2017, January

Happy New Year!

Happy New Year Maproom!

Happy New Year!

Maproom,
Have a prosperous, productive and wonderful New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.

--Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 19:06, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Frederick Achom Page

Hello,

I've noticed you've reverted the edit i made back to the previous one including the scam story. There are no reliable sources backing up the scam lead section you reverted. Please do well to check it. Margaretver (talk) 14:27, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

It's scam stories, plural. There's a list of references on the talk page: Talk:Frederick_Achom#Subject_again_convicted. Maproom (talk) 16:03, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

The consensus regarding links to "New York" is irrespective of the subject of the page. It concerns all links to New York. bd2412 T 16:08, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

What do you mean by a "link to New York"? New York is a city, not a publication. Maproom (talk) 13:17, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Lancastrian Brigade Junior Bandsmen

Hello Maproom,

I am hoping I'm in the correct place to communicate with you on a one-to-one basis. If I recall you needed to know the title of the article it is; Junior Bandsmen Wing Fulwood Barracks 1961-1963.

I would be very grateful if you could encourage me to proceed correctly in publishing this article. If not forward this email onto someone who can please. You have probably realised I am not a Wikipedia editor or a writer of articles. I am just someone off the street who has a true story to tell, who has submitted a genuine article and photos with supported authorisation.

Do I need to resubmit this article and the authorisations again ? if so how please.

Yours faithfully Charles Dobson CD0060576 (talk) 21:09, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello CD0060576. Yes, this is a good place for one-to-one communication.

I did not need to know the title of the article. User:Dodger67 asked, near the top of the draft, "What is the actual title and subject of this draft?". You have never answered that question. Is it intended to be about a building, an institution, a group of people, or something else? The subject of an article should be indicated by its title and evident from its first sentence; neither is the case here. And why is "1961-1963" appended to the title?

Wikipedia does not exist to "tell stories". Rather, it has articles about notable subjects (click on that blue word to find what "notable" means here). I cannot tell what the intended subject of the draft is, but I still have doubts about whether it is notable. If its notability cannot be established, by references to reliable independent published sources that discuss the subject, then the article cannot be accepted. I see that the draft mentions a picture, and an article, in the Isle of Man Daily Times, but does not cite them in an acceptable way. Any experienced editor could correct the style of the citations, but few will have access to an archive holding that newspaper – I certainly don't.

I see that you have tried to supply a copyright release for an image you want to use. I am not an expert in this, but I doubt that the release is acceptable. You have provided it within the draft itself, but it ought to be sent to the authorities at Wikipedia Commons if that is where you want to upload the image. Also, it says "permission to reproduce the photograph on the Wikipedia page". That is insufficient for an image to be accepted by Wikipedia Commons. The owner of the copyright must also provide the right for everyone to redistribute copies, and to create and distribute derivative works, even for commercial purposes. You can learn more about this here. Maproom (talk) 08:53, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello CD0060576. Yes, this is a good place for one-to-one communication.

I did not need to know the title of the article. User:Dodger67 asked, near the top of the draft, "What is the actual title and subject of this draft?". You have never answered that question.

Is it intended to be about a building, an institution, a group of people, or something else?

Reply: It is an organisational group photograph The subject of an article should be indicated by its title and evident from its first sentence; neither is the case here. Reply: Can I suggest the title be changed to: Lancastrian Brigade Junior Bandsmen. And why is "1961-1963" appended to the title? Reply: This is a period this organisation existed.

Wikipedia does not exist to "tell stories". Rather, it has articles about notable subjects (click on that blue word to find what "notable" means here). I cannot tell what the intended subject of the draft is, but I still have doubts about whether it is notable. If its notability cannot be established, by references to reliable independent published sources that discuss the subject, then the article cannot be accepted.

Reply: The Lancastrian Brigade is a very notable organisation please sees.... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lancastrian_Brigade

I see that the draft mentions a picture, and an article, in the Isle of Man Daily Times, but does not cite them in an acceptable way. Any experienced editor could correct the style of the citations, but few will have access to an archive holding that newspaper – I certainly don't.

Reply: Everyone has access to the Manx National Heritage (www.manxnationalheritage.im) where the Isle of Man Daily Times documents are archived. People can search / research any topic / story published. The below email authorises the use of the recruitment photo; From: Richard Butt [1] Sent: 03 July 2016 11:51 AM To: Nicol, Sue Subject: Re: urgent copyright request Thanks, While the Isle of Man Daily Times no longer exists, it is a part (albeit dormant) of Isle of Man Newspapers' portfolio. When the Isle of Man Courier Group bought the Examiner titles in 1986 it included the Isle of Man Times (both daily and weekly), the Manx Star and the Isle of Man Gazette as well as the Isle of Man Examiner, of course. He has our permission to use the photo, so long as Isle of Man Newspapers is credited on a caption (or equivalent).

I see that you have tried to supply a copyright release for an image you want to use. I am not an expert in this, but I doubt that the release is acceptable. You have provided it within the draft itself, but it ought to be sent to the authorities at Wikipedia Commons if that is where you want to upload the image. Also, it says "permission to reproduce the photograph on the Wikipedia page". That is insufficient for an image to be accepted by Wikipedia Commons. The owner of the copyright must also provide the right for everyone to redistribute copies, and to create and distribute derivative works, even for commercial purposes.

Ticket Reference No Ticket#2016100410011781 Refers: to the below email.

Below is the authorising email for the group photo from From: Winter & Kidson Multimedia Sent: 22 September 2016 08:28 To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: permission to use Junior Bandsman Wing Fulwood Barracks 1961 To: [email protected]

I hereby affirm that I James Kidson, the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the media work [3] as shown here: in the attached image I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the following free license: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International.[5] I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project. James Kidson Copyright holder 22-09-2016 Ticket Reference No Refers: Ticket#2016100410011781 You can learn more about this here. Maproom (talk) 08:53, 6 January 2017 (UTC) Hopefully above there is sufficient material to proceed to have this article published on the Wikipedia Fulwood Barracks pages. I could resend any email should you require them. Please if I can be of any assistance please advice. Best Regards Charles CD0060576 (talk) 16:59, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

So the subject of the article is the photograph. I am sure that the photograph is not notable enough to justify a Wikipedia article. But if you want to upload the photograph to Wikimedia Commons, I think you should be able to do so, if you provide the copyright release which you have copied above. I have never myself provided a copyright release for Wikipedia Commons, but I believe it involves a moderate amount of bureaucracy. However, you may be able to bypass the bureacracy if you can persuade Mr. Kidson to create an account on Wikimedia Commons and then upload the photograph there himself. Maproom (talk) 17:07, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi Maproom, I think asking Mr Kidson to create another account is disappointing to say the least. I feel rather embarrassed to do so as suggested. The issues / problems is not his fault but Wikipedia's bureaucratic machine / process (as you know). I feel the very disappointed we should be taking that route. How about Wikipedia taking responsibility for it's misgivings and try and find this article. If it would help: I could forward my email to yourself or someone else to investigate which is my preferred option or resubmit the article if it makes it easier ?. Best Regards Charles CD0060576 (talk) 21:11, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

I understand that you don't want to approach Mr. Kidson about it again. So you can submit the message from him to the authorities at Wikimedia Commons yourself. Don't ask me how to do this, I have never done it myself and I don't know how to. Or you could post the photograph to some other site, such as Facebook, where they are less bothered about respecting copyright law.

