User talk:Armourae

Welcome!

Hello, Armourae, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Fiddle Faddle 17:48, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: St Joseph's Convent (primary school, Sidcup) (March 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ahecht was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:St Joseph's Convent (primary school, Sidcup) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 19:47, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Armourae, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 19:47, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

One of the complaints made by someone was the use of the word 'Fathers' when referring to religious Orders. As part of the book & docmentary I have been writing I went to the 19th century books & early 20th century correspondeences, and there, were phrases referring to the 'Soudan Fathers.' & 'Whote Fathers' Another case of some amateur editor who was on a power trip and doesn't know as much as they think they do. I published the articles elesewhere

Your submission at Articles for creation: St Joseph's Convent (primary school, Sidcup) (March 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

Somewhere in here an article is hiding. Please look with care at the text and cut it to the bone, making sure that every fact is a referenced fact. We require references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, and in WP:RS please. See WP:42

Though we do not normally consider primary schools as inherently notable, this spent some time as a secondary school, so gets a pretty good go at a free pass, but there has to be an article here.

When you wander off into the realms of child abuse you must be cast iron with your citations.

You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:St Joseph's Convent (primary school, Sidcup) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 17:48, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Goddard Oxenbridge has been accepted

Goddard Oxenbridge, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Fiddle Faddle 17:59, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:St Joseph's Convent (primary school, Sidcup) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:St Joseph's Convent (primary school, Sidcup), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:52, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:St Joseph's Convent (primary school, Sidcup)

Hello, Armourae. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "St Joseph's Convent".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 17:39, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Southwark, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romanesque. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources needed at Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Southwark

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Southwark, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. 32.218.43.30 (talk) 19:57, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Original research at Kimberly-Clark

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Kimberly-Clark, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Original research is always avoidable and never acceptable. Read WP:OR. 32.218.43.30 (talk) 02:40, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wuthering Heights (2016 film) (August 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of films and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This would have needed all additional amounts of in-depth third-party news and reviews.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wuthering Heights (2016 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 21:19, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Armourae. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Wuthering Heits (2016 film), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Your use of the pronoun 'we' suggests you are connected and editing as and/or for a group. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:14, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

as for the draft article, , what is needed is evidence from a third party reliable source that principal photography has already begun. If so, ass the source and resubmit. ( DGG ( talk ) 19:23, 29 August 2016 (UTC) -- DGG ( talk ) 19:27, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Armourae, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia. If you need assistance, check out the Getting Help section below or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~), which will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please always fill in the edit summary field to describe your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Cordially, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:59, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Wikipedia's five pillars • A tutorial • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments • Help desk • Teahouse • Help directory Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources • Topic notability What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • List of guidelines • Three-revert rule • Copyrights Image use policy • Policy for non-free content • Deletion policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Conflict of interest • Sock puppetry

Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation The perfect article • Peer review • Featured content
The community
Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette Build consensus • Resolve disputes • No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump • Signpost • IRC channels
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages • Portals Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts Awards that registered contributors can achieve and award

Your draft article, Draft:Wuthering Heights (2016 film)

Hello, Armourae. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Wuthering Heights".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 04:33, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Arthur von Frankenberg moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Arthur von Frankenberg, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Germcrow (talk) 18:10, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Arthur von Frankenberg concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Arthur von Frankenberg, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:44, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Arthur von Frankenberg

Hello, Armourae. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Arthur von Frankenberg".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Mjs1991 (talk) 06:29, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The first person, whoever it was,apparently its GMCmcrow who moved the article on this artist and designer, complained that I had not supplied references. I had actually given 16 external links. The article was of use to the arts and design pages on Wikipedia as Frankenberg was a famous and notable designer who has descended into obscurity since the 1930s. Therefore fulfils an important part of Wikipedia's ethos: providing accessible information to notable information, events and people that would otherwise be difficult to find or would be very obscure. I couldn't be bothered arguing with whoever was on a power trip & simply published it elsewhere.