User talk:Jinyoungs/sandbox
Great Train eXpress
[edit]This article needs additional citations for verification. (February 2018) |
Great Train Express is a planned higher-speed commuter rail network in the Seoul Capital Area project consisting of three separate lines, named GTX A, GTX B and GTX C, and scheduled for completion in 2025.[1][2][3] The project was first envisioned in the late 2000s, and construction of GTX Line A began in 2017.
GTX A
[edit]The line has been approved and is scheduled to start construction in late 2018. The section between Samseong Station and Suseo Station is already under construction, and service is expected to start between Samseong Station and Dongtan Station as early as 2023.
Station
number |
Station name
English |
Station name
Hangul |
Station name
Hanja |
Transfer
|
Line name
|
Distance
in km |
Total
distance |
Location
| |
?
|
Unjeong | 운정 | 雲井 | GTX A
|
---
|
0.0
|
|||
?
|
KINTEX | 킨텍스 | 킨텍스 | ---
|
---
|
||||
?
|
Daegok | 대곡 | 大谷 | ---
|
---
| ||||
?
|
Yeonsinnae | 연신내 | 연신내 | ---
|
---
|
||||
?
|
Seoul Station | 서울역 | 서울 | ---
|
---
|
||||
?
|
Samseong | 삼성역 | 三成 | ---
|
---
|
||||
?
|
Suseo | 수서역 | 水西 | ---
|
---
| ||||
?
|
Seongnam | 성남역 | 城南 | SRT
|
---
|
---
|
|||
?
|
Yongin | 용인역 | 龍仁 | ---
|
---
|
||||
?
|
Dongtan | 동탄역 | 東灘 | ---
|
---
|
GTX B
[edit]Station
number |
Station name
English |
Station name
Hangul |
Station name
Hanja |
Transfer
|
Line name
|
Distance
in km |
Total
distance |
Location
| |
?
|
Songdo Station | 송도 | 松島 | File:Seoul Metro Line ic1.svg | GTX B
|
---
|
0.0
|
||
?
|
Incheon City Hall | 인천시청 | 仁川市廳 | File:Seoul Metro Line ic1.svg File:Seoul Metro Line ic2.svg | ---
|
---
|
|||
?
|
Bupyeong | 부평 | 富平 | File:Seoul Metro Line ic1.svg | ---
|
---
|
|||
?
|
Dangarae | 당아래 | 당아래 | ---
|
---
|
||||
?
|
Sindorim | 신도림 | 新道林 | ---
|
---
|
||||
?
|
Yeouido | 여의도 | 汝矣島 | ---
|
---
|
||||
?
|
Yongsan | 용산 | 龍山 | ---
|
---
|
||||
?
|
Seoul Station | 서울역 | 서울 | ---
|
---
|
||||
?
|
Cheongnyangni | 청량리 | 淸凉里 | ---
|
---
|
||||
?
|
Mangu | 망우 | 忘憂 | ---
|
---
|
||||
?
|
Byeollae | 별내 | 別內 | ---
|
---
|
||||
?
|
Pyeongnae–Hopyeong | 평내호평 | 坪內好坪 | ---
|
---
| ||||
?
|
Maseok | 마석 | 磨石 | ---
|
---
|
GTX C
[edit]Final plans are currently being reviewed by the government. There are plans to extend the line to Suwon Station and to Yangju New City.
Station
number |
Station name
English |
Station name
Hangul |
Station name
Hanja |
Transfer
|
Line name
|
Distance
in km |
Total
distance |
Location
| |
?
|
Geumjeong | 금정 | 衿井 | GTX C
|
---
|
0.0
|
|||
?
|
Gwacheon | 과천 | 果川 | ---
|
---
|
||||
?
|
Yangjae | 양재 | 良才 | ---
|
---
|
||||
?
|
Samseong | 삼성 | 三成 | ---
|
---
| ||||
?
|
Cheongnyangni | 청량리 | 淸凉里 | ---
|
---
|
||||
?
|
Kwangwoon University | 광운대 | 光云大 | ---
|
---
|
||||
?
|
Chang-dong | 창동 | 倉洞 | ---
|
---
|
||||
?
|
Uijeongbu | 의정부 | 議政府 | ---
|
---
|
References
[edit]External links
[edit]Category:Higher-speed rail Category:Rapid transit in South Korea Category:Rail transport in Seoul Category:Proposed railway lines in Asia Category:Proposed public transport in South Korea
Weiwei’s peer review
[edit]1. No. I didn’t see the importance of the GTX, why it matters, what it contributes to the Korea society.
2. Yes. The author is introducing three lines of GTX, and she said it in the very first sentence.
3. No. The author didn’t talk too much about the following parts.
4. The importance of the GTX.
5. The history and development of GTX. Maybe could be a separate section.
6. Yes. The author talked about GTX A,B, C separately.
7. Yes. The three lines are of equal importance and equal length.
8. Yes.
9. No. The author is simply descibing the ongoing progress.
10. No.
11. No.
12. No.
13. No. I think the author did pretty well.
14. Yes. They are all from journals and worldwide news.
15. Yes. The 8th citation is cited quite frequently.
16. No.
The article is in a neutral tone and the sources are reliable. One thing I like is that the author provides detailed forms of the trail lines. (Is this original or adapted from other sources? If so, any citations?) Some drawbacks, however, are that the article is unbalanced in terms of citations--the 8th citation is cited several times and is much more than the others. Also some citations are repeated, the author could use cite from existed source instead of creating a new one. And the last sentence in section GTX B saying the mayor’s claims need to have a clear citation connected. There are some grammar mistakes needed to fix. What's more, at the begining of the article, the author introduces the history/development of the GTX, which could be a separate section or a separate pragraph. Overall, the draft is in a good shape!
Weiwei961208 (talk) 22:41, 3 December 2018 (UTC)