User talk:KojiDude/Archive 4

SarekOfVulcan RFA

Thank you for !voting on my RfA. If you supported, I'll make sure your confidence is not misplaced; if you opposed, I'll take your criticism into account and try to adjust my behavior accordingly.

See you around the wiki!--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 01:03, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your !vote at my RFA

Thanks!

Thank you, KojiDude, for your support !vote at my RFA. I will be doing my best to make sure that your confidence has not been misplaced. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 18:46, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks

My RfA

I hope the other kids at school play with me...

Thank you for your support in my recent RfA, which closed successfully. I felt the process was a thorough review of my contributions and my demeanor, and I was very gratified to see how many editors took the time to really see what I'm about and how I can be of help to the project. As a result, some editors changed their views during the discussion, and most expressed specific, detailed points to indicate their opinion (whether it was , , or ).

A number of editors were concerned about my level of experience. I was purposeful in not waiting until a particular benchmark occurred before requesting adminship, because I feel - as many do - that adminship is not a reward and that each case is individual. It is true that I am not the most experienced editor around here, but I appreciate that people dug into my contributions enough to reach the conclusion that I seem to have a clue. Also, the best thing about this particular concern is that experience is something an editor - or administrator - can always get more of, and I'll continue doing that, just as I've been doing. (If I seem a little slow at it, feel free to slap me.)

Thanks in particular for being an early supporter. I had several comments early on that were a little disappointing and it was encouraging to see some validating input.

I am a strong believer in the concept that this project is all about the content, and I'm looking forward to contributing wherever I can. Please let me know if I can be of any help. In the meantime, I'm off to school...

Thanks again!

Frank | talk 11:52, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possible typo on your userpage

I wasn't sure if it was a typo or not, but you have "Be weary, my sexy-ness knows no bounds" on your userpage. "Be weary" means be tired while "Be wary" means be cautious. I didn't know which one you meant, so I don't know if it's a typo or not. Just thought I'd mention that here. Useight (talk) 20:45, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hm... I didn't know that. I meant the second one. Thanks for pointing that out! Why is the English languege cursed with homophones?--Koji †Dude ^(C) 21:39, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to help. I've got your back. Useight (talk) 18:24, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dude.....

Dude ur a hypocrite, u were the one to call me a dumb-ass so thats why i called u a dumbass and dumbshit.Johnny542 (talk) 03:55, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

? Hypocrite? I didn't say it was bad that you insulted me, I just said we should ignore that while we discuss the article. Did you read the rest of the message? (Haven't looked at your talk page yet)--Koji †Dude ^(C) 03:57, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah dude lets just forget about this shit and just be friends okay ^_^. Also, sorry it took me a long time to respond. Johnny542 (talk) 04:00, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good to me. :-) --Koji †Dude ^(C) 17:02, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, so whatsup ^^. Johnny542 (talk) 01:14, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Adolf Hitler

Please refrain from performing joke edits to articles. Thanks. —David Levy 04:34, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try. Sorry.--Koji †Dude ^(C) 14:14, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You crackin' up Leon? Nutshells on Hitler? Arguing with yourself at RfA in the oppose section? (while I found it mildly humorous and know you meant no harm, it was still rather rude to the candidate and assumptive to the community, and you know how much I dislike RfA...) You need a beer? Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 22:12, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the RfA thing was weird, I know. But it's better for me to argue with myself then drag everybody into an RfA drama fest, right? About the beer... come on. If you think I'm screwing with Hitler now, wait until I'm drunk.--Koji †Dude ^(C) 00:09, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to know you're ok. I've seen enough Wackiness^TM from you on my very own talkpage to know that you have a keen and wonderful sense of humor. One that I happen to "get". Others may not, being that they have inferior intellect to you and I. All that to say, don't go adding dumbass (I use that term lightly) templates to high-risk articles. And the arguing with yourself, while hilarious, was bizarre enough that some others are commenting based on your comments. Don't do that to another RfA candidate - RFA is hell for them. Oppose who you wish, support who you wish, but don't make a mockery at the expense of someone ballsy enough to actually hit "save" when faced with that transclusion button...Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 00:21, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, tell me about it. Them Wikipedians got noooooooooo sense of humor... I dunno, I think more people should be silly at RfA. It's always so serious and scary there. It wouldn't be hell for the cnadidate if everybody took it a little lighter. I know what you're thinking though, but I'm not going to do anything totally un-called for, so don't worry. But, I am looking out for the next RfA that I can't decide on, so I can put in my SUPER ULTRA OMEGA RED AWESOME DECISIVE BUFFALO NEUTRAL.--Koji †Dude ^(C) 00:38, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looking forward to that :-). As long as you mean it sincerely...Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 00:40, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dude...=

