User talk:Iuio

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --Benon 00:38, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Iuio, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --TeaDrinker 00:48, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re:VWXYZ series

This page has already been listed on AFD, and so will be deleted. Please contribute in a more constructive manner. Setokaiba^✌_≝ 13:57, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you wanted to talk to me, you could have done so on User:24.87.43.26's talk page as clearly stated on my user page. (Iuio 00:48, 23 March 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Templates

Could you please stop making templates, and could you please stop re-creating deleted content. You're welcome to edit the encyclopedia, but we really don't need a separate "This user reads ... " for each amendment of the Constitution. Templates are for helping to write the encyclopedia, not for the use of single people to make dozens and then link to them from their userpage. Everything you did in template space you could have just done in your userspace. Actually, that would've been much preferable. Remember, Template: namespace is not userspace. --Cyde Weys 23:34, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Adam Savage image

Please refrain from adding fair-use images to your userpage. This is not allowed, per WP:FUC. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 23:46, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've protected your user page until you stop reinserting this image, as it isn't allowed. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 06:13, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, I'll stop inserting the Adam Savage image into my user page. Now unprotect it. (Iuio 06:19, 26 September 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Fair enough. Unprotected. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 06:21, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No hard feelings? (Iuio 07:15, 26 September 2006 (UTC))[reply]

I don't ever take intarweb drama seriously. I understand why you got irritated; it's one of those rules that sucks. If you still want an image, I suggest tracking down a free image of Adam Savage; we could use one for the Adam Savage article, and you could use a free image on your userpage. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 08:07, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Tycoon Computer Games

This is a reminder that you are a member of the said Wikiproject. A request has come up for this Wikiproject to be listed as inactive, and archived. Please remember that you are a part of this Wikiproject. If you have been active about this Wikiproject, do not hold this personally, this is a message given to the whole group. Thank you. bibliomaniac15 02:14, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Franklin (soldier)

A tag has been placed on Paul Franklin (soldier), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable (see the guidelines for notability here). If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, articles #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Fsotrain⁰⁹ 19:25, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The links to the notability guidelines, as well as WP:BIO are good places to start looking for ways in which the article can better assert the subject's notability. -Fsotrain⁰⁹ 19:35, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I did read your reason, but I had no idea that the article was previously created/deleted either, until you told me. I don't really know what to tell you, except that a)a case for speedy deletion is much stronger when dealing with recreated content, and b)the subject itself does not appear to meet WP:BIO, so probably little can be done for notability even if the requisite sources are referenced. As for the anon. comments on the Talk page, yes, they aren't very helpful, but as they don't cross the line into personal attacks against you, (last I checked), I don't feel comfortable removing them. -Fsotrain⁰⁹ 02:11, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seal of the United States Senate

There's been some back and forth edits on what graphic should be used as the Seal of the United States Senate in the United States Senate article. In order to resolve the disagreement, I'm trying to start some discussion on the issue on the article's talk page. Since you're one of the editors that has edited the Senate article in regards to the Seal graphic, I thought I'd let you know about the discussion in case you want to weigh in. Thanks. - Walkiped ^{(T | C)} 06:47, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't look like a vandal. Please provide an edit summary when you edit.

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. Will (Talk - contribs) 21:10, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This message was applied to your talk page because you left the summary out of at least one edit. As for which edit, since the templates available to me don't provide a way for me to list which one, I suggest you check your contribs.

I normally check the edit summary before deciding whether or not to wait on the diff to load (which takes a lot of time). I feel I must load the diff if no summary is provided. When you provide that summary, you speed up my patrol because I feel more comfortable skipping the diff load. Will (Talk - contribs) 20:03, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it's the connection that's slow. Besides, I would still insist on doing something. Will (Talk - contribs) 20:11, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please be courteous to other editors and use edit summaries when updating articles. The Mathbot tool shows your usage of edit summaries to be extremely low:

Edit summary usage for Iuio: 19% for major edits and 100% for minor edits. Based on the last 150 major and 1 minor edits in the article namespace.

