User talk:Ficaia

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Ficaia! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! 𝕸𝖗 𝕽𝖊𝖆𝖉𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕿𝖚𝖗𝖙𝖑𝖊|🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦|☎️|📄 22:18, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A bowl of strawberries for you!

Great wee article on one of Coleridge's poems. scope_creep^Talk 12:29, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Ficaia

Thank you for creating Lillie Sullivan.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 18:06, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Standard alert for discretionary sanctions covering gender disputes

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 08:44, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Ficaia

Thank you for creating James Peacock (navy officer).

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 17:25, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Important notes

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 12:35, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Ficaia

Thank you for creating Portrait of Jacopo Sannazaro.

User:Netherzone, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating this article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Netherzone (talk) 20:15, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Ficaia

Thank you for creating Cain and Abel (Titian).

User:Netherzone, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating this article on another Titian painting.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Netherzone (talk) 20:18, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Ficaia. Thank you for creating Portrait of John Frederick I, Elector of Saxony. User:Netherzone, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Netherzone (talk) 18:38, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Ficaia. Thank you for creating John Savage (author). User:Bruxton, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article. Please consider lengthening the lead to summarize the body of the article per MOS:LEAD

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 23:16, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not very good at writing leads, so I tend to leave it for others to do if they wish. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 23:20, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Ficaia. Thank you for creating Thomas Mitchell (painter). User:Bruxton, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks again, also MOS:LEADLENGTH

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 23:17, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DNB and others.

I was going to drop you a line about the difference between {{cite DNB}} and {{DNB}}, because of your edits the new article you created Samuel Sidley however I see that you created that article on 18 September 2022 and three days later you created Edward Gibson (painter)‎ on 21 September 2022‎ and by then you had worked it out yourself.

There are many of these types of template triplicates see User:PBS/Notes#List of PD Templates for a list of some of them. Given you area of interest shown by those two articles. You might find {{Bryan (3rd edition)}} and {{Bryan (1903 edition)}} of some use. If you have need of {{cite Bryan (3rd edition)}} let me know and I will create it.

Two other points:

Please see Where to place attribution in the Plagiarism guideline.
If you find a book that you would like to include in an article but it is not cited please place it in a "Further reading" or "External links" section below the section containing the bullet pointed list of full references. This makes it easier to keep track of what is used to support the text in the article and what is not.

Other than that I think the two articles I have had a look at are a useful contribution to Wikipedia. I am not as active as I one was but if I can help in you in any way please let me know on my talk page.

-- PBS (talk) 17:58, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yes there is one other point I wanted to mention. There is a project group for the Wikisource DNB to Wikipedia articles Wikipedia:WikiProject Dictionary of National Biography and coupled to that is the Wikipedia:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/DNB Epitome if you create articles such as you did please update the list and double tick their entries in that list. Often the entry in the DNB Epitome (see the footnotes on the pages next to the subject's name) makes a good basis for the lead in the Wikipedia article, or for creating a stub of an article. -- PBS (talk) 18:05, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In the article William Wilkins (educator) you had an entry in the sources section:

Laughton, J. K.; Lambert, Andrew (2004). "Williams, Robert (1765–1827), naval officer". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford University Press. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
Marshall, John (1823). "Williams, Robert". Royal Naval Biography. Volume I, Part II. London: Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, and Brown. pp. 856–861.

There is a template {{cite ODNB}} for such entries:

*{{cite ODNB|last= Laughton |first=J. K. |last2=Lambert |first2=Andrew |date=2004 |title=Williams, Robert (1765–1827)  |id=29539}}

Laughton, J. K.; Lambert, Andrew (2004). "Williams, Robert (1765–1827)". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/29539. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)

There is a template {{Cite RNB1823}}

*{{Cite RNB1823 |wstitle=Williams, Robert |volume=1 |part=2 |pages=856-861}}

Marshall, John (1823). "Williams, Robert" . Royal Naval Biography. Vol. 1, part 2. London: Longman and company. pp. 856–861.

