Jump to content

User talk:Dreamy Jazz/Archive 7

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1←Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9Archive 10

hi

hi — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.204.59.60 (talk) 21:05, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 22:03, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

User:Aumgirl2024/Sydney Clouts

Dreamy Jazz, I thought I might see a response like yours, and I understand why. This is a student, and I'm the teacher for this class: we just moved a few things to mainspace and the redirects don't serve a purpose. Going through the motions of asking them etc. takes too much time: they're new editors. Thanks. Dr Aaij (talk) 17:41, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Dr Aaij, I do get that, but the speedy deletion policy is pretty rigid. If you want to re-nominate it without asking them, go ahead, but I suspect that it will remain there for a while. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 18:00, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Incredibly minor, but in the |GG rename notes, the section to the passing motion uses the '' italics, which breaks the link. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 16:12, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Amorymeltzer, thanks for noticing that. I've fixed the issue (so that the anchor link now works). Happy editing and mopping, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 20:46, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Regarding adoption

Hello Jazz, last time when I asked you about my adoption, you said you are busy. But now nearly a month has passed and I don't know are you still busy or not. If you will be available so please let me know on my talk page or ping me here. Thanks. Greetings, Kammil ⟨talk⟩ 18:24, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi Dreamy Jazz, I want to ask one more thing, what does closing an sockpuppet investigation mean? As you can see, my case is still open and I don't know what will happen after any admin will close it. So, could you please tell me. That will be very helpful. Thanks. With love from, Kammil ⟨talk⟩ 18:34, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Kamilalibhat, hi. I think as long as you can understand I might not be able to get back to you quickly, I'm happy to take you on as a adoptee. I generally see adopting as a informal process, so I have no structure or anything in particular. My talk page is open to your questions.
To answer your question, closing a sockpuppet investigation happens when everything that is needed has been done such as blocks (if needed), tagging socks (if needed), requesting global locks (if needed) or any other matter directly related to the report and the socks reported. A closed case is technically provisionally closed and can be reopened if necessary. Once a case is archived to the /Archive subpage, then a case has been fully closed. There is a bit of a backlog at SPI at the moment and so your report may not be dealt with for a while. I'll have a look at your report now though. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 22:32, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
I've decided to leave a comment. As I am now considering you as my adoptee, I don't think I can act in a uninvolved enough way to close the case. Let me know if you have further questions. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 22:46, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

GPinkerton

Hi, your creation of said user page with the {{Banned user}} template seems to have some issue, as the template is not visible on the page. Could you check for any problems? Thanks, JavaHurricane 15:51, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

JavaHurricane, hi. Per the documentation of the banned user template the banner is not shown when the user is banned by the arbitration committee. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 15:53, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Thanks! JavaHurricane 15:54, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
GPinkerton was banned without talk page access by Guerillero for violating his topic ban on his own talk page. Maybe this will accelerate the answer for SD.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 22:25, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
Paradise Chronicle, I cannot comment on what or how fast the committee is discussing as I am not in the loop with their discussions, but I can reassure you that they are actively discussing it. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 22:27, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
Here is what I found at WP:TBAN, as to me they are not allowed to edit anything concerning their topic ban on Kurds and Kurdistan, neither the articles nor the talk pages.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 22:46, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

AfD

Hi Jazz. I'm here to ask you that during AfD process, are votes polled by IP's also counted or not? Thank you! –Kamilalibhat ⟨talk⟩ 05:43, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Kamilalibhat, votes by IP addresses are not excluded in AfD, but it is important to note that AfD's are not votes. This is because the policy or guideline based arguments behind the votes, and not the number of votes itself, should be used to determine consensus on what action to take. This means if an IP makes a well thought out policy based argument for a particular action, their vote has more weight than a experienced editor who only makes a vote without justification or evidence. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 09:17, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Ip problem

136.158.29.160 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) can they be blocked. –Kamilalibhat ⟨talk⟩ 09:32, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Kamilalibhat, hi. Reports of a problematic IP/account which is vandalizing are best dealt with at WP:AIV as although I may happen to be online at the time and may deal with it before it is dealt with at AIV, reports at AIV are seen and dealt with quicker. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 13:25, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Dreamy Jazz, it was reported by the bot and was warned only warning but still it was not blocked and it was vandalising. I thought you were online at that time that's why I reported here. –Kamilalibhat ⟨talk⟩ 13:31, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Kamilalibhat, sure. I had only logged in to check my notifications and then left to do something else. I think you missed me by a minute or two. Anyway happy editing, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 13:32, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Dreamy Jazz, yes I also thought when you didn't acted. –Kamilalibhat ⟨talk⟩ 13:36, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Fezification

Hey, I just saw this. Congratulations! -- RoySmith (talk) 19:48, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

RoySmith, thanks. I now have a full Fez instead of half of one . Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 20:01, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Weareme234 socks

Thank you for your comprehensive tidying up of this editor’s socks and their contributions. As you may have seen at User:Arjayay/W sock I have been tracking this editor for some time.
I hope you don't mind me approaching you directly, some admins do, but you are familiar with this case, and in my experience with other sock-masters, if they can be hit quickly, they tend to lose enthusiasm, whereas SPI can take a long time
93.168.76.182 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) has, today, added an image montage at Medininagar:-

Would you be willing to block/range block this IP? (please see User:Arjayay/W sock for other IPs) or do I need to start another investigation at SPI, as the last one is now closed? Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 10:33, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Arjayay, I've blocked /28 for 2 weeks. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 12:46, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Thanks very much - given his track record I'm sure there will be more - Thanks again - Arjayay (talk) 12:49, 16 February 2021 (UTC)


As predicted we appear to have another sock in Electrouser (talk · contribs)
The account was created on 16 February. shortly after using the, now blocked, 93.168.76.182 (talk · contribs)
The user page templates include "comes from India", "is a Muslim" and "Jharkhand" as User:Abdullah Ahsan Mumtaz, User:Abdullahmumtazahsan/sandbox and User:Weareme234
The articles edited are the same/similar, bearing in mind that Jamshedpur, Dhanbad and Economy of Ranchi were protected to stop this sock.
Created 2 new Drafts as forks to the articles he can't edit - Draft:Sports in Jamshedpur‎ and Draft:History of Dhanbad city such fork articles are typical, please see User:Arjayay/W sock#Articles created
Other edits include the usual photomontages at Magnitogorsk, Medininagar and Jhansi
‎Economy of Jamshedpur has been edited by User:Abdullah Ahsan Mumtaz, User:Quetterry, User:IndianMuslimUser, User:Abdullahmumtazahsan and User:Weareme234. Electrouser has, instead, edited ‎Talk:Economy of Jamshedpur. His (unsourced) suggested edit includes "Jamshedpur is home to India’s largest, oldest, first and private iron and steel manufacturer which Is Tata Steel, commonly called as TISCO in Jamshedpur.", which can be compared with "Jamshedpur is home to India's first private iron and steel company, which is Tata Steel (commonly called as TISCO in Jamshedpur)." by User:Abdullah Ahsan Mumtaz here
Please could you look at this and do the necessary - thank you - Arjayay (talk) 16:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Arjayay, I'll probably file a case for this, as I generally like having cases for accounts where the sockmaster isn't an LTA. Just keeps the records good for any future CU on accounts (as they will want an account to compare to from the archive). If you don't mind, can I copy your comments / evidence here verbatim (with a link to where you made the comment) to the case and then close it as a pro forma? I'll be blocking and tagging the account now regardless of whether I file the case as it is ducky enough. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 21:15, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Of course you can copy my comments - as we know, all posts on WP are issued under copyright release licence (CC BY-SA ?). I'm not sure what constitutes an LTA case, but having persued User:Weareme234 through so many socks, it seems like one to me - Thanks and best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 22:07, 19 February 2021 (UTC)


