User talk:Aunva6/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

Welcome

Hello, Aunva6, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:18, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Pope Benedict XVI

Howdy. I agree, we editors shouldn't let the IP get under our skin. However, because the IP has continued to use Pope of Rome in his posts (after complaints were made), it creates the impression that he's doing so 'merely' to get under our skins. In otherwords, the IP is now being a dick. FWIW, I'm an athiest. :) GoodDay (talk) 03:52, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

yeah, that's true, but hammer needs to read Wikipedia:Don't_stuff_beans_up_your_nose. I might go talk to the IP about it Aunva6 (talk) 03:58, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited AMD Accelerated Processing Unit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FM2 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Why are you claiming GHBishop was personally attacked and not vandalizing a paragraph?

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ys_(series)&diff=538504905&oldid=538496750

It's clear that he blindly reverted good faith attempts to improve that paragraph and didn't care of the result of what he left behind. There's no way he could've missed the obvious errors, only explanation would be a blind reverting and NOT caring.

1) "According to in-game lore, the ancient Ys age because humans overused "

2) "The tower houses a small annex, titled "the Tower of Rado," at the 3/4 of the spires length." (I don't even know how you could fix that last part.)

3) "Rado's Annex" is the most well known title and he threw it back to the version of "The Tower of Rado"

4) "brought fourth" when it should be "brought forth".

Are you defending blind reverting with no real attempt at justifying it other than "unencyclopedic" and/or vandalism because you know him?? --MegaMind75 (talk) 03:19, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

please sign your comments. I did not say anything about him being right or wrong. I was warning that your response was not appropriate. Aunva6 (talk) 03:12, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, but just cause "BLINDLY" was capped?? I've seen a lot worse and right ON that same page... --MegaMind75 (talk) 03:19, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

not just that. accusing him of vandalism and such isn't really an appropriate response. perhaps I was a bit strong in my warning... Aunva6 (talk) 03:20, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Well, it being that User: MegaMind75 was just blocked as being a sock of User: Ysfan, I think WP: SPADE would render his argument invalid, seeing as he intends to use dishonest methods to keep his contributions on the page. Regarding WP: AGF, I don't see how my edit was in bad faith. I merely reverted his edit with the edit summary: Unencyclopedic. If I had put an inflammatory comment such as: "Cutting out the crap", then an AGF warning would surely be warranted. As for the content, it occurred to me that statements such as "An all-out war had begun...", were unencyclopedic, although perhaps the reverting ALL of the content may have been unwarranted. It was mostly trivial fanboyisms, not very relevant, and to top it all off, unsourced as well. However, I do not intend to edit-war over the matter, and I will post a thread on the talk page shortly. I apologize for any inconvenience this user may have caused you. GHBishop (talk) 03:52, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

yeah, I saw the whole sock convo. sorry if i was kinda heavy-handed on the warning. to be fair, I did warn him about his revert comment, before I found that he was a sock. Aunva6 (talk) 03:59, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Untold Stories Mula Sa Face To Face

Howdy. I trust you've had a chance to read the history of this article by now and no longer think it CSD-able. If I'm mistaken, drop me a note on my talkpage please and we can discuss further. - TB (talk) 16:11, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

yeah, it's much more encyclopedic now. no need for deletion Aunva6 (talk) 16:33, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

TextDrive

TextDrive should not redirect to Joyent. TextDrive acquired the Shared Hosting userbase of Joyent and the TextDrive page was being updated to reflect that change as well as working on getting some of the past history sorted. Not sure what you're smoking to say the edits are vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 105.236.212.248 (talk) 07:03, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Hello Aunva6. Would you consider undoing your redirect? The old TextDrive article was deleted via PROD in 2008, so it would be routinely restored if anyone were to request it at WP:REFUND. The new material added by the IP appears plausible and has good sources. You might argue notability, but since there has never been an AFD, that decision remains to be made. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 15:00, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

sure, it just looked like he was vandalizing a redirect... i'll undo my undo Aunva6 (talk) 15:40, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Bridal Mask

I wrote about 80% of the article for Bridal Mask. If you think anything violates any of Wikipedia's regulations, feel free to edit/delete it. That is the whole point of Wikipedia after all. I did notice that you attempted to delete all my changes though, some of which were grammatical or character description edits, which also means you violated my rights to make changes to the article, so please make sure you don't just delete all my work without a justified reason just because you happen to generalize all my edits as a "violation." It takes time to write, so I do not appreciate people mindlessly clicking a button to undo my changes.

please sign your talk messages. I undid it because it appeared to be violating WP:NPOV and also appeared to be advertising. if you can put it into a neutral view, feel free to put it in. Aunva6 (talk) 17:47, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Richland APU

Hi. You reverted my change about Richland APU and it's 20-40% comparison to Llano, not Trinity. I should have been more clear with my facts and my line of reasoning. Here is the actual claim by AMD from their slide. Notice in the slide, it says 20-40% faster than the previous generation APU. [1]

Here is the official AMD 2013 road map and it calls both Trinity and Richland 2nd generation APUs. With Llano being the first generation APU. [2]

In light of AMD's terminology and simple observation Richland's fastest APU specs which are very modest improvements over Trinity, its seems clear AMD is making a comparison to Llano, the first generation APU. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Castaa (talk • contribs) 21:10, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

can this be discussed on the article talk page please? it's easier for other editors to get in on the discussion of the content if we do. perhaps it is. I'd still like to get input from other editors on this. I don't see any comparison in there saying it is overall better (although I expect it is). Aunva6 (talk) 21:18, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

AMD Loss

Hi there :) I don't understand what exactly was wrong with my edit of the AMD financial results of 2012. The company had a net loss of 1.183 Billion USD that year. If you have time, maybe you can explain it to me, or just correct it on the AMD wiki page. Because the information on that page is completely wrong at this time (2011 results marked as 2012). Thank you in advance :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Willyfisch (talk • contribs) 17:18, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

actually, I think I was wrong... you were doing it correctly, I think. it just looked off to me that they would not be making a profit, but it appears that you are right... Aunva6 (talk) 19:03, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited FIRST Robotics Competition, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Duluth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Pope Francis

Hi. You removed a chunk of the lead on the page for Pope Francis - could you explain your rationale for removing this? The section was:

A native of Buenos Aires, Argentina, Bergoglio was ordained as a priest in 1969. From 1998 until 2013, he served as the Archbishop of Buenos Aires, and Pope John Paul II made him a cardinal in 2001. Elected as pope in 2013 following his predecessor Pope Benedict XVI's resignation, Bergoglio chose "Francis" as his name. This marked the first time in papal history that this name had been used, and along with Pope John Paul I is one of only two times since Pope Lando's brief 913 reign that a serving pope held a name unused by a predecessor. Francis is both the first Jesuit priest and the first native of the Americas to be elected Pope. He is also the first non-European pope since Syrian-born Pope Gregory III, who died in 741.