-- PBS (talk) 18:52, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The "Bryan (3rd edition)" template might be useful at Benjamin Richard Green, but without the "This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain..." bit at the start: is there a way to do that? 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 14:09, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Ficaia. Thank you for creating William Gibson (painter). User:Netherzone, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Netherzone (talk) 18:22, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Beyschlag

Hi thanks for creating this article. When we translate or borrow from other language wikis it’s a requirement to acknowledge the source. The best way to do this is to include it in your edit summary (e.g. “translated from fr.wiki”) and there’s also a translation template you can add to the talk page. If you can confirm where material for this article was sourced I’ll add the template to the talk page for you. Happy editing and please leave a message on my talk page if you need any help Mccapra (talk) 20:50, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't actually translate that article from the German article. I wrote it based on the English-language Benezit. I did include the German-language sources from the German wiki article as "further reading", so I guess I did copy that. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 20:54, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into William Duthie (author). This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:09, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For some reason I couldn't move the page in question; sorry for the inconvenience. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 02:11, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DS alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Iskandar323 (talk) 17:51, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Did You Know? nomination

Hello! Your submission of Carter Moore Braxton at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! DecafPotato (talk) 20:47, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Francis Washburn

Hello, Ficaia,

Thank you for creating Francis Washburn.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for the article, but it really needs some work - there are sources on the page, but they are not used to link to any facts in the article! The only reference is, confusingly for readers, to 'Heitman' - where the fact - and many more given in the article - could easily be sourced to a reference in one of the works you have listed under 'sources' using the 'Cite' tool. Facts should be linked to a citation...

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Alexandermcnabb}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 05:04, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for William of Littlington

On 29 October 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article William of Littlington, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that William of Littlington opposed the division of England and Scotland into two Carmelite provinces in 1303, was excommunicated, and did four years' penance in Paris? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/William of Littlington. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, William of Littlington), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Ichabod Chauncey

Hello! Your submission of Ichabod Chauncey at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! -- RoySmith (talk) 13:47, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Ichabod Chauncey

On 6 November 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ichabod Chauncey, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the nonconformist minister Ichabod Chauncey was banished from England under the Religion Act 1592 and spent two years in exile in Holland where he published a defence of his actions? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ichabod Chauncey. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Ichabod Chauncey), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Al-Wishah

I couldn't see the direct relevance of the image you added to Al-Wishah; it was nevertheless an interesting lead and has a new home at The Book of Exposition. Iskandar323 (talk) 11:46, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My bad. I assumed it was a translation of Al-Wishah. Thanks for correcting that. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 11:49, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

James Warden

Ficaia, thanks for your input at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Warden. Would you be interested in adding some of the sources discovered during that discussion to the article itself? I, for one, would be grateful. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 14:03, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Ravenshoe (novel)

Hello! Your submission of Ravenshoe (novel) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Flibirigit (talk) 18:10, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Warren Richard Colvin Wynne

Hello! Your submission of Warren Richard Colvin Wynne at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! DigitalIceAge (talk) 17:52, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Warren Richard Colvin Wynne

Thanks for starting an article on Wynne. I've been slowly writing articles on some of the minor engagements in the Zulu War and hope, at some point, to work on articles on all the forts too. Don't know if you are interested in the era, but if you're working an anything similar in the future (or interested in looking at the forts) give me a nudge, I've got a few books to hand - Dumelow (talk) 18:55, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dumelow: Thanks for taking the time to really flesh out the article :) BTW, one sentence you added to the article seems to cut of mid sentence: "On one occasion Wynne, found that marker posts, used by the garrison to determine rifle ranges in case of attack and to delineate the route of a new approach road, were being moved at night by the." Did you mean to write "enemy" at the end there? 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 03:02, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, missed this reply. Yep, had intended to write "Zulu" here, now fixed. Cheers - Dumelow (talk) 20:20, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Carter Moore Braxton

On 29 November 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Carter Moore Braxton, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Carter Moore Braxton fought for the Confederacy throughout the American Civil War and, according to one report, had seven horses killed under him but avoided any wounds? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Carter Moore Braxton. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Carter Moore Braxton), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Edward Glemham

