User talk:Jtrost

This user may have left Wikipedia. Jtrost has not edited Wikipedia since 25 January 2009. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Please leave new messages by clicking the tab. I will reply to you on your talk page.

Archives
Archive #1, Nov 05 - Oct 06

Do we need to have some arbitration?

You were the only one to object to my edits. You said to take it to the talk page. I have done so. You have not responded there. I also note that you have reverted other edits. So you know, simple reverting without discussion is considered disruptive. With unexplained reverts, it appears that you are going contrary to WP:OWN.

If you request a discussion, then you should discuss. If you do not discuss, there can be no discussion.

I feel that you have been aggressive and unfair. Do we need to go to an arbitration or RfC? --Blue Tie 14:25, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I'm asking that you please be civil and assume good faith, and not jump straight to arbitration when someone disagrees with you. I replied to your comment as soon as I could. Unfortunately, I do not have the luxury of time to visit Wikipedia every day. Regarding the issue at hand, discussing changes to the Lost template is something that is always done regardless of the size of the change. If you take a look through the history there's discussion about just about every change, big and small. You should have discussed adding Lostpedia before adding it, per the status quo. Jtrost (^T | C | _#) 23:58, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK. If you point to an example of incivility I would like to apologize for it.

Although you do not have the luxury of time to visit wikipedia every day, you had sufficient time to revert my edit within minutes and without an appropriate comment. A comment to describe why there is an objection is appropriate, not just reverts. Incidentally, contrary to your assertion of seeking discussion first, the idea on wikipedia is not to discuss first and then edit but rather to edit first and then discuss if there is a problem. If you are interested in learning about that as the wikipedia method, I can direct you to a number of comments in policy, guidelines and essays.

And that was the approach I originally took... in good faith. I specifically requested an explanation, you simply reverted and told ME to take it to the talk page... you never gave one word there to explain the problem. So, while I did originally exercise good faith, I did not see it in return, but rather a somewhat aggressive and confrontational stance.

I used the word "arbitration" loosely to include RfC or Mediation. I have the feeling that you have taken some sort of special ownership and, even in the paragraph above, you are apparently applying and enforcing your own set of rules to that page, contrary to wikipedia policy and guidelines. I am perfectly willing to exercise good faith if you have not done that, but your actions so far, have been in that direction. If that is the case, (and you would know best how you feel about things) we should not take a great deal of time fiddling with a discussion that will not go anywhere -- just bring in other commentators right away. Do you disagree or do you think a discussion will lead to a resolution without that? Test your own mind and feel out whether you feel inclined to compromise or not -- you are the only person who has objected.

On that note, I have replied to your reason on the talk page. You reason seems to be unsubstantiated, given that the area of the nav box is "Miscellaneous" and the link was to a wikipedia article. --Blue Tie 00:14, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

International broadcasters

Hello Jtrost, I was hoping you'd be willing to comment at Talk:Lost (TV series)#International broadcasters. Thanks. -- Wikipedical 00:12, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Vaughan

Nick Vaughan has been renominated for AfD --Kevin Murray 21:26, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:LostDVD2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:LostDVD2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 01:06, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New WikiProject Illinois Collaboration Division

Hey, saw you were a participant in the Illinois WikiProject. I thought I would let you know that there is a new Collaboration Division up for the project. The goal of the division is to select an article or articles for improvement to Good article standard or higher. There is a simple nomination process, which you can check out on the division subpage, to make sure each candidate for collaboration has enough interested editors. This is a good way to get a lot of articles to a quality status quickly. Please consider participating. More details can be seen at the division subpage. IvoShandor 11:25, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rousseau

Per this edit, the character meets Wikipedia notability guidelines, AfD the article if you wish, however you have no consensus to redirect. HTH HAND. Matthew 14:20, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Paulo (Lost)

Hello there! Although you seem to be quite inactive lately, you have edited many Lost pages in the past and I was wondering if you would support or comment on my nomiation for Paulo (Lost). Thanks, thedemonhog talk • edits • count 17:20, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Nylf.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Nylf.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:17, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Lost episodes

Hey Jtrost, I just nominated List of Lost episodes for Featured List status again and was hoping you could support or comment on the nomination at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Lost episodes. Thanks. -- Wikipedical 07:22, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fairbury, IL

You were kind enough to provide the source for your large edit to the article on Fairbury. Do you feel confident that your edit is indeed your own writing, and would not be regarded as plagarism by anyone else reading that book? If you feel your writing is original, then I have no intent of further challenging the matter. I merely want to make sure that we are all on the up-and-up. Unschool 18:39, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Survivor2dvd.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Survivor2dvd.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:25, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Friends

The Friends article received heavy editing today by unregistered users, which I noticed at WikiRage.com. The article may benefit from a good review. According to Wikipedia Page History Statistics, you are one of the top contributors to that page. If you have the time, would you please read over the article and make any necessary changes. Thanks. -- Jreferee ^(Talk) 02:03, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Illinois 2007 Census

The WikiProject Illinois 2007 membership census has concluded. If you did not add your name during the last week, you were declared "inactive" in the project, your name is still listed at The Participants Page. You can change your status by replacing {{member inactive}} with {{active}} in the table. Any members should also feel free to fill in any missing details on the list below.