Hi Dreamy Jazz - yet another sock - this time as Techsuper (talk · contribs)
Usual set of infoboxes
Very first edit was to Draft:City Center, Dhanbad a draft started by User:Weareme234
Also edited Draft:Dhatkidih and Draft:Telco Colony both drafts started by User:Weareme234
Second edit was to add a photomontage - again typical
Created multiple fork articles - again bearing in mind that Jamshedpur, Dhanbad and Economy of Ranchi are protected - created Draft:List of tech parks and business parks in Jamshedpur, Draft:Founder's Day in Jamshepur, Draft:Transport in Dhanbad, Draft:Software industry in Jharkhand, Draft:Economy of Medininagar (Daltonganj), Draft:Economy of Poona‎, Draft:Devdas Palace
Is, yet again, creating his own version of Jamshedpur article at User:Techsuper/sandbox
It is so blatant I almost wonder if he is trying to get caught? Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 17:21, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Oh and Rawatbhata was edited by User:Abdullah Ahsan Mumtaz and User:Electrouser - Arjayay (talk) 17:25, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Arjayay, done. Blocked, tagged, creations deleted and edits reverted. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 17:44, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Thanks Dreamy Jazz - I know we can't stop the whole of Riyadh editing, but these last two accounts were after your range-blocks - can these be widened to include the IPs used by these accounts? - Thanks again - Arjayay (talk) 17:52, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Arjayay, its possible that they have moved from using that IP since the range block. I can't say whether a wider range block will effect them. If they make further IP edits and are found, then I can make further range blocks as appropriate. I suggest that if you want a range block, you file a SPI requesting CU with the request to apply appropriate range blocks. Unfortunately, as I'm not a CU I cannot see IPs behind the accounts, but a CU at SPI will be able to. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 18:08, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

And the next sock is ...... Userline (talk · contribs)
Usual new draft articles as forks to the semi'd articles Draft:Uliyan (a suburb of Jamshedpur) Draft:Government, Politics and Civic Administration in Jamshedpur
Other drafts on usual subjects Draft:Economy of Bhilai and Draft:List of cities in East India
Edited ‎Talk:Jamshedpur as can't edit the article - as did User:Abdullah Ahsan Mumtaz and User:Quetterry
Edited Bistupur as did User:Quetterry ‎and User:Weareme234
Us

I also have suspicions about Metteler (talk · contribs) their only edit is at Bokaro Steel City but it is very similar to those by‎ User:Abdullah Ahsan Mumtaz, and article has also been edited by User:PhotographerIndianMuslim, User:Quetterry ‎and User:Weareme234
Thanks - Arjayay (talk) 16:39, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Arjayay, perhaps it might be worth requesting CU for Metteler at the SPI? It would certainly be useful so to keep the chain of confirmations going as well as to look for any sleepers. I forgot about this report and will block Userline now. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 23:54, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi Dreamy Jazz Today's sockpuppet is Leolamite (talk · contribs)
The userpage explains the repeated additions/promotion of Tata steel in earlier edits - Arjayay (talk) 21:23, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Dealt with. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 23:21, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Block evasion at Zack Snyder

See [4]. Is that the same kind of edits as the previous sock (i.e. Special:Contributions/Makasm)? Probably needs a rangeblock. Cheers, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 15:31, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

RandomCanadian, hi. This sockmaster is usually detectable due to their creations which are now deleted. They also make other edits to attempt to disguise the tell-tale signs, which included the edit to Zack Snyder. I wouldn't say that this is related to Saqlainify based on the edits at the moment, but if they create any promotional spam articles, then do feel free to notify me. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 16:57, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Your message

You sent me a message here:[5] saying that I can discuss at WT:ACN and now Primefac removed my post and said I am not allowed to discuss it: [6] --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 00:38, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Supreme Deliciousness, hi. That notice was cross-posted by User:ArbClerkBot when I made the announcement. Although I made the announcement, I did not deliberately place the discuss this link on your talk (as this was the bot). We are discussing this on clerk-l and will probably change how the bot works such that a clerk can instruct the bot to not add the discuss this link for certain named users. I apologise for the misunderstanding caused by the bot. The diff for the bot's cross-post is here. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 00:42, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Verifiability of Astan Bandar

Hello Jazz, hope you are fine. I have been reviewing the article, Astan Bandar since past few days. I think the article is unreferenced, inspite having websites and some other stuff placed between <ref> and </ref>. Could you please look at the references of the article and share some knowledge? I'm confused about the verifiability of the article. Thank you! –Kammill ⟨talk⟩ 18:59, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Kammill, hi. I think this article does need more references and have done some cleanup to the article. The references to the websites only linked to the homepage of the news organization, which did not support the material it was being used to reference. I removed these references, as what is needed is a direct URL to the article published by the news organization to support the information. I haven't checked whether the books support the information they reference. Although most statements have an inline reference, the article itself could do with a few more references which are independent and reliable before it can be considered to have enough references. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 22:28, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello Jazz, while working on the article, Umaria district, I found a link to a Hindi Wikipedia article. Is it permitted to link from one Wikipedia to another? –Kammill ⟨talk⟩ 09:33, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Kammill, in short yes. However, if there is an English Wikipedia article it should be linked to instead of the Hindi Wikipedia article. If the English Wikipedia does not have the article yet, it is preferable to link to the title on the English Wikipedia as a redlink and also next to it link the Hindi Wikipedia article. This is because an English speaking reader may be confused when, after clicking the wikilink, they end up reading the article they want to read in Hindi.
The template {{interlanguage link}} can be used to provide a redlink and a link to the Hindi Wikipedia article. You provide in the first parameter the name of the article in English (which is redlinked), then the language code for Hindi (which is "hi") and then the article title for the article on the Hindi Wikipedia. This template replaces the wikilink present on the page and in this case would be {{interlanguage link|Baderi (gram panchayat)|lt=Baderi|hi|बड़ेरी}}. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 11:07, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
What is April Fool's day on Wikipedia? Could you tell me anything about that?–Kammill ⟨talk⟩ 18:12, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Kammill, April Fool's day on Wikipedia is where editors will make jokes and pranks on Wikipedia. This can include creating joke AfD nominations, creating joke RfAs for users (including already existing administrators) and joke requested move discussions. It is based on the idea of April Fool's day and happens on the day of April Fools (1 April), however, not all April Fool jokes or pranks made follow the format of a traditional April Fool's joke (i.e. joke or prank followed by "April Fools!"). Further, these jokes are usually inside jokes with at least some level of irony. Any discussions opened as an April Fools joke (such as a joke RfA or AfD) are usually closed soon after the end of the day (end of day being 00:00 2 April UTC).
April Fools on Wikipedia is rather controversial, as several editors disagree with the idea while others want it to continue. It is important to note that several rules exist surrounding April Fools, which are detailed at Wikipedia:Rules for Fools. Each year a list of jokes and pranks made as part of the April Fools day on Wikipedia is made. A index these lists can be found at Wikipedia:April Fools. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 21:23, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Another User:Weareme234 sock seems to have been setup

User:Abdullah000mumtazahsan only done a few edits so far but is starting to quack. See User:Abdullah000mumtazahsan/sandbox. noq (talk) 23:05, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Noq, thanks. Taking a look. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 23:07, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Dealt with lock request filed. Thanks and happy editing, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 23:13, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Looks like another. User:Metteler. Created a "list of " article here, adding unsourced stuff and left aligned images [7]. noq (talk) 14:44, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Noq, thanks for reporting. I've dealt with it. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 22:08, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

ARBKURDS shortcut request

Hey. I think I've probably exceeded the editing of arbitration pages (i.e. WP:APLRS) for the time being, so I'm requesting for the addition of a WP:KURDS and/or WP:ARBKURDS shortcut for easy-linking access. Thanks for taking the time. Regards, El_C 16:23, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

El C, I assumed that you were specifically wanting these shortcuts to link to the DS, so I've created them to link to the DS and added the shortcut box in the DS section. Let me know if I assumed wrong. Thanks and happy editing / mopping, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 21:49, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Yes, exactly. Thank you! El_C 22:26, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

User:Inspiralens sock

Hi there. I see you were the admin dealing with the sock puppetry case of User:Inspiralens. One of the socks was User:Youngjtdyt2020. Based on CheckUser evidence, is their grounds for User:Youngjtdyt, who is currently active and editing the same page as before, being a sock in breach as well? Thanks. DaHuzyBru (talk) 04:13, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Ausbasketvic is more likely to be Inspiralens. I've blocked both, though. If Youngjtdyt somehow isn't Inspiralens, it's probably paid editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:50, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for dealing with the sock. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 08:23, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
@NinjaRobotPirate: Just wanted to note for you both – the Draft:Trace Cureton Wikipedia page was linked on the home page and elsewhere on tracecureton.com. I noted this here before approaching either of you and now the link on the home page is gone. See here and here for archives of the website. My point being, as both of you probably gather: 1) Youngjtdyt and/or Ausbasketvic must be directly connected to the subject, or 2) either or both users quite possibly might be Trace Cureton himself or they have access to his website. The Undisclosed paid tag template on the article was very warranted. DaHuzyBru (talk) 09:37, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Inspiralens' deleted user page said the account belonged to "a basketball consulting agency". Anyone that works alongside Inspiralens is probably also a paid editor. See User:NinjaRobotPirate/Identifying sock puppets for my thoughts on the matter. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:55, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

