User talk:KingActor

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Poster5371842.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Poster5371842.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:25, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Poster5371842.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Poster5371842.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. (ESkog)^(Talk) 07:20, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I

I have started discussion about your contributions at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#KingActor.2C_now_reincarnated_as_WriterMJ. Ros0709 (talk) 08:43, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of KingActor

A tag has been placed on KingActor requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ros0709 (talk) 08:59, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New Id

It is bad enough keeping track of you with just one Id. You have created user:WriterMJ so I have blocked this Id. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 11:10, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]