I don't understand your comment about misgivings. Wikipedia has no misgivings, or responsibility, on this issue. Resubmitting the draft would be a waste of the time of the editor who assesses it: it will certainly be rejected, as its subject is not notable. Maproom (talk) 08:34, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

You do surprise me that Wikipedia has no responsibility regarding this article

If someone tries to submit an article which is clearly not suitable for Wikipedia, then "Wikipedia", or rather the volunteers who edit it, have no responsibility to help. I have nevertheless done my best to answer your questions.

or why it can't be located.

It is still at Draft:Junior_Bandsman_Wing_Fulwood_Barracks_1961-63. I have been obliged to delete most of its contents, after reading it carefully and realising that it was a direct quotation from the Isle of Man Daily Times. Wikipedia is very fussy (much more so than most other web sites) about respecting copyright law, and direct quotations of such length are not acceptable on Wikipedia.

You sound very curt, off handed, disrespectful and not wanting to engage with the contributor. I respectfully request we calm down. You say this article isn't notable please explain why you come to this conclusion.

I did not say that the article isn't notable. I wrote "the photograph is not notable enough to justify a Wikipedia article". It's the subject (in this case a photograph), not the article, that is not notable.

My previous conversation goes like the with Stephen Philbrick:

[Ticket#2016070710015214] Confirmation of receipt (Re: Submiting two photo [...])04/10/2016 19:17

Dear Charles Dobson,

Unfortunately, we are extremely backlogged.

In addition, the original permission did not have a link to the image although there was an attachment. As part of our process, we attach a permission tag to the image but we have to find it. I searched for: File:Junior Bandsman Wing Fulwood Barracks 1961.jpg

But did not find it, not even in our deleted files.

Yours sincerely, Stephen Philbrick

I would be very grateful if you could advise how we could proceed. If this article needs to be in the hands of others to tweak by a professionals could take ownership, any suggestions please. This article / subject needs to be on the Wikipedia's Fulwood Barracks web pages..... Please help me if you can. Best Regards Charles CD0060576 (talk) 16:42, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

No amount of tweaking, or even professional rewriting, could make Draft:Junior Bandsman Wing Fulwood Barracks 1961-63 into an acceptable article. However you may be able to add some information to Wikipedia's article Fulwood Barracks.

As for providing an acceptable copyright release for the photograph – that is something I have never done and don't know how to do. But if it's Wikipedia Commons where you want to upload it, you would probably do best to ask for help there, rather than here on English-language WIkipedia. Maproom (talk) 20:35, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello Maproom - I'm still struggling I would like to submit a new document, unfortunately I am unable to edit the original article Junior_Bandsman_Wing_Fulwood_Barracks_1961-63 as it has been removed or deleted. The new article will be titled "Lancastrian Brigade Junior Bandsmen (Period 1961-1963)" The photograph you refer to has been uploaded please speak to Stephen Philbrick. If there's anything you can do or recommend the process as to how to retrieve this document to edit I would be most grateful. Yours Faithfully Charles DobsonCD0060576 (talk) 16:01, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

As I told you above, the draft is still at Draft:Junior_Bandsman_Wing_Fulwood_Barracks_1961-63. It has not been deleted. I doubt you will get an article accepted with the title "Lancastrian Brigade Junior Bandsmen (Period 1961-1963)": as well as being too long for an article title, it does not refer to a notable subject. I don't know why you want me to speak to Stephen Philbrick, and anyway I don't have contact details for him. Maproom (talk) 17:11, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the edits

Hi Maproom! Hope you are doing well. I just wanted to say thank you for the edits. I appreciate you taking your time to help me improve it. I wonder if you would lend me a helping hand on improving it and getting it published. I kind of new here and would like to consult your expertise. http://wikivisually.com/wiki/Draft:Geovanny_Vicente_Romero Thanks in advance.ComPol (talk) 20:54, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the edits

Hi Maproom! Hope you are doing well. I just wanted to say thank you for the edits. I appreciate you taking your time to help me improve it. I wonder if you would lend me a helping hand on improving it and getting it published. I kind of new here and would like to consult your expertise. Thanks in advance.ComPol (talk) 20:53, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

January 2017 European cold wave

Re this edit - as shown here, the polar air mass is centred over Russia, and eastern Scandinavia, though I agree that the non-technical press reports do not make it exactly clear. If we can find a better meteorological explanation, I suggest we use it. Ghmyrtle (talk) 09:04, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

From the Al Jazeera source: "The reason for the frigid blast is a strong area of high pressure that has settled over western parts of the continent. The location of the high-pressure system, or anticyclone, means that the past few days have seen a cold northerly blast extend from Scandinavia to the Levant countries." This makes meteorological sense. An anticyclone, with its clockwise winds, over Western Europe would bring air from Scandinavia to the eastern Mediterranean.

The severe-weather.eu page refers to "The brutally cold airmass from Russia and Scandinavia which continues spreading across central Europe into N Balkan."

Neither is compatible with the "strong winds circulating from eastern Russia towards eastern Europe" which I removed from the article. I have no objection to the current state of the article. Maproom (talk) 10:29, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

That's fine - I was only concerned about your exclusion of Russia. Ghmyrtle (talk) 10:34, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Heiner Thiel

Dear Maproom, if i have it right, you transformed all links on the site, yes? - I wrote this <ref>{{Internetquelle |autor=Hans Zitko |titel=Zu den farbigen Wandobjekten von Heiner Thiel |Sammelwerk=Embodying Colour. Catalogue accompanying an ongoing Exhibition-Project, curated by German Artists Heiner Thiel and Michael Post |Seiten=77–80 |datum=2013}}</ref> and you made from it <ref>{{cite web|title=Zu den farbigen Wandobjekten von Heiner Thiel|trans_title=|periodical=|publisher=|url=|deadurl=|format=|accessdate=|archiveurl=|archivedate=|last=Hans Zitko|date=2013|year=|month=|day=|language=German|pages=|quote=}}</ref> - if i have it right, now noone knows anymore that this is an article from the catalogue??? And you also erased the pagenumbers - is this really helpful to find the article to erase these both information?