WikiProject AfC

Hello Jazz, hope you are fine. I had some questions about WikiProject AfC. Who are probationary members? When they are removed from the list of members? Why are editors added to the list of probationary members? –Kammill ⟨talk⟩ 19:23, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Kammill, probationary members are those who are part of the Articles for creation WikiProject and can use the helper script, but are only part of the project for a set time and they can be removed without discussion for behavior or actions which would mean their membership should be revoked (e.g. accepting drafts for undisclosed payments). The decision to make a user a probationary user is the decision of the administrator who responds to the membership request. Once the probationary period is up, an administrator can choose to remove the user, extended their probationary period or make them a full member. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 20:05, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello Jazz, could you please fix errors in my subpages and userpage. It will be very helpful. You see, I'm stuck somewhere and I don't know how to fix it. –Kammill ⟨talk⟩ 05:19, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Kammill, I've fixed the issues with stray characters being displayed instead of your header on your userpage. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 08:44, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Dreamy Jazz, see my userpage. I think something else is wrong now. –Kammill ⟨talk⟩ 08:52, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Kammill, didn't see that error. I've just fixed that now. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 08:56, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Dreamy Jazz, thanks for helping me to get out of this situation. I really appreciate you for helping me. Thanks a lot 😊 –Kammill ⟨talk⟩ 09:02, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Recall

Hello Jazz, hope you are fine. I just want to know about recall process. What is it? –Kammill ⟨talk⟩ 04:38, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Kammill, if you are talking about administrator recall, then recall is a informal and non-binding process where individual administrators by choice say that if certain criteria are met they will resign as an administrator. The administrator will define a number of steps to be taken. All a editor would need to do is follow these steps, and as long as they are all completed and satisfied, the administrator would ask to resign. This removal is seen as "under a cloud", so to get the tools again they would need to have another WP:RfA. However, an administrator could pull out of the process at any point including after all the steps are completed. It requires that an administrator keeps their word. This is not the only way for an administrator to have their tools removed. At the moment the only way for an administrator to have their tools removed without them resigning is for the Arbitration Committee to remove them. There is a proposal which is being considered by the community to create a process where the community can remove the tools from an administrator, which is at WP:DESYSOP2021. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 09:24, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Anjum Lucknowi

thanks for that cleanup. Should Draft:Anjum Lucknowi be IAR/CSDed or does it need to molder until June when it's six months stale? Thanks! StarM 20:12, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Star Mississippi, hi. Praxidicae and I thought it best that it be used as a honeypot. However, if you think it's best deleted go ahead. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 20:14, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Nope, that makes sense to me. I remember one version early in the article history but haven't followed it recently. Thanks! StarM 20:19, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
I’m a big fan of using draft space as a honeypot in this respect and generally don’t like stuff being salted there because it’s way easier to evade and throw it into main space. VAXIDICAE💉 20:44, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Definitely wasn't advocating salting draft, sorry if that wasn't clear. Unrelated, but while we're here and since you're way more versed in some of the socks, is there an editor who usually creates articles about his own "films" that are YouTube? Special:Contributions/GabrielCombs seems familiar, but I can't place it. There is a channel and he appears to exist, but I can't see how these are in any way legit as they'd be trademark violations, among other issues. I draftified the one that was in mainspace as there was no applicable deletion criteria, but I'm not sure if there's anything further needed. Thanks either way StarM 20:56, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Star Mississippi, nothing comes to mind. I think I've only seen one sockmaster which promotes their YT channel, and they are not this user. If you want to ask other editors who are versed in socks, perhaps a post at Wikipedia talk:Sockpuppet investigations. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 21:10, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Thank you, will do. Have a good evening. StarM 21:24, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Is there any problem?

Hello Jazz. You see I'm here again with a question. Is there any problems is the following two pages:

If there are any problems, can you please sort them out. I requested this message to be sent yesterday, but it is still pending.Kammill ⟨talk⟩ 14:03, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Kammill, hi. Your request should be dealt with soon. I would note that this message probably does not need to be sent to blocked users as they cannot join. This includes ProudIndian007. Also its probably best, with the message as it is currently worded, to not send the message to those already a part of this. For example Titodutta is listed as a member, but is in the list you would send the invite message too. I might be able to take a further look later, but at the moment I can't filter out these users from your list. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 14:58, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Dreamy Jazz, I added Titodutta (and all those to make them aware about the collaboration). Kammill ⟨talk⟩ 15:40, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
  • I see. I got your (Kammill) Wiki-email also. It is a pretty hectic time. Anyway the first place to initiate the discussion is the India noticeboard and wait for a week. Getting more members signing up is a good idea, however your message does not clearly menion the action point. "Add your name as a participant" — then what? Would send another message to them to start the monthly collaboration? From my experience of both successful and failed attempts on monthly collaborations, I feel what you need is: a) get the event page ready, b) notify the noticeboard and the list members to suggest/voice on the nominations, c) start the editing work of the month. As step 0) you can inform the noticeboard that you are interested to work on this, and see if anyone wants to join you or offer any suggestion. Note: You may also see the past discussion on the noticeboard to understand why it stopped or the reviving attempts. Regards. --Titodutta (talk) 15:09, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
    Titodutta, thank you for the suggestions. I thought I will send another mass message on the 1 April to the participants and inform them, what to do. I will write on the noticeboard aslo (per your suggestion) and see if members join. Kammill ⟨talk⟩ 15:51, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions

Hello Jazz, hope you are fine. Yesterday I came across a user talk page and found a note given by one editor to other about discretionary sanctions. It was something written like: want to make you aware of the administrative ruling in effect. Do you know anything about these sanctions since you are also sysop. Regards, Hulged ⟨talk⟩ 04:41, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Hulged, yes. Discretionary sanctions can be applied by either the Arbitration Committee or the community. For an editor to be sanctioned under these discretionary sanctions they need to be "aware" of the existence of said discretionary sanctions. Being aware includes having another editor post on your talk page with a standard notice for that area. The rules around awareness are complicated, but are detailed here. These discretionary sanctions can be used by an administrator to sanction someone for behavior after they were aware for the purposes of the sanctions, and also place page restrictions (including protecting the page, revert restrictions and other restrictions which are considered useful for the smooth running of Wikipedia). These restrictions cannot be lifted by anyone except the administrator who placed them (if they are still an administrator), at AN by having a clear consensus of uninvolved editors, at AE by having a clear consensus of uninvolved administrators, or at ARCA by the passing of a motion.
You won't be sanctioned using the discretionary sanctions until you are aware and then are disruptive in the area which you are aware has discretionary sanctions. A list of these areas is at Wikipedia:General sanctions § Active sanctions. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 08:47, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
One more thing, I'm your adoptee (Kammill). I have been renamed. –Hulged ⟨talk⟩ 09:49, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you

The helpers barnstar
Thanks for helping me whenever I reached you! --Hulged ⟨talk⟩ 09:55, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Nirmal Gehlot

Hi Dreamy Jazz! Since you protected Nirmal Gehlot from being recreated, you might be interested in the new article Nirmal Gehlot Utkarsh. Happy editing! GoingBatty (talk) 12:50, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

GoingBatty, thanks for alerting me to this. I've blocked the account and deleted their creations. I've also filed a pro forma SPI to note the account's existence. Happy editing, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 13:17, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Another shortcut request: Gender and Sexuality

Hey. Now that WP:ARBGG leads to the old case, can we maybe get a WP:GENSEX shortcut for Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gender and sexuality? Thanks, as always, El_C 13:56, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Posteemptive thanks! El_C 15:02, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
(edit conflict) created that shortcut and added a shortcut box next to the remedy. Happy editing and mopping, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 15:03, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Bindheswari Prasad Keshri (previously not in a separate section)

In the site https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bindheswari_Prasad_Keshri,

please rectify the name of the concerned person. His actual name is Prof. Bisheshwar Prasad Keshari. He used to be my father-in-law. It would be appreciated if you could do the needful. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 42.104.72.2 (talk) 11:13, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello IP. I have moved the page based on two sources in the article ([8] and [9]). Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 22:13, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Talk page archive

