User talk:Eiga-Kevin2

Your GA nomination of Eiji Tsuburaya

The article Eiji Tsuburaya you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Eiji Tsuburaya for comments about the article, and Talk:Eiji Tsuburaya/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Oltrepier -- Oltrepier (talk) 14:22, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Toho into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 12:39, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for not providing attribution, I'll keep it in mind in future editing. Eiga-Kevin2 (talk) 20:42, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kaiju Collaboration

Hello Eiga-Kevin2, just wanna thank you for your work expanding the old kaiju articles such as Godzilla and the like. Considering how adept you are at this, I have a proposition for you. I have been working on a couple of articles on some of the kaiju and wanted to see if you are interested in expanding them with me. The first one I am working on so far is on Varan (via my separate userspace drafts), which is getting closer to completion but I think you could assist in that one. My goal is to get that and several other kaiju articles up to GA status or at least up to my standards of a well-rounded article. just feel free to send me a message on my talk page if you are interested. Paleface Jack (talk) 02:53, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Paleface Jack: Certainly! I would love to help you make this pages GA, I'll get started fixing up the kaiju pages with you at your suggestion when I have the time. Eiga-Kevin2 (talk) 04:29, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good. I had some ideas for Varan, such as the missing citations and whatnot there are some sources listed on the Japanese wiki of Varan the Unbelievable which I have been trying to gather. You seem to have a lot more access to resources than I do, whereas I am building them from scratch (making a massive list of literary sources on Kaiju). Paleface Jack (talk) 15:30, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, its looking good so far! I've been collecting books for over a year now (I've already got publications like Ryfle's books, Ragone's book on Tsuburaya, Famous Monsters of Filmland issues, and Behind the Kaiju Curtain if you want more info from them referenced) and with help from my Japanese friend on Discord, we may be able to check, translate and reference more Japanese sources on your revision page. Eiga-Kevin2 (talk) 20:43, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

sounds good. you can always add information that you find that is not there and I will check it out and make sure its all up to snuff. I am pretty specific with my writing, being a writer and all. Paleface Jack (talk) 02:17, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The revision looks great and almost complete IMO, what do you want to move onto next? Because I'd personally like to collaborate with you on (and put my best work into) fixing up the kaiju at the top of the view chain: the Godzilla, Rodan, Mothra, and King Ghidorah articles (in that order). (Also, I can't find Varan even mentioned in Behind the Kaiju Curtain.) Eiga-Kevin2 (talk) 05:27, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well before we go about to the next project. I still am looking at finding sources to cite the video game appearances and the toy releases. I have also been looking at the Japanese wikipiedia entry of the first film which gives some additional literary sources, and also looking at Toho Kingdom's entry on Varan which tells of additional literary sources in their background and trivia section (thats how I found out about the poisonous spines ability). I got everything from the Japanese Wikipiedia entry all transferred and the above mentions issues are pretty much all that is needed to be done. After that I have another userspace draft where I have been working on Megalon so that will be the next one. Paleface Jack (talk) 19:12, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not really great at citing video games and toys either sorry, as there are only a few reliable sources for those. However, I do find the Godzilla Store is a nice reliable source which we could cite. In the meantime, I'll keep trying to find other reliable sources online and will either post them here or add them to the Varan revision. Eiga-Kevin2 (talk) 20:43, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In case you are curious, here is the link to the japanese article: https://ja-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/?_x_tr_sl=ja&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_hist=true#『ゴジラ対メガロ』のメガロ Paleface Jack (talk) 15:26, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's okay. I am not good at those kinds of sources either. My experience working on the Leatherface article for over a year kind helped a little bit. My best bet for the video games is either revies or the game manual though those can be pretty tricky to track down. I consider this sort of a learning experance considering these characters are all Japanese so research into reliable sources can be a little tricky.--Paleface Jack (talk) 21:49, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

K. Do, you think we should add all the details to the page now? It all looks fine to me, expect I think an image like this one of Ken Kuronuma and Nakajima shaking hands instead of your proposed concept art file in the "Development and design" section. Eiga-Kevin2 (talk) 03:49, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