Is it definitively better to sign the links like you did in the english wikipedia, or should i keep the german way to make links??? Would be thankful for an answer, kind regards, --Gyanda (talk) 01:31, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Gyanda, the only edit I have made to Heiner Thiel is to replace a comma by a period at the end of the first sentence. I see from the article's edit history that AnomieBot has been changing the style of the citations. Maproom (talk) 08:48, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for your quick answer. Now i ask myself, how can a bot change something to the worse and if i would add the missing info - would the bot erase that again? Is there a means to prevent bots to make things worse??? Kind regards, --Gyanda (talk) 15:12, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

I haven't studied the bot's edits in detail, but I believe that its conversions of "Internetquelle" to "cite web", "autor" to "last", "datum" to "date", etc., in the English-language version of the article, were improvements. Maproom (talk) 08:25, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

February

Please comment on Talk:Kfar Ahim

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Kfar Ahim. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of sport utility vehicles

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of sport utility vehicles. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Pedophilia

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Pedophilia. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Doxycycline

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Doxycycline. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

WP:BLP

I do not wish to template a regular, but a regular should know better than to make an edit like this--which contains very, very serious BLP violations, with loaded language completely unverified by the sources (first paragraph), loaded language containing OR/synthesis based on an unreliable source (second paragraph), and chatty gossip completely unverified by anything (third paragaph). Did you seriously reinstate allegations based, apparently, on some Amazon reviews? Drmies (talk) 17:20, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Look quickly, because I'm about to scrub the history of this content. Drmies (talk) 17:23, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

This was over a month ago, so I don't recall what the material I restored said. I reverted an unexplained deletion of content, some of it referenced; then looked at what I had restored, and redeleted some of it as unreferenced and/or irrelevant. I accept that I should have looked at it more critically (particularly in a BLP), and before restoring any of it. Maproom (talk) 22:51, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Thank you. It basically argued that this subject, who had been a victim of sexual blackmail and exploitation, ran a scam to make money off of people's desire to give to charity. It alleged fishy business dealings, working under an alias, and false advertising. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 02:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Digital transformation

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Digital transformation. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemistry

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemistry. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Lubrizol edit request

Hello Maproom. I am posting here to see if you would look at a request I have for the Lubrizol Corporation page. Your January 31 edit to that page addressed part of my request and I would be interested in what you think of the rest of the request. Thank you for any advice you can give. Lz maor (Talk · COI--Lubrizol employee) 13:49, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

I have made some edits as in that list of suggestions. Maproom (talk) 14:10, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for the edits, Maproom. Do you have any tips on how I could get more editor engagement on this page? I have reached out to many WikiProjects, Third Opinion and Teahouse, yet the page still needs work. For example, as I write this, the About section contains two seemingly random facts about Lubrizol. I think an Operations section, such as the one I drafted or something similar, would better serve Wiki readers. Thank you for any advice you can give. Lz maor (Talk · COI--Lubrizol employee) 13:43, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I have little interest in articles about companies, and no knowledge of the relevant guidelines. I've already done as much on the Lubrizol article as I feel competent to do. Maybe another posting to the Teahouse would help? Maproom (talk) 14:49, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Thank you, Maproom. I appreciate all of your help. Lz maor (Talk · COI--Lubrizol employee) 13:58, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:MAKS Air Show

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:MAKS Air Show. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Voting system

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Voting system. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Clean coal technology

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Clean coal technology. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

March

Please comment on Talk:Sirius

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sirius. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Robert Sungenis

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Robert Sungenis. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Smith & Wesson M&P15

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Smith & Wesson M&P15. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:North American Aerospace Defense Command

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:North American Aerospace Defense Command. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

10 days.

Please comment on Talk:List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

1 day.

Please comment on Talk:Field-programmable gate array

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Field-programmable gate array. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

19 days.

Notice old RfC withdrawn and recreated with a clarified question

This is to notify you that the prior RfC at Talk:List_of_scientists_opposing_the_mainstream_scientific_assessment_of_global_warming was withdrawn as the question confused several people, and instead it was re-opened with a new clarified question. I am notifying all those that responded to the old RfC (except those that have already responded) so that they may comment on the new RfC. The new RfC is here: Talk:List_of_scientists_opposing_the_mainstream_scientific_assessment_of_global_warming#RfC:_Should_the_phrase_.E2.80.9Cthe_consensus_has_strengthened_over_time.E2.80.9D_be_removed_as_WP:SYNTHESIS_or_WP:UNDUE_WEIGHT.3F Obsidi (talk) 23:39, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

2 hours.

Please comment on Talk:List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

1 day.

Please comment on Talk:Memphis Meats

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Memphis Meats. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

2 days.

Please comment on Talk:American Pekin

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:American Pekin. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

2 hours.

Please comment on Talk:Opioid use disorder

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Opioid use disorder. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

1 day.

April

Please comment on Talk:Microscope

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Microscope. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

5 hours.

Please comment on Talk:Borderline personality disorder

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Borderline personality disorder. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

1 day.

Please comment on Talk:1873 in Germany

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:1873 in Germany. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

17 days.

Please comment on Template talk:Infobox software

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox software. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

18 hours.

Jim Fung

The page Jim Fung is using mainly references from the subjects own club website as well as containing info and bio of other people. I don't think it can pass notability but I'm not sure where to start in cleaning it up. Any thoughts? Cheers Australianblackbelt (talk) 22:54, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

The Sydney Morning Herald obituary seems a valid source. There's two other independent sources I don't have access to. Notability is marginal at best. I've deleted a section on another person – that's a common problem in martial arts biographies. Maproom (talk) 06:21, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomy

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomy. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

5 days.

Please comment on Talk:Email

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Email. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

3 days. The RFC had already been closed when this invitation was issued. Maproom (talk) 07:23, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:W56

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:W56. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

2 days.

This just in....

Czech Republic just recognized the Armenian Genocide hours ago. Can you please update this map? The Czech Republic must now be dark green. Source. (By the way, it's a FB post but it's reliable since it's posted by an official newspaper account.) Étienne Dolet (talk) 20:05, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

I'll have a look. Maproom (talk) 20:20, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Sorry, I can't. That file is formally a vector file (SVG) but is effectively an unnecessarily large bitmap. Files structured like that combine all the disdavantages of vector and bitmap formats, while introducing others of their own. I can do nothing with it.

