User talk:Kotbot

Confirming that I am the owner of Kotbot.--Kotniski 20:36, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Koniowo

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Koniowo, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Cerekwica, Lower Silesian Voivodeship. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:37, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ossówka

A tag has been placed on Ossówka, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to a nonexistent page.

If you can fix this redirect to point to an existing Wikipedia page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you also fix the redirect. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Metropolitan90 (talk) 15:00, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jeziorno

A tag has been placed on Jeziorno, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to a nonexistent page.

If you can fix this redirect to point to an existing Wikipedia page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you also fix the redirect. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Metropolitan90 (talk) 15:01, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orłów Drewniany

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Orłów Drewniany, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Bobliwo. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:49, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tarzymiechy Trzecie

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Tarzymiechy Trzecie, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Bobliwo. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:03, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tarzymiechy Drugie

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Tarzymiechy Drugie, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Bobliwo. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:03, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalisme.

Veuillez cesser immédiatement le vandalisme des pages polonaises. Budelberger (talk) 14:46, 28 August 2008 (UTC) ()[reply]

Acceptez mes excuses JVEP - ce n'etait pas de vandalisme, ce n'etait qu'une erreur programmatique qui a ete resolue.--Kotniski (talk) 18:59, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Interwiki

Looking at one of Kotbot articles (Wiśnicz), I see it was not linked to from pl wikipedia. This should be corrected, if possible - can Kotbot update pl wikipedia with links to en articles it is creating? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 14:54, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it could, and it used to do so - but due to performance issues (it slowed the whole process down too much) I stopped it doing that. I thought existing interwiki bots would add the missing links, but maybe they need a bit of time.--Kotniski (talk) 15:17, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pages you created

Stop creating so many pages bot, you are flooding Special:NewPages! --The Firewall 09:37, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'll stop it for a bit.--Kotniski (talk) 10:45, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

heh I didn't mean to interrupt bot's work. Isn't there a way to bypass Special:NewPages? Because this bot apparently never makes bad pages that need to be checked. --The Firewall 20:26, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've asked at Village Pump (WP:VPT) but I suspect there isn't any way to do that. Unfortunately I don't have a permanent fast link I can run the bot over, so I have to take full advantage of the online time I can get. If I could find a way of having it running all the time then I'd slow it down to reduce the flood of New Pages.--Kotniski (talk) 09:15, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PS The reply from Village Pump is that there is no way to bypass New Pages, but if you want to hide those particular pages, you can use the "hide bot edits" option while viewing.--Kotniski (talk) 09:42, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah thanks, didn't notice that link earlier. --The Firewall 06:07, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stara Wieś, Pruszków County

Hi. Your bot created Stara Wieś, Pruszków County, with the location given as
{{coord|52|8|275|N|20|76|906|E|region:PL_type:city }}. Which got flagged for having more than 59 seconds in a minute. The correct location seems to be
52°04′58″N 20°46′09″E / 52.08275°N 20.76906°E / 52.08275; 20.76906 (dms: 52°04′58″N 20°46′09″E / 52.08275°N 20.76906°E / 52.08275; 20.76906). Or close to that, like
52°04′55″N 20°46′17″E / 52.08192°N 20.77140°E / 52.08192; 20.77140 (dms: 52°04′55″N 20°46′17″E / 52.08192°N 20.77140°E / 52.08192; 20.77140).

The odd thing is that the article says,

"It lies approximately 51 kilometres (32 mi) east of Nadarzyn, 50 km (31 mi) east of Pruszków, and 36 km (22 mi) east of Warsaw."