Diff is here: [[3]]

Blelbach (talk) 07:11, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
I did? must have been a mistake. i'll fix it. Aunva6 (talk) 07:16, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

it appears to have been redundant anyways, aside from some better wording that I added back in. Aunva6 (talk) 07:23, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

I added it from a request on the talk page, I think the idea was to have some more bio info in the lead. Either way, it looks fine to me right now. Thanks! Blelbach (talk) 07:28, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

truxeper was working on the lead... lol. caught a vandal tho, as I was lookin at the history Aunva6 (talk) 07:30, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Small world, [and another guy] were just talking about him and reported him for edit warring. Blelbach (talk) 07:42, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

lol, he replace the lead with"NEW POPE: Who is this man named Bergoglio?"-- I slapped a lvl4im on his talk, so just AIV if he causes problems again. now I gotta fix a template.... Aunva6 (talk) 07:46, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Santa Maria Maggiore

I am critical of the process Aunva6's for changing the name of Santa Maria Maggiore, Rome. They are not based on a fact. He states "English speakers say "Mary Major"; I challenge anyone to to a google search for Travel books and guides using Mary Major Travel versus those using Maria Maggiore Travel. By far, the term to refer to the Roman church, used by Fodors, Lets Go, DK guides, Lonely Planet, Mobile Reference, and others is Maria Maggiore, not Mary Major. Only Mobile Reference uses both terms.

For this reason and many other stated above:

• The statement: English speakers in Rome do in fact use "Mary Major" when speaking English, not "Maria Maggiore". is false.

• The statement: They would think it a little odd to say: "I'm going to Santa Maria Maggiore." is false.

• The statement by Whiteguru that implies that Maria Maggiore is the term used for Italians. When in Rome... is false. It is the term that is used by English speakers, wherever as the guides and texbooks indicate. I challenge Whiteguru to come up with evidence to the contrary. Wikipedia is supposed to house facts, not invented novel research. Whiteguru is making facts up in his conclusion.

Rococo1700 (talk) 13:55, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
why did you post this on my talk page? especially after changing the name in the top statement from what you posted at the article. Aunva6 (talk) 15:04, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

warning

just a misunderstanding, cultural differences.

Please refrain from abusing warning or blocking templates. Doing so is a violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 16:59, 14 March 2013 (UTC) And your supremacist head needs a good shaving. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 9:02 am, Today (UTC−5) ec) Oh, another one of those supremacists. You know how offensive you guys are when you claim that anyone who doesn't know English is stupid? Maybe you can come down your high horse and treat other people as human beings... Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 9:11 am, Today (UTC−5) what do you call that? for sure, it isn't the way to resolve a dispute. if it isn't a personal attack, I don't know what is. Aunva6 (talk) 17:03, 14 March 2013 (UTC) Speaking English is a race? Since when? Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 17:04, 14 March 2013 (UTC) perhaps racism was the wrong word, but it wasn't that far off. shaved head and supremacist used together typically evokes the though of neo-nazis. besides that, nobody was saying that people who don't know English are stupid; he was only stating that, due to his level of education, it is extremely unlikely that he would not speak English. Aunva6 (talk) 17:10, 14 March 2013 (UTC) So don't come to my page and bring up racism; and claiming that all educated people speak English is supremacist, it implies that those who don't are uneducated (Getting one's head shaved is a punishment in my neck of the woods, btw, nothing else). Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 17:12, 14 March 2013 (UTC) where was that implied? the only implication is that highly educated people are likely to speak english. english is very commonly used in international buisness and communication. the chances that a cardinal, especially one who is involved in international relations, would not speak english are very low. Aunva6 (talk) 17:22, 14 March 2013 (UTC) Simple logic. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 17:23, 14 March 2013 (UTC) obviously not that simple. all I could see was some discussion about finding sources that give information about his level of english fluency. so what if some users make a few assumptions on a talk page discussion. they didn't add it to the article until they had a good source. stop reading what isn't there. Aunva6 (talk) 17:28, 14 March 2013 (UTC) Yeah. Stop reading what isn't there. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 17:30, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

AFD

I was chewed out for this when I was new, so now it's your turn There is a process that needs to be followed before bringing any article to AFD, and the most important part of that is to familiarize yourself with the part of WP:N that applies to the subject you're planning on nominating. If you ever have a doubt about whether or not something merits inclusion, post a question on WP:N/N and someone will help you. Cheers! §FreeRangeFrog^croak 19:28, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

yeah, I was probably too hasty in nominating it for deletion... should have stuck with the notability tag. Aunva6 (talk) 20:29, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

No worries, we all pooch it at some point. Learn from it and move on. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 20:53, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Resilient Barnstar
		The ability to recognize and learn from one's mistakes is critical here, yet all too often we find it lacking. When someone demonstrates that they do have this quality I believe it deserves recognition. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:40, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Anti-Piracy Law Group: Reverted first usage of "pornographic" back to "x-rated"

I reverted this edit (only the first instance of 'pornographic') because 1) a law firm wouldn't describe its own clients' works as "pornographic," a pejorative term; but 2) a defendant's family members might well use the term "pornographic" in stating their disapproval of the defendant's taste in videos. Not all "X-rated" videos are necessarily "pornographic", one is a superset of the other. We can discuss this when you get back. Regards Mbstone (talk) 07:35, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