Actually that's not quite true. I can do something – I can convert it to a bitmap (a PNG), make the Czech Republic dark green, and upload it as a new file. I'll be breaching WP guidelines, which regard all SVG files as better than bitmap files even when they clearly aren't. But I'll do it anyway. Give me about 20 minutes. Maproom (talk) 20:30, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

EtienneDolet: here it is. Maproom (talk) 20:53, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Thanks a lot Maproom! Étienne Dolet (talk) 21:08, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

EtienneDolet: to get this into use, someone must visit all the articles that use the map (they're listed at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Nations_recognising_the_Armenian_Genocide.svg) and replace "Genocide.svg" by "Genocide.png". I'm willing to do that – what do you think? Maproom (talk) 21:12, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

I've linked to the updated map from Armenian Genocide. Maproom (talk) 07:14, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

EtienneDolet: I've started to work through the "File usage on other wikis" links at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Nations_recognising_the_Armenian_Genocide.svg, editing the articles (not user pages, talk pages etc.) that use the map to use the .png version instead. I've gone alphabetically from a to g. I omitted fa because I wasn't able to edit there, maybe because that article is protected. I'll do some more sometime. Maproom (talk) 20:57, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Thanks Maproom! Ideally though, we should also have the .svg map updated. Or else, we're just going to get mixed up and some users may use the .svg map that's in stock, rather than the .png. I'm seeking to find an editor that can do that. If not, I'll work to have the .png map all throughout the project. Étienne Dolet (talk) 21:14, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

I've gone on up to N. Several of the articles at hy:WP are protected, no surprise there. Maproom (talk) 13:31, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

I've now done all the articles, except:

Farsi, probably because the article is protected
Polish, where it seems I have to use the Visual Editor (which I find hard enough in my own language, let alone one I can't read)

Maproom (talk) 17:20, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Athletics at the Inter-Allied Games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Humphreys. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, bot. You're right. Maproom (talk) 09:59, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Speed of light

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Speed of light. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

2 days.

May

Please comment on Talk:Economic Freedom of the World

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Economic Freedom of the World. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

2 days.

Please comment on Talk:Menstrual disc

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Menstrual disc. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

10 days.

Please comment on Talk:Microscope

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Microscope. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

12 days.

Please comment on Template talk:Medical resources

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Medical resources. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

6 days.

Please comment on Talk:Car

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Car. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

8 days.

Marthe Rakine

FYI - I've moved this out of draftspace and back into article space. I originally created it there, but an IP came along and added a bunch of unsourced information, which is what caused it to look unfinished. I've edited it a bit, but can find no source online to support some of the claims which I removed. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 08:30, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for removing the poorly-formatted mess.

I've no view on whether the article currently satisfies WP's notability requirements. But it might help if you could give page numbers for the two books cited. Maproom (talk) 09:17, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

I'll add them. My own view is that she does, because she's in at least two biographical dictionaries. (The websource from the gallery cites a dictionary of Canadian artists to which I have no access.) It may be borderline, but I was willing to accept even one for notability; two just cements it for me. Also she's represented in a couple of notable collections. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 16:37, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Ref page added - I also forgot to mention that I've put it on my watchlist, so if anyone comes and does another data dump I can hop on top of it pretty quickly. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 16:57, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Map location errors

Maproom,

I'm looking for some technical help. I've been fixing errors in the category Category:Location maps with different longitude and latitude precisions. I have cleaned-up all the errors in articles, and a few in Draft/User space too. The category is now empty except for 5 special cases. One is an archived Module talk page. The other 4 are all related to an Infobox Template. While not causing any "problems", I'd like to get rid of these also just to have an empty category, which I will monitor for new errors. I can probably find and fix the problem in the Module talk page; do you think that would be considered an acceptable reason to edit an archive? Or is there another solution, some way to suppress a error in this namespace from being added to the category? And what about the template? I have no idea what is causing those errors. Is this something you can look into? Or point me to someone or somewhere else? Thanks. MB 20:23, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

I'm sorry, this is all beyond my knowledge. I can do some things with actual map images, but I know nothing about templates. You might get a useful answer at the Map workshop. Maproom (talk) 20:43, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

OK, I'll try there. MB 21:59, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Menstrual disc

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Menstrual disc. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

23 days. Repeat of notification sent out when the RFC was "only" 10 days old.

Please comment on Talk:Money.Net

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Money.Net. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

3 days.

Forthcoming meetups

To be informed of forthcoming meetups, you can put one or more of these on your watchlist:

There are also two lists on meta:, which may be added to your watchlist on meta:

The last one also picks up meetups elsewhere. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 11:12, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Surreal Barnstar

Hello.

I read the text that you wrote about yourself. It really impressed me. Even though I do not know who you are, I think you are quite a diligent and skillful guy. Our community needs such clever people as you. Good luck, in your future editions.

Best regards, FV. Vatanifardin (talk) 17:30, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

10 days.

Please comment on Talk:Pratia pedunculata

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Pratia pedunculata. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

15 hours.

Please comment on Talk:Sciences Po

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sciences Po. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

1 day.

Draft:Uwe Marx

Hey Maproom,

thanks for your advice on my first article at the help desk section. I edited the article for Uwe Marx and followed the guidelines for references and citation. Maybe you can take a look at my changes. I would really appreciate it.

Take care! Milan Reiter — Preceding unsigned comment added by Milan Reiter (talk • contribs) 13:14, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

I've done some minor edits.

To get the draft accepted, you (or someone) will need to find and cite some reliable independent published sources that discuss Marx. At present the draft cites nine sources, but the first relies on an interview with him, and the others are all written or co-written by him, so none is independent.

I would recommend deleting the entire "Media coverage" section. If the sources listed there can be cited in the article, then cite them so that they appear as references; if they can't, just get rid of them. Maproom (talk) 15:09, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

June

Please comment on File talk:Einstein and Locker-Lampson.jpeg

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on File talk:Einstein and Locker-Lampson.jpeg. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

1 day.

Please comment on Talk:Voting method

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Voting method. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

7 days.

Please Note

your change on the Kenja Communication site has interfered with a discussion about the use of the word Company or Organisation. It would be better to let it play out as Banjo has been warned about Promotional Editing by an administrator already, and has been barred. At issue seems to be the use of the word company which the Kenja group do not appear to like. They keep changing it to Organisation, and this appears to be designed to remove the evidence that the group is owned by any one, or group of people. Could you revert your edit? Kripes (talk) 08:55, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Done. Thank you for telling me about the discussion – I just saw a clunky sentence and tried to tidy it up. Maproom (talk) 09:37, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2017 Manchester Arena bombing

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2017 Manchester Arena bombing. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

19 days.

I believe that when preparing these messages, Legobot picks RfCs at random (subject to the constraints of Wikipedia:Feedback request service#Requests for comment) from whatever happens to be open at the time, regardless of how much comment it has received and (more significantly) regardless of age. Since the default duration for an RfC is 30 days, the chances of getting one that is more than (for example) one week old, should be something like 75%; but judging from your notes here and above, it's more like 33%. Around half of those that you have received have been open for less than 3 days. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 10:42, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Whatever its algorithm is, the results aren't sensible. I've complained about it, twice, without getting a helpful answer. Maproom (talk) 11:39, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Simona Caparrini

Hi Maproom, I have noticed you have cancel my contribution on Simona Caparrini's page. The page I am providing is Simona Caparrini's page on e-talenta, one of the most reputable casting network system in Europe, and that's where her date of birth comes from. I am her agent and would like to keep the source and data on e-talenta in Simona Caparrini's Wikipedia's page. Please let me know what I am doing wrong so I can fix it. Thank you. Daniela — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielamoviement (talk • contribs) 14:48, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Danielamoviement: if you are Caparrini's agent, you have a conflict of interest, and ought not to make any controversial edits to the article about here. Instead, you should describe your proposed changes on the article's talk page, and let other, impartial, editors decide whether to implement them.

