User talk:Butlerblog/Archives/2024/April

Your GA nomination of The Chosen (TV series)

The article The Chosen (TV series) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Chosen (TV series) and Talk:The Chosen (TV series)/GA2 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of David Fuchs -- David Fuchs (talk) 14:42, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Can I have your expertise?

Hi, could you tell me what caused you to revert these edits?
Someone asked a question about one edit at ANI (which is the wrong place to ask questions but, eh) and that edit was made by a similar IP who even edited one of the articles you reverted (the first one they edited): Special:Contributions/50.49.98.45.
There was also a previous IP that was blocked for disruptive editing (for 31 hours), who edited one of the other articles they edited, but I don't really understand, what is it that I should be watching out for in their edits? – 2804:F14:80C8:4701:3C07:6F36:D6F6:97FF (talk) 22:44, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

It is part of a range of IPs that has a pattern of problematic and disruptive editing. The issues for these IPs generally are excessive "see also" links (too much overlap or too broad), oversimplification of language, unnecessary links in article text, never uses edit summaries, and doesn't communicate via talk pages. Those things by themselves don't necessarily warrant broad-based reversion, and ordinarily, reverting those types of edits would involve some type of communication with the editor involved. However, in this particular case, the editor already knows this, doesn't communicate with other editors, and seems to just not care. ButlerBlog (talk) 11:43, 29 April 2024 (UTC)