Hello Jazz, Lowercase sigma bot lll did not archive my talk page threads. Will you please see what is the problem. –Hulged ⟨talk⟩ 06:40, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Hulged, that's because due to that you have selected the parameter 'minthreadsleft' to 3. Therefore, the bot will not archive 3 sections. If you change it to 0, then the bot will archive it. Thank you. Gold ★ 786 08:53, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Gold Star 786, it was not the issue. Actually I was renamed from Kammill to the Hulged and I forgot to update the configuration for bot to archive my talk page. –Hulged ⟨talk⟩ 08:57, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Hulged, No, that's not the issue. Renaming your account won't stop the bot. I think I've corrected it now. Let's see whether the bot archives it now or not. Thanks! Gold ★ 786 09:01, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Username change request

Started by sock. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 19:05, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

Hi, will you change my username to "Gold Star". My username is too long. Thanks! Gold ★ 786 07:47, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)Gold Star 786, username change requests are best dealt at WP:RENAME. I'd recommend you to make a request there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hulged (talk • contribs) 09:11, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Sock puppet at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment

Dreamy Jazz, Tataqp has been indefinitely blocked as a sockpuppet of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AK at Aquila Polonica Publishing. After the block, I struck their comment following Wikipedia:Dealing with sockpuppets#Striking because other users (such as myself) referred to this long statement in which this publisher tried to argue their books should be used because of the "devastating long-term impact of postwar communist disinformation warfare" in other sources. This strikeout was reverted by Volunteer Marek (who has also taken upon himself to restore PR material (literally taken from the press kit of the publisher) introduced by the sock). I apologize if I overstepped in striking out the sock puppet myself. Now that the sock puppet has been indefinitely blocked, could you strike him out?--Bob not snob (talk) 05:57, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Per WP:BITE and WP:AGF, I think it is more likely we are dealing with two people editing from the shared IP than with any nefarious socking that requires striking. Well, at least when the two accounts affiliated with the Aquila Polonica are involved. Or if it is one person, then their statements can be combined; that should be clarified as it is a bit confusing. As for the restored content, it is perfectly fine per WP:SPS. We can cite the publisher's statement about their own book. Although I'd suggest changing the reference from the press release to the quoted book page. It's not like information that the book's new edition was published recently is irrelevant or biased. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:40, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Piotrus, confirmation from a checkuser is more than just sharing the same IP address. This also includes matching user agent strings, so it is probable that these users are the same person, otherwise these two people are using the same computer and same browser. As it happens, Primefac has hatted the section so it's now dealt with. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 18:51, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Dreamy Jazz, I see. Check out the new developments here [10]/[11]. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:25, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
If they are unblocked as the unblocking administrator considers them separate people, I'll make sure to unhat their section. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 08:26, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Clerk Training

Hello Jazz, what is clerk training? –Hulged ⟨talk⟩ 19:09, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Hulged, clerk training, in a broad sense, is the training of a trainee clerk. I can be more specific if you mention which type of clerk you are asking about. SPI clerk training is where a checkuser trains their trainee clerk in the procedures and ways of SPI. Arbitration clerk training is where a trainee clerk gets on-the-job experience how to clerk, with non-trainee clerks and arbs looking over their shoulder to make sure they are doing things right. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 20:50, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Dreamy Jazz, I'm talking about SPI clerk training. –Hulged ⟨talk⟩ 04:32, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Hulged, SPI training is where a SPI trainee clerk who is chosen by a checkuser (or checkuser with help from a full SPI clerk) is given training in how SPI works. The process of training is generally informal, with most of the training and time spent as a trainee being on the job training. SPI training includes how to tag users, where to block users and how to identify socks. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 08:41, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Dreamy Jazz, then SPI trainees can be admins only. –Hulged ⟨talk⟩ 09:26, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Hulged, not necessarily. Being an admin as a SPI clerk helps, but SPI clerks who are not admins can recommend administrators take action like blocking or protecting which they cannot do. Knowing when it is appropriate to block as a SPI clerk, even if you are a non admin, is useful for determining what action is best to recommend to the administrator. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 11:31, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

spihelper

Hello Dreamy Jazz, here is a new userbox for those who use spihelper such as yourself. Jerm (talk) 01:08, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Wikitext userbox where used
{{User wikipedia/spihelper}}
This user manages sockpuppet investigations with spihelper.
 linked pages
Thanks, I've added it to my userpage. Happy editing, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 08:48, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Presbyterian Children's agency

Hello, Dreamy Jazz! We spoke in late August and I believe I submitted my revised article on Sept. 3. I haven't heard anything about it. Do I just need to stay patient or did I not actually submit it, or what?

17:15, 3 September 2020 diff hist 5,739‎ N User:Neerono/sandbox ‎ A previous version of this was considered subjective. This is shorter and more neutral, e.g.,just one of 17 citations is the agency's own website. current Tag: Visual edit: Switched

Neerono (talk) 14:47, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Neerono, to submit a draft article for review you should place {{subst:submit}} at the top of the draft (in this case your sandbox). At the moment this draft article is not submitted, so doing the above will submit it. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 15:09, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Oh, the horror! Well, at least I know now and can fix it. Thanks, Dreamy Jazz. Neerono (talk) 15:52, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

First motion can't pass either

The first motion (instant desysop) can't pass either. There are five oppose votes and three support votes. There are 12 active arbitrators, but Beeblebrox has recused so actually only 11. Even if the 3 remaining arbitrators would vote first choice, it would give that motion 6 support votes with one of them being second choice and another being third choice. The motion to suspend (3 months) already exceeds this with 10 support votes, two of which are second choice. If the eleventh arbitrator would oppose that motion it wouldn't change anything either. Actually the mystery eleventh arbitrator appears to be David Fuchs who has already voted and appears to have intentionally skipped on voting on the suspend (3 months) motion. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 06:29, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Alexis Jazz, hi. The first motion could still technically pass. If the fourth motion and the third motion receive majority opposition (pretty much not going to happen, but it still could happen) and then the other arbitrators who have not voted vote in support of the first motion, the first motion would pass. A motion cannot pass when there is a majority to oppose the motion as arbitrator(s) would have to change their vote (or cannot pass when a competing motion passes, but this relies on the competing motion passing). Otherwise it still technically can pass if further arbitrators vote / other motions fail. My understanding is that the fourth motion is the one that will be passed and enacted, but the arbitrators wanted to give a bit more time for votes and comments from other arbitrators. I imagine this case request should be closed by motion soon. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 09:59, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
"A motion cannot pass when there is a majority to oppose the motion as arbitrator(s) would have to change their vote" Isn't this also true for the first motion? Oh well, it's theoretical in this case anyway. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 21:24, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Not currently. There is 5 oppose votes and 6 is a majority. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 22:35, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
I see you adjusted the numbers, it used to say 7 is a majority. If the three remaining arbitrators had supported the first motion, it would be passing but overruled by the motion to suspend which has greater support. In order for it to pass and not be overruled, some arbitrators would have had to change their vote. I think I get it. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 11:57, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Question

You indefinitely banned GPinkerton from the English wikipedia: [12]

And here it emerges that GPinkerton is sending emails to user's about articles: [13]

Isn't this a violation of their ban from Wikipedia? --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 14:37, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Supreme Deliciousness, GPinkerton is banned from making any edits, as a site ban relates only to editing. The remedy to ban GPinkerton did not also say that their email access should be disabled, and as such they are allowed to use Special:Email. If they abuse it, then email access may be removed. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 14:45, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
But if you take a look at Ichthyovenators comment:[14] "I saw that you wikipedia e-mailed me concerning "Heraclius III", but when I open my e-mail I can't see the e-mail you sent (don't know why), so I can only see the first few words you wrote. I'm aware that there was a co-emperor by the name Heraclius, who could be considered Heraclius III if Heraklonas is considered Heraclius II, but Mango places "Heraclius III" in the co-regency with Heraklonas and Constantine III, whereas the later co-emperor Heraclius ruled with Constans II and Constantine IV." its clear that GP is discussing the content of the Wikipedia article, i.e: trying to influence how the article gets edited. How is that not a breach of their ban? --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 14:51, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Supreme Deliciousness, as a general case, per WP:PROXYING, editors are not allowed to make edits on the direction of a blocked or banned editor unless the change is good and it can be shown the editor has independent reasons for making the edits. I am not aware of a policy or guideline which prohibits the site banned user from making the request somewhere not on wikipedia. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 15:05, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
However, per WP:NOTBURO, just because there isn't a rule against it doesn't mean it doesn't violate the spirit of the ban. I would say that GPinkerton shouldn't be making requests for other users to edit. A site ban means you shouldn't be editing Wikipedia. Asking someone else to make your edits is just circumventing the rules in my opinion. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 15:21, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Thats exactly my point. GPinkerton is using email to solicit other editors to edit Wikipedia articles according to GPs views. That is imho a clear violation of their ban. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 16:02, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Help supplying a copy of a deleted page