Using edit summaries helps other editors quickly understand your edits, which is especially useful when you make changes to articles that are on others' watchlists. Thanks and happy editing! --Kralizec! (talk) 19:09, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Several of the pages you recently updated were on my watchlist. Since you chose not to use an edit summary to describe your changes, I double-checked each of the article on my watchlist to ensure the edits were not vandalism, copyrighted text, or any of the myriad other bad things that can happen. To use your edit of the Royal Navy article as an example, if 100 people have this article on their watchlists, you just made 100 people go and make sure your edit was a good, beneficial edit. However if you had used a short, descriptive edit summary to describe your change (such as added category), the vast majority of people may have checked one of your edits, but not all of them. Using good edit summaries makes the lives of your fellow editors a lot easier. You can view the edit summary usage of any editor by putting their user name into the mathbot tool. --Kralizec! (talk) 19:59, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have the same policy. I should also note that some anti-vandalism bots might have been programmed to treat edits without summaries as more likely to be vandalism than those with summaries. It is quite important! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Will Pittenger (talk • contribs) 16:42, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Regarding your reply [1] on my talk page, one of the Webster's Dictionary definitions for "rude" is marked by or suggestive of lack of training or skill. As wikipedia's guideline on WP:ES indicates that editors should "always fill in the summary field," then yes, not using edit summaries could be considered by many to be "rude." However, keeping the WP:BITE guideline in mind, I prefer not to think of failing to write edit summaries as being "rude" or unskilled, but instead as new editors who may not yet be familiar with the many guidelines and official policies on wikipedia. Hence why I left a friendly "please be courteous to other editors and use edit summaries" on your talk page. --Kralizec! (talk) 14:19, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

USCOTW

Thanks - I'll go ahead and add my name but I only watch it once in a while. Since one of my article nominations was a USCOTW, I thought I should help in the process. Sorry about not archiving. Since I don't check it very often, it wasn't until January when I looked at switching it. Since there were not that many nominations, I didn't feel too bad about giving it a little longer on the COTW. Morphh ^(talk) 01:23, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ASUE

Hello, Iuio and thank you for your contributions on articles related to A Series of Unfortunate Events. I'd like to invite you to become a part of WikiProject A Series of Unfortunate Events, a WikiProject aiming to improve coverage of A Series of Unfortunate Events and related articles on Wikipedia.

If you would like to help out and participate, please visit the project page for more information. Thanks! <3 Clamster 18:55, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to our humble wikiproject! Thank you for creating the userbox, but we do have one already, located here: User:Jitterro/Userboxes/ASUE project. It is also listed on the WP:ASUE's template page. <3 Clamster 20:32, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to put the userbox on WP:ASUE's template page. <3 Clamster 00:33, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lemony Snicket Roll Call

Hello, Iuio! Your username, as well as the usernames of other members of Wikipedia: WikiProject Lemony Snicket, has been moved to the inactive members list, as part of a process for making the wikiproject active once again. If you would like to continue to be an active member, please follow the instructions on the top of the participants page to add your name to the active participants list.

Thanks! Clamster 16:54, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Frank Welker

Hi luio, thank you for all your hard work and interesting edits and additions. I have a request, I have been watching the Frank Welker page and keeping it clean and lean. I find that the succession boxes are a little too much information that would be better served on each indiviual actors pages. Also, because the the role of Megatron was created by Frank Welker I think it is better just to address the relevance of his particiption. He is still actively doing Megatron projects and did the DVD game, based on the recent film and the premium DVD for Kmart as an addition to the film. And Megatron for a game for Hasbro all in 2007. Corey Burton did Megatron for the recent TV series. Thanks again and keep up the good work.--User:Greensmaster 16:47, 09 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Burglars steal Milan Lučić's Memorial Cup ring from his Vancouver home

Thanks for contributing this article to Wikinews, but please be careful with copyright violations. The second half of the article was a blatant copy-paste job from The Province article. --SVTCobra (talk) 22:58, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lemony Snicket task force

Hello, Iuio and thank you for your contributions on articles related to the works of Lemony Snicket. I'd like to invite you to become a member of the Lemony Snicket task force, a task force aiming to improve coverage of Lemony Snicket and related articles on Wikipedia.

If you would like to help out and participate, please visit the task force page for more information. Thanks! — The Man in Question (gesprec) · (forðung) 06:40, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Book plots

Please note that plot summaries should be limited to no more than around 500 words. Thanks. Yworo (talk) 20:38, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Plot summaries on Wikipedia are limited to 500 words. Please do not edit war to insert a longer summary. Wikipedia is not robbing anyone of anything, they can read the book. Yworo (talk) 21:58, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Answer: they aren't allowed to either. Yworo (talk) 20:44, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm under no obligation to patrol all articles on Wikipedia. I attempt to keep the articles on my watchlist in line with Wikipedia standards. Other stuff exists is never considered a valid argument on Wikipedia. Yworo (talk) 18:49, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:How to write a plot summary#Length. Yworo (talk) 10:42, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Line breaks

Hi.