When I get enough energy I will transfer it, I have a number of images I think work well.--Paleface Jack (talk) 22:44, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe a behind-the-scenes photo of the design. I will leave that up to you.--Paleface Jack (talk) 23:18, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I'll add one or two soon. Eiga-Kevin2 (talk) 23:20, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article is looking good. i made some minor adjustments. (the first image and the one on the flying prop are the best). For the Megalon article its gonna be a little tricky cause he is featured so extensively in video games and the like. Megalon also has a pretty big power set so we will see how that all comes together. I will start looking at the japanese wikipiedia version of Godzilla vs. Megalon, those versions of the english article always seem to be a wealth of potential sources in addition to wikizilla with some of the sources they cite. Paleface Jack (talk) 15:11, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, Wikizilla would probably be the most useful for all that info IMO. I've been an editor on that site for a while as well and could ask some of my fellow collaborators for some help on this Megalon page if we need it. In the mean time, I may be fixing up your revision of the page all of today. Eiga-Kevin2 (talk) 21:00, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

sounds good. I was doing bits here and there when my work breaks allowed me to. Thursday will be more major edits for me so I will do some revisions up till and try to find some way of citing those pesky video games that were only released in Japan. Then see about working on Megalon. Paleface Jack (talk) 04:37, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i am also a Godzilla franchise lover can i help you in your works Tanishkshatriyaaiims (talk) 03:01, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Eiji Tsuburaya

On 10 July 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Eiji Tsuburaya, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Eiji Tsuburaya (pictured) helped complete the first iron shooting crane? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Eiji Tsuburaya. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Eiji Tsuburaya), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Megalon and other Kaiju edits

Hey Kevin, just wanted to give you a heads up and let you know that I have been working on the Megalon article a lot lately. Still needs a lot of work but its really shaping up. Anyways I saw you recently been editing an article on the Rhedosaurus and I can help work on that article to some capacity. I have been thinking on the article for Godzilla and just the VAST scope of it, and was contemplating various ideas on how I would ever tackle it (I don't want it to turn into another Leatherface article cause that one took several years on and off). Anyways keep up the good work! Paleface Jack (talk) 16:20, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just a little small update, I did a brief literary search for sources to add to the Rhedosaurus article and found about 32 different books that can possibly be cited. I might add these into the article today or this week so I will keep you posted. Paleface Jack (talk) 18:37, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. sounds great! I've got a lot on my plate at the moment, but will help you out with the Megalon revision when I have the time. As for Rhedo's page please feel free to add whatever reliable sources you'd like in the meantime, I'll also do a bit of work on that when I've got the time this week and hopfully we can move onto Godzilla's page once we are both happy with what's on those pages. Eiga-Kevin2 (talk) 21:03, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No worries my friend. I have a lot of projects and stuff like that too so I have been splicing my time and whatnot. As for old Rhedo, wording is needing to be fine tuned with the bolder clames like him being the most influential monster (he is one of them). My best advice on how to structure character articles is looking at others, I had to take inspiration and note on the whole citation and writing structure for my Leatherface article which is still waiting for GA review but you can take a look at that one if you are trying to figure out character article structure. I took the courtesy of taking the Rhedo article and putting it into the Varan userspace for further tuning. As for Megalon, it seems to be a bit bigger than I thought it would be so I might take a breather from that to think about how to go about finishing it. Paleface Jack (talk) 03:51, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations \| August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Shin Ultraman

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Shin Ultraman you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Adamstom.97 -- Adamstom.97 (talk) 00:45, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Important foreign film"

Regarding these edits [1], there's some misinterpretation. I checked the Ryfle/Godziszewski source and this is the original source that they're citing. Only one journalist is saying this, so it doesn't belong in the lead since this is not the general consensus. Also, the writer is talking about Godzilla, King of the Monsters!, not Godzilla (1954 film). I already added the material to the former article, see Legacy section. Armegon (talk) 17:45, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, ok I see. Sorry for the misunderstanding sir. Eiga-Kevin2 (talk) 18:50, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Shin Ultraman

The article Shin Ultraman you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Shin Ultraman and Talk:Shin Ultraman/GA2 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Adamstom.97 -- Adamstom.97 (talk) 00:22, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Shin Ultraman

The article Shin Ultraman you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Shin Ultraman for comments about the article, and Talk:Shin Ultraman/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Adamstom.97 -- Adamstom.97 (talk) 22:03, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Interlanguage link

Hi, thanks for the great work on Shin Ultraman! I've added Template:Interlanguage link to several ja links in the article. Red links encourage other Wikipedians to create the missing articles, and if/when they are created Cewbot automatically removes this template after it detects the articles on English Wikipedia--converting {{ill}} links to regular (blue) links. BorgQueen (talk) 23:29, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ty, I forgot to do that. Eiga-Kevin2 (talk) 01:45, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promotion of Eiji Tsuburaya filmography

Congratulations, Eiga-Kevin2! The list you nominated, Eiji Tsuburaya filmography, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gorosaurus kaiju.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gorosaurus kaiju.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Need Help