On 2 December 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Edward Glemham, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Edward Glemham destroyed two Spanish vessels, repulsed four galleys, and captured a rich Venetian merchant ship in his first voyage as a privateer in 1590? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Edward Glemham. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Edward Glemham), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Ficaia. Thank you for your work on Francis Grosvenor Hood. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 23:09, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Robert de Ogle

On 11 December 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Robert de Ogle, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Robert de Ogle captured five Scottish knights near Newcastle in 1341 and received royal licence to crenellate his property? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Robert de Ogle. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Robert de Ogle), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Jonas Moore (officer)

Hello! Your submission of Jonas Moore (officer) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 04:00, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Olive Temple

On 12 December 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Olive Temple, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Olive MacLeod (pictured) journeyed 6,000 km (3,700 mi) through Africa in 1910–1911 to visit her murdered fiancé's grave, and wrote a book based on her observations? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Olive Temple. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Olive Temple), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 34,038 views (1,418.3 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of December 2022 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 10:48, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Warren Richard Colvin Wynne

On 14 December 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Warren Richard Colvin Wynne, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that while hemmed in at Ekowe during the Anglo-Zulu War, W. R. C. Wynne attempted to respond to heliograph signals by means of a signalling screen and a balloon? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Warren Richard Colvin Wynne. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Warren Richard Colvin Wynne), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

-- RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Robert Home (officer)

On 16 December 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Robert Home (officer), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Robert Home was sent by the British Army to Canada in 1864 to report on the defence of the frontier against the eventuality of an American invasion? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Robert Home (officer). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Robert Home (officer)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Fort Pearson

On 17 December 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Fort Pearson, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that during the 1879 Anglo-Zulu War a British soldier committed suicide by throwing himself off the 300-foot-high (90 m) cliffs at Fort Pearson (depicted)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Fort Pearson. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Fort Pearson), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Maria Advocata (Madonna del Rosario)

On 20 December 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Maria Advocata (Madonna del Rosario), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Maria Advocata (pictured) is one of the oldest icons of Mary, mother of Jesus, and that according to legend it was painted by Luke the Evangelist? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Maria Advocata. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Maria Advocata (Madonna del Rosario)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

-- RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Justly Watson

On 27 December 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Justly Watson, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Justly Watson died suddenly in 1757 from the effects of poison administered in his coffee, it was believed, by a black female servant? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Justly Watson. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Justly Watson), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 00:02, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Ficaia. Thank you for your work on Richard Beach. User:Bruxton, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

There are many sources available to add to the article - especially in books. please consider developing the article with more references.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 17:11, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Military History Newcomer of the Year, 2022

		The WikiProject Barnstar
		Congratulations! As the lead coordinator of WikiProject Military history it is my pleasure to present the WikiProject Barnstar in recognition of your nomination for the 2022 Military History Newcomer of the Year. Please accept this token of gratitude and appreciation on behalf of the project; we hope to see more of you in the years to come. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:14, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Ravenshoe (novel)

On 11 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ravenshoe (novel), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Ravenshoe has been noted for its passages dealing with the Charge of the Light Brigade, a failed military action during the Crimean War? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ravenshoe (novel). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Ravenshoe (novel)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:03, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Si Jenks

Hi @Ficaia:, could you please create an article for American actor Si Jenks who had starring roles in films such as The Rider of the Law, Oregon Trail, The Cowboy Star, Zorro's Black Whip, The Great Train Robbery and has already an article in the French Wikipedia? 190.219.168.53 (talk) 07:37, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Ficaia. Thank you for your work on Jules Frédéric Ballavoine. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for writing the article! Keep writing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 05:08, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for William Nicholas (officer)

On 30 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article William Nicholas (officer), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that during the bloody siege of Badajoz, William Nicholas (pictured) was wounded by musket-ball and bayonet, but continued to give orders and was carried up the breach, only to be shot again? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/William Nicholas (officer). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, William Nicholas (officer)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

-- RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for George Charles Hoste