Also, you should reveal your position as a paid editor, in a statement on your talk page.

The source https://www.e-talenta.eu/members/profile/simona-caparrini is clearly not independent of the subject. It is even written in the first person. It therefore cannot be regarded by Wikipedia as a reliable independent source. The same is true of her IMDB entry. I have been unable to find any reliable independent published source (as required by Wikipedia) for her date of birth. I note that Google gives her date of birth as 30 July 1966, but I certainly don't regard that as reliable. Maproom (talk) 15:57, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Cinemaitaliano.info is a real web site for Italian cinema. Stefano Amadio is the editor in chief and he has received the Award Premio Meccoli "Best Web Site for Cinema"/Premio Meccoli "Miglior Sito di Cinema" in 2014 in Assisi. The web sites has thousands of pages of movie revies, interviews with Italian celebrities, and biographies of Italian actors and directors. This web site cannot be edited by external sources but only by the team of professional Italian journalists coordinated and supervised by Stefano Amadio himself. Below are the datas/statistics of the web sites emailed by Stefano Amadio each day to every professional journalist in Italy. To write that this web site is forged or not existant, and its contents are forged or false is defamatory. Stefano Amadio email: [email protected]

Utenti mensili/monthly visitors : oltre 180.000 accessi singoli (single accesses) over 180.000 Visualizzazioni mensili di pagina: 320.000 (monthy page visualisations): 320.000 Tempo medio sul sito 2'12" (average time spent on the web site) 2'12" Database dei singoli film comprende 13.000 titoli (database of individual movie pages)13.000 Database "Persone del Cinema": 75.100 (database of individual pages of people of the Italian showbiz): 20.500

Newsletter mensile comprende 26.500 e-mail/ monthly newsletter mailed to 26.500 single email addresses Iscritti tramite registrazione: 11.660/People registered through the web site: 11.660 Articoli pubblicati ad oggi: 35.500 Articles published to date: 35.500 Iscritti pagina Facebook: 20.500/facebook's page followers: 20.500

The page about Simona Caparrini (like EVERY PAGE in cinemaitaliano.info) can be edited only by Stefano Amadio, and he has reliable sources being an Italian movie journalists. If you put in doubt this page you put in doubt every page of every single Italian actor/actress or Italian directors of the last 20 years. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oscar5757 (talk • contribs) 18:32, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

I don't doubt that Cinemaitaliano.info is a real web site, and is widely used. So is IMDB. And I do not believe that Cinemaitaliano.info is any more reliable than IMDB. Both offer "profiles", created by their subjects. Maproom (talk) 19:06, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

I am not a paid editor and this is final. I don't like your accusations. I don't spend all this time on WP because we all have lives. You, on the contrary seems not to have a life and to pass all your free time on WP acting as a paid editor or as a special 'policeman of WP'. Undoing changes with more power and authority than many others contributors. On which basis? And you are not well informed at all, because what you have written here is false: Cinemaitaliano.info has not profiles that can be edited by externals contributors. The articles and profiles are written and edited by professional journalists. You should make better research before contributing to the page of other people and accusing them of writing their sources. And I suspect you have a personal interest in harming Simona CAPARRINI. There are dozens of Italian actresses on Wikipedia and there are NO independent and reliable sources to confirm their date of birth (only a few examples: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donatella_Finocchiaro ; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anna_Foglietta; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giuliana_De_Sio; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matilde_Gioli; ecc.) and you are focusing ONLY on Simona Caparrini. Why is that? Is she an ex-girlfriend of yours? Anyhow, this dispute has really lowered my enthusiasm to contribute on WP. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielamoviement (talk • contribs) 17:57, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

You wrote "I am her agent" – I assume that she pays her agent.

According to what NatGertler wrote in this thread, "CinemaItaliano.info encourages users to submit biographies and date of birth for performers". I can't judge which of you is right, as I can't read Italian.

You accuse me of focusing on Simona Caparrini. I have made thousands of edits, only three of them to the Caparrini article. Every edit you have made has been to that article, or to add her name to a cast list. I do acknowledge that all of these have been constructive edits, except for your addition of a dubious date of birth. Maproom (talk) 19:03, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Xbox One

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Xbox One. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

3 days.

MfD nomination of Draft:1902 Software Development Corporation

Draft:1902 Software Development Corporation, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:1902 Software Development Corporation and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:1902 Software Development Corporation during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:46, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Isaac Newton in popular culture

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Isaac Newton in popular culture. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

6 days.

'Assistance with Sabotour'

Thanks for your message - it's a fair point, and I'll certainly bear it in mind for the future. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 09:25, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Patrick Matthew

Hi Maproom,

that is one impressive archive going back a decade! I think you just won this episode of the internet. I fully respect and appreciate your reasoning for removing the Sutton spat stuff. It is a difficult situation which we're trying to resolve very quickly. At stake here is persuading a group in Matthew's home area that Sutton is unknowingly leading them astray. In academia, as I'm sure you know, this means the public are innocent, but the incapable researcher is liable for the consequences. The further problem is that they've just won £10K of lottery funding, and if Sutton gets his way, it'll have his mistaken claims all over the information boards that they're going to develop to mark Matthew's local legacy. Most important from my point of view, is that he is telling primary school kids his fantastic story about Matthew, and it's hard to say how that i going to impact their concept of trust and truth. His research really is dire. He really is way off mark. That Natural Histories blog is stacked with great posts challenging his claims. It's written by a highly qualified and to my mind brilliant educator. His grasp of this period of history combined with understanding about evolution is second to none. The other blog is by another excellent scholar who is very cautious and precise, everything Sutton is not. I have spent 16 months collecting more material independent of those blogs, and my hand has now been forced to publish, but unfortunately there is not enough time to go the formal route before the money is committed and Sutton screws it up for a lot of hardworking volunteers who are engaged in conserving their natural heritage and improving life for their community. None of us researchers are part of this btw. They are up in Perthshire, Scotland. I am in Edinburgh. The others are in London and Frankfurt. But truth conforms to no boundaries, and truth is what motivates us. Sutton is just fame hungry. Spend a few minutes on his twitters or many blogs and see for yourself. So, not wanting to put you in a difficult position, I'd rather negotiate something here, and not play silly games undoing and redoing on the page. Allow me to open, if you don't mind: what is it going to take to maintain our message that it has been shown, Sutton's claims are false, either on the main page, or a subsidiary thereof? Jfderry (talk) 02:05, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for explaining the background. I'm now on my way abroad for a week's holiday, with limited internet access. So I'll be keeping out of this mess anyway, which frankly is quite a relief. Maproom (talk) 10:37, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Good for you! Dead jealous. I will say now that I'm going to reinstate your undo's, but please, it's not personal. I just need to apply the pressure. Happy to revert, or redirect to another page etc, either upon your return, or it may have already happened, and you can see if it's sufficient / appropriate then. Meanwhile, mine's a martini. I'll be by the pool :)) Jfderry (talk) 12:09, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Évian Conference

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Évian Conference. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

2 days.