...the nutshell was the funniest thing I've seen in a LONG time! Frank | talk 22:25, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:HAU, Status, and you!

As you may know, the StatusBot responsible for maintaining the status of the Highly Active Users was taken offline. We now have a replacement in the Qui status system. This semi-automatic system will allow you to easily update your status page found at Special:Mypage/Status which the HAU page code is now designed to read from. If you are already using Qui (or a compatible) system - great! - no action is needed (other than remembering to update your status as necessary). If not, consider installing Qui. You can also manually update this status by changing the page text to online, offline, or busy. While it is not mandatory, the nature of HAU is that people are often seeking a quick answer from someone who is online and keeping our statuses up-to-date will assist with this. Note if you were previously using your /Status page as something other than a one-word status indicator, your HAU entry may have been set to "status=n" to correct display issues. Please clear this parameter if you change things to be "HAU compatible". Further questions can be raised at WT:HAU. This message was delivered by xenobot 22:47, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Uh... okay. Am I supposed to...like...do somethin' about that, or what? This makes no sense to me. NEED SIMPLE ENGLISH. TELL KOJI WHAT DO.--Koji †Dude ^(C) 23:24, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Go to WP:QUI and follow the steps there. The rest should take care of itself. Useight (talk) 00:13, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why the hell didn't you say that in the first place? It took me longer to read that message than it did to install the thing. Anyway, so far this Qui thing seems like the coolest thing I've ever seen, so bravo.--Koji †Dude ^(C) 02:51, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blame the botop, I heard he's nub. –xenocidic (talk) 02:52, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My RFA Thanks

Saw your notice at the top of the page; with that in mind, I should say that this is not a discussion about KojiDude, but it is positive. I am positively delighted to have had your support at my RFA, which closed as short while ago as a success. Thank you! StephenBuxton (talk) 23:22, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, good luck. Thanks for bothering to personalize the RfA Thanks. :-) --Koji †Dude ^(C) 01:55, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thank you

		Thank you!
		KojiDude, it is with deep awareness of the responsibility conferred by your trust that I am honored to report that in part to your support, my request for adminship passed (87/14/6). I deeply value the trust you and the Wikipedia community have in me, and I will embark on a new segment of my Wikipedia career by putting my new tools to work to benefit the entire community. My best to you, Happyme22 (talk) 03:14, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for voting in my RfA, which passed with 90 support, 2 oppose, and 0 neutral.

All the best, Ben MacDui ^Talk/Walk 20:28, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gamer93

What the hell is with this guy? He should receive a warning or something. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 03:47, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Meh, he's new. I left him a message, so as long as he actually reads some of the links I put up, he'll be fine. You're right, he should be warned, but only if he does it again. I'm not sure where to report him if this gets out of hand, though.--Koji Dude ^(C) 03:54, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for backing me up man. You're a good friend ;) Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 03:58, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem. :-) Any time.--Koji Dude ^(C) 04:06, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

Nice signature. — Realist² (Speak) 01:29, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Huh. Thanks! :-) --Koji Dude ^(C) 01:37, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:GreenEcho

