. Dlohcierekim 02:41, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
Re: Quick thanks
[edit]You're welcome. I'm just glad to see that the sword of vandal-fighting is as swift as ever. :-) Happy editing! CarrotMan (talk) 08:30, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit]Peppermint Chills Thanks you for removing vandalism from his User-page. |
Peppermint Chills 23:43, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
My talk page
[edit]Thanks for sorting out the vandalism! 18:12, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
Sorry, about editing the Brocton page, really appreciate what you guys do. Was just having fun with a friend... Keep up the good work and love Wikipeidia. Thanks :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.249.94.153 (talk) 22:34, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit]Thanks for the Barnstar - Keep up the good work yourself Vrenator (talk) 19:00, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to STiki!
[edit]
Hello, Lozeldafan, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Here are some pages which are a little more fun:
We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and -- t numbermaniac c 05:33, 21 July 2013 (UTC) |
STiki emergency
[edit]Hello! Due to a security update to the wiki software, older versions of STiki are no longer functional. You've been identified as a user of STiki, and are kindly asked to upgrade to the current version at Wikipedia:STiki#Download before continuing with use of the tool. Continuing to use older versions will be detrimental to the STiki project. Please see Wikipedia talk:STiki#Errors for a discussion of this issue or to respond to this message. Thank you! 04:11, 21 August 2013 (UTC) |
A Tesla Roadster for you!
[edit]A Tesla Roadster for you! | |
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! Gg53000 (talk) 14:41, 8 January 2014 (UTC) |
Hello Good Sir
[edit]I see you've reverted a recient edit of mine. I'm inquiring into the reason you did so? 209.50.138.253 (talk) 00:19, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
- In reference to this edit, I can answer for him/ her: deliberate misspellings of Wikipedia template titles and the inclusion of inaccurate and racist terminology within a subject heading are likely to get your work reverted whenever they appear on Wikipedia-- or possibly get you justifiably banned. That's why. I am surprised you do not understand this outright, good sir. KDS4444Talk 23:10, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
sup — Preceding unsigned comment added by Savorycesar (talk • contribs) 00:58, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, NFD9001. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Select Survey Invite
[edit]I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they affect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take no more than 1-2 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_+_Politics.
Your survey Link: http://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9S3JByWf57fXEkR?Q_DL=56np5HpEZWkMlr7_9S3JByWf57fXEkR_MLRP_bJlU1jAUvgGixCt&Q_CHL=gl
I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.
Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 01:14, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, NFD9001. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hey!
[edit]Hey! Another wikipedian friend. Feel free to reach out anytime. Benjamin (talk) 07:23, 25 February 2020 (UTC)