User talk:Dag21902190

May 2024

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Martin Buber have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Martin Buber was changed by Dag21902190 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.887931 on 2024-05-22T15:57:27 00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:57, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Please particularly note the restriction until your account has been active for 30 days and 500 edits. Thank you. Innisfree987 (talk) 23:45, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Behavior at CfD

Hi Dag21902190. I just wanted to let you know that your behavior at various debates categories for discussion are veering into personal remarks. Remarks like you are flexing your ignorance of Israeli history or insinuating that people have an ulterior motive for wanting to merge a category (What’s the real reason for you to want to delete my work?) is not okay, no matter how upset you might be. I have had my own work deleted before, so I know how it feels. But we are just trying to make Wikipedia the best it can be, and accusing long-term editors of editing in bad faith is not going to get you too far. Let me know if you have any questions, House Blaster (talk · he/they) 23:44, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Hello, I'm Fram. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Herman Brusselmans, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Describing one's own personal mixed and problematic feelings is not "inciting violence" or "calling for violence", and without reliable independent, neutral sources describing it thus, it is a BLP violation to post this in Wikipedia voice, like you did here. Please stick to neutral descriptions. Fram (talk) 12:39, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fran, I did provide a source. What are you talking about? Dag21902190 (talk) 14:02, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Moshe Leshem moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Moshe Leshem, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Bbb23 (talk) 22:49, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reblocked

Above, on 16 July, you stated I am making a clear and firm commitment to refrain from using any AI tools in the future. Today, 10 August, you posted an AI-generated comment at Talk:Zecharia Wallerstein. As this clearly shows that your "firm commitment" is meaningless, I have reblocked your account. Appeal instructions are as above, or can be found at the guide to appealing blocks. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 23:15, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Block appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dag21902190 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I apologize for using AI to respond to the speedy deletion nomination of a page I created. As I’m currently working on other projects, I wanted to respond quickly. I’ve made a commitment not to use AI in writing articles, and I haven’t, and never will. I now extend that commitment to the talk pages as well. I hope you’ll take a look at the pages I’ve created, as there’s much to explore. I’m looking forward to contributing more. Best regards. Dag21902190 (talk) 23:30, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

There's an old saying that goes, "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me." You already made a promise not to use AI tools. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:19, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What can I do to get back in the good graces of the Wikipedia Kings? Am I not a net positive? My contributions have been great! Can you at least review to see if I’m a positive contributor to the platform? I think you’ll agree that I am. NinjaRobotPirate —Dag21902190 (talk • contribs) 00:27, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The calculus of net positive relies not only on weighing positive and negative contributions, but considers also the cost of supervision and/or remedial efforts, and the impact of uncollegial comments. Your failure to commit to self-discipline as a member of the community suggests that any residual positive effect would be expensive overall. _signed,Willondon (talk) 01:02, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My contributions have been great!. Not in my view, certainly not the pages you've created, which are mostly about non-notable subjects and many of them are blatantly promotional. I also wonder if you're an undisclosed paid editor. Your agenda to write about Jewish topics only is unusual, your account is only 4 months old and yet you've amassed well over 2K edits.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:09, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your accusation that I’m a paid editor is bizarre and baseless. The majority of the subjects I write about are historical figures who have already passed away. Why is it strange that I focus on Jewish history? Many editors choose to specialize in specific topics. Instead of recognizing the significant contribution I’ve made—over 5,000 edits in just a few months—you've resorted to attacking my work. Suggesting that the subjects I cover are not notable is simply false. Your behaviour is nothing short of bullying and antisemitism. Something I’ve consistently encountered on Wikipedia. Dag21902190 (talk) 05:08, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you moved my page about the National Youth Front to the draft space. The page was highly developed and more detailed than many other pages currently on Wikipedia. I'm curious as to why you wanted it removed, and then immediately targeted me on my talk page. Your actions suggest that you don't want me to write about neo-Nazi organizations in America.

Care to explain your reasoning behind moving it to the draft space? Dag21902190 (talk) 05:35, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Block Appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dag21902190 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There aren’t many contributors focusing on Jewish history on Wikipedia, and my work helps fill that gap. In just a few months, I’ve made over 5,000 edits, significantly advancing areas like Israeli history and Rabbinical history. Much of my work has focused on improving content by adding infoboxes to underdeveloped pages, creating articles for subjects that have been overlooked, organizing articles through categorization, and enhancing pages with relevant photos. I would absolutely love to continue my work, as I have a few projects that I’m working on right now. Can I have a chance to keep going? Dag21902190 (talk) 05:20, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I agree that your contributions are a net negative to Wikipedia. 331dot (talk) 06:41, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Why?…

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dag21902190 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I’m going to try this again and hope that it doesn’t get hijacked by an administrator who responds with one sentence. There aren’t many contributors focusing on Jewish history on Wikipedia, and my work helps fill that gap. In just a few months, I’ve made over 5,000 edits, significantly advancing areas like Israeli history and Rabbinical history. Much of my work has focused on improving content by adding infoboxes to underdeveloped pages, creating articles for subjects that have been overlooked, organizing articles through categorization, and enhancing pages with relevant photos. I would absolutely love to continue my work, as I have a few projects that I’m working on right now. Can I have a chance to keep going? Dag21902190 (talk) 06:50, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your use of AI tools after saying you wouldn't use them is good enough reason to decline this unblock request. PhilKnight (talk) 10:03, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've revoked TPA for your repetitious, disruptive unblock requests and your personal attacks. Additionally, including deleted edits, you have made about half of your claimed 5,000 edits. Perhaps you have another account? Or maybe WP:LOUTSOCKing.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:12, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Saul Jay Singer

Hello Dag21902190, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Saul Jay Singer, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saul Jay Singer.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Dclemens1971}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dclemens1971 (talk) 21:19, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yehuda Gershuni moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Yehuda Gershuni. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 03:17, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chaim Hissin moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Chaim Hissin. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 03:18, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kehillas Ohr Hatorah moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Kehillas Ohr Hatorah. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 03:21, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chaim-Ber Gershonovich Hodos moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Chaim-Ber Gershonovich Hodos. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 03:23, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kemp Mill Synagogue moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Kemp Mill Synagogue. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 03:24, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yitzhak Merkin moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Yitzhak Merkin. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 03:28, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Amnon Haramati moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Amnon Haramati. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 03:29, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Any future unblock - admins to note:

Unfounded and veiled (initially) allegations of racial/religious prejudice on User talk:Jimboson and elsewhere by their puppet suggest to me that an unblock is unlikely to be forthcoming. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dag21902190 for the SPI 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:22, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Bieler moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Jack Bieler. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Innisfree987 (talk) 07:45, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chabad of Silver Spring (August 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Greenman were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chabad of Silver Spring and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 08:32, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dag21902190! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 08:32, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kidnapping of Ariel Cunio and Arbel Yehud

The article Kidnapping of Ariel Cunio and Arbel Yehud has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There is nothing encyclopedic about this article that isn't briefly listable at Israel–Hamas war hostage crisis.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Remsense ‥ 诉 10:58, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yizhak Halperin

The article Yizhak Halperin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NBIO and WP:SIGCOV

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Vegantics (talk) 20:56, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Moishy Tanenbaum (Uncle Moishy)

Hello, Dag21902190. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Moishy Tanenbaum (Uncle Moishy), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:10, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Michoel Frank

Hello, Dag21902190. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Michoel Frank, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:09, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jonah Lerner

Hello, Dag21902190. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jonah Lerner, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:09, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]