Hey, a sandbox article for an off-wikipedia project was recently deleted for the "Wikipedia is not a web host" policy. I understand that the the sandbox isn't intended for non-related work. However, the content on the page is mildly important to me. I noticed that I could simply ask an admin/sysop who is willing to provide a copy. If you are willing to supply a copy of User:BigCheese76/sandbox, it would be appreciated. I understand what I did broke Wikipedia policy, and so, if I am given a copy, will use the copy to copy and paste the contents of the article onto a seperate website, such as Google Docs. If you could provide a copy for a short time it would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!

BigCheese76 (talk) 12:11, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

BigCheese76, hi. I'd prefer if I could email you with the page content instead of restoring it. If you attach an email address to your account in Special:Preferences and make sure that "Allow other users to email me" is ticked. I can send you through the Wikipedia software an email containing the content of the page. I will not be able to see your email address unless you email me back. This will mean that the page isn't restored, but you still receive the page content. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 13:47, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morteza Andy

You have deleted this article, please can you close the associated AFD? GiantSnowman 16:14, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

GiantSnowman, sure. Will do. Thanks for noticing. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 16:14, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Not a problem, thanks for sorting so quickly! GiantSnowman 16:16, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Question about edit tag in bot trial

Hi Dreamy Jazz, how did you add the "bot in trial" tag to these edits? I think that that is a terrific idea. --TheSandDoctor Talk 01:11, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

TheSandDoctor, hi. When saving I pass "bot trial" in the tag parameter when calling pywikibot.BasePage.save(). I imagine that for any other bots, all they need to have is "bot trial" passed as a tag to what ever saving method the bot uses. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 07:49, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Thank you! --TheSandDoctor Talk 14:28, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Dreamy Jazz Bot 7 approved

Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Dreamy Jazz Bot 7 has been approved! Happy editing --TheSandDoctor Talk 14:28, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks. I'll get the bot running soon. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 19:19, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

28 edits at once...

...to the jazz project strikes me as a bad idea.
Vmavanti (talk) 12:14, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Vmavanti, I'm not sure what you are talking about. Could you clarify, as I've not made 28 edits at once to the WikiProject page. If you are talking about my bot, it only edits {{WikiProject Biography}} uses. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 12:46, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
I got 28 emails in my inbox today for 28 articles at Wikiproject Jazz being changed at once. All of them were by Dreamy Jazz bot and that leads back to you.
Vmavanti (talk) 12:50, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Vmavanti, I see. My bot does only edits WikiProject Biography so I am not sure why you would be getting notifications for that. If you mean watchlist notifications, I then understand what you mean. The bot is slowed by the server automatically based on server lag, but if necessary I can further slow the edit rate. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 12:54, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
I've limited the bot to making an edit every 20 seconds. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 14:03, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Andrew Wyeth

Greetings! May I ask why you placed this Template category on the Talk Page for Andrew Wyeth (Painter): [15]? Thanks. Maineartists (talk) 13:22, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Maineartists, because the article is categorised in Category:20th-century American musicians. This means that, unless the categorisation made by someone else was wrong, the article is about a musician. In this case I don't think this article is about a musician and as such it's inclusion in the category back in 2015 doesn't seem to be right, so I'll revert my bot and remove the category. Thanks for noticing and happy editing, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 13:24, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
Dreamy Jazz Yes. Definitely a mis-categorization. Thanks for clearing all this up. Maineartists (talk) 18:37, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Bio tagging

I see on my watchlist that your bot had tagged Al Franken, Rachel Maddie, and Magic Johnson as musicians. Why? – Muboshgu (talk) 15:25, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Looking a little further, I think it's because they've won Grammy Awards. Not all Grammy winners are musicians. Please fix your bot task. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:28, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The contributions also had Jack Nicholson, Edward R. Murrow, Cynthia Nixon, and Bob Newhart. I've blocked the bot, as I don't know many of the individuals on the recent contribution list with "actor" and "director" disambiguators and do not want to review them all. Please let me know when this is straightened out and I'll unblock. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:56, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Muboshgu, the list of categories the bot uses to decide if someone is a musician is at User:Dreamy_Jazz_Bot/Task_4.3/musician_categories. They are all subcats of Category:Musicians though I agree that not all Grammy Award winners are necessarily musicians they are awards to "recognize achievement in the music industry". I've removed the grammy award's category and will momentarily revert the incorrect edits.
Also the bot hadn't edited in 4 hours before you blocked (the laptop running it had it's power cable pulled out accidentially so ran out of battery), so although I don't question the reasoning for the block I would say that such a block wasn't needed if the bot wasn't editing. Also, I would have appreciated if you had used the bots shutoff pages which are listed at the top of it's userpage and in the task table. For this task this is User:Dreamy Jazz Bot/shutoff/Task 4.3 or User:Dreamy Jazz Bot/shutoff (the all tasks one). Placing any content there stops the task from making any more edits and is less major than directly blocking, but as you blocked there is no need for content in them now. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 16:50, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Muboshgu, the bot is fixed. If you would kindly unblock it. I've removed all categories which make someone a musician which are winner's or participant's categories. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 17:23, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
I did not know about shutoff pages, so I'll keep that in mind for the future. I only just learned with this incident that the big red shutoff button on bot pages is blocking the bot. I'll unblock the bot now. Can it also be programmed to remove the musician tag from the non-musician Grammy winners? – Muboshgu (talk) 17:23, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Muboshgu, I'm doing the removal semi-automatically with AWB search and replace rules to revert the bot's 350 last edits (which are where the wrong categorization has been based on my inspection) using my account. This should be done in the next 15 mins or so. Thanks for noticing this and the quick unblock after my fix. Happy editing and mopping, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 17:26, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
I'm also going to add to the bot's edit summary the category which led it to believe a page was about a musician. This will make it easier for other editors to understand why the bot tagged someone. I'll do final checks, finish the reversion and add the extra summary part to the bot before restarting it. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 17:28, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
In case anyone is wondering, I've explain in further detail why the bot made the edits. The grammy award category is a subcategory of Category:Musicians and as I thought when filtering out the list that grammy awards were for musicians only, I didn't see an issue about using this category. However, as evidenced, this isn't always the case and as such music awards can be for non-musicians too (for example for record producers). To be on the safe side, I've removed any category from the list which is to do with awards. This includes ones which are musician categories (such as grammy award for best song) as music awards in general seem to be a grey area (i.e. possibly for both musicians and non-musicians). I also removed musical groups from the list as when the bot processed a bunch of those categories it only found 2 articles which were for groups but were about a person too, so processing these categories is less useful and there could be an argument to be made that a non-musician person who is related to the band could be in the category about the musical group. This should mean that the category list now only has categories which only contain musicians. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 18:32, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
I'm going to start the bot again. The bot is based off categories, and as such mis-categorised articles may lead to incorrect tagging. As I'm now including what category made the bot tag a page in the edit summary for each bot edit, it should be clear as to which category caused the bot to edit (and as such which to remove). For example, if someone is categorised as a trumpeter but they are not a musician by trade this may be seen as an issue. However, the category should only be there if there are reliable sources to support it's inclusion and as such if the bot did tag a non-musician the category on the article also should be removed. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 19:21, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Biography tagging error

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that the bot task tagging for musicians is doing a weird error where it overrides part of the next WikiProject banner as you can see here, which I've manually fixed. Rfl0216 (talk) 15:29, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Rfl0216, yeah. That is a bit weird. I've not seen that error but I'll see what it might be caused by. Thanks and happy editing, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 19:43, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Incidentally the bot has finished running this task, so I'll make sure this error is fixed before running it again. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 19:47, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Stoney Burke