I was ust following WP:euphemism. if there is consensus that it should be otherwise, that's fine with me. Aunva6 (talk) 15:48, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jupiter (mythology)

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Jupiter (mythology) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Redtigerxyz ^Talk 09:18, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Message on Talk:Jupiter (mythology)/GA1.--Redtigerxyz ^Talk 17:19, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

put the GA nom on hold if it isn't fixed by then, seeing as I don't have as much time at the moment, unless other editors can fix it. Aunva6 (talk) 01:05, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Video card, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SLI (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Piledriver (microarchitecture)

The article Piledriver (microarchitecture) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No context or explanation of topic, starts off almost mid-paragraph with text which is presumably copied from somewhere else. Not an asset to the encyclopedia.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 14:41, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

March 2013

WP:PA, I have nothing more to say

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed. If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards. If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Do not improperly use warning templates. You have effectively been editing for only two months, so please become more familiar with proper editing and protocol. If you need help in unfamiliar areas, please contact an experienced editor who can assist you. --76.189.111.2 (talk) 21:25, 21 March 2013 (UTC) Please stop your disruptive behaviour. Your behaviour is verging on harassment. Wikipedia prides itself on providing a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing edits potentially compromise that safe environment. If you continue behaving like this, you may be blocked from editing. I understand your home on spring break, but you need to behave and edit appropriately. Please become more familiar with relevant policies and guidelines. 76.189.111.2 (talk) 22:00, 21 March 2013 (UTC) excuse me? i'm not the one dredging up ancient history, nor the one who is acting confrontational on talk pages. my being home for spring break has nothing to do with this dispute. further such actions may result in administration intervention. -- Aunva6talk - contribs 22:10, 21 March 2013 (UTC) You're young and very inexperienced with only two months of editing. Beware the boomerang. Disruptive behavior such as this is very problematic. ;) 76.189.111.2 (talk) 22:20, 21 March 2013 (UTC) I am well aware of the boomerang, I have been nothing but civil towards you. I realize my past mistakes and learn from them, as it is said, that one cannot learn if one is perfect. besides, your contribs show that you have only been editing for a month, why are you badgering me about experience? -- Aunva6talk - contribs 22:27, 21 March 2013 (UTC) Again, your inexperience is showing. It would be impossible for you to know how long I've been editing since I'm a dynamic IP. Your "past mistakes"? Uh, your inappropriate behavior happened last week. Haha. Look, you're new. I strongly suggest that you learn the basics and keep out of all contentious matters, particularly ones that you have no involvement in. Acting in a way that could make new editors believe you are experienced, or even an admin, is highly inappropriate. And for the record, if someone removes a welcome template from their talk page, you must never re-add it. But as I said, you shouldn't even be doing that until you get some more experience. 76.189.111.2 (talk) 22:52, 21 March 2013 (UTC) the welcome was an accident. I didn't remember welcoming you the 1st time. I have never, ever claimed to be an admin, nor will I ever. I make no claims of being experienced, rather, I am acutely aware of it, and I make a point of trying to learn from mistakes. if I stay out of contentious matter, how will I get any experience? as for ancient history comment, I was referring to your dragging up seb's ANI from 3 years ago. the disagreement with seb was entirely a misunderstanding due to cultural differences, which I have learned from. -- Aunva6talk - contribs 22:59, 21 March 2013 (UTC) Again, that's inexperience. Any knowledgeable editor should always first check a talk page's edit history before adding a welcome template. I didn't say you claimed to be an admin; I said that your actions give most new editors the false impression that you are one. That's why experienced editors and admins are typically the ones who should add templates. You get experience by doing basic editing and then progressively more complex matters; not by pasting templates, and most definitely not by getting involved in contentious editor battles in which you have absolutely no involvement. That's a huge mistake, especially for a rookie, and can be extremely disruptive and counter-productive, which you have clearly learned (hopefully) by your involvement in this matter. You have been editing for a mere two months, yet inexplicably chose to not only get involved in a significant dispute, but, amazingly, to also give behavior advice to editors who I'm sure are quite a bit older than you. I'm sure you meant well, but look at the result. That's why only experienced editors should inject themselves in matters like this. In terms of Seb, an editor who was blocked for saying fuck you to another editor giving a third editor a warning for personal attacks is rather ironic, wouldn't you say? ;) For now , I would focus on helping articles and stay far away from disputes between editors. And leave the regular template-pasting to the veterans until you become one yourself. 76.189.111.2 (talk) 23:22, 21 March 2013 (UTC) I have nothing more to say on this. please don't carry on. I don't care much what you think. I do not need another editor to tell me i'm inexperienced, and that I shouldn't do normal edits. -- Aunva6talk - contribs 23:59, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Duplicate voting on Talk:Basilica di Santa Maria Maggiore

Welcome to Wikipedia. I notice you've been a contributing editor for 2 months and 5 days (not including your 5 edits in 2008) so I'm sure this is a simple mistake. As a beginning editor, you seemed a little confused about the discussion on Talk:Basilica di Santa Maria Maggiore. After User:Rwflammang did not sign his edit, you added a second duplicate "Oppose" for him. When you added that second duplicate "Oppose" crediting Rwflammang, User:Johnbod pointed out your mistake and removed the duplicate vote. You then inserted the duplicate "Oppose" vote again in this edit. I'm sure it was a simple oversight on your part. I moved your comment about Rwflammang to its correct location, and deleted your duplicate "Oppose", knowing you would not want a false vote counted. I clearly described my edit in the Edit Summary, which you apparently did not notice. If you have anything further to add on this issue, please use Talk:Basilica di Santa Maria Maggiore. Thanks. Bede735 (talk) 21:12, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

I was stating my opposition in agreement with rwflammangs statements. If I did have a duplicate vote, I must not have noticed. there was some pretty screwed up ordering, so it's easy to make a mistake. I guess I thought that you thought that I had written that huge statement that rwflammange wrote. basically SNAFU. thank you for letting me know -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 22:03, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Archiving

Hi. Several of the pages where you installed Miszabot already had archive pages; you left the counter value at 1, so the bot proceeded to put one or more sections on each of the old pages before getting to a new one. I reverted the bot's actions and reset it to point to the last archive page, or the next. I think I caught them all.