On 31 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article George Charles Hoste, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that George Charles Hoste took charge of the quarter-deck guns of the frigate Spartan, defended her against a French squadron, and took the brig Sparvière as a prize? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/George Charles Hoste. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, George Charles Hoste), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:03, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Ficaia. Thank you for your work on HMS Helena (1778). User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello! Thank you for creating the article. I encourage and hope you will write more article in the future. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 10:34, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Naval officers

Hi, I see you've been creating some naval officer articles; thanks! I note however that long-standing precedent on Wikipedia for Royal Navy officers is for the disambiguation to be "(Royal Navy officer)" or "(Royal Navy officer, died 2000)", etc. It's been argued over the years but for now that's still the trend. Cheers, Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 15:20, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll rename the articles. I think for concision "naval officer" might be a better disambiguation, unless there are two notable naval officers of the same name from different navies. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 10:40, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Gother Mann

On 26 February 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gother Mann, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Gother Mann commanded a small body of militia on Dominica during the French invasion in 1778? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gother Mann. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Gother Mann), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for A Blonde Woman

On 28 February 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article A Blonde Woman, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Palma Vecchio's A Blonde Woman (pictured) may be a goddess, a lady, or a courtesan? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/A Blonde Woman. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, A Blonde Woman), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Polyptych of Saint Barbara (Palma Vecchio)

Hello! Your submission of Polyptych of Saint Barbara (Palma Vecchio) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! MelanieN (talk) 17:34, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Ficaia. Thank you for your work on Allegory of Marriage. User:Onel5969, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice job on the article, keep up the good work.

Ways to improve Portrait of Doge Andrea Gritti

Hello, Ficaia,

Thank you for creating Portrait of Doge Andrea Gritti.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for creating this page on a notable painting by Titian! I would recommend adding more sources, including: Cole, Bruce. Titian And Venetian Painting, 1450-1590. N.p.: Taylor & Francis, 2018 (it discusses Michelangelo's Moses statue as a possible inspiration, which is important to mention); Vinet, Angelle M. James McNeill Whistler an Evolution of Painting from the Old Masters: Identified By Two Missing Masterpieces. N.p.: Lulu Publishing Services, 2017 (the work's influence on some of Whistler's portraits); additional potentially helpful resources are also available on the Met Museum's website in reference to the version made by his workshop, which is in the museum's permanent collection (and which you included in the article) https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/437830. I hope this helps. Please feel free to remove the tags as soon as more sources are added and let me know if you have any questions. Ppt91 ^talk 20:08, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ppt91}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

DYK for Polyptych of Saint Barbara

On 21 March 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Polyptych of Saint Barbara, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Saint Barbara (pictured) in Palma Vecchio's Polyptych of Saint Barbara has been said to express the noble serenity of a saint who is still a woman? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Polyptych of Saint Barbara. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Polyptych of Saint Barbara), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

-- RoySmith (talk) 12:02, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Allegory of Marriage

On 7 April 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Allegory of Marriage, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that although Titian's Allegory of Marriage (pictured) left England in the 17th century, two early replicas, probably done from the original, remain in the Royal Collection? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Allegory of Marriage. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Allegory of Marriage), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Aoidh (talk) 00:02, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for George Wythe Baylor

On 20 April 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article George Wythe Baylor, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Confederate troops under Colonel George Wythe Baylor disabled two Union tinclad gunboats on the Red River in Louisiana on May 5, 1864? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/George Wythe Baylor. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, George Wythe Baylor), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:03, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Tobit and Anna with the Kid

On 22 May 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tobit and Anna with the Kid, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Rembrandt drew heavily on two copperplate engravings of earlier works by other artists for the composition of Tobit and Anna with the Kid (pictured)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tobit and Anna with the Kid. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Tobit and Anna with the Kid), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Aoidh (talk) 00:02, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An honest question

Hi Ficaia

Regarding Stonewall Jackson, is the dispute Virginia? Trust me, if I saw a notation there I wouldn't have added it. I've added U.S to over a thousand people and never even thought about a dispute that with the naked eye .. there is no info regarding it in the infobox. Honestly I'm intrigued.