Not all street performers are musicians. Viriditas (talk) 21:56, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Viriditas, good point. I'll revert all bot edits which tagged street performers as musicians tomorrow. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 00:28, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Question

A user I have never interacted with has put that they hate me on their user page. I thought maybe it was a joke involving the USERNAME template but I checked the source and it is attacking me personally. What puzzles me further is that upon further investigation saying that was their third edit on Wikipedia. I have never interacted with this user and I do not know why they would say such a thing. I have a feeling this might be a sock of someone like WarpedMask4801/DarwinandBrianEdits but I do not know and do not have enough information to go to the sock report page. I also don’t know if this is enough to take to ANI. And based on their pure hatred of me out of nowhere I also don’t think asking them about it on their talk page or removing the message would lead anywhere. I’m honestly not sure where to take this and was wondering if you could look into it or point me to the proper place to report it. CAMERAwMUSTACHE (talk) 17:17, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

CAMERAwMUSTACHE, I haven't taken a long look but I suspect this is someones sock. If you are not sure who is it (and as there is personal attacks) you can always take it to ANI. I would deal with it myself, but I'm a little busy for a while. If its not dealt with later on tonight I'll probably dealt with them. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 19:05, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Okay, thank you. I shall take it to ANI. I just wasn't sure if this warranted their attention, so thank you for clarifying that. CAMERAwMUSTACHE (talk) 19:24, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
CAMERAwMUSTACHE, yeah the userpage alone would be enough for me to bring to a noticeboard or raise it on their tak page. Although not a personal attack which I would block for, it's not needed and the mention of it suggests it is someone's sock. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 19:36, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Yeah this user has gotten more disruptive and I didn't realize it until after I posted it to ANI but he was already reported to ANI for unrelated issues before I even went onto there. CAMERAwMUSTACHE (talk) 19:39, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
And looks like they've been blocked. They removed the part themselves, so I think this is all dealt with. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 19:40, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Many thanks

Hey, many thanks for updating that SPI case of mines. Cheers.---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 21:36, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

No worries. Happy editing, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 22:49, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Homesand / Lass-Lass merge?

Hi! You might want to merge Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Homesand (you just closed) into Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lass-Lass where DUCK evidence was presented for the link to Lass-Lass. Homesand was blocked 26 hours after the report for disruption, so there was nothing left to do, but the subsequent sock should be associated with the right case, right?--Eostrix  (🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 06:11, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Dealt with. Thanks. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 09:01, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

DS 2021 Review Update

Dear Dreamy Jazz,

Thank you for participating in the recent discretionary sanctions community consultation. We are truly appreciative of the range of feedback we received and the high quality discussion which occurred during the process. We have now posted a summary of the feedback we've received and also a preview of some of what we expect to happen next. We hope that the second phase, a presentation of draft recommendations, will proceed on time in June or early July. You will be notified when this phase begins, unless you choose to to opt-out of future mailings by removing your name here.
--Barkeep49 & KevinL (aka L235) 21:05, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

How to relist RM discussions

Hi, thanks for helping out at WP:RM! To relist a move, you have to put it directly after the move proposal signature as I did here[16] otherwise the relist doesn't go through. See Wikipedia:Requested_moves#Relisting_a_requested_move (t · c) buidhe 02:10, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Whoops. I'd forgot exactly where that went. Thanks for fixing that. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 07:18, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Looks like another User:weareme234 sock

at User:User Jamshedpur. Not many posts yet but looking similar. noq (talk) 13:23, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Noq, blocked report made at SRG. Thanks and happy editing, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 14:26, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

And another one... User:BlackToer. noq (talk) 11:41, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Forgot to reply, but dealt with. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 19:27, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

SPI

Hi. Please look into this case as you are a SPI clerk. Thanks. — A.A Prinon  Leave a dialogue 15:12, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Hey DJ,

Should WP:APL#Antisemitism in Poland: Motion_ May 2020 be copied into WP:APL#Remedies? Also, can you set up a direct link to the section like we have for WP:APLRS (perhaps WP:APLPP, WP:APLECP or WP:APL500/30)?

Thanks,

François Robere (talk) 20:52, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

François Robere, thanks for noticing this. I have added the remedy in and created two shortcuts which are now listed in the shortcut box. If you wish to create the other redirects you have suggested then you can but ideally you shouldn't then add them to the shortcut box as listing two is probably enough. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 21:57, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
That's very good. Thanks! François Robere (talk) 08:33, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The discussion is about the topic James Charles (Internet personality).

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

benǝʇᴉɯ 22:22, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

SPI Atharv Bakshi

Hi. Do you have any suggestions on what could be done with this one? Is it just fire fighting? Should I request a CheckUser on the next IP I find, so that the master might get a confirmed sock tag from the evidence? -- DaxServer (talk) 16:47, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

DaxServer, the checkuser tool per policy cannot be used to connect IP addresses to accounts except in cases of serious distruption, and even then a checkuser disclosing the IP address of an editor is an exceedingly rare occurrence. Changing tags from suspected to confirmed, although useful for record purposes, doesn't help in preventing the sockmaster in any way. When the evidence is obvious enough running a checkuser, unless it is to check for sleeper accounts, is unnecessary as it's already clear that this IP or account is block evading. Although multiple confirmations can lead to WP:3X bans, often a sockmaster such as Atharv Bakshi is unlikely to request an unblock anyway so the difference between a ban and a block becomes little to nothing. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 19:46, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
With regards to other options that could be explored, partial blocks on a very wide range for their favorite articles and/or page protection may be a useful method to prevent further block evasion. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 19:47, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for the clarifications! This user isn't doing any serious disruption, thus a CU is not allowed. -- DaxServer (talk) 19:52, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Filter 1153

See the notes at 1153 (hist · log). Basically, anytime you're dealing with substed templates or signatures, Special:AbuseFilter/test is useless, because it's putting added_lines_pst (the wikitext after substations have taken place) in added_lines (normally exactly what's in the edit form). This is probably unfixable; the contents of added_lines are discarded once the edit saves; so unless another filter was tripped there's nowhere for /test to recover it from. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 22:06, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Suffusion of Yellow, although I appreciate the edit I am wondering why Special:AbuseFilter/examine/log/30169567 was then caught by the filter when testing for "Initiated by". Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 22:08, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
Oh I see. Ignore me. I realise that edit was a reversion. Thanks for fixing it. I was using the batch test page to see if it worked, so I hadn't realised it wouldn't actually work. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 22:11, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
Certainly, it would be possible to also test for reversions like that one. But I'm guessing the warning would be useless; the user is obviously really determined to file the report by that point. Or maybe, they're just a newer user cleaning up after a page-blanking spree, so the warning would be irrelevant. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 22:16, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
Yeah, the intent is to warn the newer users who may be on mobile etc. and wouldn't have seen the edit intro when filing the case. Its an extra step to provide guidance before filing a premature case request. If they have decided to revert the removal (which is usually done by clerk anyway) I don't think any number of warnings would stop them. Thanks again for noticing this. I wonder how many more quirks of the abuse filter there are... Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 22:20, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Edit filter/Traps and pitfalls is an ever-growing list. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 22:25, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Apachekamumbai

in re: Andrew Oyombe (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

jazz my real names is andrew oyombe opiyo and the one written is andrew oyombe on wikipedia i have tried several times to ask for deletion of my name on wikipedia i dont want to be in it,kindly help to delete me completely and i will apreciate with due respect — Preceding unsigned comment added by Apachekamumbai (talk • contribs) 21:47, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Lugnuts see the above. The editor is requesting deletion of the article about them. From what I can see they are notable enough for a Wikipedia article and per WP:LUC the subject of an article doesn't have an special rights over it. I would say that this article is probably going to stay, but as the creator of the article do you have any thoughts? Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 21:28, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
Morning! This same question about this article came up before (probably by the same editor), but for the life of me, I can't locate the thread. Firstly, the article is notable, with the subject playing multiple times for the national team (see WP:NFOOTY). Secondly, looking at the edit history and the user's talkpage, I think the main issue is around the second paragraph the situation about the subject's asylum in Sweden. This was added here. Maybe the simple solution is to remove just this paragraph? @JTtheOG: - what are your thoughts? And thirdly, this article exists on three other wikis too (IT, PL, PT). Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 06:46, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Fez of Excellence

Fez of Excellence
Your contributions to the arbitration clerk team over the last year and a half have been invaluable, Dreamy. Thanks for all you do – I don't know where we'd be without you. KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 06:41, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
L235, thank you! I'd also say the same to you, and also for your work as an arbitrator especially with the discretionary sanctions review has been really great. Thanks again and happy editing, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 19:43, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Articles for Creation July 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive

Hello Dreamy Jazz:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 1500 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:53, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.