It's actually ~25 km SW of Warsaw; does the bot automatically generate such text from the coordinates?
—WWoods (talk) 23:00, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, sorry, the bot doesn't pick up errors in coordinates very well - I'm planning to improve the code. At the moment I deal with these errors manually, and sometimes it takes a few hours or days before I catch up. Thanks for the pointer.--Kotniski (talk) 07:50, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Misplaced maps in Polish place articles

Hi! I've noticed that when the bot creates an infobox containing a map, the map is misplaced such that it overhangs the edges of the infobox (at least that's how it appears in IE6) - see for example Łukawica, Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship, Sokule, Masovian Voivodeship, Podbuszyce. I'm not too sure how to correct this, and given the number of articles the bot has produced, correcting all of them would be a job better done by the bot than manually. Any thoughts? -- Timberframe (talk) 15:13, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not seeing that either in IE7 or Firefox (and I've never noticed any problems when I've viewed these things in IE6 either). Perhaps it depends on screen resolution? Anyway, the problem is most likely to be with the template {{Infobox Settlement}}, which handles the positioning of the maps.--Kotniski (talk) 09:18, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, looking at that template's talk page, I see they've been having problems like that. So it's not the bot's fault, and it looks like the problem's solved now anyway.--Kotniski (talk) 09:51, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's good. I'm not seeing it today on IE7 or Firefox either. I'll check again when I next have access to IE6. -- Timberframe (talk) 10:43, 8 November 2008 (UTC

Looks OK on IE6 now as well. -- Timberframe (talk) 09:48, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Berezyszcze

A tag has been placed on Berezyszcze, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

the article utterly fails to recognize the significance of the village.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Archaeopteryx (talk) 00:06, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stub templates

Hi K - most of the stub templates you've been making with this bot for the new geo articles have been fine, but you slipped up with the naming of one today. Hyphens aren't used within the names of places in geo-stub templates, (camelcaps are used instead, since hyphens are used to separate the parts of a template name). So I've moved {{Kędzierzyn-Koźle-geo-stub}} to {{KędzierzynKoźle-geo-stub}}. May be worth watching to make sure that the same thing doesn't happen with any more you make! Grutness...wha? 01:18, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks for pointing it out. I'll check there aren't any more like that.--Kotniski (talk) 10:48, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I found a few more with hyphens and moved them. According to the list of Polish counties there shouldn't be any more.--Kotniski (talk) 11:00, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just a general note that you should have a Emergency shutdown button on your botpage eventually

A bot that creates new pages (automatically patrolled) should have one, seeing as many other bots do. ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 06:36, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Holy crap/how does this work

I was just checking on my articles in special:newpages and every page there was created by you (a bot appearantly). How does that work/why do people complain about it? How does the bot create so many good articles on it's own? Daniel Christensen (talk) 08:38, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, "good" is perhaps an exaggeration, but the articles are taken from Polish Wikipedia, and while they are not exactly translated, the essential standard information (coordinates, population etc.) is extracted and fitted to an English model to make acceptable stubs.--Kotniski (talk) 08:56, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chroberz — IPA pronunciation.

Hi, could you add IPA pron. for article about Chroberz? Thanks in advance. Keep up the great work! Visor (talk) 21:29, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created by Kotbot and coordinates

Excellent work with the series of articles created! Just a minor point, instead of adding the coordinates twice, once with the {{Infobox Settlement}} and once with {{coord}} would you add to the coordinates just once? The flag "coordinates_display=Y" can be used to display the coordinates with the article's title, sample: Zwierzyn, West Pomeranian Voivodeship [1]. -- User:Docu

Yes, I thought of doing that when Infobox Settlement was changed, but somehow never got round to it. Now I'm nearly at the end, I'll probably just carry on till the end doing it like this, and possibly change them all in some future pass, rather than risk changing the code now. (I'm assuming it doesn't really matter - the end result is the same - if you think there's some important reason for doing it the other way, then I could still change it.)--Kotniski (talk) 08:55, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A friendly note

Just a friendly note that your current bot edits are not covered under any of your existing bot requests, if they continue I will be forced to temporarily block the account. Q ^{T C} 08:41, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

They're correcting articles the bot itself created - I don't see any problem with that as being covered by the original request (it's like doing something in more than one stage).--Kotniski (talk) 08:57, 31 August 2009 (UTC) (However I've stopped the bot for now; let me know if you think there are any problems with what it's been doing).--Kotniski (talk) 08:59, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, the edits themselves seem fine, it's just I could find no mention anywhere of what task it was related to. I'll bring this up on the WP:BAG and WP:BON boards for further input. Just for clarification is this related to task 3? Q ^{T C} 09:31, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's right. Basically it's repairing minor faults in the earlier articles that were rectified when the bot created later articles, and taking account of coordinate information which other bots have added in the meantime.--Kotniski (talk) 09:39, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'd give it 24-48 hours and if nobody brings up any problems on WP:BON to go ahead an resume. Q ^{T C} 10:24, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK. --Kotniski (talk) 10:31, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, seems there are no objections, so I'll be resuming these edits shortly.--Kotniski (talk) 07:28, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Słowiki-Folwark

