User talk:Bluedoor17
Welcome!
[edit]
|
May 2021
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Music of Hawaii, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please see MOS:BOLDLINKAVOID. I will check to ensure there is a link to Hawaiʻi Peaceray (talk) 20:33, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
May 2023
[edit]Hi Bluedoor17! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Lauren Boebert that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Aoi (青い) (talk) 22:02, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Aoi! Thank you for letting me know, I had assumed that minor edits were just a few sentences, rather than paragraphs. I will keep that in mind for future edits. Thank you again! Bluedoor17 (talk) 22:44, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of User:Nickkroll
[edit]A tag has been placed on User:Nickkroll requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Completely unnecessary page containing unverified claims, created following this and similar tweets.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Nythar (💬-🍀) 19:54, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
June 2023
[edit]A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. BangJan1999 20:45, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
July 2023
[edit]Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Bo Burnham, you may be blocked from editing. Felida97 (talk) 09:45, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- I simply added info to the personal life section that was in the info box section. Either change both to 2013- present, or both to 2013-2022. As it stands right now, the page is inconsistent and incorrect. Bluedoor17 (talk) 15:06, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- I missed the other edit and have reverted that as well, so thanks for the info. However, I have to note that making unsourced changes simply for consistency or because someone else also made the same unsourced change is a terrible idea, incorrect and not an excuse for the addition of unsourced content. Instead of making the page consistent by repeating unsourced information, you could have simply reverted the other edit, thereby making the page consistent as well. Felida97 (talk) 18:54, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- I am confused why you didn't just look at the history and see which edit came first and ended up attacking me instead of the original editor. For someone extremely concerned with Bo Burnham's wiki page, it's shocking that you missed this. Bluedoor17 (talk) 21:36, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- First off, I'm not attacking/have not attacked you, I'm saying/said your edit and reasoning/excuse was wrong (and you would have a hard time finding anyone on Wikipedia disagreeing with me there). Secondly, I'm not really more concerned with Burnham's page than any other page of the hundreds on my watchlist which is also the explanation why I missed it, because the edit was made two days earlier (thus, not immediately before your edit on my watchlist) and I don't necessarily go to the history every time I see a wrong edit on my watchlist (also your [non-existent] edit summary didn't indicate that you made it for consistency reasons, which is something that would have probably prompted me to look more closely at it). But yeah, I guess it is shocking that I missed it... Felida97 (talk) 13:44, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
- I am confused why you didn't just look at the history and see which edit came first and ended up attacking me instead of the original editor. For someone extremely concerned with Bo Burnham's wiki page, it's shocking that you missed this. Bluedoor17 (talk) 21:36, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- I missed the other edit and have reverted that as well, so thanks for the info. However, I have to note that making unsourced changes simply for consistency or because someone else also made the same unsourced change is a terrible idea, incorrect and not an excuse for the addition of unsourced content. Instead of making the page consistent by repeating unsourced information, you could have simply reverted the other edit, thereby making the page consistent as well. Felida97 (talk) 18:54, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 27
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Colors (Halsey song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Westlake High School. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:57, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)