I appreciate your input. Bringingthewood (talk) 22:57, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the talk page consensus for Stonewall Jackson. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 23:27, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for that, it's good reading. But I'm glad that some wikipages have it left blank (no city or state). That leaves people like me away from touching it, lol. When I saw U.S. for birth and resting place ... well you know.

At least we met. Thank you and enjoy the rest of your week.

Regards, John Bringingthewood (talk) 23:42, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Sorry about marking your page incorrectly!

1TWO3Writer (talk) 19:16, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All good. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 19:46, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Francis Augustus Hare, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Back Creek and White Hill.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Thank you for your interesting and informative articles on the Idylls of Theocritus. Keep up the good work!

Schminnte (talk • contribs) 17:46, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Charles III requested move discussion

There is a new requested move discussion in progress for the Charles III article. Since you participated in the previous discussion, I thought you might like to know about this one. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 06:14, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Other British monarch requested move discussions currently taking place

Since you recently participated in the Charles III requested move discussion, I thought you might like to know that there are two other discussions currently going on about other British monarch article titles here and here. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 22:21, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You’re welcome to join

You are invited to join WikiProject Phoenicia

You appear to be someone who may be interested in joining WikiProject Phoenicia. Please accept this invitation from a member of the project.
I can't wait for us to work together! el.ziade (talkallam) 22:33, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Let's go!

el.ziade (talkallam) 22:33, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Ficaia. Thank you for your work on Eagle Springs, Texas. User:Lightburst, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello, the neighborhood is probably notable per our guideline for WP:NPLACE. Please consider adding more reliable sources )WP:RS) and developing the article so that notability is made clear. I see some sources exist.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Lightburst}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Lightburst (talk) 00:35, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Our Lady of the Fire

Hello, Ficaia. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Our Lady of the Fire".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 12:10, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Richard Henry Jackson

Hello, Ficaia. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Richard Henry Jackson".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 12:21, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Baylor family

Hello, Ficaia. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Baylor family, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Forlì Cathedral

Hi. Are you planning to expand this in the near future? if not, I'd like to. (I realise I don't have to ask but since you've seen it through from draft, it seems polite to!) Best, Ingratis (talk) 10:30, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please, go ahead 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 11:23, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK - thanks Ingratis (talk) 14:00, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

John Allen (settler) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to John Allen (settler). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it is a copyright violation of http://whiteangels-thoughts.blogspot.nl/2015/06/a-man-from-somerset-england-in-tasmania.html. Please sort this out by using your own words. Report: https://copypatrol.toolforge.org/en/?id=102148413 . Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 20:47, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a copyright violation. The site in question is merely copying text from a public domain obituary, which I've cited. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 22:00, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Age of Consent (novel)

On 17 September 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Age of Consent (novel), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the first imported copies of Norman Lindsay's Age of Consent were confiscated by Australian customs authorities? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Age of Consent (novel). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Age of Consent (novel)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Kusma (talk) 00:02, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move discussion

There is currently a Request Move discussion about William IV. Since you participated in the previous move discussion involving William IV, I thought you might want to know about this one. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 19:26, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Karl Vanselow

Hello, Ficaia. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Karl Vanselow, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:03, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pierre-Louis Guinand

Hello, Ficaia. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pierre-Louis Guinand".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:05, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Ficaia. Thank you for your work on Henry von Phul. User:FatalFit, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you very much for contributing to Wikipedia! I've marked the article as reviewed.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|FatalFit}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

FatalFit | ✉ | ✓ 07:15, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Argonautica (Valerius Flaccus)

Hello, Ficaia. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Argonautica".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:00, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

William Loring Nunez Spencer

Hi, a question about the page William Loring Nunez Spencer, which you've made the majority of contributions to. While this person was born William Loring Nunez (an interesting story on its own), and was latter married to George E. Spencer, per WP:COMMONNAME, I wanted to suggest that May Nunez may be a more appropriate article title. Looking at period reporting via newspapers.com gets 100 relevant hits on "May Nunez" vs. zero on "William Loring Nunez Spencer". Dmoore5556 (talk) 22:46, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved the article to May Nunez as you suggest. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 23:08, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Dmoore5556 (talk) 00:41, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Thomas Jefferson Towles