Hi! Was wondering can you have a look/do some cleanup at Godzilla_(franchise)#Box_office_performance. That was mostly if not all edited by User:Maestro2016 who is now banned. This goes back as far as July 2018 according to the edit logs [2]. Timur9008 (talk) 23:58, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing! I'll happily give it a try when I have the time. Eiga-Kevin2 (talk) 03:51, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Timur9008 (talk) 10:23, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is it ok if I remove that section from the article? Given its User:Maestro2016 work and been unchecked for so long. Timur9008 (talk) 17:05, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

G-1.0 on WikiProject Film

I published the post. I pinged you but in case it didn't work, here it is. Armegon (talk) 01:45, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the post from WikiProject Film. Maybe I'm being impatient, but no one's responded to it and the way you revised the edit is good enough for me. So I don't see how outside opinions can make it better than it is. Armegon (talk) 20:37, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Btw, I was just making a major edit to the page and then went to publish it to find that my edit had conflicted with another's again. Was that you? Eiga-Kevin2 (talk) 20:45, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's possible? This is the edit I made to G-1.0 today. The conflict editing thing happens, if I understand it correctly, when two editors are either editing the article at the same time or trying to save their edits coincidentally at the same time. I honestly don't know for sure how it works, but when it happens to me I try again a few seconds later. Armegon (talk) 21:58, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see. About that edit, Ando didn't really outright dispute that claim, he was just acknowledging that theory from social media and mentioning his hypotheses that it is a Godzilla project based on Yamazaki's statement. Eiga-Kevin2 (talk) 22:05, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wolfman vs. Godzilla.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wolfman vs. Godzilla.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An encyclopedia should use prose

Please note WP:PROSE. An encyclopedia should use prose. There has been a long standing consensus against using tables listing critics in film articles (even though some TV, Games, or Music articles do this). Please do not add tables to the Reception response section of film articles.

Instead please try to choose from the most notable critics and select short comments from their reviews about the actual substance of the film, rather than just scores in a table. -- 109.76.138.72 (talk) 19:48, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to an in-person meetup in Mohua / Golden Bay

Thinking about your summer break? Think about joining other Wikipedians and Wikimedians in Golden Bay / Mohua! Details are on the meetup page. There's heaps of interesting stuff to work on e.g. the oldest extant waka or New Zealand's oldest ongoing legal case. Or you may spend your time taking photos and then upload them.

Golden Bay is hard to get to and the airline flying into Tākaka uses small planes, so we are holding some seats from and to Wellington and we are offering attendees a $200 travel subsidy to help with costs.

Be in touch with Schwede66 if this event interests you and you'd like to discuss logistics. Schwede 66 09:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Kamiki and Yamazaki of "Godzilla Minus One" (cropped).jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Kamiki and Yamazaki of "Godzilla Minus One" (cropped).jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:30, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A thanks

Hey, thank you for extending the release for Minus one's NA showings. Starkiryu64 (talk) 18:52, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your welcome pal, I'm happy to help you with anything in regards to Minus One Eiga-Kevin2 (talk) 19:58, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources

Rotten Tomatoes is a film aggregator. It's not a reliable source for biographical information. See, for example, Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 411#RFC: Use of Rotten Tomatoes for biographical information. A reliable source for biographical information would be something like The New York Times. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:00, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Monarch: Legacy of Monsters, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — YoungForever^(talk) 05:54, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Shigeo Tanaka.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Shigeo Tanaka.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Seawolf35 ^T--C 20:22, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TFL notification

Hi, Eiga-Kevin2. I'm just posting to let you know that Eiji Tsuburaya filmography – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for February 19. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 22:29, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

films from Japan

Thank you for quality articles such as Eiji Tsuburaya, Eiji Tsuburaya filmography, King Kong vs. Godzilla and Shin Ultraman, for reviewing the work of others, for infoboxes for your user and Tōru Takemitsu, - (not Kevin) from New Zealand, you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2911 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:07, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join New pages patrol

Hello Eiga-Kevin2!