Talk:Evidence-based medicine had a different problem: a link to a banned website, which meant that nothing actually got saved on the first archive page. Again, I rolled back the page, and stuck a space in the URL. The bot should run properly tomorrow.

—WWoods (talk) 09:30, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

thanks. I guess it's one of tyhose things that is easy to overlook. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 13:45, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Walloped

Flatpack self-assembly fish-drying rack £375, all major credit cards accepted

Krunch! Wham! Biff! Urkkk! How dare you musky me??? Darwinbish has walloped you with a rack of dried stockfish. Better take this seriously. She wants you to know she'll send her boys next time.

lol. bishes are all ovah me!!! -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 00:09, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Hardware articles for project computing

Hi.

I saw your note on the project page and would like to offer help... Which articles specifically? I should be able to help. LMK Synergee (talk) 02:11, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

well, we are forming an informal task force to clean up AMD articles, but almost all the hardware articles are a total mess. let's start with AMD APU, and work from there. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 02:33, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

WP:DEFCON

Please stop. Somethings are funny, telling everyone the site is being heavily vandalized isn't. Legoktm (talk) 14:59, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

sorry, I thought it was voxelbot doing it. seemed funny at the time anyways, I mean, the defcon has never seriously been at lvl 1 anyways -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 15:03, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

FWIW...

...I've supported your idea of merging the people who can't find a way to laugh today. CycloneGU (talk) 21:01, 1 April 2013 (UTC) not entirely sure what you are referring to, but I think I have some idea. lol -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 21:14, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dachau concentration camp, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Department of Defense (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:56, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Allenton house fire

The IP has merged the article again. Without any discussion etc. BabbaQ (talk) 18:31, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

I undid the merge once again.--BabbaQ (talk) 18:39, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

and I gave him a lvl3 disruptive, adn told him to discuss it on the talk page. if he continues, then it will be edit warring, and may need to be reported to ANI. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 18:43, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Seems like a similar situation is now happening at Emmelie de Forest. The user has reverted your edits. Unwilling to understand basic guidelines. I leave it up to you what to do.--BabbaQ (talk) 00:47, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Um, you are the only one unwilling to understand basic guidelines. If you took the time to read Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources, you would discover that "Self-published material may sometimes be acceptable when its author is an established expert whose work in the relevant field has been published by reliable third-party publications" (the author has several mainstream books on the exact subject, which are in fact cited tons of times on Wikipedia) and thus meets the criteria for being used as sources. The deletion of sourced content counts as vandalism. Vinson wese (talk) 00:49, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

read the rest: "Self-published information should never be used as a source about a living person, even if the author is a well-known professional researcher or writer; see WP:BLP#Reliable sources.". -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 00:51, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

It's not a source about a living person, it's a source about historical facts relating to people who lived in the 19th century. Vinson wese (talk) 00:55, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

the artice is about a living person. therefore, the BLP standards and policies apply. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 00:56, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

On a personal note I have to say I admire your patience with the user. --BabbaQ (talk) 00:58, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

This comment says it all about this users intentions of being civil.--BabbaQ (talk) 01:06, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

it has its limits though, and he reached them when he violated 3rr. I reported him to ANI edit warring noticeboard, here. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 01:11, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

The user left you no other option. So good decision.--BabbaQ (talk) 01:12, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

yep. he got a 31 hr block, so hopefully, he won't keep trying to push it. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 01:24, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Perhaps a revert back to your latest version is appropriate. Or will you break the 3RR then?--BabbaQ (talk) 01:26, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Urban did it. Thank you for handling this situation.--BabbaQ (talk) 01:27, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

The user has now made a edit request, check his edit history.. --BabbaQ (talk) 18:00, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Well, that's not an edit request. I don't think the user meant to call it so, either. See how the section right above is called "Edit request"? You know how when you add a section, and don't do anything in the edit summary field (which is how new or otherwise, er, less careful, users edit), the default edit summary becomes the name of the previous section. That must have happened here. Bishonen | talk 18:10, 8 April 2013 (UTC).

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to you let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You do not need to participate however, you are invited to help find a resolution. The thread is "Copernican principle". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot ^{operator / talk} 07:05, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:BP

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:BP. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 13:17, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Section blanking

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Vinson wese (talk) 17:14, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Simply ignore Vinson Wese. It is no point in discussing this with the user. The user has proven he is not willing to have a mature discussion of any kind. Regards,--BabbaQ (talk) 17:17, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

I would suggest removing the ANI notice and simply let Bishonen deal with the user shortly. To avoid lenghty discussions on the matter. --BabbaQ (talk) 17:21, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

meh, just following procedure, more or less. bishonen is an admin, and i posted on the administrators noticeboard. she can close it, but this may get a faster response

BabbaQ is quite right. I've dealt with them, and posted a brief update on ANI. Bishonen | talk 17:30, 18 May 2013 (UTC).

kay, sounds good. perhaps it's just somewhat automatic thinking process of mine... -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 17:35, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

No worries Aunva, you actually helped solved it faster. My mistake. Sorry. :)--BabbaQ (talk) 17:42, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

no prob... all's well that ends well.-- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 20:14, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:BP

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:BP. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 14:15, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Upcoming Wikipedia meetups

In the area? You are invited to the upcoming Minnesota meetups.

To kick-off monthly meetups in the Twin Cities, two events will be held in Special Collections at Minneapolis Central Library this summer. These are mostly planned as opportunities for Wikipedians to discuss editing, but all are welcome!

Special Collections contains many valuable historical resources, including the Minneapolis Collection, consisting of files on hundreds of topics related to Minneapolis from neighborhoods to politicians (it's best to call or email in advance to request materials). Free wifi and several public computers are available.

Place: Minneapolis Central Library, 300 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis
Special Collections (4th floor)
Dates: Saturday, June 1
Saturday, July 6
Time: 12:30pm–2:30pm

For more info and to sign up (not required), see the meetup talk page.