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Thomas Jefferson Towles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://files.usgwarchives.net/tx/smith/bios/txgray/towlestj.txt. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 08:55, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Thomas William Humphrey

Hello, Ficaia. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Thomas William Humphrey".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:01, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Junia Torquata

Hello, Ficaia. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Junia Torquata".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 00:04, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Thomas John Lucas

Hello, Ficaia. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Thomas John Lucas, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:08, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol invitation

Hello, Ficaia.

The new pages patrol team is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles and redirects needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
I believe that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 14:43, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of The Rape of Lucretia (Ficherelli)

Hello! Your submission of The Rape of Lucretia (Ficherelli) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:01, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New page reviewer granted

Hi Ficaia. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at the permissions page in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page or ask via the NPP Discord. In addition, please remember:

Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page, including checking for copyright violations using Earwig's copyright violation detector, checking for duplicate articles, and evaluating sources (both in the article, and if needed, via a Google search) for compliance with the general notability guideline.
Please review some of our flowcharts (1, 2) to help ensure you don't forget any steps.
Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:37, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Ficaia. Thank you for your work on George Carter Stent. Dcotos, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hi, Ficaia Nice work, you may add few more reliable sources from jstor about him.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dcotos}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dcotos (talk) 05:11, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive

New Page Patrol \| January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
On 1 January 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Domingo Álvarez Enciso

Hello, Ficaia,

Thank you for creating Domingo Álvarez Enciso.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add additional sources to this article to establish notability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Prodraxis}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

~ Prodraxis (Merry Christmas!) 04:22, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Season's Greetings

		Season's Greetings
		Wishing everybody a Happy Holiday Season, and all best wishes for the New Year! The Nativity scene on the Pulpit in the Pisa Baptistery by Nicola Pisano is my Wiki-Christmas card to all for this year. Johnbod (talk) 02:59, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for The Rape of Lucretia (Ficherelli)

On 2 January 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Rape of Lucretia (Ficherelli), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the painter of The Rape of Lucretia updated the ancient legend by setting the scene in the bedroom of a contemporary Italian home? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Rape of Lucretia (Ficherelli). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, The Rape of Lucretia (Ficherelli)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 00:02, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 21,385 views (891.0 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of January 2024 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for The Rape of the Sabine Women (Poussin)

On 10 January 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Rape of the Sabine Women (Poussin), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Poussin painted the abduction of the Sabine women twice (one pictured), once for a prince and once for a cardinal? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Rape of the Sabine Women (Poussin). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, The Rape of the Sabine Women (Poussin)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Waggers TALK 00:02, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024

Hello Ficaia,

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000 reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000 reviews), 6 Silver (2000 ), 8 Bronze (1000 ), 30 Iron (360 ) and 70 more for the 100 barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:

You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Pages Patrol Discord.
Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol May 2024 Backlog drive

New Page Patrol \| May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
On 1 May 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1579 in England

Hello fellow editor! I was doing some article clean up and stumbled into the above article. It's well sourced and laid out, however I'm worried it's not written in a very encyclopedic manner (though I personally like a bit of flowery language every now and then). I didn't want to tag it because it's not really a huge deal, just maybe something to adjust. I can assist if needed! :) Lindsey40186 (talk) 02:02, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to expand/rewrite. I only created the article as a starting-place. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 02:53, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of reliable sources noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is The Telegraph and trans issues. Thank you. I am informing you because you have commented on a prior RfC on a similar issue. Chess (talk) (please mention me on reply) 02:55, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject

Hi, I see you're a member of WP:Mythology, would you be interested in a sub project on WP:Anthropology on oral tradition? Kowal2701 (talk) 14:46, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol September 2024 Backlog drive

New pages patrol \| September 2024 Backlog Drive
On 1 September 2024, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each article review will earn 1 point, and each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]