The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024 GAN backlog drive

Good article nominations \| March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Shuji Abe.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Shuji Abe.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:44, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gomorrah.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gomorrah.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:19, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jirahs.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jirahs.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:20, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Office Shuji Abe" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Office Shuji Abe has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 30 § Office Shuji Abe until a consensus is reached. Rusalkii (talk) 21:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted

DELETED Tanishkshatriyaaiims (talk) 17:33, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Office Shūji Abe" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Office Shūji Abe has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 7 § Office Shūji Abe until a consensus is reached. CycloneYoris ^talk! 06:53, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gomora (kaiju) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gomora (kaiju) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gomora (kaiju) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 05:59, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jirahs for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jirahs, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jirahs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Godzilla Minus One

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Godzilla Minus One you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Broc -- Broc (talk) 06:05, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Godzilla Minus One

The article Godzilla Minus One you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Godzilla Minus One and Talk:Godzilla Minus One/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Broc -- Broc (talk) 10:01, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Godzilla Minus One

The article Godzilla Minus One you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Godzilla Minus One for comments about the article, and Talk:Godzilla Minus One/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Broc -- Broc (talk) 08:04, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Godzilla Minus One

On 7 August 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Godzilla Minus One, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a Japanese essayist and film historian has called Godzilla Minus One a "dangerous movie"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Godzilla Minus One. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Godzilla Minus One), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 00:03, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 16,491 views (687.1 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of August 2024 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hiii...!!

I am also a Godzilla fan and i am also learning japanese just like you, please reply me i am your very big fan (Really!!)

I also want to tell you a theory about Godzilla's real life existence ..!(related to Proxima centauri b)

I am not kidding this topic is really necessary to discuss with you... so dear sir try to edge some time...! Duolingoiscat (talk) 14:21, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pokémon Heroes

I did want to clarify a few things with you regarding the nom:

Could you clarify what else needs to be done? If it's most of what Nineteen Ninety-Four Guy suggested, I'll see what I can do, but I would appreciate some extra clarification on if there's any other gripes you yourself had with it.
Could I run the article by you again once I've done some more work on it? I'm not sure how much more I'll find, but if I feel it's sufficient for a re-nom, I'd appreciate having an extra once over to make sure everything's covered well enough.

Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 19:58, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, here's what else I think needs to be done: The page needs more: credits in the infobox (suggest you take those from the Japanese Wikipedia as you did with the bit about the Pokémon Festival), and some sentences need to be rewritten (e.g. "The English adaptation was produced by 4Kids Entertainment and distributed by Miramax Films and was released in the United States on May 16, 2003" & "received primarily negative reviews from critics, earning a Rotten Tomatoes rating of 19%"). I recommend changing the Reception section to just for critical reviews, making the release and box office part its own, and moving the references and Festival details to a post-release section or something like that. Lead needs a rewrite to mention the voice cast, development stuff, etc. Maybe refer to The Boy and the Heron to use as a reference for the page formatting. And yes, I can give you some more advice once you think you've fully sorted it out. Eiga-Kevin2 (talk) 23:54, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Eiga-Kevin2 would you suggest putting the references in a sub-heading of Reception, or in its own separate heading? As an unrelated question, how did you find those two sources you managed to find during the review? I'm admittedly not well-versed in searching through archives and the like, so I'd appreciate advice on this if possible. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 00:08, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm suggesting putting the Pokemon media references in a separate one. Oh and I found those sources by changing the range of time to the year that the film was released, which can be done by accessing Google Search's "Tools" section and selecting dates under "Any time". Sorry if some of what I'm saying is slightly unclear by the way, I'm a bit sleep deprived. Eiga-Kevin2 (talk) 00:22, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Eiga-Kevin2 Thank you for letting me know about this! I genuinely never knew I could do this until now, and this is very helpful. I've found a few more reviews, which I've added to Reception. This should hopefully balance out Nineteen Ninety-Four Guy's undue weight concerns. I've shifted the post-release stuff to a tentatively titled "Legacy" section, though let me know if you feel a different name is better for that.

I'll get to re-wording and adding some more info from the JP article tomorrow. I'll try and do the same search but with the Japanese title tomorrow and see if I can't turn up some more information as well. I will say that I'm not sure how much developmental information will turn up, but I do not think there will be nearly enough to satisfy Nineteen Ninety-Four guy's comments unless I somehow land on some extreme jackpot sources. On top of adding the info to the lead, what other information would you suggest adding to the article in order to help expand this section? Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 03:31, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've expanded the lead with information from the article and re-organized some sentences and their placement. I've added some names to the infobox and expanded a bit with a new source, but the Japanese name search only turned up the one source I added. The Japanese article doesn't have much else I can use in terms of sourcing, I'm afraid, so I think this is the maximum expansion there will be, at least from what I could find. Let me know if anything else needs changing. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 21:41, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lead looks a bit better, but I'm a bit put off of "The film's title was revealed on January 30th, 2002 in Japan." being the second sentence. Recommend moving that to a be apart of another lead paragraph for production and just having the cast, staff, and short synopsis after the opening sentence per MOS:FILMLEAD. Also, is there anything written online on the film's themes? Eiga-Kevin2 (talk) 22:14, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Eiga-Kevin2 themes are in music, or themes as in the themes of the story?

