User talk:Agney Mendon

June 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing like you did on Kundapur. Please cite your changes and do not remove existing citation and information supported by it.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.

If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. MehmoodS (talk) 20:19, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.MehmoodS (talk) 20:56, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Page block

You have been blocked indefinitely from the article Kundapur for persistent disruptive editing despite warnings. In particular, you have removed reliable sources and the content based on them, and added unsourced content. Note that you may still edit Talk:Kundapur (as well as the rest of Wikipedia) to discuss changes you want to make to the article. You can request unblock by placing {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page. Bishonen | tålk 21:17, 30 June 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Final warning

You are not permitted to intentionally distort the meaning of Wikipedia's content, as you did at Shivaji. Please take this as a final warning; any repetition will likely lead to an indefinite block. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia; please read WP:5P, which will give you some guidance as to the behavior expected here. Vanamonde (Talk) 07:23, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Tipu Sultan, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 09:13, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Tipu Sultan. Favonian (talk) 10:07, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Standard notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Dr.Pinsky (talk) 18:34, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Favonian (talk) 06:18, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The information given in Tipu Sultan page is inaccurate, I wanna provide the accurate information so it doesn't lead to controversies Agney Mendon (talk) 06:24, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Agney Mendon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The information given in Tipu Sultan page is inaccurate, I wanna provide the accurate information so it doesn't lead to controversies Agney Mendon (talk) 06:50, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

What you are doing is whitewashing articles by removing well cited information, and not heeding the advice you have been given. This is a collaborative project where we all must work together to achieve a consensus as to what an article should say. It's not enough to say the sources in the article are inaccurate, you must discuss as to why they are and/or offer your own reliable sources to support your claims. As noted above, you have chosen to edit in a contentious topic area with its own special, stricter rules. Until you indicate your understanding of these things, you can't be unblocked. 331dot (talk) 07:18, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{unblock} Agney Mendon (talk) 18:45, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Agney Mendon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand the advice given

Decline reason:

One open unblock request at a time, please; you had two. This is not convincing. You do not show that you understand why your edits were inappropriate and do not indicate what you'd do differently if unblocked. Yamla (talk) 19:14, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblocking

Well I'll be using the references, unblock me Agney Mendon (talk) 17:08, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]