This invitation was sent to users who were interested in past events. If you don't want to receive future invitations, you can remove your name from the invite list. —innotata 14:02, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Air France Flight 447

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Air France Flight 447. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 15:15, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Flare (pyrotechnic)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Flare (pyrotechnic). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 15:15, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Note about Talk:Flare (pyrotechnic)

Hello, Aunva6.

I wanted to give you a heads-up about your comment in Talk:Flare (pyrotechnic)'s RfC: Your rec. in the survey section has been unlisted due to lack of relevance. Please note that the RfC is not a deletion discussion of any sort and regardless of the outcome of the RfC, the dab page will stay put. (So, your oppose is practically a support.) The subject of the RfC is to decide whether or not the subject of that article is the primary meaning of the word "flare". You are more than welcome to cast your opinion again. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 00:44, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:India Against Corruption

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:India Against Corruption. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 16:15, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Great American Wiknic

In the area? You're invited to the Great American Wiknic.

Place: north of Minnehaha Falls in Minnehaha Park, Minneapolis
Date: Saturday, June 22, 2012
Time: 12–4 pm

• Accessible from the Minnehaha Park METRO station, bus, walk, bike, or car
• If driving, free parking available on 46th Ave. S, and pay parking in the park
• Food and drink options nearby, or bring your own... maybe even to share!

For more, and to sign up (encouraged, not required) go to the meetup talk page.

This invitation was sent to users who were interested in past events. If you don't want to receive future invitations, you can remove your name from the invite list. —innotata 03:10, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Methylene blue

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Methylene blue. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 16:15, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ribbon (computing)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ribbon (computing). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 17:15, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

The Complimentary Rotating Swedish Massage Award

		Swedish massage award
		You have been awarded a complimentary Rotating Swedish Massage! Redeem token at this spa for that fresh rejuvenated feeling! bishzilla ROARR!! 14:10, 23 June 2013 (UTC).

Greetings

Greetings. I saw one of your edits, and I'd like to make a request if you don't mind. If you add that to articles, could you please place it in the external links section? I thought it was not ideal for readers to see this tag at the top of the article, because the concern related to a specific section at the bottom of the article (below any article prose). The page gets thousands of views a day, for what it's worth. Anyhow, happy editing. Thanks for your contributions. Biosthmors (talk) 17:29, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Biosthmors, I appreciate the feedback, but don't talk to me, talk to the people who maintain twinkle. I hardly ever manually tag. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 19:22, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Creation Museum

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Creation Museum. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 17:15, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mazda B-Series

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Mazda B-Series. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 18:15, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Minnesota Wikipedia Meetup on August 3

In the area? You are invited to the upcoming Minnesota monthly meetup on August 3.

Place: Lavvu Coffee House
813 4th St SE, Minneapolis 55414
Date: Saturday, August 3
Time: 1:00pm-3:00pm

For more info and to sign up (not required), see the meetup talk page.

This invitation was sent to users who were interested in past events. If you don't want to receive future invitations, you can remove your name from the invite list.

—innotata 23:36, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I added a talk page section discussion about removing AM3 Steamroller CPU discussion from the article. I'd appreciate your feedback. Castaa (talk) 13:31, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

B777 type

Yes, the B777 model is a type. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.60.50.60 (talk) 03:16, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:North American Water and Power Alliance

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:North American Water and Power Alliance. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 18:15, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

List of AMD CPU microarchitectures

Hello, I think Bulldozer is Family 12h and Piledriver is Family 15h. So in this list Llano should be changed to Bulldozer and Bulldozer should be changed to Piledriver. --DrSeehas (talk) 19:00, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

llano is the same as the architecture of the phenoms and athlons (k10/10h). the APUs skipped bulldozer entirely. it's complicated, but it appears that llano was a family unto itself. [4] [5]. i'm not sure if the family designation is even relevant, even AMD rarely uses the designations... typically, they are just referred to by the codename. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 19:37, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

I agree, Llano is not Bulldozer. All AMD technical documents are organized by family. You won't find any codenames in AMD technical documents (otherwise it would be easy). IMHO Llano is an APU codename like e.g. Ontario, not a core/architecture codename (like e.g. Bobcat).
Maybe we should move this discussion to the article talk page? --DrSeehas (talk) 21:08, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

probably. i'd like to see what others can dredge up. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 21:11, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

To be continued at article talk page --DrSeehas (talk) 21:20, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

no context

Please check WP:CSD -- no context can only be used if it impossible to tell what the article is about.An article on a book that has title and author has context; an article on a drink that says what it is made of has context. Context doesn't require references. Having context doesn't, of course, necessarily mean either is notable. DGG ( talk ) 03:37, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

true... I think i've been a bit deletionist lately... hehe -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 04:20, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

major resort hotels

They're often notable, it's worth looking for sources. Certainly they aren't A7. Sometimes they are G11 or G12, but I don;t think any of the 3 you marked today were, and I removed the speedy tags. DGG ( talk ) 03:03, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

ok, although I didn't see any claims to notability...perhaps I should've used the tag instead... I think i'm being too deltionist lately, hehe... -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 20:45, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Double signed

Oh, that was just me and my Bishonen sock. Thanks anyway. Bishonen | talk 20:23, 19 August 2013 (UTC).

LegendRJL

Just a quick question, are you blindly converting the template over to jctbtm, or are you also checking to see if any of the color codes need to be specified in |keys=? That's why we have to manually convert the last of them Imzadi 1979 → 00:56, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

oh, did not see that mentioned anywhere. most of the ones converted were stand-alone, however, or at least, they appeared to be. additionally, they are mostly userspace drafts that may have been missed by whatever your previous method was. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 01:13, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

We've been doing most of them manually... rschen7754 was using some simple AWB logic to look to see if there was |type=concur or similar above them in the tables to include those in the |keys=. That's why we had to leave transclusions attached to manual tables for last, to do manually. Imzadi 1979 → 01:14, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

I see what you mean. as far as I could tell from the doc, it was mostly a drop-in replacement. perhaps it should mention that somewhere. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 01:18, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Heterogeneous System Architecture concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Heterogeneous System Architecture, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 19:21, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Genetically modified food controversies

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Genetically modified food controversies. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 19:15, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Industrial Union of Donbas

Please, reconsider the nomination of speedy deletion. I am still working on the article. Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 13:51, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