The clerkiest clerk that ever did clerk award!

The clerkiest clerk that ever did clerk award!
I hereby award thee the clerkiest clerk that ever did clerk award! Many thanks, Dreamy Jazz, for getting ARBCOM stuff done, consistently and expediently. I see you! El_C 13:23, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
El_C, thanks! Happy editing, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 16:40, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for your question support at my RfA

I think of a wikipedian as an odd sort of miner. There's all this unknown matter, but generations of us will gradually uncover and put forgotten knowledge into a usable/trust-able framework. One day after my death the pedia will look like a digital Moria, a vast and recoverable place of great treasure only made possible because of willingness and civility. BusterD (talk) 19:38, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

BusterD, yeah. Everything must draw to a close though I hope Wikipedia will continue for many years to come. Wikipedia is the gateway to general understanding for everyone and for that I think Wikipedia has made this world better and more equal. I like your comparison to Moria and even now I think that Wikipedia is like an active Moria where most editors and readers are unlikely to have read all of what Wikipedia has to offer. There will always be a cavern or mineshaft to travel down and explore. Although I didn't ask you a question, I am happy to have voted support for you. Hopefully you will enjoy the mop. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 20:16, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Kingdmusic artist page

Can you please include Kingdmusic on Wikipedia? Dengatk (talk) 20:04, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Dengatk, hello. Wikipedia has notability guidelines which mean that a person, such as Kingdmusic, needs to be considered notable enough for a standalone article for it to be created. In this case the general notability guideline and the musicians notability guideline should to be met for Kingdmusic to have a standalone article. Simply this means that Kingdmusic needs to have been significantly (i.e. more than just a passing mention) covered in multiple independent and reliable sources, and also should have met one of the items in the musicians notability guideline. If you think that Kingdmusic is notable enough for an article then you can request it at Wikipedia:Requested articles. Alternatively if you want to create it yourself you can start it at Draft:Kingdmusic and then when you want to submit it for review add {{subst:submit}} at the top of the draft. If you do create the draft, then I suggest citing the independent and reliable sources as this makes it easier to show notability and also ensures what you write is backed up by sources.
I also advise you to read our policies on conflict of interest editing and also you must disclose any payment or compensation you receive to make edits per this site's terms of use. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 20:33, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for your reply. This where Kingdmusic was mentioned as a notable person https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/K-Anthony. He's also been mentioned on notable news sites. Are you able to help add him? I can provide all necessary links to information. Dengatk (talk) 21:01, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Dengatk, if you want to have someone create it for you I suggest posting a request at Wikipedia:Requested articles. This is not really my area of editing, so an editor with more experience of where to find high quality sources for this rapper will be better. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 21:13, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Thank you Dengatk (talk) 21:14, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Deletion of Flying Blind (Band)

Hiya! A page I was in the (super newbie) process of creating, Draft:Flying_Blind_(Band), was deleted. Is there any way I could recover the work I had done so I can try again with more information/sources/articles? Or if there is something else I need to do, I'm more than happy to do that as well. =) Thank you for your time! Funny Drummer (talk) 05:43, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Funny Drummer, hello. This article was speedy deleted because it contained a copyright violation as it copied largely from https://music.apple.com/gb/artist/flying-blind/86318 and https://www.allmusic.com/artist/flying-blind-mn0000164719/biography. As it is a copyright violation, I can't provide you with a copy of the deleted draft. If you decide to make the draft again please ensure that it is not a copyright violation. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 08:38, 16 July 2021 (UTC)


Thank you so much for the help! I understand what needs to be fixed now. =) Back to square 1! Funny Drummer (talk) 03:00, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

The da Vinci Barnstar for you!

The da Vinci Barnstar
For your excellent clerking and initiative at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Index/Clarification and Amendment requests, have this fine barnstar. First time I've ever had the privelege of giving this one out! Keep up the good work. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 22:34, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
CaptainEek, thank you so much! Honored to be the first you give this barnstar to. Happy editing, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 08:29, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
Great work on the page! ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 13:21, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Tech News: 2021-29

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes

  • The tool to find, add and remove templates was updated. This is to make it easier to find and use the right templates. It was supposed to come to the first wikis on 7 July. It was delayed to 12 July instead. It will come to more wikis later this year. [17][18]
  • Special:UnconnectedPages lists pages that are not connected to Wikidata. This helps you find pages that can be connected to Wikidata items. Some pages should not be connected to Wikidata. You can use the magic word __EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ on pages that should not be listed on the special page. [19]

Changes later this week

  • Recurrent item The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 20 July. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 21 July. It will be on all wikis from 22 July (calendar).

Future changes

  • Advanced item How media is structured in the parser's HTML output will soon change. This can affect bots, gadgets, user scripts and extensions. You can read more. You can test it on Testwiki or Testwiki 2.
  • Advanced item The parameters for how you obtain tokens in the MediaWiki API were changed in 2014. The old way will no longer work from 1 September. Scripts, bots and tools that use the parameters from before the 2014 change need to be updated. You can read more.

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

15:29, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Merchandise Giveaway Nomination – Successful

A Wikimeida t-shirt!
A Wikimeida t-shirt!

Hey Dreamy Jazz,

You have been successfully nominated to receive a free t-shirt from the Wikimedia Foundation through our Merchandise Giveaway program. Congratulations and thank you for your hard work! Please email us at merchandise@wikimedia.org and we will send you full details on how to accept your free shirt. Thanks!

On behalf of the Merchandise Giveaway program,

-- janbery (talk) 00:46, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Socks

Hi DJ
I’ve gone for supplies and currently have a signal
Could you please look at User:Warefere Indian Muslim and User:Mr. Talking - Thanks - Arjayay (talk) 12:02, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Arjayay, will do. Thanks, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 12:03, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Arjayay, I've blocked both and reported both for global locks as it  Looks like a duck to me Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 22:42, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Karen Whittmer stub

in re: Draft:Karen Wittmer Jekel (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi. Is it the significance of Ms. Whittmer at question. I believe it was the first-ever all female masthead at a newspaper, certainly the first at a U.S. daily -- and it was a deliberate experiment by Gannett, the publisher of USA Today.

If it is the sourcing, what would qualify as a valid source?

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.242.56.228 (talk) 19:04, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

IP, notability on Wikipedia is generally defined by whether the subject has had significant coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources. In this case the important bit is that multiple of these independent and reliable sources are needed to establish that this person is notable enough for a standalone article. Your draft only included one source, the AP obituary, which met this significant coverage. The Facebook link, as far as I could tell, was not accessible to me and also was just a photo. To ensure that the level of notability is reached you need to find and include multiple of these independent and reliable sources. Perhaps it would be a good idea to find source(s) which supports her being the first-ever all female masthead at a newspaper (as you have said above) and include this with the source(s) in the article.
Wikipedia's notability doesn't necessarily translate 1 to 1 to real life notoriety or notability. It is used to determine mostly if the subject has enough reliable and independent sources to write a neutral and factually correct article on the subject. For example, the obituary may have an incorrect statement and without other sources this incorrect statement may go unnoticed. With more sources this statement is more likely to be noted as contradictory.
In regards to your question about what qualifies as a valid source, sources for determining notability should be independent (i.e. the source is not written by the person or someone connected with the person), reliable (i.e. that the source is seen as reliable enough to be used to source a large part of the article), secondary sources (i.e. a source which evaluates primary sources), and also cover the subject in a significant way (i.e. the source should talk about the subject directly and in detail). Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 19:41, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

The Entertainment Gazette

I'm trying to work out how to reply to you as a message, thank you for the feedback - this is NOT paid and I'm not being paid to produce/edit an article. I'm just listing the publication into Wikipedia, much like The Sun, Daily Mail, Daily Mirror etc. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Digitalnewsuk (talk • contribs) 17:34, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Digitalnewsuk, okay. Your username suggested that you may be paid to edit (as it seemed to be some organization), but as you have declared you are not paid that is all fine. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 21:05, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Ofra Cosmetics

Hi! First, I want to thank you for helping me submit my Ofra draft again! However, it was declined by one of the people who previously reviewed the article. They said it was more neutral, but then said my sources were the same, but I've added and changed sources since the last time they reviewed it. I have multiple sources that fit the wikipedia citations guidelines, so I'm not quite sure what else they want when Ofra is clearly notable. I have two, independent scholarly articles that conduct a deep analysis on the company and its brand strategy that are both from a 3rd party. I also have sources from newspapers. reliable news sites, and notable website that are independent and completely 3rd party. So, if you have any advice or can tell me where I'm going wrong, I would appreciate it. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by BaileighD (talk • contribs) 19:38, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

BaileighD, Clearfrienda hasn't previously reviewed that specific draft based on the edit history of the draft. I would advise that if you can find more reliable and independent sources then it will help. Asking the most recent reviewer will also be best (as you have done). Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 21:34, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Oh she reviewed my previous article "Mardi Paws." I've been told that fewer reliable and solid sources is much better than having a lot of weak sources, so I'm hesitant to add anything. I have scholarly articles, secondary news sources, etc, and I already have about 20 sources. I'm not sure why or how I could add more when just a few is encourage, and i already have more than a few. I know she can better answer, but I've found some reviewers aren't specific in their corrections, but you've helped me once, and were super clear, so I just thought to get your opinion as well. Thank you.