GreenEcho has a 3-minute window... he's got warnings all over his user page, is there nothing to do about it? He's seriously disrupting a number of pages and has been 3RR and vandalism warned a few times now. Naahid بنت الغلان ^{Click to talk} 22:39, 24 July 2008 (UTC) [reply]

I'm not sure what can be done, but I'm assuming the 3-minute window will be ignored due to his consistent (and recent) history of revert-warring. I've linked to one of his 3RR warnings. I'm not an admin, so you'll have to wait until one reviews your request. I'm expecting a block, though.--Koji Dude ^(C) 22:53, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My RFA

Thanks for commenting in my RFA. Even though you opposed, I understand your concerns, and if you see me do something wrong, please tell me.

Cheers!

J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 20:39, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfB Thank You spam

Thank you for participating in my RfB! I am very grateful for the confidence of the community shown at my RfB, which passed by a count of 154/7/2 (95.65%). I have read every word of the RfB and taken it all to heart. I truly appreciate everyone's input: supports, opposes, neutrals, and comments. Of course, I plan to conduct my cratship in service of the community. If you have any advice, questions, concerns, or need help, please let me know. Again, Thanks! — Rlevse • Talk • 08:48, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't bite the templates

Please do not refer to templates as "s.o.b."'s or sneaky bastards. They have feelings too. –xeno (talk) 15:36, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I knew that thin-skinned sissy would run and complain to an admin. >:-( For christ's sake, {{vacation}}, grow a pair!--Koji Dude ^(C) 15:44, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

heh... whilst on teh subject of templates, I'm not sure if you're big on the interwiki stuff, but I just finally fixed up {{iw-matrix}} for general public consumption. –xeno (talk) 15:45, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. I haven't spread out to enough wiki's for that to be usefull to me (I think I've got 3 or 4, couldn't figure out the SUL), but I'm impressed with your technical-know-how. Oh, and, this edit summary suggests plagiarism on your part—I'll have to bring this to WP:ANI now. :-) --Koji Dude ^(C) 15:52, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

More...

How about WP:CIVIL and WP:DONTBEADICK. Get over whatever the hell you're pissed at me about already and quit with the damn insults everytime you edit after me or leave a remark behind. It is immature and getting old fast. You claim to be a Christian adult, so act like it. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 14:31, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm suprised you think I'm specifically doing this to piss you off. I'm also suprised you would question my religion too. That's taking your argument a step higher! Let me explain for a second. One user, and one IP adress question a change you made to an article. You respond with "Your changes aren't going to happen". I didn't mind much, because that was more or less true. Now, another user has expressed concern. A brand new user, with only one edit, and an account less than 12 hours old; you label him a SPA. What the hell is the reasoning behind that? You're assuming bad faith and you know it. I insulted you once, and if you were really as mature as you act, you'd know you earned it. Stop seeing these guys as vandals and sockpuppets, and start seeing them as what they -- and you -- are: editors.--Koji Dude ^(C) 14:38, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Calling someone a jackass in your edit summary is doing something specifically to piss someone off and was beyond uncalled for. You disagree with my marking all the SPAs as such when that's all they are, fine, do it like a polite, intelligent human being without adding the insults. I'm not assuming bad faith, I'm neutrally noting the person has not edited anything else and I'm well within the advice offered WP:SPA. "In communal decision-making, single purpose accounts suspected of astroturfing or vote stacking will sometimes have a tag added below their name, as an aid to those discussing or closing the debate. Please do not take this as an attack on your editing, some users just find it easier to discuss issues when it is clear who the new editors are." It isn't biting a new person, its noting they are new. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 14:44, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's an assumption. We aren't supposed to label every new editor an SPA. Everyone has "little or no edits" outside of a certain topic when they first start. ;-) Give the guy a break, and don't have the bad actions of the people who came before him fall onto his record. Do you see what I mean?--Koji Dude ^(C) 14:48, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks!

