User talk:Arbeiten8

April 2024

Hello, I'm InfiniteNexus. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Expend4bles have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. InfiniteNexus (talk) 00:15, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unplugged (smartphone) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Unplugged (smartphone), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 00:12, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Arbeiten8!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 14:36, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Hello, I'm Butlerblog. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Language of Jesus, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ButlerBlog (talk) 12:28, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Noting specifically what you added, I don't disagree with the premise of what you added, but it is entirely unsourced and as such, it is original research. Don't add statements of that magnitude without a cited source. ButlerBlog (talk) 12:30, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Jesus" is the anglicized Greek version of the Hebrew name "Joshua." It is explained in the main Jesus article. You can consult Wiktionary. --Arbeiten8 (talk) 19:41, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter. It needs to be cited. Read WP:WHYCITE. It likewise doesn't matter what is in other articles. Wikipedia cannot be used to source itself (WP:NOTSOURCE). If you don't understand, ask. This is a primary content guideline so understanding how/when to cite material is important. ButlerBlog (talk) 21:25, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did I stop you from contributing and improving the article? Arbeiten8 (talk) 21:52, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about God of the New Testament

Hello, Arbeiten8

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Godsy and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect God of the New Testament, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 11 § God of the New Testament.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Godsy}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

— Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 05:29, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"God of the Old Testament" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect God of the Old Testament has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 12 § God of the Old Testament until a consensus is reached. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 01:28, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of infant monarchs moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to List of infant monarchs. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 07:30, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request

Hi. I noticed you answered an edit request to remove the old name of the subject of the article. Per MOS:NB, if the subject is known by their old name professionally prior to the name change, as is the case in this article, the name should be listed in the article as a former name. You changing it without any discussion goes against the letter of the guideline and such change should be made through consensus on the talk page first. I reverted the edit and would just caution making any such change again without discussing in and achieving consensus for the change first. cyberdog958^Talk 03:03, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ms. Steele wasn't notable at all until this documentary came out. In fact, we didn't have an article on her until the documentary premiered. Arbeiten8 (talk) 03:06, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In this case, multiple of the references used in the article refer to the subject by their former name, so the former name should be listed or else it wouldn't even make any sense to the uninformed reader. If anything of their career is mentioned to prior the name change, and if any reference refer to the subject with their former name, it should be kept in the article once per the guideline. cyberdog958^Talk 03:17, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The references are made with male names for Vivian Wilson (publicly done by her father, New York Post, and many others), Rachel Levine, and others. Don't harm people emotionally. Arbeiten8 (talk) 03:20, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is inappropriate to resort to personal attacks. Reach consensus on the talk page before making the change on a contentious topic and there should be no problem. cyberdog958^Talk 03:27, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you be patient? Can you stop badgering me with your constant retorts on my talk page? Please wait to see if others will chime in on the relevant talk page.Arbeiten8 (talk) 03:31, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Me responding to your statements on your talk page do not constitute badgering me with my constant retorts. cyberdog958^Talk 03:42, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just 1 question. Can you wait like me? This will allow others to comment. Arbeiten8 (talk) 03:45, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And again, if consensus is reached to remove the name on the talk page, that is one thing. But the change should not be made unilaterally without discussion. cyberdog958^Talk 03:18, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nicholas Crovetti (October 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

IMDB may not be used as a reference

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nicholas Crovetti and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:55, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Arbeiten8! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:55, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Unplugged (smartphone)

Hello, Arbeiten8. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Unplugged (smartphone), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:07, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Elbrus Kutrashev

Hello, Arbeiten8

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username MPGuy2824, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Elbrus Kutrashev, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article. You may remove the deletion tag yourself once the article has at least one reliable source.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:10, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Markus Potzel moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Markus Potzel. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Does not currently appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:BIO. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CoconutOctopus talk 11:45, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Stone Jesus" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Stone Jesus has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 31 § Stone Jesus until a consensus is reached. Dr vulpes (Talk) 06:55, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Grant Cardone (October 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Several junk sources, but no reliable independent secondary sources discussing Cardone in any depth.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Grant Cardone and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 13:58, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Arbeiten8. Thank you for your work on Jimmy Sharmahd. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

nick isn't mentioned in the target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:50, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The subject's YouTube uses the nickname. I added it in the external links section. Arbeiten8 (talk) 10:57, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ahoo Daryaei

A tag has been placed on Ahoo Daryaei requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Looks like a case of BLP1E lets wait to create article.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Accesscrawl (talk) 01:39, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Albert Einstein, you may be blocked from editing. Remsense ‥ 论 11:46, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you reply to my comment on the article's talk page. Arbeiten8 (talk) 11:47, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Arbeiten8. Thank you for your work on Reza Rasayi. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

please add a mention of this person to the target page, with a good reference.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:08, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have time to work on this. You can delete it. Arbeiten8 (talk) 13:56, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Arbeiten8. Thank you for your work on Informational defect. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

try to integrate this phrase into the target article

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:24, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Arbeiten8 (talk) 07:45, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 12:37, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A boilerplate shouldn't be a substitute to offend and dehumanize people. I provided reliable sources on the talk page. I did it for the record. Arbeiten8 (talk) 21:51, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Unplugged (smartphone)

Hello, Arbeiten8. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Unplugged".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:00, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Page titles and neutral point of view

Hi, please see WP:NPOVTITLE regarding your recent move of Protecting Women's Private Spaces Act. I have reverted your move; if you want to change the title, I would strongly suggest starting a requested move discussion. :Jay8g [V•T•E] 05:21, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can discuss on the article's talk page. Arbeiten8 (talk) 05:34, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]