Please comment on Category talk:Deaths by type of illness

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Category talk:Deaths by type of illness. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

2 days.

July

Please comment on Talk:Audio converter

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Audio converter. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

1 day.

Please comment on Talk:2017

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2017. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

3 days.

Please comment on Talk:List of elevation extremes by country

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of elevation extremes by country. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

8 days.

Please comment on Talk:Islamic calendar

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Islamic calendar. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

5 days.

Thanks

I don't think my ping worked so I just wanted to let you know I appreciate the improvement you made to the map of North Borneo. I'm not sure whether you noticed, but it is used in 16 different articles so it was definitely worth the effort.--S Philbrick (Talk) 18:36, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Thank you. I'm not that pleased with it, myself. I copied the "Sa.a." from "Sarawak", but I had to construct the "..b.h" myself, and didn't do it well. They're too small, and it shows. (This wouldn't have happened if it were a well-constructed SGF instead of a PNG.) Maproom (talk) 18:56, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Anne Wilson Schaef

You blanked User:Great mystery and created User:Great mystery/Anne Wilson Schaef. There are two problems with what you did there: Firstly, the content in question was copy-pasted or closely paraphrased from here in violation of copyright. Secondly, even if the original had been OK, there should not be copy-paste "moves" on Wikipedia because they destry attribution to the editors who originally created the content. See Help:Moving a page on how to change a page name instead. Huon (talk) 22:26, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Huon: thank you for letting me know, and for dealing with the problem. You're right about the copyvio of another site, I hadn't noticed that. And I see now that a copy-paste "move" of content created by a user in his own userspace to another page in his own userspace can still be problematical: I thereby became responsible for the copyvio. Maproom (talk) 07:08, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

YO! Sushi

Hi. Thanks for stripping back some of the promotional content added to that page. There have several episodes where the article has been overwritten with promotional junk. After this was recently done by a paid editor, I tried to go through the previous content, check claims and add sources where possible. I reverted all of the changes made yesterday to restore a version that has some neutral sourced text. Drchriswilliams (talk) 07:33, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Calendar

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Calendar. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

1 day.

RfA

Thanks for supporting my run for administrator. I am honored and grateful. ) Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 00:34, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:0.999...

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:0.999.... Legobot (talk) 04:28, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

3 days.

Requirements for Notable Person

Hello Maproom (talk), you've helped me a great deal in learning more about what justifies a notable person (in the particular Wiki way), and so I'm going to rework the bio for the person I've been trying to get up. I have a couple questions for you. First, is there anyway to highlight how many times the subject has been interviewed by reputable news outlets, and asked to discuss important financial issues on the world stage. Or, what about the fact that they are called upon to be a speaker on a panel, frequently, as an expert in certain finance issues and matter (ie. Venezuela's collapse). I ask this because I have one event in which he was a key player, but I know I need two noteworthy events that he played a part in. Wondering if being a notable speaker and sought after expert can be molded into this? Lastly, if I create a new profile in the sandbox, is there any way I can point it's publication to you so that you could approve or tell me what to fix? Thank you for your help! MeredithKitz (talk) 15:54, 26 July 2017 (UTC)MeredithKitz

Hello MeredithKitz. Being interviewed, and being invited to important discussions, do not make a person notable. If reputable news outlets discuss what he did in an interview or discussion (just quoting what he said is not enough), that would help to establish him as notable.

You should not be trying to create a profile. Wikipedia does not accept profiles, it only accepts neutrally written articles.

If you create a draft of a proposed article in your sandbox, you can send me (or any other editor) a link to it and ask for an opinion. It might be better to create it as an actual draft, so that other editors feel welcome to try to improve it.

I suspect you have an undeclared conflict of interest. Please read WP:COI.

Please comment on Talk:Vegeta (condiment)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Vegeta (condiment). Legobot (talk) 04:26, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

1 day.

Please comment on Template talk:Taxonbar

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Taxonbar. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

4 days.

August

Please comment on Talk:Fighter aircraft

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Fighter aircraft. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

7 days.

Please comment on Talk:Battle of Mosul (2016–17)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Battle of Mosul (2016–17). Legobot (talk) 04:25, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

16 days.

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elements

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elements. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

4 days.

Please comment on Talk:Carbylamine-choline-chloride

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Carbylamine-choline-chloride. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

8 days.

A cup of tea for you!

For being able to identify sarcasm from a simple use of italics.

Maineartists (talk) 20:16, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Google memo

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Google memo. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

10 days.

Sir Terence English

I appreciate your review of this article Whispyhistory (talk) 14:30, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

I've done some copy-editing on Terence English‎ and Draft:DHMSA. If you don't understand the reason for any of my changes, please ask here – or just revert them, if you prefer. Maproom (talk) 17:55, 20 August 2017 (UTC).

Thank you. That's amazing. I appreciate your help.Whispyhistory (talk) 18:29, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

History of Medicine Society

Thank you. I feel like like a school child who has had their essay marked with red corrections all over. I do very much appreciate your corrections and am learning for next time. I have too many capital letters! Whispyhistory (talk) 18:33, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2017

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2017. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

2 days. Maproom (talk) 07:29, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Haildhar Madrasah (August 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shadowowl was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Some words in this article are not translated.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Haildhar Madrasah and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

» Shadowowl Marcos Rodriguez | t | SPI | AIV | Sandbox | Helpdesk » 17:19, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Hello! Maproom, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! » Shadowowl Marcos Rodriguez | t | SPI | AIV | Sandbox | Helpdesk » 17:19, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bay Area Rapid Transit

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bay Area Rapid Transit. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

1 day.

Please comment on Talk:Vaccine

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Vaccine. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

8 days.

September

Please comment on Template talk:Infobox scientist

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox scientist. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

9 days.

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Libraries

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Libraries. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

2 days.

Brian Edwards

Thank you for your message. I had to change my username from PG Productions Inc because Wiki blocked it and requested the name change. But in any event, back to my client Brian Edwards. I'm at a dead end. I don't understand how any of this Wikipedia stuff works. All I know is that the page about him (not owned by him or me as another editor pointed out) which was not what I meant in my initial message i.e. I was referring to the page about my client - I was not claiming ownership.