 Done. it just needs some more sources to establish notability. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 14:02, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Just wanted to point out that A7 does not apply anyway, as the article contains a "credible claim of significance or importance" ("one of the biggest corporations in Ukraine"), even though it is unsourced. If the author can improve on that (or at least source that claim), all should be well. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); August 14, 2013; 14:03 (UTC)

yeah, I must've missed that. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 14:04, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks to both of you for understanding. I agree that it needs some "polishing". Please, give me sometime to improve it. Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 14:06, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

I think the article passes wikipedia notability issues now. Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 02:09, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Reviewer

Hi Aunva6. Per your request I've granted you access to the reviewer right. In doing so I reviewed your edits and I would just like to point out that your patrolling of new pages gives me somewhat pause. Please take a moment to read up on WP:NPP and WP:Deletion, and if you need any help don't hesitate to ask. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:09, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

yeah, I kinda thought that might be the case. I got talked to about that previously. my problem was probably my interpenetration of what constitutes a claim to notability. my standards were too high. thank for the concern, however. feedback is always welcome. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 00:08, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

FAC review swap

Hi Aunva6, I see you and I both have articles on the FAC page that have only one support/review each - your Elgin Cathedral and my Ambohimanga. Would you be up for a mutual FAC review swap? They're both historic structure articles, so we'll probably enjoy reading each other's work. Best, Lemurbaby (talk) 14:36, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

why not. At least FAC is faster than GAN, I have a GAN that's been sitting for about a month. i'll see if I can find anything on yours. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 14:39, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

I've completed my review of the article, so when you've had a chance to make changes please ping me on my talk page if I don't seem to notice/respond right away. I saw you left a few comments but not a larger review or a support on the Ambohimanga FAC. Since it's getting close to the time when the admins will pull the article unless it gets three supports, I'd be grateful if you could have another look sometime soon. Cheers, Lemurbaby (talk) 12:02, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

ok, Lemurbaby (ping!), I put a support on the FAC. I'll start on my FAC again today. I've been rather busy, what with college move-in and all. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 13:12, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:DB-AFC

A tag has been placed on Template:DB-AFC requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 03:51, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Simona Williams

The user is at it again and a obvious sockpuppet of previous user that edited the article in the same way. The user labelled you destructive.--BabbaQ (talk) 01:20, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

I suggest you withdraw the AfD nom as soon as possible. The article has been improved today and new refs has been added.--BabbaQ (talk) 18:47, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

I see you did withdraw it, Aunva. Are you sure? Extrabladet, BT and Expressen really are lousy tabloid rags to be the only sources, and the career, well… it's definitely lacklustre. I'd like to see a few more people have a chance to weigh in on the AfD. And it seem to me the subject might well prefer no article, compared to one that outs her age. We should consider whether we're hounding a living person. Also, SomethingXXXXXXX, who commented in some detail, should have a chance at discussing it. Apparently one of the reasons he hesitates to AfD the article himself is that the procedure for nomination is absurdly thorny. I can't blame him there, as a pretty inexperianced user; I don't find it easy myself. By comparison, I just nominated an image for deletion at Commons, and was awed by how easy that was; apparently there's no real need for the confusing, jargon-ridden, template-infested, multi-step procedure that we have. :-( Please consider re-wakening your nomination before it's closed. Bishonen | talk 20:06, 29 August 2013 (UTC).

I want to point out that aunva decided to withdraw it himself before I wrote it so I did not request it. And how can we know that the subject doesnt want an article? --BabbaQ (talk) 21:01, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Bish is right, a consensus (whether it be keep or delete) should be made. the sources are pretty shaky, and it is a BLP article. what the subject wants is irrelevant. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 21:06, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Article Feedback Tool update

Hey Aunva6. I'm contacting you because you're involved in the Article Feedback Tool in some way, either as a previous newsletter recipient or as an active user of the system. As you might have heard, a user recently anonymously disabled the feedback tool on 2,000 pages. We were unable to track or prevent this due to the lack of logging feature in AFT5. We're deeply sorry for this, as we know that quite a few users found the software very useful, and were using it on their articles.

We've now re-released the software, with the addition of a logging feature and restrictions on the ability to disable. Obviously, we're not going to automatically re-enable it on each article—we don't want to create a situation where it was enabled by users who have now moved on, and feedback would sit there unattended—but if you're interested in enabling it for your articles, it's pretty simple to do. Just go to the article you want to enable it on, click the "request feedback" link in the toolbox in the sidebar, and AFT5 will be enabled for that article.

Again, we're very sorry about this issue; hopefully it'll be smooth sailing after this :). If you have any questions, just drop them at the talkpage. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) 21:54, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Unsigned

I'm curious as to why you falsely attributed an unsigned comment on Jimbo's page to me. Joefromrandb (talk) 21:46, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

I thought it was. I wouldn't knowingly do something like that. you were the last one to edit in that section, I (incorrectly) assumed that that was your comment. sorry -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 21:57, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

OK, thanks. Joefromrandb (talk) 22:09, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the beer

Just what I needed. And thanks for putting EC up for FAC. I'd never have got round to it, being a lazy sod! Best. --Bill Reid | (talk) 18:24, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

New proposal regarding Wer900 at AN/I

In an effort to resolve the discussion at AN/I regarding Wer900, I have offered a new proposal at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Alternative proposal: Restriction on venues for complaints. Since you have weighed in on previous proposals regarding this user, I am notifying you of the new one in case you wish to opine. Regards, alanyst 18:48, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Wolf attacks on humans

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Wolf attacks on humans. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 01:19, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Elgin Cathedral

So pleased to see the article promoted. It's exactly the type of article that gets Wikipedia a good reputation. Tim riley (talk) 16:29, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for putting the article through. You've probably given me enough confidence to put some of the other articles I've been main contributor to up for FAC so once again, thank you. --Bill Reid | (talk) 08:58, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

thanks for witing such a great article in the first place! couldn't have done it without your help! -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 03:52, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Pope Benedict XVI