Also, how would you suggest including cast? Most of the Japanese main cast isn't verifiable, and only the guests are, while the English leads are verifiable while the guests are not. I'm not quite sure how to go about this. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 22:25, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm referring to story themes. I'm gonna go ahead and make some edits to the article to help you out if that's ok with you. Eiga-Kevin2 (talk) 22:29, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good. As for themes, I'm afraid I can't find anything on those specifically. Most reviews are just straight reviews, and unfortunately book/scholar coverage for this movie is rather lacking. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 22:37, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re-organized the lead per your thoughts. I feel it can be cleaned up a bit, and it still needs some more alterations (Such as adding cast), but I wanted to gauge on if anything should be changed here in advance. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 22:51, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just did a massive rewrite of the page and lost all my edits because of an edit war. I'm probably gonna go back to make those edits again later but am quite annoyed so I think it'll be best if I take a break from it today sorry. Eiga-Kevin2 (talk) 00:07, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Eiga-Kevin2 That's perfectly alright. I greatly appreciate the help so far. Thank you for your contributions and enjoy the break! Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 00:10, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Eiga-Kevin2 I understand you're probably busy, so would you want me to try and implement some of the changes you wanted for the article in your stead? Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 01:31, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Sjones23

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Pokémon Heroes § Recent changes. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 23:23, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you remove the dubbing info on Godzilla Minus One?

I mean, the info was correct and I didn't read anywhere that it was prohibited to add this kind of information. Un Gateaux (talk) 20:06, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've had discussions with other users about it before. Since the film is a live-action one with practical actors, generally its cast for dubs in other languages doesn't require a mention in the cast section. MOS:FILMCAST merely suggests using a table for English and Japanese voice actors in the Cast section for pages on anime films. Also, you cited Netflix directly, I would recommend you use a reliable secondary source instead. Eiga-Kevin2 (talk) 20:34, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pulgasari GA Review

Hello, just letting you know I will review Pulgasari, starting tomorrow probably. Best. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 21:43, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thanks. Eiga-Kevin2 (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mushy Yank: Sorry to bother you about this but now that the page has passed, I apparently can't be the one to add the GA icon to the article. Could you please do that? Thanks. Eiga-Kevin2 (talk) 21:02, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Pulgasari

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pulgasari you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mushy Yank -- Mushy Yank (talk) 21:44, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, I was adding the GA template on the TP at the same time as you :D; I hope the edit conflict was resolved. I've added it in the Good Articles Media an Drama list but confess I hesitated before categorising it in the 1990s and not the 1980s. If you think that was a mistake, feel free to change. Best, -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 21:02, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just saw your other message. Will do, certainly-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 21:04, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Christiebot beat me.:D -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 21:06, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for that. I'm not so sure if it should go under 1980s or 1990s on the list either. I think probably 1980s since most sources cite it as a 1985 film, and it was first screened in 1986. Eiga-Kevin2 (talk) 21:08, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK! Makes sense. I'll change it. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 21:30, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Pulgasari

The article Pulgasari you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Pulgasari for comments about the article, and Talk:Pulgasari/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mushy Yank -- Mushy Yank (talk) 21:04, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pulgasari

Hello, Eiga-Kevin2. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Pulgasari at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 07:23, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thanks. Eiga-Kevin2 (talk) 07:14, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shin, Kim Il Sung, and Choi.png

Hi Eiga-Kevin2. I don't think the non-free use of File:Shin, Kim Il Sung, and Choi.png meets Wikipedia's non-free content use policy, specifically non-free content use criterion #1 (WP:FREER) and non-free content use criterion #8 (WP:NFC#CS), for use in Pulgasari#Development. Non-free photos like this are generally only allowed for identification purposes when they're used for primary identification purposes in the main infoboxes of stand-alone articles about the persons depicted in the photo. Non-free usage in other articles or in other ways tends to be much harder to justify and almost always is considered to be WP:DECORATIVE. I don't think you would be able to establish a consensus in favor of this particular use if this file were to be discussed at WP:FDD, but it could also adversely affect the FA review of the article. You probably should consider tagging the file for speedy deletion per WP:G7 and looking for freely licensed equivalent images that can be used instead, even if they're not the exact same image. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:00, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Shin, Kim Il Sung, and Choi.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Shin, Kim Il Sung, and Choi.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Shin Sang-ok.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Shin Sang-ok.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file from a commercial source (e.g. Associated Press, Getty Images), where the file itself is not the subject of sourced commentary. If you can explain why the file can be used under the non-free content guidelines, please add the appropriate non-free use tag and rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Marchjuly (talk) 20:30, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]