Brian became my client in December 2016. And to my understanding the article about him had been active for about two years. Yesterday, a producer who visited Brian's website - clicked on the Wiki link and found the page had been deleted and sent me a message. At that point, I created a Wiki account so I could seek assistance with this matter. I'm sure you have more important articles that you edit, but I would really appreciate any guidance you could provide me in taking the necessary steps to get the article back up. If there were corrections necessary, could you send me a copy of the article so that I'm aware of what the problems are? I'm not a writer or an editor and I'm not part of any Wikipedia team. I'm just trying to find the proper procedure to get the article reinstated.

Again, thanks for your message and I really appreciate your time!

Pamela Davis

Pamela,

I'm not an admin, so I have no special powers, and I can't see what the article looked like before it was deleted. If you want to see it, you could ask the admin who deleted it, Doc James, and he'll probably be willing to send you a copy. The reasons for the deletion are (I think) indicated by the symbols G5,11,TOU. I ought to be able to find out what these mean, but I've tried and failed.

As Edwards is your client, you have a conflict of interest, which you ought to declare on your user page, as explained at Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest#Paid_editors. I encourage you to make this declaration: editors with a declared CoI are treated with more respect than editors with an undeclared CoI. Maproom (talk) 20:59, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

There's a similar thread at User talk:ColinFine#Brian Edwards. Please see WP:MULTI. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 23:39, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Haildhar Madrasah has been accepted

Haildhar Madrasah, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 03:19, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Um, yes. If you are interested in that article, please read my disclaimer on its talk page. Maproom (talk) 09:07, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Google's Ideological Echo Chamber

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Google's Ideological Echo Chamber. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

13 days.

Help needed on 2 subjects

I note that you have already commented on the Futility Closet plagiarism and spamming - though I am not sure who is going to do what about it at this stage.

I've expressed my views there. I don't feel any compulsion to do more.

I also have a problem with a new editor (User:WyndingHeadland)who does not seem to understand what Wikipedia is all about. (OK, that presupposes that I do.) The article concerned is Highland Clearances and he has added, at the end of a very long talk page, a justification (in his mind) for including lots of stuff that is not supported by the sources that the article does/should rely on. Since I am more of an "article content" person than a "Wikipedia procedure" person, I am at a loss as to how to explain to this new editor the errors of his/her ways. What the new editor needs is some sort of political blog on which to express their ideas, not an on-line encyclopedia. I have randomly picked you (sorry) as someone who might be able to offer some advice on this. I am aware of the advice "leave it alone and the unhelpful editor will go away" - I used that with the last one and it worked - but now we have another one, I have a whole library of books on the subject which I have recently read, but cannot really wait another year to sort out this article. If this second problem is not one for you, where should I go for advice?
Incidentally, it has occurred to me that this apparently new editor may actually be the old problem one who has come back as a sock puppet - or do they all seem to have the same lack of logical thought processes and poor use of English? I note that this recent one seems to have some familiarity with the Wikipedia guidance which I would not expect a genuinely new editor to know, and has also deleted their talk page (which would seem consistent with someone with experience of causing trouble).
Will be offline for several hours, but if you can offer any help, it would be very welcome.
Thanks, ThoughtIdRetired (talk) 08:32, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

I've had a look at Highland Clearances, put it on my watch list, and reverted a recent edit there by, as it happens, WyndingHeadland.

I doubt it's the same new editor again. There's no shortage of opinionated new editors who fail to follow Wikipedia procedures because they don't understand them; and the Highland Clearances is a topic that elicits strong opinions. In time, they either go away, or they read and start to follow the guidelines. Maproom (talk) 09:48, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Thanks your input - think I have a plan of action on both - I'm reverting the spam (slowly, there is rather a lot of it) and I'll research the plagiarism issue. I've seen standard/recommended Wikipedia text on the matter before and I'm sure I'll find it again. I am tempted to re-open the deletion debate on Futility Closet as it only survived due to the spammer's input. I take your point on the new user on Highland Clearances - it is a page that attracts a particular brand of unresearched nonsense - but I think that is part of the subject. I have a half-drafted answer to the new user and will get it off in a day or two. (I think he might have had an editing session on getting back from the pub.)ThoughtIdRetired (talk) 11:28, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Noting that WyndingHeadland has reverted you in Highland Clearances, I thought I should let you know that I created a talk page for this user with what I hope is a reasoned argument to consider that Wikipedia has some rules. I fear that may have had an opposite effect than that intended.ThoughtIdRetired (talk) 08:03, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

WyndingHeadland did not revert my edit to Highland Clearances. Their following edit summary even stated "Agree with previous revert." Maproom (talk) 08:49, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Clearly I was reading the article with my pessimism tinted sunglasses on. Sorry to be a pest.ThoughtIdRetired (talk) 11:01, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Infobox writer

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox writer. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

5 days.

Please comment on Talk:Plimpton 322

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Plimpton 322. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

4 days.

Please comment on Talk:Retrospect (software)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Retrospect (software). Legobot (talk) 04:25, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

9 days.

Please comment on Talk:List of films based on actual events

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of films based on actual events. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

5 days.

Thanks!

Hi Maproom, thank you for your comments at my RfA. Your support is much appreciated! ansh 666 22:20, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elements

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elements. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

20 days.

Please comment on Talk:Suzuki Hayabusa

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Suzuki Hayabusa. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

3 days.

Proposed Deletion of Page

Please,Please dont delete my Count Arthur Strong page. I have Put Days into it and i don't want to see it destroyed. Please. 46.254.249.237 (talk) 20:35, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Count Arthur strong PROD

The IP "declined" your PROD. Are you going to take it to AfD instead? ThanksL3X1 (distænt write) 20:49, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

I guess so. Maproom (talk) 21:34, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ducati Monster

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ducati Monster. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

6 days.

October

Please comment on Talk:Tension headache

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Tension headache. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

12 days.

Please comment on Talk:Google's Ideological Echo Chamber

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Google's Ideological Echo Chamber. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

40 days. Same request sent at 13 days. (I think an editor removed the RfC tag for this contentious issue, and another editor restored it, triggering a second wave of invitations.)

I like to improve article

Sir iam new user how to improve an article? Davidjonesxp (talk) 07:27, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

You have already asked this at the Teahouse, where I gave an answer. Maproom (talk) 07:53, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Meg Patterson

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Meg Patterson. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

8 days.

Please comment on Talk:Bipolar disorder

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bipolar disorder. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

9 days. Maproom (talk) 06:27, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jianianhualong

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jianianhualong. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

DHMSA

Please could you do a redirect, thank you Whispyhistory (talk) 15:00, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Done, see Diploma in the History of Medicine of the Society of Apothecaries. Maproom (talk) 20:31, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Abortion

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Abortion. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

6 days.

Your draft article, Draft:Yeh hypothesis

Hello, Maproom. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Yeh hypothesis".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 01:13, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Haildhar Madrasah

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Haildhar Madrasah, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for Deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Worldbruce (talk) 04:29, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rockin' Johnny Burgin

A tag has been placed on Rockin' Johnny Burgin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 12:02, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Plasma (physics)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Plasma (physics). Legobot (talk) 04:27, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

13 days.