Your edits created duplicate of coordinates. I think, the existing one below map is enough. Please, correct it.--WlaKom (talk) 10:08, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is quite normal - one set of coordinates must be in the infobox to make the map work, and another set goes at the top of the page because that's where people expect coordinates to be (regardless of whether the article has an infobox). Check with other articles that use {{Infobox settlement}} - I think you'll find this is quite common practice (that's why the coordinates_display parameter was added to the template, after all).--Kotniski (talk) 10:41, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you think, you are right, change all of them or none of them. It doesn't make sense to change only one. I agree, this is very common to see coordinates at the top, but only when you don't have them inside infobox.

Nie myślę że, dublowanie informacji jest właściwe. Może należałoby usunąć ją z miejsca poniżej mapy? --WlaKom (talk) 11:17, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Zdaje się, że to wymagałoby zmiany kodu w {{Infobox settlement}}. Należałoby zgłosić taką propozycję na stronie Template talk:Infobox settlement. Zgadzam się, że to może być lepsze rozwiązanie.--Kotniski (talk) 13:00, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kotniski is 100% correct in this. Very common to see double coordinates in ifnobox and at top. If anything though it is more important the infoboxes has them to display the pin maps. Himalayan 20:14, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dąbrowa, Rzeszów County

The article Dąbrowa, Rzeszów County has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A village with less then 900 people? Totally useless

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CJISBEAST (talk) 22:58, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Gmina Goczałkowice-Zdrój

Template:Gmina Goczałkowice-Zdrój has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji 01:55, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Gmina Jejkowice

Template:Gmina Jejkowice has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji 01:56, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Gmina Kozy

Template:Gmina Kozy has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji 01:56, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Gmina Spytkowice, Nowy Targ County

Template:Gmina Spytkowice, Nowy Targ County has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji 01:56, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ignacewo, Podlaskie Voivodeship

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ignacewo, Podlaskie Voivodeship requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article consists of a dictionary definition or other article that has been transwikied to another project and the author information recorded.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. RCSprinter123 (talk) 20:56, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Status and Advice

As reviewing administrator, I of course did not delete this. --the ed. who placed the notice was inexperienced, and , as you know, all such towns are notable DGG ( talk ) 15:17, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks (from the operator).--Kotniski (talk) 15:19, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kotbot edit summaries

Could you please take a look at Wikipedia:Bot owners' noticeboard#General notice to bot owners about edit summaries and see if the suggestions might apply to your bot? Feel free to add your own suggestions and comments there too. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 21:06, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nakielec for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nakielec is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nakielec until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jtrainor (talk) 22:58, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Prostki, Podlaskie Voivodeship for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Prostki, Podlaskie Voivodeship is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prostki, Podlaskie Voivodeship until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Bulwersator (talk) 09:00, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chmurówka for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chmurówka is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chmurówka until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Bulwersator (talk) 08:21, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

urban-rural Gmina pages: wording

I noticed that the urban-rural Gmina pages, which you created, all had a phrase like this one in Gmina Bytów: and as of 2006 its total population is 23,568 (out of which the population of Bytów amounts to 16,715, and the population of the rural part of the gmina is 6,853). (emphasis added), which I changed to and as of 2006 its total population is 23,568, of which the population of Bytów is 16,715, and the population of the rural part of the gmina is 6,853. My reasoning: out of which would be correct for something like The factory manufactured cement and concrete, out of which the hospital was constructed. But there's no out-ness in portions of a population living in town. The words amounts to seems to be just a pretentious way of saying is. And what was in parentheses doesn't seem parenthetical, but simply co-equal with the rest of the sentence.

I edited about 77 of the urban-rural Gmina pages; including all of the ones starting with A and B. At first, changed only out of and later I started making all three changes.