You have put in too many line breaks in hockey templates. I think I know why. It's because the goals in some cases do not seem to align align with the scorers, if scorers' (and assisters') names are long. I think this is due to how wide your screen is. If it's wide enough, this problem does not occur. Instead there appears a superfluous line-break. So I'll remove the extra line-breaks.

Cheers.

LarRan (talk) 10:01, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Trackers Task Force

Hello, Iuio! I'd like to invite you to join the proposed Trackers Task Force. If you are interested in Patrick Carman's series The Trackers, you are perfect for this proposed WikiProject!!!! Just add your name to the support list to join! The task force is under construction, so maybe you can help. We need 3 more supporters before September 21 or else the proposed task force will go into the Archives. Goodbye!!! Hidividedby5 (talk) 12:53, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 17:53, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination as a United States Wikipedians' Collaboration of the Month candidate

The Hope Diamond has been nominated to be a future United States Wikipedians' Collaboration of the Month. All editors interested in improving this article are encouraged to participate. You can vote for this or other articles article of the Month here. --Kumioko (talk) 19:36, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
Rollback can be used to revert vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
Rollback may be removed at any time.

If you do not want rollback, then contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some information on how to use rollback, you can view this page. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, just leave me a message on my talk page if you have any questions. Happy editing! Malinaccier (talk) 19:44, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination as a United States Wikipedians' Collaboration of the Month candidate

Greetings, as someone who has signed up to be a member of the United States Wikipedians' collaboration of the Month, I wanted to let you know that several articles have been nominated to be a future Collaboration of the Month article. All editors interested in voting for or improving these article are encouraged to participate. You can cast your vote here. --Kumioko (talk) 18:59, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012 USCOTM - The Star-Spangled Banner

Hello, Iuio! The Star-Spangled Banner has been selected as the United States Wikipedians' Collaboration of the Month article for January 2012 and we are looking for editors to help improve the article. You were identified as an editor or WikiProject with an interest in the article and we thought you might be interested in helping out. Thanks!!!

--Kumioko (talk) 20:15, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Leon Panetta as a United States Wikipedians' Collaboration of the Month candidate

Greetings, as a member of the United States Wikipedians' collaboration of the Month, this notice was sent to let you know that the article, Leon Panetta, has been nominated to be a future Collaboration of the Month article. All editors interested in voting for or improving these article are encouraged to participate. You can cast your vote here. --Kumioko (talk) 16:28, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Daniel K. Riskin may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

2005, Riskin was interviewed on Discovery Canada’s flagship daily science show, ''[[Daily Planet (TV series|Daily Planet]]'', by then-host [[Natasha Stillwell]]. Years later, Riskin joined the show

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:20, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Spy Fox in "Dry Cereal" for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Spy Fox in "Dry Cereal" is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spy Fox in "Dry Cereal" until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Skamecrazy123 (talk) 17:19, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Iuio. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Phoenixes listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Phoenixes. Since you had some involvement with the Phoenixes redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Nohomersryan (talk) 04:23, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Iuio. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Merci (company)

The article Merci (company) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence provided or found to indicate this to be more than a company going about its business. Fails WP:NCORP.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AllyD (talk) 21:16, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(Note that this article had been repurposed by an IP overwrite subsequent to the original 2007 article about Merci chocolates. There is now an article about the chocolates at Merci (candy). AllyD (talk) 21:22, 1 November 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Merci (company)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Merci (company) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 09:02, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Iuio. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Princess Delphine's stepmother

Hi. I have a big doubt about your edit in Princess Delphine of Belgium. Generally, stepparents enter your life after you were born. Our pages stepmother and stepfather understand it that way as well. Paola was married to King Albert a long time before Delphine was born. I don't know anybody who would call such a person their "stepmother". Sigur (talk) 13:51, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bloomsbury 21

The article Bloomsbury 21 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No meaningful secondary sources found. This was essentially a short-lived marketing campaign for the publisher Bloomsbury and not deserving of a standalone article. Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cielquiparle (talk) 00:13, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]