Picture

Could you please take a look at the request I made at the WP:Grapics Lab /Map Workshop .I asked you because you seem to be the only one active on that page -

To ping me add {{ping|Force Radical}} OR [[User:Force Radical]]

09:11, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Force Radical: in your request, you specified what you want shown, but not what map you want it shown on: the second image is missing. Now that I've looked at the source code for your request, I see that you wrote "File:File:India Red Corridor map.png" where you meant to write "File:India Red Corridor map.png". And now that I've looked at that map, I believe it would be possible, but difficult, to do what you want, because of all the separately-coloured subdivisions of the eastern provinces. It would be easier to adjust the border of Kashmir on the original map. I may get round to doing that; but I definitely won't have time for a few days. I suggest that you correct the link for "Map witth acceptable border" in your request, that way someone else may decide to do it. Maproom (talk) 14:15, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

~~Nope I guess you misinterpreted me, I need a redrawing of the border of Kashmir only as per the NPOV guidelines.I will update the image when I have time-~~

~~To ping me add {{ping|Force Radical}} OR [[User:Force Radical]]~~

Pay no attention to the last comment, It was written in a hurry and was clearly missed the mark. As you have said above I have updated the request with the syntax correction and added a clarification that a border adjustment of Kashmir is also okay-To ping me add {{ping|Force Radical}} OR [[User:Force Radical]] 09:36, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Blue

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Blue. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

15 days.

November

Please comment on Talk:List of pioneers in computer science

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of pioneers in computer science. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

5 days.

Please comment on Talk:Substance abuse

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Substance abuse. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

4 days.

Please comment on Talk:Muhammad ibn Musa al-Khwarizmi

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Muhammad ibn Musa al-Khwarizmi. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Thank you - Prof Askari Draft

Thank you for editing the Draft:Syed Hasan Askari (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Syed_Hasan_Askari) Can this be published now or what would I need to do get published. Please advise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Syedahmerraza (talk • contribs) 22:03, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

You can submit a draft for review by adding {{subst:submit}} at the top. But if you submit Draft:Syed_Hasan_Askari in its current state it will be rejected. The references are not done in an acceptable way; in particular the numbers in square brackets in the text, which are supposed to be links to the references, don't link to anything. You need to read Help:Referencing for beginners, or at least look at some existing Wikipedia article, to learn how to cite references. Also, some of the references cited, in particular nos. 10, 12 and 13, contain extensive comments and credits, rather than simply specifying the sources cited. Also, the article needs to concentrate on what he has actually done, rather than on the honours he has been awarded. Maproom (talk) 22:45, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Immer Zu

Thank you for deleting copyrighted violated text; I felt guilty about that :) Espngeek (talk) 22:17, 8 November 2017 (UTC)Espngeek

Please comment on Talk:Julian day

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Julian day. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

2 days.

Please comment on Talk:Red panda

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Red panda. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

12 days.

Please comment on Talk:Monero (cryptocurrency)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Monero (cryptocurrency). Legobot (talk) 04:24, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

11 days.

Comment on your recent post on the talk page of Energetically Modified Cement (EMC)

I am the "Karl", referenced in your post. This article, at the time I got involved years ago, was almost certainly written primarily by Vladimir Ronin, listed in the article as the one who developed the process (an outright lie). He did not want to actually explain this quite simple process in the article, for business reasons. Instead, he wanted to use the page to promote his business with EMC (the Texas project probably being the largest). Well, I got angry, and made the mistake of getting into a heated debate with him, because I hate this sort of thing. A plague of editors then descended. After a long fracas, one of the editors partly rewrote the article, and I did minimal editing of it simply for technical accuracy. I have not touched it since. As of today, 11/16/17, the article is simply grossly inaccurate drivel. Any actual facts I put in at that time, have long since disappeared, presumably axed by Ronin editing anonymously. This entire useless article should be thrown out, and completely rewritten. Unfortunately, other than Ronin, I'm probably the only other person on the planet who could rewrite this article. Why don't I? HO, HO, HO! I've HAD IT with editing Wikipedia! I have spent untold hours, researching and carefully writing stuff to post to Wikipedia, only to have an editor take 3 seconds to hit that revert button (over and over and over again) so no one can alter his precious (wrong) text, after having spent HOURS and HOURS of my time writing and referencing my addition. I would bet almost anything, that the unsigned comment added by 2.248.162.190, on the talk page that you responded to, is Ronin. It sounds very, very, very much like him. Ronin owns this article, and still uses it to discreetly promote his business. After all, isn't this what Wikipedia is for? Karl — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.218.109.175 (talk) 23:10, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Oncotarget

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Oncotarget. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

19 days.

Please comment on Talk:Benito Mussolini

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Benito Mussolini. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

17 days.

Please comment on Talk:?Oumuamua

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:?Oumuamua. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

8 hours. And it's Talk:ʻOumuamua. Maproom (talk) 15:29, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Yes, but Legobot (talk · contribs) has trouble with Unicode characters (ʻ is U 02BB "MODIFIER LETTER TURNED COMMA") and it converts these into question marks. As a result, it splatted redlinks around the place, which is why I created the redirect. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 09:33, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

December

Please comment on Talk:BMW

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:BMW. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

1 day.

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Maproom. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Intelligent design

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Intelligent design. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

8 hours

Please keep the descriptions neutral

I just reverted your three edits at list of evangelical Christians for failing to maintain WP:NPOV. Some of the edits were good at reducing unnecessary content, but comments like "An ultra-conservative force in the Evangelical movement" was problematic. Actually, now that I look more closely at the edit, I'll do a self-revert. You removed it. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:47, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

:-) I certainly didn't write that. NPOV? I have no idea whether it was meant as a compliment. Maproom (talk) 23:11, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Kashmir conflict

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Kashmir conflict. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

10 days.

Please comment on Talk:International System of Units

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:International System of Units. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

1 day.

Thank you

Thank you for all your help over the last few months. Have a lovely Christmas 🎄. Please do still check my articles and where possible. Whispyhistory (talk) 13:29, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Atrial fibrillation

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Atrial fibrillation. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

4 hours.

Cropping an SVG

Hi Maproom! Would you mind please removing the border from File:Drop (loyalty program) logo.svg? Thanks in advance! Happy holidays, Daylen (talk) 18:43, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) @Daylen: What border? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 23:06, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

I shall do so, tomorrow morning (UK time) probably, unless someone else has done it ahead of me. Redrose64: I assume that, by "border", Daylen means what some would call "margin", or maybe "padding": the transparent space around the visible part of the image. Maproom (talk) 23:20, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Oh, altering the viewbox= values to scale up and shift the origin. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 23:50, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Yes, that's my plan, once I'm sober. Maproom (talk) 23:52, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Done. Maproom (talk) 09:48, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:USS Nimitz UFO incident

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:USS Nimitz UFO incident. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

10 hours.