The article Pope Benedict XVI you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . There are some changes needed to be addressed before the article meets the good article criteria. If these are fixed within 7 days, the review will continue; otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Pope Benedict XVI/GA3 for things which need to be addressed. – Quadell ^(talk) 15:41, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Bot gone wild

You should read my 1714 30Sep2013 post at “Bot gone wild”.Sammy D III (talk) 18:10, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Re: Pier Paolo Pasolini

I read your message. Thank you for writing, but the reason I keep reverting him, is because According to his attitude, i was afraid he would be another troll. Now regarding the page, the other reason I revert him is because there is already some notable works of Pier Paolo, why add more, so because of his repetitive attitude, I felt I had to revert his edits. I'd still would like to know why too much concern of maintaining "salo" if its already mentioned down below? (N0n3up (talk) 17:34, 1 October 2013 (UTC))

it's a complex issue. for one thing, you're edit warring -even if you're rigt- it's not OK to edit war.

anyhow, the difference is, the mention you keep removing is specifically there to explain his style of works. especially the obscenity. thae other mention is in the listings of his works. it's not redundant, as each has a different purpose. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 18:31, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

I read your message, Thanks for letting me know. I let him do what he wished to prevent any further edit warring. (N0n3up (talk) 23:21, 2 October 2013 (UTC))

thank you. remember, if you have any questions about wikipedia, you can always ask at the teahouse. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 00:14, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll keep that in mind. (N0n3up (talk) 00:42, 3 October 2013 (UTC))

Hi Aunva6, sorry to bother you but where can I request the protection of a page or article. Thank You. (N0n3up (talk) 21:17, 6 October 2013 (UTC))

Hi Aunva6, I have a problem, the same IP user whom I was involved in the edit war on the article Pier Paolo Pasolini is back. (N0n3up (talk) 21:22, 6 October 2013 (UTC))

October 2013

i do not wish to be in an edit war but N0n3up is continuing to edit in an arbitrary fashion, i think you understand the problem but i'll explain it just in case, N0n3up is continually removing salo as a notable work from the pasolini infobox, i've tried to explain to him the legacy surrounding this film, but he will not listen, i have no problem with reaching a consensus on the article's talk page, but i regret having to involve more people and waste their time as well as mine, could you please help me start this up on the talk page as to if others believe as i do that salo belongs in the notableworks box — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.137.42.20 (talk) 21:47, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Only because you keep writing on my page, continue to edit without trying to work the situation out, and if you would have used the talk page, like I suggested many times, I would have left this alone, but since he kept continuing to go on without reaching consensus, I had no choice, and you have never mentioned anything about it's legacy nor showned any reliable sources to indicate or support your statement. (N0n3up (talk) 22:06, 6 October 2013 (UTC))

Hi again, I'm here to let you know that I reverted the edit of IP 86.137.42.20, because I'm not sure if he really means to do good or if he's just another troll. Please help. (N0n3up (talk) 22:15, 6 October 2013 (UTC))

N0n3up, I wouldn't report him, or the boomerang might catch you. how about the both of you stop reverting each other, and have a reasonable discussion? stop attacking each other. focus on content, not conduct. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 22:28, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Then please help me to reach a consensus. I reverted him because of his behaviour on Wikipedia. And yes, I'm probably not being constructive on trying to solve the situation but I can stop editing in that certain article if he used the talk page, which he now did at least. It doesn't matter whether I was right or wrong, it only bothered me how the IP handled the situation at first. (N0n3up (talk) 22:34, 6 October 2013 (UTC))

Then it's settled, the work stays. If it really is a notable work of his then it's fine by me. (N0n3up (talk) 22:58, 6 October 2013 (UTC))

If you want to find a source, that's fine with me. I'm glad that a reasonable solution was found. if wyou want to hear more editors' thoughts on something, feel free to start a request for comment. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 23:47, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

It's all right, we made up and reached a decision. (N0n3up (talk) 23:53, 6 October 2013 (UTC))

A question about this article "Brunei"

Is "Recognised" suitable to describe English on the info-box in regards to this Section 2 of Article 82 on the Country's Constitution?

Article 82

Section 2 - An official version in the English language shall be provided of anything which, by this Constitution or by any written law or by the Standing Orders, is required to be printed or in writing, and such version shall, in addition to the official Malay version, be accepted as an authentic text. Constitution of Brunei. Alevero987 (talk) 18:12, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

ask on the article talk page. I'm not really a contributor to that article, aside from maybe some copy-editing. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 23:08, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

FA review?

Hello,

I noticed that you are involved with the physics articles on Wikipedia, and I was wondering if you could help me out. Right now, I'm working to bring the article AdS/CFT correspondence to FA status. So far, people have had many good suggestions and many positive things to say about the article, but I'm having trouble getting people to support or oppose the nomination.

I was wondering if you'd be willing to take a look at it and tell us your thoughts at this page. Please note that you do not have to be an expert on the subject. The article has already been checked quite carefully by other reviewers, and at this point, I'm just looking for people who can check that it meets the FA criteria.

Please let me know if you're interested. Thanks. Polytope24 (talk) 15:38, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

CSD declined

I'm just letting you know that I have declined your CSD A7 at Christopher Omoseibi. This was obviously a page under construction and you tagged it in under 1 minute. If you still think it should be deleted after giving it more time, you may restore the CSD tag. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:29, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

i suppose, but I did a little googling, and he doesn't meet the sports guidelines for notability. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 14:25, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

"currently"

Hi there-- I noticed your edit to Hanford Site. Actually, "currently" really shouldn't be used because such statements are only valid at the moment they were written. There are alternatives, such as the {{as of}} template. WP:DATED addresses this issue with some other suggestions. Regards, Orange Suede Sofa (talk) 01:07, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Chimi Yangzom Wangchuck

Hello Aunva6. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Chimi Yangzom Wangchuck, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: This is about a different person than Sonam Dechan Wangchuck. Thank you. —Darkwind (talk) 23:46, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

oh... ok... -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 00:43, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Protection template

Thanks. I usually wait for the bot to add it but it must not be running just now. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 23:46, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

I wasn't aware of a bot that adds them to fully protected pages. no prob anyhow -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 23:48, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

bish christmas

Season's greetings from Santa and her little helpers

thank you! i'm not sure if I should be afraid of whatever darwinbish has in store for me... that sock can be quite mischievous! -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 21:24, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Portrait of Darwinbish enjoying a practical joke to the full

Ka-BLAMMM!