IvoShandor 11:12, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit to Lost (season 4)

Welcome back? -- Wikipedical (talk) 03:11, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Futurama

It look like you didn't listen to me ether. That was a true fact that I put down and you reverted it. There was five seasons in the US because it was on the 7:00 P.M. slot and did not always show it for most of the first run. The UK and other countries had four seasons because it had better ratings in those places and showed it most of the time. The episode page goes by the volume DVD sets. Please put back my edit. Thank you.--Stco23 (talk) 04:00, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The only reason I put the five seasons is so people would not be confused with the UK season run since the US run was showin in five seasons.--Stco23 (talk) 04:26, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Seanandchristian.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Seanandchristian.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:26, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Celebreality

An editor has nominated Celebreality, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celebreality and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:44, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA thanks

Thanks for your contributions to this article:

This user helped promote Trump International Hotel and Tower (Chicago) to good article status.

You may wish to comment at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Trump International Hotel and Tower (Chicago)--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 04:16, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CHICAGO

According to my records, you have nominated at least one article (Prison Break) that includes a category at WP:CHIBOTCATS and that has been promoted to WP:FA, WP:FL or WP:GA. You are not signed up as an active member of WP:CHICAGO. If you consider yourself either an active or semi-active member of the project please sign up as such at Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/members. Also, if you are a member, be aware of Wikipedia:Meetup/Chicago 3 and be advised that the project is now trying to keep all the project's WP:PR, WP:FAC, WP:FAR, WP:GAR, WP:GAC WP:FLC, WP:FLRC, WP:FTC, WP:FPOC, WP:FPC, and WP:AFD discussion pages in one location at the new Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/Review page. Please help add any discussion you are aware of at this location.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 18:47, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Loyola-logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Loyola-logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:14, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Issues addressed in Nip/Tuck

I have nominated Issues addressed in Nip/Tuck, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Issues addressed in Nip/Tuck. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Remurmur (talk) 00:06, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FLC

FG has been nominated for FAC can you review--Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 20:16, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Family Guy FAC

Hello. You had previously reviewed Family Guy for FAC. The article has been nominated again, and the review page can be found here. Thanks. Ω phois 14:54, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Stories Project

Aloha!

My name is Victor Grigas, I’m a storyteller at the Wikimedia Foundation in San Francisco working on collecting stories of interesting Wikipedians that can be used to compel donations for the 2011 fundraiser.

I found your user name on this list: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedians_in_Chicago

If you are interested in participating, and would like to schedule a telephone or Skype interview with me, please send me an email ([email protected]) along with any questions or concerns you may have.

Thanks for your time!

Victor, User:Victorgrigas

PS If you know of anyone with whom I should speak please let me know :)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox The Apprentice

Template:Infobox The Apprentice has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. AussieLegend (talk) 06:13, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:TheOffice(US)2-10.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:TheOffice(US)2-10.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:12, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:TheOffice(US)2-05.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:TheOffice(US)2-05.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:14, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:TheOffice(US)2-01.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:TheOffice(US)2-01.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:14, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:TheOffice(US)2-03.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:TheOffice(US)2-03.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:15, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Apple Inc.

Hello Jtrost,

You've been identified either as a previous member of the project, an active editor on Apple related pages, a bearer of Apple related userboxes, or just a hoopy frood.

WikiProject Apple Inc. has unexpectedly quit, because an error type "unknown" occured. Editors must restart it! If you are interested, read the project page and sign up as a member. There's something for everyone to do, such as welcoming, sourcing, writing, copy editing, gnoming, proofreading, or feedback — but no pressure. Do what you do, but let's coordinate and stay in touch.

See the full welcome message on the talk page, or join the new IRC channel on irc.freenode.net named #wikipedia-en-appleinc ^connect. Please join, speak, and idle, and someone will read and reply.

Please spread the word, and join or unsubscribe at the subscription page.

RhinosF1^(chat)_{(status)(contribs)} and Smuckola on behalf of WikiProject Apple Inc. - Delivered 15:00, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]