If you agree with me, I wonder if you could create a bot to edit all approximately 600 urban-rural Gmina pages and make these changes as I started to do.

Before focusing only on Gmina pages, I also edited 5 County pages (Głogów County, Bolesławiec County, Leżajsk County, Tarnobrzeg County, and Zgorzelec County); they used out of which also.—Anomalocaris (talk) 03:57, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nowe Mierzno

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nowe Mierzno requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Krimin killr21 (talk) 22:34, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.

I'm from Sokolnik (Masovian). If you have any questions Sokolnik about the falconer write boldly. Hubercik6 (talk) 20:13, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article notability notification

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote recently, Ludomki, has been tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: Find sources: "Ludomki" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 14:42, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article notability notification

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote recently, Ludwików, Radomsko County, has been tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: Find sources: "Ludwików, Radomsko County" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 14:42, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article notability notification

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote recently, Modryń, has been tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: Find sources: "Modryń" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 14:43, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article notability notification

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote recently, Naruszewo, has been tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: Find sources: "Naruszewo" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 14:45, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article notability notification

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote recently, Nowa Wrona, Płońsk County, has been tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: Find sources: "Nowa Wrona, Płońsk County" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 14:45, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article notability notification

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote recently, Nowe Staroźreby, has been tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: Find sources: "Nowe Staroźreby" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 14:45, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mikołajowy Las

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Mikołajowy Las, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 18:07, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Borki, Żuromin County for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Borki, Żuromin County is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Borki, Żuromin County until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Magicsan (talk) 16:07, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kwaszyn

The article Kwaszyn has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks reliable sources to deserve an article. Also does not meet WP:GEOLAND nor WP:GNG for notability. s

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. {{SUBST:replyto|Can I Log In}}^{Copy and paste the code to reply}(Talk) 17:42, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of InCruises LLC for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article InCruises LLC is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InCruises LLC until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joanrivers (talk) 05:56, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Janiszowice, Krosno Odrzańskie County for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Janiszowice, Krosno Odrzańskie County is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janiszowice, Krosno Odrzańskie County until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JTZegers (talk) 19:25, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Parnówko for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Parnówko is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parnówko until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JTZegers (talk) 19:32, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Wierzchno, Myślibórz County for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wierzchno, Myślibórz County is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wierzchno, Myślibórz County until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 08:30, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nawojczyn for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nawojczyn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nawojczyn until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

EpicPupper 21:46, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your article Zabiele, Gmina Kolno

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Zabiele, Gmina Kolno to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages needing translation into English, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. TheManInTheBlackHat (talk) 20:38, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Krzesin Landscape Park for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Krzesin Landscape Park is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krzesin Landscape Park until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Crainsaw (talk) 11:01, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Na Górze for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Na Górze is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Na Górze until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FOARP (talk) 20:25, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Osowo Małe, Gmina Lipnica for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Osowo Małe, Gmina Lipnica is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Osowo Małe, Gmina Lipnica until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FOARP (talk) 18:22, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kraklewo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kraklewo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kraklewo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FOARP (talk) 19:10, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Święte, Pomeranian Voivodeship for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Święte, Pomeranian Voivodeship is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Święte, Pomeranian Voivodeship until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FOARP (talk) 07:49, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Brzęczek for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brzęczek is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brzęczek until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FOARP (talk) 08:22, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Polesie, Pomeranian Voivodeship for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Polesie, Pomeranian Voivodeship is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polesie, Pomeranian Voivodeship until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FOARP (talk) 08:42, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Owczarki, Pomeranian Voivodeship for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Owczarki, Pomeranian Voivodeship is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Owczarki, Pomeranian Voivodeship until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FOARP (talk) 10:33, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Piwnice, Pomeranian Voivodeship for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Piwnice, Pomeranian Voivodeship is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Piwnice, Pomeranian Voivodeship until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FOARP (talk) 11:09, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kudyny for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kudyny is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kudyny until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FOARP (talk) 11:59, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Łuknajno-Leśniczówka for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Łuknajno-Leśniczówka is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Łuknajno-Leśniczówka until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FOARP (talk) 12:36, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pszczółki, Warmian-Masurian Voivodeship for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pszczółki, Warmian-Masurian Voivodeship is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pszczółki, Warmian-Masurian Voivodeship until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FOARP (talk) 15:21, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tałty SHR for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tałty SHR is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tałty SHR until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FOARP (talk) 15:30, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zielony Gaj, Mrągowo County for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zielony Gaj, Mrągowo County is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zielony Gaj, Mrągowo County until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FOARP (talk) 15:50, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ławki PGR for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ławki PGR is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ławki PGR until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FOARP (talk) 16:27, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Góra, Kętrzyn County for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Góra, Kętrzyn County is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Góra, Kętrzyn County until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FOARP (talk) 11:21, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jeżew PGR for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeżew PGR is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeżew PGR until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FOARP (talk) 19:09, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zajączkowo-Dworzec for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zajączkowo-Dworzec is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zajączkowo-Dworzec until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FOARP (talk) 12:56, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zajączkowo-Wybudowanie for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zajączkowo-Wybudowanie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zajączkowo-Wybudowanie until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FOARP (talk) 13:13, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Grabino