I can't think what you mean! darwinbish ^BITE ☠ 12:10, 25 December 2013 (UTC).

Wikipedia Day Meetup on January 18

In the area? You are invited to the upcoming Minnesota meetup in commemoration of Wikipedia Day.

• Place: Seward Cafe
  

2129 E Franklin Ave, Minneapolis, MN 55404

• Date: Saturday, January 18, 2014
  
• Time: noon

For more info and to sign up (not required), see the meetup talk page.

This invitation was sent to users who were interested in past events. If you don't want to receive future invitations, you can remove your name from the invite list. —innotata 04:08, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

FDNY

Thank you for the feedback. I am still learning and have made a fair number of mistakes. :-\ Thanks for helping me learn! --Zackmann08 (talk) 18:14, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

not a problem, we're all learning all the time, otherwise, what's the point of life? trust me, i've made my fair share of mistakes like that, not a big deal. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 19:06, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

Just for being awesome. :-) Zackmann08 (talk) 20:00, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Tadeusz Kościuszko nominated for FA

This is a general notice to previous reviewers: The Tadeusz Kościuszko article has again been nominated for FA. Opinions are needed at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Tadeusz Kościuszko/archive2. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 01:35, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Energetically modified cement

I undid you edit to the advert banner and started a discussion about it on the talk page. Please feel free to comment. XFEM Skier (talk) 21:56, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Sock Puppetry Investigation

You should be informed that your name was brought up in a sock puppetry investigation, in connection with the ongoing discussion about energetically modified cement. The sock puppetry investigation is located here. Feel free to delete this message. XFEM Skier (talk) 19:47, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you! re. Energetically modified cement

		The Civility Barnstar
		...awarded for displaying appropriate and admirable civility during some facet of the energetically modified cement incident, based on my reading, after-the-fact, of talk pages and notice boards. Azx2 18:51, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Precious

right things
Thank you for quality articles such as Elgin Cathedral, and for doing the right thing often: welcome new users, fight vandalism, move pages, request sources, fix errors, explain, "Notice: You can be bold and fix things yourself." and a sensible suggestion for arbcom, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:55, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

About London First "de-PROD"

Hello Aunva6! I have contested the proposed deletion of this article, as it seems that there are cogent arguments that may be made against its deletion. Perhaps this may be better addressed at a WP:AfD discussion? Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 10:18, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Steam (software)

thanks. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 03:55, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

That's okay, but you don't have to press the 'thanks' button every time I make an edit. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 00:02, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

yeah, is suppose it spams up the notification list. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 00:14, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Yes; it's also annoying to check notifications every few minutes. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 02:59, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Pothole

Hi Aunva6, Thank you for your interest in the Pothole article, where I note that you placed tags for ref improve and undue. This suggests that you felt that the article "needs additional citations for verification," in the first instance and "lends undue weight to certain ideas, incidents, or controversies," in the second instance. I was surprised to see the ref improve tag, since I have used a reference for every segment of the article covered. Perhaps, if you see gaps in places, you could call them out with a citation needed tag. Otherwise, I feel that everything that you see is properly and adequately referenced. As to the question of "undue weight." it's hard to respond to that tag without any corresponding discussion in the Talk page. Perhaps, you would be so good as to provide some context for that tag in the Talk page, so that I or other editors can address the problem that you perceive. I'll look forward to your clarifications at Talk:Pothole. Sincerely, User:HopsonRoad 01:22, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

well, the exact wording of the tag was not exactly what I intended, however, I meant that the article seems to focuse a little too much on how potholes are fixed, and need more on the rest of it. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 03:33, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

I very much appreciate your reply, Aunva6. Perhaps you could expand a bit on "the rest of it." Bear in mind, there is a section on pothole formation before the discussion of how they are fixed (Formation, Prevention and Repair are the three main sections). My feeling is that the principal mechanisms of formation are well-covered. I'm interested to know what additional information you would find helpful on behalf of the reader. Sincerely, User:HopsonRoad 12:21, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

My thinking is to await some actionable suggestions on the article at its Talk page until 1 June. If I receive none, I'll remove the tags. Sincerely, User:HopsonRoad 20:14, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Steam FAC

I don't want you to feel discouraged, Aunva6. Just dedicate yourself to making the Steam article fantastic and as the person who made it a Good Article, I'll be willing to back you. ;) DARTHBOTTO _talk•cont 20:35, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

yeah... i would have done a peer review first, but past experience tells me that nobody reviews them. vaypertrail has also been pushing the phishing crap, which is clearly not notable. nothing ventured, nothing gained. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 22:01, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Well, he's right that you should be a significant contributor before nominating a page. However, his reviews are often impossible and unrealistic, so it's difficult to judge. Just work on making this page your objective- that's all I can really say on the matter. DARTHBOTTO _talk•cont 06:34, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Bump. ResMar 05:02, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

On a related note, if you have trouble garnering attention while sitting on one or any of Wikipedia' many content review heaps, I recommend you try tit-for-tat tactics. Editors just like you too worry about whether or not their article will or will not get reviewed before archival, and appreciate the attention of experienced content editors; if then at the end of your review you ask them to reciprocate in your favor, they are likely to do so. Do your homework, though, and make sure the editor from whom you are soliciting a review is a sufficiently experienced one to provide a strong review. This bit of social engineering brought to you by ResMar 05:06, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Semidemiwikibreak?

Little Aunva not seen around much, why? Respectfully missed! darwin^fish 11:04, 26 October 2014 (UTC).

real life keepin me busy... getting ready for winter and stuff. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 12:58, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Precious again

right things
Thank you for quality articles such as Elgin Cathedral, and for doing the right thing often: welcome new users, fight vandalism, move pages, request sources, fix errors, explain, "Notice: You can be bold and fix things yourself." and a sensible suggestion for arbcom, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:55, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

A year ago, you were the 821st recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:11, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

wow, a year already... time flies... -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 01:03, 11 April 2015 (UTC)