Lack of reliable sources

Hi, there is not many reliable sources that I can use on Draft:Anthem of Kamchatka Krai, so there is not much I can do other than putting the external link to a reference, other than that there is not much I can do. GoldenChannels (talk) 23:26, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

GoldenChannels, unfortunately then it's probably best that the content (or a reduced amount of content) in the draft is added to Kamchatka Krai as a new section. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 03:58, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

kindly unblock user:DC Themmie

hello good evening Mr Dreamy jazz i am the user;DC Themmie which have been blocked and banned by wikipedia as an Socuppetry. I have voilated the rule sir before but now i am ready to comply with the rules of wikipedia

1. I will not copy and paste any spam and promoting articles on wikipedia again 2. I will not open many account on wikipedia to cause calamities on wikipedia again 3. I will learn the guidelines of wikipedia when editing or creating any articles on it. Kindly please sir{{unblock|my user page DC Themmie on wikipedia, from now henceforth i will always comply to the rules and abiding with it when creating on wikipedia, i wont open any account again to cause calamity again, i will always edit and create reliable source on wikipedia thanks.105.112.208.139 (talk) 21:48, 1 August 2021 (UTC)}} .

Dealing with at the IPs talk. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 21:57, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you for helping me understand the relevant policy for my recent edits on #wikipedia-en-help 😸 -Arzg (talk) 14:08, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Arzg, good to hear. Happy editing, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 19:59, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

DS double tagging

Irish RepublicanMedia (talk · contribs) was soft blocked and requested a rename to BalearicSunrise (talk · contribs) but then went ahead and registered the new username and started using it. IRM had a DS notice for the troubles. BS is editing in the same area so I gave them a DS notice too. It seems a grey area between double tagging the same person (probably) and ensuring that the second account was aware. Not sure how it falls from an Arbcom rules perspective. Thanks, Cabayi (talk) 06:25, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) Cabayi, I don't see anything too wrong with that, though this is definitely IAR territory. I'd say that the second notice makes it clear for anyone who doesn't check the past account that they have in fact been notified. GeneralNotability (talk) 13:55, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
Although GN has given a good answer, my response to this would be alerts apply per editor (and thus per person) and not per account. As such they are formally aware. However, the DS alert filter log which is used to check if a editor is formally aware doesn't show this previous alert under their new username. Although the accounts may be clearly linked, a passing editor may miss the previous alert which isn't desirable.
Therefore, I think that IAR applies here. For example, if DS is likely to be used to warn/sanction the editor placing the alert again for the entry to show up in the log will likely prevent confusion or misunderstanding. However this may not be needed for a constructive editor who had the alert simply because they edit in the topic area. Regardless, an editor in good faith placing an alert on a new account before the 12 months is up cannot be seen as disruptive in my eyes. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 17:30, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Tech News: 2021-35

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes

Problems

  • Musical scores were unable to render lyrics in some languages because of missing fonts. This has been fixed now. If your language would prefer a different font, please file a request in Phabricator. [20]

Changes later this week

  • Advanced item The parameters for how you obtain tokens in the MediaWiki API were changed in 2014. The old way will no longer work from 1 September. Scripts, bots and tools that use the parameters from before the 2014 change need to be updated. You can read more about this.
  • Recurrent item The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 31 August. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 1 September. It will be on all wikis from 2 September (calendar).

Future changes

  • You will be able to read but not edit Commons for a few minutes on 6 September. This will happen around 05:00 UTC. This is for database maintenance.
  • All wikis will be read-only for a few minutes in the week of 13 September. More information will be published in Tech News later. It will also be posted on individual wikis in the coming weeks. [21]

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

15:59, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Sock?

This is wrt to this SPI. You let it go under good-faith, given that Zekewoks (talk · contribs) doesn't edit again. On 30th August, Cactinites claimed that Penacurt (talk · contribs) was another one of their accounts, just hours after refusing the existence of any other account (also denied while the SPI was open), although they haven't used it since the SPI. An IP has also claimed that Steadtaut (talk · contribs) and Starksulk (talk · contribs) are Cactinites' accounts; they do have similar contributions.

Apart from this, there needs to some reprimand for or action against User talk:86.143.34.127 for going around and badgering Cactinites on different talk pages, literally threatening them of consequences unless they accept, while being well aware of the appropriate process to follow. There is also Special:Contributions/2409:4063:4185:8BF6:D89B:92C:B483:B6E6/64, Special:Contributions/110.227.118.224 and Special:Contributions/27.57.72.0, who for some reason have found Cactinites and Penacurt and initiated the exact same conversations 86.143 was doing.

Really, what a mess. 2405:201:4013:80F3:85E3:D6F0:AC56:8E46 (talk) 22:02, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

I'll reply to the IP making the accusations on Cactinites talk page to go to SPI or to drop the stick about the accounts seeing as the socks above haven't edited since. Thanks for making me aware. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 18:39, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Thanks! 2405:201:4013:80AA:1081:181A:60BA:31C1 (talk) 19:56, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Protection request

@Dreamy Jazz: Can you please protect List of Seventh-day Adventists. My reason I'm sick and tired of IP's adding names to this list without references, to me are these people being added really Seventh-day Adventist? Former Seventh-day Adventist? Or just just raised in the Seventh-day Adventist Church. Also adding names more then once to this list and not putting people in alphabetical order is a problem. And putting people who should not be added to this list. To me if IP's want names to be added to this list, they should make their request on the talk page of this article. I've been trying to improve this list for a few years know, sadly this virus has slowed me down. Catfurball (talk) 18:02, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

I'm not sure that I would protect the page at the moment. There are constructive edits being made (unless I'm wrong) and the edit rate is very slow. As such only longer lengths of page protection would be effective at preventing vandalism, but this also has the side effect of preventing constructive edits. I would suggest going to the requests for page protection page and making a request there if you feel that page protection is needed. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 20:57, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Congratulations from WikiProject Articles for Creation!

The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar & The Teamwork Barnstar
Congratulations! You have earned The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar and The Teamwork Barnstar for reviewing 58 drafts and doing 30 re-reviews during the WikiProject Articles for creation July 2021 Backlog Drive. Thank you for your work to improve Wikipedia!
On behalf of WikiProject Articles for Creation, Enterprisey (talk!) 00:18, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Copied content

The article named Nuwandika Senarathna has copied content from the article "Falan Andrea" and contains incorrect information and unreliable references. Can you do something about it? Nirdis (talk) 11:19, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Dealt with. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 16:23, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Thank you, but that article is still there, someone has moved it again. Please can you look into that matter? Nirdis (talk) 06:16, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Not much more I can do but tag it with more sources and remove the unrelated sources. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 11:11, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi! Reply-link has officially been superseded by mw:DiscussionTools, which you can install using the "Discussion tools" checkbox under Preferences → Beta features. DiscussionTools, developed by the WMF's Editing Team, is faster and has more features than reply-link, and it wouldn't make sense for me to keep developing reply-link. I think the Editing Team is doing amazing work, and look forward to what they can do in the future. Thank you for using reply-link over the years! Enterprisey (talk!) 06:11, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dreamy_Jazz/Archive_7&oldid=1234784808"