User talk:Bentonianalia

Welcome!

Hello, Bentonianalia, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Lil Mad, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! A little insignificant ^{Bloated on candy} 20:03, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lil Mad

A tag has been placed on Lil Mad requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. A little insignificant ^{Bloated on candy} 20:03, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of D-rap

I have nominated D-rap, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D-rap. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. A little insignificant ^{Bloated on candy} 20:04, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of SCORPLION22

A tag has been placed on SCORPLION22 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. NotedGrant Talk 20:31, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Menu for YouTube videos

A tag has been placed on Menu for YouTube videos requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. —Largo Plazo (talk) 21:17, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Middle East (group)

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on The Middle East (group) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Hqb (talk) 21:23, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as The Middle East (group), you will be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:26, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for creating nonsense pages. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

--Orange Mike | Talk 21:35, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bentonianalia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I haven't attacked other or accused other editors, why can't I write something and don't get it removed, I have wrote the truth in everything I have wrote and I haven't attacked anybody

Decline reason:

You were not blocked for attacking other editors, or for writing anything which was not "the truth" as you put it, so there is no reason to defend yourself from those things. However, you have half a dozen warnings here about creating new pages which are not compliant with Wikipedia policy, and you ignored those warnings and kept creating new pages. The appropriate action when several people have told you that what you are doing is wrong is to stop doing it. Your response, which was to ignore everyone else and keep doing whatever you felt like, is inappropriate and appears to be the reason that another administrator blocked you. If you wish to be unblocked, you need to convince the administrators that you will stop the actions which got you blocked, in this case, you need to indicate that you will stop creating new pages, since you obviously don't know what consititutes an appropriate encyclopedia article. Jayron32 00:47, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bentonianalia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Well menu for YouTube videos is something important made by Mahdi Davami, it's not protecting anybody, it's facts and The Middle East (group) is the group who made this feature first in action also I wanted to write the film that included the feature menu for YouTube videos and the film is made by The Middle East (group). But I was blocked so I couldn't So the facts are about the special feature that The Middle East (group) have made and the film who included this feature and the system of the menu for YouTube videos. So Jayron32 has maybe misunderstand it, all of these 3 are about each other.

Decline reason:

YouTube videos are not inherently notable. Under the conflict of interest guidelines, we all agree not to write about our own work. So you aren't likely to be unblocked while you are still not planning to follow those rules.FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 11:42, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bentonianalia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

But how do you know that Mahdi Davami is me from my yahoo name? I can be someone else. I want to write about a group who in action have made this feature available and the name of the film who had this feature and what this feature is, why are you writing that I do this for my own work?

Decline reason:

I'll repeat what Jayron32 said above: you were blocked for repeatedly creating nonsense pages after being asked to stopped. You will not be unblocked until you convince us that you are here to contribute constructively. TN X Man 15:19, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bentonianalia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What is this? What is nonsense? D-rap, menu for youtube videos, the middle east (group) and fear in iran (who I was supposed to write, but couldn't) is not nonsense. I'm writing about a feature that is not really invented, but put in action at YouTube (who is a big internet site). This is information about the feature, the group who made it and the film who included the feature and also D-rap is another thing, but it's facts. You are deleting something that is NOT nonsense and TNXMan writing: "you were blocked for repeatedly creating nonsense pages after being asked to stopped". I stopped writing as you ment when I wrote: Menu for YouTube videos also SCORPLION22 is the one who made this feature in action so I was writing real facts that you said it was nonsense? Read more from what I have written so you get it!

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:35, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Additionally, since this is your fourth unblock request and you still continue to dispute the block rather than explain why you understand it, I am revoking your access to this talk page to prevent you from wasting any more of our time. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:35, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bentonianalia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to tell you something that is important I will not take back my words back and say that they were wrong, they were TRUE and NOT nonsense. If you think you can block me for that reason you are only being cruel. I can't call all the people in the world humans anymore. People in wikipedia are an example some of you are declining and they think they can take your rights. NO you can't I repeat I wrote about a feature, a film who included the feature AND the one who made this feature in action at YouTube! That is my word! I think some of you guys should read the rules you get from your HEAD about rights!

Decline reason:

No new argument; protecting page as you've been overindulged. -- Daniel Case (talk) 16:59, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Bentonianalia, have you read the rules on notability yet? I believe it was wrong to call what you wrote nonsense in the sense that the person who called it that might have meant it wasn't true, but the menu seems to be, and the video certainly is, trivia not meeting the notability standards of Wikipedia. Now, when you talk about people taking your rights (there is no right to post whatever you want to Wikipedia) and you start lamenting about cruelty and inhumanity—well, my goodness! Obviously you have no idea what rights or cruelty or inhumanity are. —Largo Plazo (talk) 16:53, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]