Thank you...

...for participating in my RfA, which closed with 119 in support, 4 neutral and 5 opposes. I'm honestly overwhelmed at the level of support that I've received from the community, and will do my best to maintain the trust placed in me. I 'm also thankful to those who opposed or expressed a neutral position, for providing clear rationales and superb feedback for me to build on. I've set up a space for you to provide any further feedback or thoughts, should you feel inclined to. However you voted, thanks for taking the time out to contribute to the process, it's much appreciated. Kind regards, Gazi moff 22:46, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou

Just a little note to say thankyou for participating in my successful RFA candidacy, which passed with 96 supports, 0 opposes, and 1 neutral. I am pleasantly taken aback by the amount of support for me to contribute in an administrative role and look forward to demonstrating that such faith is well placed. Regards, WilliamH (talk) 09:17, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE: RfA Quote

Ah, no problem! Thanks for letting me know. I agree - ironic, isn't it. - Rjd0060 (talk) 18:42, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Leon, thank you for your contribution to the discussion at my recent RfA. If ever you have any concerns about my actions, adminly or otherwise, don't hesitate to let me know. Best wishes, Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 23:04, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thank you

KojiDude/Archive 4, I wish to say thanks for your support in my successful request for adminship, which ended with 82 supports, 3 opposes, and 1 neutral. I will do my best to live up to your expectations. I would especially like to thank Rlevse for nominating me and Wizardman for co-nominating me.
— JGHowes ^talk - 19 August 2008

Power levels

Where was it decided that only the most recent power level would be listed for Dragon Ball characters? I'm sure there was a discussion on this. That's why I undid this edit. Thoughts? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 02:55, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure where it was, but I definetly remember that discussion going down somewhere. I would've reverted the edit too, it's pretty poitnless to list all the power levels in the series. It might be helpful to put "Last Recorded Power Level" or something similar, instead of just "Power Level". To avoid confusion.--Koji Dude ^(C) 04:29, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mind if I leave it in your hands? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 04:30, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, don't sweat it. I'm going offline right now, though (actually just popped in to check if I had messages). I'll get it in the morning.--Koji Dude ^(C) 04:32, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hope you don't mind, I tweaked the grammer for the three pages ;) Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 01:59, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not at all! :-) Thanks.--Koji Dude ^(C) 16:48, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Nameks05.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Nameks05.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:15, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

77.42.186.127

Dude, what the heck is going on with 77.42.186.127... he reverted good edits of mine and then went ape on me. WTF? ناهد/(Nåhed) _speak! 20:35, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just your everyday troll. Probly reverted your edits to mess with you, and yelled at you for the same reason. Best thing to do is report him to the appropriate board (WP:AIV or WP:AN/I would be good places to start) or directly to an administrator. Could be worth it to try and talk some sense into him first, though.--Koji Dude ^(C) 20:48, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An update

There has been an update to a summary you have endorsed at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Majorly#View by Jennavecia. Jennavecia ^(Talk) 05:26, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you mean this, then I beleive I still endorse the view.--Koji Dude ^(C) 14:46, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I keed, I keed

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be deleted for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. . Attacking an admin? How dare ya!!!! Keeper ǀ 76 21:17, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And with that, you've made my day. :-) --Koji Dude ^(C) 21:23, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice

Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 21:07, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think there's been some kind of glitch in your bot, I edit from the Chicago area in the U.S., henche the american flag on my Userpage. I watch Doctor Who, though. Great show.--Koji Dude ^(C) 21:28, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks

Thank you for voting in my RfA, which succeeded with 71 support, 14 oppose, and 5 neutral. Thanks for your participation. I hope I serve you well!

--Smashville^BONK! 23:42, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which passed with a count of (154/3/2). I appreciate the community's trust it me, and I will do my best to be sure it won't regret handing me the mop. I am honored by your trust and your support. Again, thank you. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 18:47, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]