The article Grabino has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search fails to find sources to verify that this place exists; the Polish article was deleted for this reason. Maps of the area show Park Grabina nearby but that is not a village.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ktery SK for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ktery SK is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ktery SK until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FOARP (talk) 12:54, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Łęki Kościelne SK for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Łęki Kościelne SK is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Łęki Kościelne SK until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FOARP (talk) 12:58, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Suchodębie PGR for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Suchodębie PGR is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suchodębie PGR until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FOARP (talk) 13:26, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bzówki PGR for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bzówki PGR is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bzówki PGR until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FOARP (talk) 13:30, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nowe Ostrowy PKP for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nowe Ostrowy PKP is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nowe Ostrowy PKP until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FOARP (talk) 13:41, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hutniki for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hutniki is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hutniki until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FOARP (talk) 16:15, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Milczany, West Pomeranian Voivodeship for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Milczany, West Pomeranian Voivodeship is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milczany, West Pomeranian Voivodeship until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FOARP (talk) 17:09, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nowa Łęknica for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nowa Łęknica is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nowa Łęknica until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FOARP (talk) 07:51, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pod Jedlinką for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pod Jedlinką is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pod Jedlinką until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FOARP (talk) 08:13, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pieniężno Drugie for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pieniężno Drugie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pieniężno Drugie until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FOARP (talk) 08:31, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Harasimowicze-Kolonia

The article Harasimowicze-Kolonia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

It is not a settlement, it is a solectwo and does not meet WP:GEOLAND.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ostrowie-Kolonia

The article Ostrowie-Kolonia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GEOLAND. Solectwo, not settlement.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Krajków, Łódź Voivodeship

The article Krajków, Łódź Voivodeship has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article states that it belongs to Gmina Wieluń, but its related article on the Polish wikipedia states that it is in Gmina Mokrsko. What's more, the Polish article states that it is part of the town of Krzyworzeka, Łódź Voivodeship, i.e. not a separate town in its own right. There is no content here that could be merged into Krzyworzeka.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Martinice (Žďár nad Sázavou District) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Martinice (Žďár nad Sázavou District) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martinice (Žďár nad Sázavou District) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mseingth2133444 (talk/contribs) 04:04, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kępniak, Kuyavian-Pomeranian Voivodeship for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kępniak, Kuyavian-Pomeranian Voivodeship is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kępniak, Kuyavian-Pomeranian Voivodeship until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:33, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wola Bukowska

The article Wola Bukowska has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article only has one source, fails WP:NOTABILITY, and needs more verification citations. On Wikipedia, it's always important for me and other Wikipedians here to look for sources before proposing this for deletion. Unfortunately, I didn't find any sources for this article, which is mainly why I am proposing this be deleted.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GoodHue291 (talk) 19:00, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pastewnik, Otwock County

The article Pastewnik, Otwock County has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a village, there is nothing in the source that was cited, and the Polish Wikipedia article was deleted (https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Poczekalnia/artykuły/2015:06:13:Zastarze)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]